Why we shouldn't sell Lescott

Comments (8)

It really gets my goat up when I hear the media and most other football pundits harp on about player power. They are all saying if a player wants to leave, his club has no option but to sell him, regardless of any contract that exists between the player and the club.

We see it happen all the time. We experienced it with Wayne Rooney and more recently with Andy Johnson. Now we have Joleon Lescott demanding a transfer. But are the players right to demand a transfer, regardless of the circumstances, when quite often they have a contract that states they have no legal power to quit at all? Also are the players acting professionally when they throw their toys out of the pram, and act like a 5-year-old being deprived of sweets when they don't get their own way?

Players are not hard done by! They are payed massive, massive wages, earning more money in a week than most of us would see in a year. They get other perks from the club, like obsenely expensive cars, huge houses, free medical treatment, free kit & clothes and I heard that Wayne Rooney even got Everton to buy a house for his mum.

For all the money that a club pays a player, what should they expect in return? IMO I would expect a player to honour the terms and conditions of his contract with the club, like any other professional who signs a contract.

So why should Everton sell Joleon Lescott when he is contracted to play for them for another 4 years? Well the answers to that question is easy. There is no point in keeping a player whose heart is no longer in the job. Also the transfer money would come in very handy. So there are two good reasons to sell him.

But, my argument is that Everton shouldn't sell him. Why? Not selling would set a precedent in football for the future for clubs to follow. It would put a dampener on the apparently unstoppable juggernaut of player power.

It would make future overpaid pre-madonas think twice before they try pushing their weight around and bullying their club into selling them. It would make players more respectful of the contracts they themselves have signed up for. It would shift the balance of power in the game back to the clubs. It would force rich clubs like Manchester City to follow the correct channels when they are interested in signing a player, instead of tapping him up via the media.

So, Moyes for the good of the future game, let Lescott rot in the reserves for year.
Brian Baker, Aldershot     Posted 21/08/2009 at 06:42:05

Return to the Mail Bag