Skip to Main Content
Members:   Log In  |  Sign Up

1970 — What went wrong?

By Bob McEvoy :  10/03/2010 :  Comments (28) :

In a couple of weeks, we’ll arrive at the 40th anniversary of the Blues’ 1970 League Championship triumph: 1 April 1970: Everton 2 - 0 West Brom... on a Wednesday night. 10 days earlier, we’d beaten Liverpool at Anfield when Shankly had recalled Ian St John and Ron Yeats in a desperate attempt to halt the Blue tide.

The following week I saw us put 5 past Peter Bonetti and Chelsea in the first 45 minutes; still the best half of football I’ve seen. Then a tight win at Stoke on the Easter Monday... followed by the West Brom game two days later. We won the league with two games to spare.

Our club doesn’t do dynasties but in all bar one case it’s always down to circumstances beyond our control: 1891... moved ground; 1915... WW1; 1939... WW2; 1985... Heysel. To 1985 you can add 1987 and the lack of European football. Blimey, even in the Dixie years between 1928 and 1932, we managed to get relegated! After '63, the team primarily broke up through the ageing process although that was accelerated by the Tony Kay saga and perhaps the fact that we drew Inter Milan in the first round of the European Cup — who went on to win it two years on the bounce.

But in 1970, we should have been all set. The average age of the squad (if you take out Morrissey, Labone, Newton and Brown) was under 25. The Holy Trinity only played 24 games together out of 42 in the league (I looked it up), suggesting that the team could cope without one of them (although, in the early part of the season, Tommy Jackson had been the replacement when Howard Kendall had been injured but Catterick sold him in the October and I can’t for the life of me remember why).

Brian Labone missed the last 10 games through injury but a young Roger Kenyon had stepped in seamlessly. Alan Whittle aged 21, had played the second half of the season and scored for fun... and we had an 18-year-old Dave Johnson waiting in the wings. Jesus, even Gordon West was only 27, although disconcertingly his missus had made him cry off from the ensuing Mexico World Cup, which I thought was a bad sign.

One thing I’ll never forget was an interview that took place on Match of the Day after the Sheffield Wednesday away game, 3 days after we’d won the Championship. The interviewer was questioning Harry Catterick and Alan Ball (Bally was captain as Labone was injured) about the victory we’d just achieved against Wednesday and the League triumph in general. I can’t recall the details but the general tenure of the interviewees was that they’d just been to a bloody funeral. What should have been an occasion of joy and mirth was the complete reverse. I remember thinking “What’s the fucking matter with the pair of them?” I know Catterick was an awkward sod and uncomfortable with the press but Bally wasn’t... It didn’t sit well with me.

Of course the following season was a disaster. We finished 14th. We got knocked out of the European Cup by Panathinaikos (in the 1st leg, how the fuck we weren’t 5 up in the first 20 minutes is beyond me) and the FA Cup by Liverpool in the space of 3 days... And for the next 13 years, apart from the odd oasis, that was pretty much it!

So... what went wrong? This much I know (or at least I think I know)...

1) Catterick was in poor health and this was to have a detrimental effect on his job performance.

2) Labone and Ball came back knackered from Mexico.

3) Harvey had some mysterious eye injury that meant he was never the same player.

4) Labone was pretty much finished by the end of the '71 season and perhaps his positive influence was a big miss.

5) Ball was sold to Arsenal at the end of '71 amidst rumours of gambling debts... although, as it transpired, I’m pretty sure we had his best years.

We should have dominated English football for the next 5 years. Apart from Leeds United, the rest of the potential challengers were very ordinary. Arsenal did the double in 71 with a team that was nothing more than workmanlike.

There are plenty of players from the 1970 team that are continually in the local media but I’ve never seen or heard a definitive explanation for the collapse; maybe I missed it. If so, perhaps someone can enlighten me.

The saddest part of all is that the team was absolutely brilliant and it was such a waste. As I said, we don’t do dynasties... but maybe we do patterns. Every 24 years we win the league. 2011...? We can live in hope.

