The Mail Bag
Replacing rather than building
Comments (18)
Is it just me or are Everton constantly having to replace players rather than build on what we have got? Losing Lescott now is an example of this:
Southall - Gerrard - Simonsen - Myhre - Wright - Martyn - replaced by Howard
Weir - Krøldrup - Lescott - replaced by ???? (Taylor/Distin/Hangeland?)
Stubbs - replaced by Jags - now need cover for him
Pistone - Naysmith - Valente - replaced by Baines
Carsley - Castillo - replaced by ???
Pembridge - Kilbane - Davies - Pienaar
Bent - Beattie - Johnson - Yakubu - covered by Jo & Saha
If we want to be progressing, shouldn't we be looking to bring players in to give competition to the ones ahead of them? Prime example is Hibbert: how many more years are we going to be exposed with him playing at right-back?
It's no good having a good atmosphere in the squad (currently ruined by someone greedy). We need to be building on 5th place. Surely coming 5th 2 years in a row and playing in Europe should be a good start to attract quality players instead of having to replace them year-in, year-out.
Peter Keating, Posted 26/08/2009 at 11:47:00
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
1 Posted 26/08/2009 at 16:50:00
2 Posted 26/08/2009 at 16:58:21
Southall is over fifty now, Weir 39, Stubbs retired, Pistone retired....What sort of fucking team would that be??
Why did we ever get rid of dixie...
3 Posted 26/08/2009 at 17:01:47
4 Posted 26/08/2009 at 17:11:23
Editorial Team
5 Posted 26/08/2009 at 17:09:18
After being in serious overload mode recently, the mailbag is slim pickings today... And you know, if someone has taken the trouble to write in, I feel a certain duty to post their effort, even if the content is (ahem) questionable.
These days I try to say nothing... but like Cairan, sometimes I just can’t hold back. Part of the issue here may be related to our Membership system, which I think is on the whole working very well... for the regular posters at least.
What seems to happen, though, is rare posters probably find it easier to bash off a Mailbag item or Fan Article rather than log in and comment on an existing thread. That would also behoove them to actually read the threads — something which again seems to be a growing issue, if the content of this OP is anything to go by.
That raises the question: Should we limit original submissions to existing members? My feeling is No... but perhaps I need to ask Lyndon for a flag on the initial posts that indicates if someone is a member, and how frequently they are posting. [Next we could have you all choose those cute little avatars and have ranks for differing levels of membership participation...??? er, perhaps not!]
So, to answer your question, I guess I’m kinda using this as an example post in the occasional series "What not to post on ToffeeWeb".
6 Posted 26/08/2009 at 17:35:33
On another note this post is so bad its just crazy. Maybe I just don’t get it.
7 Posted 26/08/2009 at 17:48:57
8 Posted 26/08/2009 at 17:56:03
Andy Johnson, McFadden, Rooney, and now Lescott, come to mind.
Maybe if we had signed some decent players at the start of the summer, Lescott would not have been tempted away to a brighter future at Man City.
Now we find ourselves trying to shore up the defence with a cover player till Jags is back.
I am still confident that we will again have a sucessful season, top 6 and a few cups runs, but we must learn next season and build on what we have.
9 Posted 26/08/2009 at 18:08:20
I agree very strange post. It's a pitty Dixie died, I’m sure he would have score another 60 goal this season.
10 Posted 26/08/2009 at 16:55:54
Editorial Team
11 Posted 26/08/2009 at 20:22:18
I know our rules and Conditions of Use seem Draconian to some, but they were developed in part to prevent such occurrences here on ToffeeWeb. Thanks for all your help and continued support!
12 Posted 26/08/2009 at 20:46:58
13 Posted 26/08/2009 at 14:51:37
After a late recovery inspired by young Jack Rodwell, Everton have ended up in seventh place. Everton, realising that Rodwell is a hot property, a player who's made the England party to South Africa, desired by both Manchester clubs, Tottenham and even Barcelona are sniffing, and having learned from the summer of 2004 when Rooney was allowed to go, decide to offer him £15,000 a week and a ten year contract.I'm making it up, but it has a familiar scenario.
By the end of August Rodwell's agent is claiming his boy has to move to further his career and Kenwright and Moyes have been saying all summer that they won't let him go. However on August 25th he signs for United for £30 million and we get Hargreaves on a pay as you play basis.
Jo's loan is extended again and we sign David Bentley after his stay at the Priory. We start the season by losing the first four games....
14 Posted 26/08/2009 at 21:19:03
15 Posted 26/08/2009 at 22:12:13
16 Posted 26/08/2009 at 23:32:25
Only today it was confirmed that Peter Storie had found another middle east buyer to take over Pompy, however that wont be needed now.
And also, news of a new American bidder for Newcastle who SSN reported was loaded. How can these people be found????
17 Posted 27/08/2009 at 00:00:29
18 Posted 27/08/2009 at 11:09:50
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.


And yet there have been a gazillion posts on this website saying that Moyes has progressed the squad every year since he's been here (although recently... not so many). There have also been a gazillion posts about the Moyes's shrinking core squad size, the reasons for that (be it dithering or financial restrictions), and the strange galvanizing backs-to-the-wall, us-against-the-rest effect this has had on team spirit. And there have been a gazillion posts about building on 5th place... or failing to. Quality players cost MONEY! And teams with MONEY snap them up. Again, isn't that the way it's always been?