The Mail Bag
Boring Boring Everton...
Comments (36)
My god what a load of rubbish we are!! Anyone who watched the Sigma game will no doubt feel short-changed by the standard of football, to be blunt it was a DISGRACE.
Yes, we won 5-1 overall but to watch that shitty hoofball is driving me insane!!!!! During the whole 90 minutes we didn't string more than 5 passes together, the only players who looked comfortable on the ball were Rodwell and Pienaar... WTF is going on at the club? Are the players just not good enough? Is this the game plan of our manager just to simply hoof it up and hope to get something? Do they practice pass and move in training?
It really is depressing, we must be the worst team to watch in the Premier League!! What's the point in having a 5-man midfield if we are just going to bypass them at every opportunity?
And as for you people out there who say, "Yea, but Osman is a centre-midfielder," ... bollocks! He was even worse last night bar, setting up the goal — and Fellaini is he getting worse game by game!! €15 million but no pace, he turns like a double-decker bus, cant win a header even though he's 20 foot tall... shocking!
Without Arteta, we have no guile whatsoever. If we have any money left, it's time we got someone in who can control the midfield... Segesson, Moutinho, Defour? Sigma was a poor man's Dundee Utd and yet they look more comfortable on the ball.
Anyone watch the Villa game afterwards? I can honestly say that there was more passing and moving in the first 5 minutes from Villa then there was from Everton in whole 90!!
ps: We missed the boat with that lad Delph, looks a class act.
Sean Mckenna, Posted 28/08/2009 at 11:24:41
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
1 Posted 28/08/2009 at 15:36:17
2 Posted 28/08/2009 at 15:40:11
3 Posted 28/08/2009 at 15:48:42
4 Posted 28/08/2009 at 15:52:05
5 Posted 28/08/2009 at 15:54:27
6 Posted 28/08/2009 at 15:54:02
You roughly have the ball for 50% of the game. The 50% of the time Sigma had the ball (and against 10 men) I thought the team did pretty well. They certainly didn’t bludgeon us - which we probably all slightly feared come Hibbert’s dismissal.
7 Posted 28/08/2009 at 15:51:07
To all intents and purposes we had qualified prior to the game yesterday (even on a bad day I couldn’t imagine us losing 0-5 to that team) so to go flat-out, risk injuries etc., etc? Was it worth it?
Now, with that said, in a more general sense I agree we do need to get as far away as possible from the "hoof ball" style of play (I’m not denying we do it) but to base your comment on yesterdays game was a bit much.
But I do agree we need a player like the one’s you mentioned .... we don’t seem to have any real physical power in midfield ... even Arteta when he returns (I can’t wait!) is hardly the physical type.
First things first though ... we need to thrash Wigan on Sunday!
8 Posted 28/08/2009 at 15:57:50
9 Posted 28/08/2009 at 16:05:37
10 Posted 28/08/2009 at 16:02:30
My paper’s headline today says "Villa stumble out of Europa League at the first hurdle". O’Neill was left talking about "should have" and "the group stages would have been a great experience..." If Moyes said anything more than ’job done’ he was wasting his breath.
As Eduardo’s shameful dive is in the news, it might be pointed out that Villa’s second (yes, second) penalty last night came from a very dubious fall by Ashley Young. Perhaps we should be coaching ’how to be cheating bastards’ at Finch Farm - as they obviously do at many other clubs. Perhaps not.
11 Posted 28/08/2009 at 16:18:05
..but I got the impression that is was more of a training match in the end, there was no point in exerting the players for a game that was already over...but again we should really expect to be able to pass the ball better.
Also we did have a lot of kids on in the second half just to give them a run out. I think in the Wigan game we will see an improvement
12 Posted 28/08/2009 at 16:28:29
13 Posted 28/08/2009 at 16:27:37
14 Posted 28/08/2009 at 16:28:27
WTF???? Say what you like about Sigma, but I will accept no slander regarding Dundee Utd.
I only watched the first half (from the 10th minute onwards), but I’m sure I saw more than 5 passes in a row a few times. And to say only 2 players looked comfortable on the ball is also an exaggeration. Due to all the fuss recently regarding Fellaini, I made a point of watching him. Do you know what? Every single time he had the ball, the next person to touch it was an Everton player. That to me suggests he is comfortable on the ball.
Maybe the second half was hoofball or whatever, but based on what I have seen, I think you decided your opinion before the game even started.
15 Posted 28/08/2009 at 16:34:40
16 Posted 28/08/2009 at 16:50:01
While Fabian Delph might be a good prospect, he’s nowhere near worth the value Villa have paid for his services currently.