Reader Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer

Pete Gunby
1   Posted 10/03/2010 at 23:18:02

Report abuse

Hi Bob, My dad and I went to quite a few games that year. We were at the Liverpool game and the clincher against West Brom. I was only 8 at the time and thought that Everton could win every game we played. Earlier that year Bobby Charlton had us pegged as the team to beat in the 70’s. Unfortunately his observation was off by 1/2 a mile.
I’ve always thought that Catterick lost the plot. He was outmanouvered by Shankley, Revie and others. It has to go down as another opportunity lost.
Mike McLean
2   Posted 11/03/2010 at 00:35:53

Report abuse

1. Labone, Wright, Newton and Ball went to Mexico. Came back knackered.

2. Harvey, Labone and Royle had one injury crisis after another.

3. Moores built a stand: and as almost in every other case, ground redvelopment = lack of funds for team rebuilding.

4. There was a lack of vision, forward planning, as well as money.

By the way, we beat West Brom 2-0 on a Tuesday night.

I too remember the Charlton quote. And in fairness, the 70’s did see some good football and a limited amount of success. Dobson, Latchford, Thomas etc were no dummies, but they suffered in contrast with what had gone before.
Steve Rowson
3   Posted 11/03/2010 at 01:55:02

Report abuse

You should have a read of Bally’s excellent autobiography which refers to Catterick’s management style of not engaging with the players, rule by fear and breaking up the team to try and maintain psychological control. Don’t know how accurate his views are but he does suggest Catterick broke up the team far too early and for his own personal reasons.
Timothy Sebastian
4   Posted 10/03/2010 at 23:45:00

Report abuse

Good article Bob. It’s always great re-living past glories days and dreaming of ’what ifs’.

The 1970 Everton team was a real enigma. As you rightly pointed out, it was a team destined for greatness. But one year on from winning the League title, it suddenly all imploded. I’m unsure why this happened, but I can speculate. In my view, it was a combination of factors.

From a macro level, I think player power was slowly coming to the fore and ’old-style’ managers like Catterick didn’t know how to handle this new situation. He seemed to want to use the time-tried and trusted method of ’sell them if they start to get cocky and rebuild from scratch’ which worked well in the 60s and before.

If you recall, Catterick rebuilt Everton twice before in the same way — once in the late 50s when he first took over, and then again after 1963 when he won the League Championship. However, as a strategy, this may not have been relevant by the 1970’s.

This aside, I also feel that many teams that were considered the ’Big 8" in the 60s — Everton, Liverpool, Spurs, Arsenal, Chelsea, Leeds, Man City and Man Utd — all seemed to have lost steam as they entered the 1970s. All, that is, except for Liverpool.

For instance, the first half of the 70s were disastrous for Manchester Utd who found themselves relegated in 1974. Manchester City who’d won the FA Cup, League Cup and European Cup Winners Cup in 1969, 70 and 71, fell off badly as the 70s progressed.

Leeds Utd’s golden era ended abruptly in 1975. Spurs and Chelsea became Div 2 teams in the 70s too. And after their League and Cup double triumph, Arsenal went into a slump of sorts until the late 70s, when they started to recover with a couple of FA Cup final appearances. The void during this period was filled for a short time by teams like Derby and Notts Forest.

So Everton’s demise in the 1970s, sad though it may seem, is by no means unusual. Anyway, it’s nice to walk back through memory lane. The 70s were indeed a fascinating time. By the way, the team jerseys looked much better back then too!

John Keating
5   Posted 11/03/2010 at 04:24:26

Report abuse

I remember the 63 and the 70 team really well. I also think in particular the 70 team fell awaqy to a number of factors all mentioned above. I must admit looking back I don’t know if Catterick had that final piece in his own personality to complete the job of a dynasty type regime.

Wilf Dixon ran the team with Catterick making his guest appearances for the media.Sometimes I think Catterick was the most surprised that we won the league on both occassions and hadn’t considered the longer term.

