I see that it is rumoured that the Yak might be reviving his move to West Ham but that Everton value him at £8M could be a sticking point. If he is truely worth that much, shouldn't he be an automatic first team choice? The fact that he isn't indicates that his market value is considerably less.
I would have thought that it would have made good business and perhaps made for some attacking entertainment to have played the Yak throughout December, which sends a message to the transfer market that we place a real value on him rather than an accountant's book value.
Alan Rooney, Posted 31/12/2010 at 10:22:33
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
1 Posted 31/12/2010 at 15:10:52
2 Posted 31/12/2010 at 15:18:53
Get him off the wages book asap. Looked absolutely useless when he came on at West ham. He is finished at this level. Beckford is the best option up front at present.
3 Posted 31/12/2010 at 15:28:13
4 Posted 31/12/2010 at 15:25:31
1. We are in the shit and potless so a low offer can be made to a desperate seller;
2. Yakubu hasn't played for the best part of a month so the buyer can lower his price again using that as an excuse ? unfit, out of form, blah blah blah;
3. Whatever offer is made can be a take-it or leave-it because any buyer knows Everton can't buy a goal at the minute and need an early sale to replace him.
Any or all of the three put Everton on the back foot and on a hiding to nowhere with getting a decent price.
5 Posted 31/12/2010 at 15:38:08
I know they were rumours but if true, these summer deals SHOULD have gone through:
Saha to Galatasaray for £8M
Pienaar for Keane plus £5M.
Yak to West Ham for £5M.
6 Posted 31/12/2010 at 15:59:18
Everton are not in a position to demand a price for a striker who is only reduced to a cameo role coming of the bench now.
7 Posted 31/12/2010 at 16:25:08
8 Posted 31/12/2010 at 16:39:40
9 Posted 31/12/2010 at 16:36:59
The Yak is certainly older than his supposed 28 years and he looks unfit and uninterested... he certainly will not do the chasing our tactics require.
Vaughan is still as raw as ever and I do not see any improvement in him. Beckford has to be given a bit more time but he is already 28 years old and is already considered best as an impact sub (according to DM)... that leaves Big Vic... if he stays injury free and has a few games under his belt he may make it BUT... he is not a natural goal scorer... he reminds me of Shola Ameobi a bit.
I reckon that's the sum total of our striking situation and with Cahill off very soon... the time for Beckford or Big Vic to come good is 'nigh.
10 Posted 31/12/2010 at 17:01:01
11 Posted 31/12/2010 at 17:28:49
Totally agree with Gav on the valuation by the way.
The club is being run very amateurishly with Gosling, Pienaar and possibly Anichebe being allowed to run their contracts down.
It seems to me that Moyes is sticking two fingers up at everybody because he feels let down by the board.
Well, the news for him is we all feel the same way ? except now we are being let down by the manager and players as well.
12 Posted 31/12/2010 at 17:32:58
West Ham now value him between £1-2M. Aside from one good season where he scored 20+ goals what a write off, near enough £9M. Master stroke by Moyes yet again.
13 Posted 31/12/2010 at 18:24:48
14 Posted 31/12/2010 at 19:23:04
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.