The Rumour Mill, Season 2011-12

Cahill mulling bumper Saudi deal

05/06/2012 | Comments (38)
According to The World Game, Tim Cahill has been offered a one-year contract by Al Nassr worth a head-turning $4m, while The Guardian suggest that the 32 year-old has already rejected a three-year contract for £10.3m from another, unnamed club in the Middle East and is also the subject of interest from China.

The claim is that Cahill's London-based agent Paul Martin has been in contact with the wealthy Al Nassr club as well as other clubs in the Persian Gulf, as the 32 year-old Socceroos mulls a possible career move after eight years at Goodison Park.

With Everton's finances as tight as ever, David Moyes could be willing to let the Australian and his estimated $75,000-a-week salary go to free up cash for squad building.

The report says that Cahill rejected a $4.5m offer by a UAE Pro-League team last season but turned it down to stay at Everton.

Original Source: The World Game

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Gareth Fieldstead
262   Posted 05/06/2012 at 03:51:10

Presuming this has some semblance of truth unless it is tax free, why would he want to move for an additional five grand a week? Personally I hope he goes, he is well past his best, we would still get a decent fee and with the proceeds from Yobos transfer we should have enough to buy Peinnar and cover Hoiletts signing on fee, well covered!
Martin Mason
263   Posted 05/06/2012 at 04:00:40

Tim has been a great servant for Everton but this move would be win-win for all parties. A good pension pot for Tim and a measure to force DM to replace him now that his influence is waning.
John Maxwell
264   Posted 05/06/2012 at 03:59:51

As much as I like Cahill, his time in the 1st team is finished.

His 68 goals for the club say it all and his commitment to and love of the club cannot be questioned. His legend status as an Evertonian is already secured.

Last season only produced 3 goals and I can't imagine things improving next season. Sorry, Tim, but it's time to move on.

Eric Myles
265   Posted 05/06/2012 at 04:11:01

Gareth, he's an Aussie so he has to pay tax on worldwide income so although there'll be no tax to pay to the Saudi government the Aussie tax man will still want his 50%.
David Chait
268   Posted 05/06/2012 at 07:33:12

Really Eric... That seems bogus and not based on any principles of source or residence, as he is neither to Australia surely. Australia really does a reputation for being highly regulated though.
Bill Goodall
269   Posted 05/06/2012 at 08:05:56

Eric,

Tim Cahill is an Australian citizen who resides in England and pays tax to the English government. If he moves to Saudi Arabia he will pay any tax he is obliged to (which is none) to the Saudi govenment.

£75k a week in England would attract a fair lump of tax. In Saudi Arabia, he would effectively earn twice as much as there is no tax.

Nick Wall
271   Posted 05/06/2012 at 08:13:23

Martin #263 - why do you think this is such a great move for Cahill ? I think it would be a terrible move for him. He's at a great club, where he has many friends, many fans, and a manager he trusts. For the sake of a bit of extra money that he doesn't need, why would he give all that up to go to a country where he has to play football with a team of mercenaries in stifling heat, where there are strange customs and no democracy. I just don't think so.
Ian Bennett
272   Posted 05/06/2012 at 08:24:15

i think eric is right. The US has something similar I believe.
Aiden Doyle
273   Posted 05/06/2012 at 08:27:59

It's not necessarily about the money, Nick. Most pros say that actually playing is the most important thing to them - and that's something that Cahill will be doing less and less of, if he stays with us.
Timothy Liu
274   Posted 05/06/2012 at 08:24:17

And his kids are in England, so...

I'd still want a bigger transfer fee.

Yusuf Bobat
275   Posted 05/06/2012 at 08:53:59

Sell. He's done his bit for us. Time for a younger man to take his place.
Dan McKie
276   Posted 05/06/2012 at 09:21:17

Eric, so you are saying whilst he has been in England, he has been getting hit 50 percent by the aussies as well as the high tax band 50 percent by the British? Yet he can still afford massive houses and a Bugatti? Can't see it.
Thomas Windsor
277   Posted 05/06/2012 at 09:33:00

I think it is time Cahill left Everton as he no longer is as effective to the team and Jelavic needs better players around him. I'm not saying go and play in UAE ? that's Cahill's choice; maybe Wigan, Bolton, or Blackburn might come in for him and keep him in the northwest.
Peter Barry
280   Posted 05/06/2012 at 09:45:01

Seems like many of you guys have not got a clue how this Tax deal works, Timmy pays his UK Tax on income earned in UK this is then set against his Aussie Tax if he has not paid as much as he would do in Aussie then the balance gets deducted by Aussie. Same works for UK citizens working abroad too too.