To be fair Shankly was more or less the first manager in the "modern" era to plan for the future, hence the dynasties we’ve seen since then. I think prior to Shankley only Arsenal had really long continual challenging for honours periods.

Possibly it was a bit new for Catterick I don’t know but I think he just didn’t have the capacity to progress within himself.

Chris Williams
6   Posted 11/03/2010 at 04:20:11

Report abuse

Just a few reflections on Catterick’s management style:-

On a few occasions I was privileged to have a few pints in a company which included Brian Labone, who was a cracking bloke, who had time for anyone who wanted to talk Everton.

He regaled us with tales of having to clock on of a morning, and how you never saw him until the day before a match, when the tactics board came out.

But the things that really stuck in my mind were the fact that he used to write out a report card after each match, rating the overall performance, and each player individually. The one he showed us was of a home game against Man Utd in the early sixties, which we wone 1-0 with a penalty by the great Roy Vernon. It had comments like ’’Young - could do better’ and ’Vernon - much better in the second half’’.

You couldn’t really make it up. But it shows that at the time, nobody knew they were creating history.

The other story concerned going away on foreign trips. At the time he was telling the story, there was some media story about a club on tour in Europe, whose players had got involved in some sort of ’honeypot’ scandal involving prostitutes and the police. Labone said there was never any chance of that happening with Everton trips, simply because Catterick took everbody’s room key and the only way you could get back in was to go and see him for your key. If you didn’t get the key, it meant that you had stayed out with a resultant fine.

Labone had respect for Catterick but was far too civilised to criticise him at all, which is a measure of the man.

But can you imagine such things happening in this day and age?
Dan Brierley
7   Posted 11/03/2010 at 04:54:19

Report abuse

Thanks for posting Bob, a very interesting read.
David Pilkington
8   Posted 11/03/2010 at 06:31:22

Report abuse

This was my first trip to Goodison, My Dad managed to get seats in the Bullens Road stand, I was 9 years old.

Don’t really know what went wrong after this but one thing is for sure. That night left me completely hooked on the Toffees and I’ve had to put up with 40 years of mood swings (depending on results) ever since.
Ray Robinson
9   Posted 11/03/2010 at 06:44:12

Report abuse

Don’t know the intricacies of what did / did not go on in the club at the time but in my opinion there were three reasons:

* the players suffered a "hangover" from the previous season and weren’t focussed
* certain players had out-performed the in 69-70 and were never as good again - particularly Alan Whittle
* Catterick seemed to panic and broke the team up too early

Plus, some times teams just peak and never attain the same heights again. It may be sacrilege to say it but I thought the 68-69 team played better than the championship winning team but never won a sausage.
David Hallwood
10   Posted 11/03/2010 at 08:00:58

Report abuse

There maybe a lesson for our times. Timothy Sebastian pointed out that the ’big 8’ all ran out of steam except the RS. And it was worse for Man U cos they ended up getting relegated, this coincided with matt Busby stepping down and they didn’t find a manager big enough to fit his shoes till SAF. Could history repeat itself? an ageing squad, up to their necks in debt, and Fergie thinking of calling it a day. Next question, can we benefit from it, and take advantage of both the RS & man Utd problems. One thing we’ve learnt from history is that all dynasties come to an end.
Eugene Ruane
11   Posted 11/03/2010 at 08:01:01

Report abuse

This is JUST a theory but..

I remember Jack Charlton and Norman Hunter talking about life under Revie.

They said in the 60’s, on the nights before away games, he would organize things like Bingo for the players.

Hunter said "it might seem odd now to imagine that, but we really enjoyed it".

Later when Revie became manager of England, he tried to do the same.

Apparently all the (non-Leeds) players took the piss and If I remember rightly, Stan Bowles REALLY took the piss (and wasn’t invited back).

Years later, I saw Bowles (STILL taking the piss!) going on about "Grown men, aw sittin’ abaaht wiv bingo cards? Cryzee!".