They could have done with perhaps signing him and loaning him back to Leeds to aid his development more steadily.
What makes me laugh is, your totally flippant knee-jerk reaction from performance in a game in fairly difficult surroundings with 10 men after 4 minutes.
As well as this, you perhaps didn’t notice, but Delph was at fault for Villa’s goal that they conceded last night, that consequently put them out of the Europa League.
Pull yourself together and reserve your judgement on the team’s performance until we are mid-way through the season.
17 Posted 28/08/2009 at 17:03:29
18 Posted 28/08/2009 at 17:03:35
Rapid deserved to go through.
We do need to keep possession better than we do but last night’s game could never be the game for that, especially after going down to 10 men so early. Nevertheless, the three best players on the pitch all wore black and pink (yuk!) Pienaar, Rodwell and (wait for it...I’ll get my tin hat on)...Neville. Gosling did a sterling job at stand in right-back and Fellaini does look ponderous at times but he has a lovely touch on the ball and doesn’t misplace many passes. Jo worked his socks off as well up there on his own for the whole game. We know where the weaknesses are and Moyes has a few days left to find at least better right-back and somebody who can relegate Osman to the bench. He could be useful there as a squad player as he was when he first came back from his loan spell. He often came on then as substitute and won games for us.
My worry is Rodwell. We know now more than ever that contracts are not worth the paper they are written on. We have to keep this lad or else we may as well give up the ghost. I hope Platini gets his new rules through pretty damned quick as that might help a bit, or we find an investor that can rebuild the club in the interim. Rodwell is potentially world class...better prospect than Rooney in my opinion although in a different role on the pitch.
19 Posted 28/08/2009 at 17:44:23
Dave,
How do you feel the new rules would help us? Granted they might slow down City, however if our budget were based on revenue then it means status quo as ManU, Arse, Chelsea, RS, Spurs and probably a couple others have larger revenue than we do. So we’d still be outspent.
Even IF we found a great new rich owner, if he was limited to our revenue and would require balanced books then even if he were the richest person in the world he couldn’t spend more than Kenwright/wrong (because I believe we were just about even on the spreadsheet last season).
So it might help stop City but it wouldn’t stop Man U and others from taking our best players and it wouldn’t allow a new owner to spend any more than BK.
Not sure I share your optimism in that plan but perhaps I’m looking at it in the wrong way. Aside from being a FU to City it doesn’t seem to do much for the non-top teams and would cement the likes of ManU, Real and others with large revenues and prevent anyone from ever overtaking them. Obviously I share no love for City but this rule just seems to help maintain the status quo and top fours.
20 Posted 28/08/2009 at 18:10:49
The guys worked their socks off in that heat (30deg+) give a bit of credit for goodness sake.
21 Posted 28/08/2009 at 18:13:59
To write that last night’s performance was a DISGRACE (your capitalisation not mine) beggars belief.
A team low on confidence and with a patched up defence weathered an initial flurry of attacks to go 1-0 (5-0) up in baking heat and survived for 80+ minutes with 10 men.
I believe more than a little bit of balance is needed in the comments you make and I detect it’s probably needed elsewhere in posts to this site too.
22 Posted 28/08/2009 at 18:02:33
23 Posted 28/08/2009 at 19:01:09
24 Posted 28/08/2009 at 19:05:00
Cheers
25 Posted 28/08/2009 at 18:38:32
I wasn’t suggesting that Platini’s new world of football finance would solve all our problems or produce a level playing field. But what it would do would prevent rich investors digging into their own pockets (and getting much of it back in tax breaks) in order to offer wages to players that otherwise the clubs could not afford to pay. Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester City do not have significantly larger attendances than Everton do so they could not afford to pay such high wages from that source. That leaves merchandising but more importantly the Champions League as the main sources of wealth (apart from someones deep pockets) and it is also my understanding that Platini wants to have a go at correcting that imbalance too.
Manchester United can meet all their bills, including wages, from attendances and so can Arsenal (probably) but I do not know that for certain. So it is difficult to argue with that(but see below)
The benefit of Platini’s new rules for clubs like Everton will, in the first instance, be to prevent the richest clubs, especially those only rich because a billionaire took a fancy to them, from getting so far ahead financially that it becomes hardly worth the effort to compete, hardly worth the effort to nurture and bring on kids and never having a hope in hell of winning significant silverware.