I worked abroad for many years while still paying UK tax and NI contributions. I now get my OAP (for which I paid my Taxes and NI contributions just like all the UK resident OAPs did) but it is FROZEN by the UK Govt at the rate of issue just because I live in Bali. My UK OAP is added to my other Private Pensions (paid for with TAXED money) and investment income and then I am TAXED some MORE because I exceed the Personal Tax Allowance.

Now there are 550,000 OAP's like me who have FROZEN Pensions but we dont use the Health Service or get Bus Passes or Winter Heating Allowance nor any of the other myriad benefits and allowances that UK and EU resident OAP's can use and claim . So we are PUNISHED doubly by HMG our OAP Pensions are FROZEN and the bastards STILL tax us and give us NOTHING.

Ciaran Duff
281   Posted 05/06/2012 at 09:55:42

Why would he be paying tax in Australia?

Tax is usually based on residency (ie where you live and earn the money). He would pay tax in Saudi (if they pay any tax) not Australia.
Eric Myles
282   Posted 05/06/2012 at 10:05:40

There's a principle called 'tax equalisation' that Peter has tried to explain.

Tim will be paying tax in UK at 40%(?). The tax rate in Australia is 50% so he will have to pay the balance 10% to Aussie government. In Saudi the tax rate is 0% so he will pay the full 50% amount to the Aussie govt.

Australia and USA have tax regulations where their citizens pay tax on worldwide income even if they are not resident, that is why that founder of Facebook recently gave up his US citizenship.

UK citizens on the other hand only pay tax on income earned in UK, so if like me you are resident abroad and salary is earned abroad then there is no tax to pay to HMRC. Income earned on renting out a house in UK is subject to UK tax though.

Peter #280, while you were working abroad you should not have been paying tax in UK and NI contributions are voluntary.

Peter Barry
284   Posted 05/06/2012 at 10:26:44

Eric most of the time I was working abroad I was working for the ODA and paid in to my UK Bank which is why I paid Tax and NI contributions. I also worked for some time in the USA/Italy/Botswana /Thailand and Indonesia where I did not pay Tax but kept up my NI contributions to ensure I got a full pension.
Mark Riding
289   Posted 05/06/2012 at 11:14:28

Peter #280 - Harsh measures all round there. Send Phillip Green an email and ask for some advice..
Aidy Dews
291   Posted 05/06/2012 at 11:08:36

If they was to offer us a decent fee for him, say, £5 to 6 million, then I think we've got to seriously think about it. He's been a brilliant servant to the club, one of our great buys, but all careers turn towards a downward spiral and unfortunately his as started so why not cash in on him now.

To get a good fee for him now from a foreign club and get him off the wage bill is a no-brainer. If selling Cahill and the likes of Yobo & Anichebe means we can appease the banks, make up our £5m deficits AND keep hold of Baines & Fellaini, then I'm all for it, even if it means we won't have anything else to sign the likes of Pienaar!

Me personally, I'd try and shift Rodwell on as well for as much as we could so we could sign Pienaar permanently and maybe sign a freebie or two. Rodders is still young and needs nurturing and there will be clubs out there willing to take him on but, because of loss of form and injuries, his stock as dropped so if we were lucky to get anything from £7 to 9 mill for him I think we'd have to seriously think about it if were desperate to get Pienaar in and one or two others?!

IMO, Rodwell is someone we can live without, we won't miss, so sell him to get Pienaar in and if possible, sign someone like Manny Fernandes or Diame to replace him and if we could stretch our money further, try and sign either of Barnetta or Rodallega to fill out the squad.

I've heard the banks don't want as much money from us this summer as they've seen sense and realise we won't do as well if we asset strip and then prize money and things coming in will drop... so instead of £10m that they wanted, it's close to half. So say they want £5 or 6 mill: Sell the likes of Cahill ? £5m, Yobo ? £3m, Rodwell ? £7-8m and Anichebe ? £3m for a total of £18m (by lowest values) whilst drastically lowering the wage bill; give the banks say, £5m, make up our £5m loses we apparently make every year before trading. This would hypothetically leave us with £8m to spend on bringing in Pienaar and whoever else Moyesie wanted to fill out the team/squad with if possible?!

This is all just guess work on who to sell and at what value but I'm going by what I've heard and how I'd value those players. We all know Moyesie wants £3m for Yobo and apparently were willing to sell Big Vic for 3 to 4 mill. If the Saudi's want Cahill then I think £5m is reasonable for him and because Rodwell as suffered with injuries and found it hard to find his form but as become an England international, I think anything from 7 mill to around about 9 or 10 is good for him too, considering his circumstances.

It all depends on Moyes's thinking of who he wants to sell to make up the money, what he's willing to do with the team and whether or not these players have interest in them to be able to get rid.

Mark Lennon
293   Posted 05/06/2012 at 11:29:46

Aussie tax? Who gives a shit, surely we should be talking football here?