The reason I mention it is that I think there was a big changes in ’society’ between 63 and 70.

I know society is constantly changing, but this was a sea-change really.

(mens haircuts are a good indicator - for most average fellers, a haircut was basically the same from 1900 to about 1965, then...head lunacy)

I believe players (especially players at non-London clubs) in 1963 were in a fairly similar situation to those in 1953.

A few quid more maybe but the Manager/boss’s word absolute law and...that’s it.

Any player that didn’t like it?

Choice - fuck off get on with it.

When we won the league in 63, I can imagine the Cat’s word was absolute law.

(nb: all that team had a short-back and sides!)

By the end of 1970 however, we’d been through The Beatles, The Stones, The Summer of Love (ie: drugs) Haight Ashbury, The Black Panthers, Paris riots, end the war in Vietnam rallies and men had walked on the moon.

By 1970, we had just had 6 or 7 years of "Question authority, your parents are wrong, break the shackles, old people cause wars, leave things to us young people" etc blah.

I’m not saying ’This is THE reason we fell apart’ but rather suggesting it was an unseen, but possibly potent contributing factor.

Players like the 18 year old Alan Ball might have been been prepared to be screamed at and fined for being late, but would the 1971 version?

Personally, I doubt it.
Chris Williams
12   Posted 11/03/2010 at 11:20:11

Report abuse

I’m sure you’re right Eugene, but if you can remember you weren’t there
Dave Roberts
13   Posted 11/03/2010 at 11:23:10

Report abuse

I think Ray Robinson hit the nail on the head with his comment about peaking.

We won the league in 69/70 but this was the end result of a process. The process began with team rebuilding after ’66 and the emergence and signing of good young players. The arrival of Alan Ball was in many ways the final piece of a jigsaw (bar one...Kendall) which led to the Championship in due course.

But the best football for me (to watch) took place in the two seasons between Ball’s and Kendall’s arrival, the formulation of the Holy Trinity and the Championship itself. The footy I watched in 67/68 and 68/69 was far superior in my view to the stuff I watched in the title year, as good as it was.

What went wrong, I think, is that by 70/71 the majority of these players had been together for four years and neither managerially nor in terms of the influence of older players (as Labone and Wilson faded from the scene especially) the club did not have the glue to keep them together. Catterick was a dead loss in this respect.

I did hear a rumour at the time that the reason Alan Ball was sold by the club so readily was not just because of the phenomenal amount of money offered, it was also about Bally continually badgering for the gradual influx of better players and that Catterick did not take too kindly to that.

If anybody has seen the interview on Sky last year of Harvey, Kendall and Royle, things were said in that that do tend to suggest that this is true.
Dave Roberts
14   Posted 11/03/2010 at 11:40:57

Report abuse


If anybody doubts how good the football was in those two earlier seasons, try

Everton 3 Man Utd 1 (Ball2 Young1- Charlton1)

It’s an old Match of the Day recording and while difficult to view because of it’s age, it’s well worth a look!
Ajay Timothy
15   Posted 11/03/2010 at 13:14:52

Report abuse

Strange how this article came up today as I was watching "Damned United" last night and remember thinking how Everton had comprehensively beaten leeds to the title in 1970 and why was that winning season a springboard for the future.

Funnily enough I think the 3 - 2 defeat to Liverpool at Anfield after being 2 - 0 up, the defeat to the Greeks in I think the European Cup quarter final, and the semi final defeat to the shite sowed the seeds for our demise.
Eugene Ruane
16   Posted 11/03/2010 at 14:30:55

Report abuse

Just watched that vimeo game (plus the Alan Ball after-dinner thing).

You just get....lost in it - fantastic.

There’s a great snippet of commentry that illustrates how fucking dull Wolstenholme was.

George Best goes on a little run..

KW: "And Best AT HIS......greatest there"

(is there ANYONE else who wouldn’t have said " his best"?)