My point about Everton finding an investor was about trying to make the club more attractive IN THE INTERIM (as I said in my post) ie, before the new rules come in so that we would be in a better position to keep players we want to keep and attract players we want. It is not only a lack of transfer funds Everton suffer from, it is the lack of ability to pay the sort of wages to players that Spurs or Newcastle can, never mind the likes of City. Platini’s rules will not be the complete answer but they will be a start and we have to start somewhere or the game outside of the Champions League/Billionaire subsidized clubs will die of malnutrition. It is already distinctly unwell!
It will be interesting too to see the details of his ideas concerning Clubs not being allowed to play in European competitions if their debt levels are beyond a certain point. That could reduce Manchester United’s position somewhat as it could Chelsea’s and Liverpool’s. Platini’s is a three-pronged assault on what he sees as killing the game....and he is right. More power to his elbow.
26 Posted 28/08/2009 at 19:56:23
COYB!
27 Posted 28/08/2009 at 19:49:55
28 Posted 28/08/2009 at 20:17:17
Apparently Moutinho has been seen in an estate agents in Manchester according to someone on sky sports, check the transfer centre then click on your stories. Very doubtful, as the fella’s a City fan and probably winding Evertonians up.
29 Posted 28/08/2009 at 20:17:27
The game I saw last night wasn’t beautiful but there was some very solid performances including Osman.
Funny how several basic errors by the normally rock solid Baines goes un-mentioned — as he is not the focus of all the negative "let's bash Everton at every turn cos we’re not a Sky 4 team" supporters.
For me this summer Moyes has stood up to the nonsense of Shittee and asked basic questions of how football is conducting itself at the moment. He may have dilly-dallied but now I believe he is coming in with what look like sensible, good signings and OK we are behind after two poor performances but there are many games ahead of us.
Keep the faith and enjoy supporting the best team in the world and be proud that we do things differently and challenge the sky 4 despite the set backs. COYB, FTRS
30 Posted 28/08/2009 at 21:06:31
Interesting discussion -- albeit in an unrelated thread but our stuff is more interesting than accusing people of being Villa fans :) -- on the spending/revenue restrictions.
Looking at the revenue figures from Forbes, while some teams may have relatively equal attendance to ours, their ticket prices and merchandising make up quite a lot:
Manchester United $512M
Arsenal $349M
Liverpool $332M
Chelsea $424M
Tottenham Hotspur $228M
Manchester City $164M
Newcastle United $198M
Everton $151M
Aston Villa $150M
Figures are in US Dollars.
So the "poorest" of the Sky Four has (at least) double the revenue of the two most recent challengers (us and Villa). Spurs are some distance ahead of us but still far enough from the 4 that I’m not convinced this would make much difference to them either. City would be absolutely screwed of course.
If the plan included revenue sharing (like in the NFL) then it becomes more helpful (although I doubt Chelsea would support that).
The story of how and why the NFL developed their system is fascinating but not the right place or time for that -- suffice to say that (EU laws which would likely prevent it aside) it is the best existing model to follow and one which (despite a couple of flaws) has helped grow US football to far surpass all other US sports in popularity and (most importantly for owners) revenue. Granted, football here doesn’t have much competition so it’s a tough sell though for those who are already rich (and have far more than the one vote they should have).
31 Posted 28/08/2009 at 23:25:09
By the way, please direct your thoughts on Fabian Delph to Bill Kenwright. He can add them to his list of missed opportunities.
32 Posted 29/08/2009 at 00:42:39
33 Posted 29/08/2009 at 09:22:09
Is it too much to ask that professional footballers paid astonomical wages could play the ball on the deck and string together a few passes. In the opening 20 minutes Sigma played more football than we did in the entire 90 mins. I appreciate that the tie was already won and no one wanted to break a sweat but that display was way below the standards expected of a team who finished 5th in possibly the strongest league in Europe.
I expect things to improve dramatically with the players to come back and the new signings, but viewing that game alone then I imagine a lot of the Czechs at the game on Thursday wouldnt have been to impressed with our ’big time stars’.
On another note, to accuse the lad of being a Villa fan just because he shares an opinion is a bit childish to say the least...I’m looking at you Ellen West.
34 Posted 29/08/2009 at 13:01:04
Most of the Premier League teams are entering tournaments or setting up bigger more competitive games, as a result EFC are slower at getting into their pace.
We need to stop going to the USA & trying to sell the EFC product!!
35 Posted 29/08/2009 at 16:24:21
36 Posted 29/08/2009 at 16:23:50
OK, forget any fluidity..........just passing will do!
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.