Great piece of nostalgia.
Dave Smith
17   Posted 11/03/2010 at 14:55:04

Report abuse

"Every 24 years we win the league. 2011...? We can live in hope"

Prepare to be disapointed. Sky re-wrote the history in 1992 and, for better or worse, football hasn’t been the same since.

Good article. Your lucky to have witnessed a championship winning side. I wonder if i ever will.
Trevor Lynes
18   Posted 11/03/2010 at 15:18:03

Report abuse

Best always said that Everton were Man Utd’s bogey team and I well remember us going in at half time 5 nil up against a Man Utd side with Setters, Cantwell, Best, Law and Charlton all playing...but then again according to the media...history of football only started with the premier league and they never mention the years between 1967 and 1994 when UTD never won the league title !!
Eugene Ruane
19   Posted 11/03/2010 at 16:17:35

Report abuse

Moment of positivity based on nothing in particular.

Maybe things WILL eventually change.

I have nothing logical to base that on, but for those old enough (quite a few on this thread) there was a time when we thought Liverpool would win the title every year for the rest of our lives.

They seemed a reliable bet every bleeding season.

Year in, year out, there they were - horrible, relentless...champions. But it’s now getting on for 20 years AND...they’re getting further away!

It certainly is "a fanny owl gime".
Terry White
20   Posted 11/03/2010 at 17:01:54

Report abuse

Don’t forget Catterick inherited in the early 60s (not the late 50s) the Carey side that played great football without winning anything - exciting going forward, loads of goals scored - but, unfortunately, also conceded, and we could rarely win away from home.

The primary change was to replace Bobby Collins with Dennis Stevens. Not popular at the time but Dennis did a great workmanlike job for us in the 63 title-winning side. Then there was Tony Kay......
Dennis Stevens
21   Posted 11/03/2010 at 17:27:21

Report abuse

Quite right, Terry. I know a lot of people still feel Catterick got rid of Collins too soon & they have a point, seeing as he went on to be Footballer of the Year at Leeds United.

I suppose trading the young David Johnson for Rod Belfitt probably wasn’t Catterick’s smartest move & can’t have helped the early 70’s team at all.
Peter Hall
22   Posted 11/03/2010 at 18:50:52

Report abuse

OK tell me if my memory is wrong - probably it is but I’m not going to look it up so here goes.

Our first home game of the 70/71 season was against Arsenal and I think it ended 2-2. I think it was the first match home or away. I was there. It was warm.

Alan Ball had taken over the captaincy from Labone. I don’t think it was temporary, I thought it was a new ‘club captain’ as Labone was nearing the end of his career. Great player. Both.

Henry Newton – majestic in the World Cup in Mexico – had arrived from – Blackburn? I think so.

But Newton made a poor headed clearance and – Charlie George? – scored from inside the box. At the Park End.

Ball went to confront Newton and Newton picked him up by his shirt and would have layed him flat if Labone hadn’t arrived to calm them down. Well – to stop them fighting. They weren’t calm – I don’t think ever again. At the match no-one had any sympathy for Ball. He showed himself what he would be – a poor captain, a niggler not an inspirer.

I’m going to post this and then research it as an exercise in memory – I’ve always believed that’s what I saw and that Ball left Everton because his captaincy was a failure. And until now I’ve never thought about checking it.

So don’t shoot me if any of the above is wrong – but it’s what I’ve always believed to be the main reason for the team falling apart in 71.

But one thing is for sure - I was there!
Brendan O'Doherty
23   Posted 11/03/2010 at 20:19:30

Report abuse

Enjoyable read Bob, reminiscing about the Holy Trinity.

The day I got up for school and heard on the radio that we had sold Alan Ball to Arsenal was a day I’ll never forget. It felt like the beginning of the end, although it had probably started before that as people have already said. I still haven’t got over it.
Paul McGinty
24   Posted 11/03/2010 at 21:40:02

Report abuse

I agree with Brendan, When Bally left we never recovered. I remember hitch-hiking back and forth to London to see us get smoked by Arsenal, with Henry Newton playing out of position. I think this was Ballys Arsenal debut ,which rubbed salt into the wound. A disaster. I was selling programmes for the West Brom title clincher in 1970. We used to get into the Lower Bullens for free with the sellers pass, but transferred into the Street End for the second half to sing, shout and generally go crazy.
Kevin Gillen
25   Posted 12/03/2010 at 05:20:47

Report abuse

God help all of us who had to sit through the trauma of the 70’s and 80’s. A number of times we should have won the league but the Lyons/Kenyon teams didn’t have the character for it. No slight on them personally but collectively we blew it on a number of occasions. I remember the goalies being less than they should have been (Lawson and Davies) and the midfielders all suffering from the expectations of the past. The expectations were so high that as soon as the team went behind the crowd got on their backs and it appeared to me the players didn’t have the experience or the character to change things. It is a travesty that we allowed Liverpool to overtake us in that period and develop themselves again when Sky came along and surpass us. The management of the club overall has a lot to answer for. Billy Bingham and Gordon Lee weren’t up to the job and neither was Mike Walker. Colin Harvey should have took us into the modern era but didn’t have a lot of luck. He had the commitment and the temperament to move us forward in a way that Kendall and Royle perhaps did not.
In truth all Evertonians have suffered greatly. Being an Evertonian is a byword for being depressed in footballing circles. At least now we have a team to be proud of in terms of their attitude and I really do hope that some of the sky four are ready to give it up. Liverpool and United are facing oblivion, they are so used to success and the finanacial state of their clubs are precarious in a global economic recession. Chelsea will soon need to recreate themselves as their kiss and tell stories and honeytraps reveal them as a team riven with internal strife. Only Arsenal with their brilliant stadium and philosophy seem ready for the next phase in the footballing oddysey. We are next best placed because we are the only team producing our own players of a sufficient high standard. Man City will do well and Villa are a threat. I dismiss Spurs - they don’t have the character or leadership and should have already broken into the sky 4 given their funding. Either Sunderland or Newcastle might emerge but they are nowhere at the moment. I am so excited about next season and get the feeling we could do something special with some luck. Great article by the way, football was different in those days, there is too much money in the game nowadays for clubs to go from Champions to relegation candidates in a season or two. The game isn’t as much of a lottery with bad pitches, inept refs, horror tackles, jumpers for goalposts etc.
Ajay Timothy
26   Posted 12/03/2010 at 11:18:01

Report abuse

Peter - I think you mean Keith Newton. We did have Henry Newton playing for us but he never made the 1970 world cup.
Graham Reed
27   Posted 13/03/2010 at 02:49:56

Report abuse

Until I read all these fascinating replies to this article I would have answered that the biggest single reason why the 69-70 team did not go on to become the team of the 1970's was the lessening of team spirit and harmony brought about by Alan Ball's appointment as captain and his general frustration with teammates when things did not go well whether he was captain or not. However there are so many good points made in the comments above that I realise that there were also many other factors at play. So here are my comments not necessarily in order of imporance.

1. Alan Ball as captain as documented above and in many direct or indirect comments made by players in books and interviews.

2. Alan Ball as a player. He had been so fantastic in the years 1967-70 that his relative loss of form after the 1970 World Cup was bound to impact the team as a whole. The loss of form was not just through being knackered but he was also carrying a long-standing pelvic injury at some point 1970-72. As has been well documented his goalscoring dropped off in this period, whereas before he was good for around 20 goals a season which was incredible considering the amount of work he got through all over the pitch.

3. Brian Labone as a captain. He and Ball were such opposites but all teams need both a Labone and a Ball. As a captain he was just right for the talented team of mainly youngsters around him. The change both on and off the field must have been dramatic when Ball took over at the end of the 69-70 season.

4. The strengths of Harry Catterick as a manager were also his weaknesses as others have already commented.There was a world of difference between managing in 1963 and 1971 as times and football changed. He was known as a 'directors manager' whereas Shankly and Revie were known as 'players managers' and the latter two were perhaps able to cope better in the early 70's. Catterick was not the only manager who found it difficult around this time. Bill Nicholson, a fairly similar type of manager, left Spurs a year after Catterick left Everton and Joe Mercer, after great success at Man City,left around 1972 and Matt Busby stepped down at ManU around 1970. It is interesting however that it was certainly not the case that all players bristled as Ball must have done under Catterick's iron rule. I can remember both Royle and Harvey speaking with great respect and admiration and liking of the manager right through to his departure. Ball was compared most often with Billy Bremner as a player (and character) but when you compare how well Revie and Bremner worked together for so many years, then we can only wonder how good it would have been in the 1970's if Catterick and Ball had had a similar relationship.

5. The team and some key players had already peaked by 1971. Ball was such an outstanding player that we can well refer to the seasons 1966-71 as the 'Alan Ball years'. The first 4 of those seasons (66-70) saw an absolutely outstanding team and there was still some pretty good stuff in 70-1. As many players and fans have said, the football in 67-8 and 68-9 was even better than in the Championship year of 69-70. The 1968 Cup should have been won and then the 68-69 European CWC must have been a strong possibility as well as another Wembley Final (and win) against Leicester in 68-9 if not for the last minute goal by Tommy Booth in the semi-final. As for 70-1, then with a little bit of good luck and better refereeing,the Blues could have been at Wembley twice in 71 against Ajax and Arsenal (wins not guaranteed). That would have been quite a load of success to match any one else in that period.

6. Ball and Harvey had been playing consistent non-stop top class football for about 6 years by 1971 and their style of play, skill, running, endeavour, tackling, workrate, commitment, was perhaps best suited for players in their early and mid-20's rather than late 20's. Husband and Whittle, two of the other flair players, hit their peak even earlier. Husband's best seasons were 66-7 and 68-9 when he was barely out of his teens and Whittle was only 19 in his fantastic 69-70 season. These two were also heavily marked and Husband in particular suffered from a bad injury apparently in a tackle by Dave Mackay.

Finally there were so many good teams in that period. Arsenal, Leeds and Liverpool were defensively minded, organised and usually dour. ManU and Spurs were somewhat the opposite, they could never get a good enough defense to go with their attacking strengths. ManCity and West Ham didnt even seem to bother with their defense but were great going forward. Everton were well-balanced with of course a wonderful midfield. The nearest team to Everton in style were Chelsea, who were a very good team in the late 60's and early 70's.They were also based on a bunch of outstanding homegrown players (Hollins, Hudson, Osgood, Hutchinson, Houseman, Harris, Bonnetti etc for Harvey. Wright. Hurst, Husband, Royle, Whittle, Kenyon) and they too imploded in the early 70's. Their relative demise is often put down to Dave Sexton being too weak a manager to deal with his grown-up youngsters while Harry Catterick was said to be too tough ! Make of that what you can.

Bob McEvoy
28   Posted 13/03/2010 at 14:31:49

Report abuse

Well I consider myself enlightened. One thing I had forgotten about was Alan Ball’s poor captaincy skills although I eluded to Brian Labone being a big miss in the original article for more than his playing abilities. I do recall Bally giving Tommy Wright a verbal lambasting for failing to overlap that lasted a good 15 seconds. In the end the crowd started slating Bally. Unfortunately I have never seen the Sky interview mentioned by Dave Roberts in post no 13.
With the anniversary approaching it would be good to hear something about this issue from one of Royle. Harvey or Kendall but I think it’s unlikely.
On a different tack I shall still have a flutter on the blues to win the league next year. COYB...

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to Fan Articles, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.

© ToffeeWeb

Latest News

Subscribe to The Athletic, Get 40% off

Online Football Betting with Betway

Bet on Everton and get a deposit bonus with bet365 at

Recent Articles

Talking Points & General Forum

Pinned Links


We use cookies to enhance your experience on ToffeeWeb and to enable certain features. By using the website you are consenting to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.