I agree that Timmy is a legend and will always be remembered at the club, but although I hate saying it, I think his time is up! We need to evolve now not stay stuck in the mud!
Lee Taylor
295   Posted 05/06/2012 at 12:05:51

If you paid tax while living abroad for extended period of time then you are daft! Answer me why half the F1 drivers live in Monaco? Rolling Stones live abroad?

The simple answer is they don't pay tax on earnings!!! If your accountant made you pay tax then I would seriously either get a new one or start wondering where his new Porsche came from!!! Haha!!!

Denis Richardson
299   Posted 05/06/2012 at 12:23:22

To simplify a little for those confused and/or bored. Most countries only require people to pay tax if they live there ('are tax resident'). However, some countries require you to pay tax regardless of where you live on the earth if you're a citizen (e.g. US and Oz).

In the latter case, you're not taxed twice/double. You first pay the tax to the country you live in (in Tims case UK), and if this is below the amount you would have had to pay if you lived in your country (OZ), you pay the difference to the tax man where you're a citizen (OZ).

As for any Saudi deal, most footballers try to negotiate a 'net salary', i.e. what actually hits their bank account and don't care about the tax rate as their employer will have to sort this out. This 'netto' phenomenon first came to the UK I believe when Gullit moved to Chelsea and said he wanted 40k a week after taxes. I.e. whatever the tax rate was he didn't care as Chelsea had to pay him an amount that meant he actually got paid 40k a week at the time!

Am sure if Timmy goes to Saudi or the UAE his agent will negotiate a 'netto' contract - or at leats try to.

Back to the OP - all good things come to an end,

Steve Smith
300   Posted 05/06/2012 at 12:41:03

Denis,
Just a hypothetical question as you seem to be in the know on this.
If Cahill pays more than he would do in Oz, can he claim the difference back ie; a tax rebate from his homeland?

On the OP, I can't see why Tim would go for a 12 month contract for only slightly more than he's earning now with two years left on his current deal.

Martin Mason
301   Posted 05/06/2012 at 13:05:43

I say it would be a good move for Tim based on it being unlikely that he is going to make the first team at Everton for much longer. I didn't realise that he had 2 years still left on his contract though. I also assumed that it would be a tax paid deal in Saudi (not only Saudi tax free) at a much higher salary so that'll teach me to make assumptions. Australians are taxed on worldwide income but not double taxed. I wouldn't like to see Tim go down the tube at EFC and play out his time on the bench or reserves; I believe he's past his sell by but he's been a great asset for us. "Legend" I'd possibly dispute as I believe this applies to a very few exceptional players whereas Tim, even at his best, was never a great player.
Dan San
304   Posted 05/06/2012 at 13:42:10

If we get the fee we should for him then it sounds like he's considering sorting out all our financial problems in one swoop, true ledge. I've said before there's more to his game than just the goals nowadays. I think he'd be a loss but with all the potential talent floating around in the market at the mo it would be nice to have a bit of cash to play with. Though if he was given an offer last summer then it should be pointed out how little we really know about what goes on inside the club. £15M please sheik, thanks.
James Stewart
305   Posted 05/06/2012 at 13:48:48

@299 rightly points out that most salaries are worked out net these days.

Players don't care about tax just ashame we all have to!

Ant Ellis
309   Posted 05/06/2012 at 14:32:08

I was born in Liverpool, now live in St Helens but work in Manchester...................................should I be paying tax?
Mark Cumiskey
311   Posted 05/06/2012 at 14:36:51

Good time for Tim to move on as we've had his best years in an Everton shirt. Arguably Moyes's finest value-for-money signing.
Aidy Dews
313   Posted 05/06/2012 at 14:54:13

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11095/7796345/Cahill-open-to-Middle-East-move
Steve Brown
314   Posted 05/06/2012 at 15:07:33

Good luck to Tim, we should let him move on for £6m.
Gareth Humphreys
316   Posted 05/06/2012 at 15:07:31

Ant, only from your US and Aussie based income.
Peter Thistle
343   Posted 05/06/2012 at 17:47:44

As good as he's been for us over the years I don't think we can justify paying him £75k a week now he's not a guaranteed first team player. If we had cash to burn then fine but we are skint and those wages could be better spent elsewhere.
Tom Owen
368   Posted 05/06/2012 at 18:56:21

Tim has been a fantastic servant to this football club. A true professional at what he does. You cannot fault is commitment. Sadly, I am one who thinks his time is up at Everton. Both (Tim & the club) need to move on and go their separate ways. He will have legendary status here at Goodison Park. If he were to stay another two seasons, I can see him becoming a fans boo boy. I'd hate to see that.

He could follow his Australian friend Lucas Neill in playing in the Middle East. Itt would be a lucrative move for him, and he'd be able to put more effort into his coaching academy.

Denis Richardson
396   Posted 05/06/2012 at 20:12:59

Steve @300 - one rule generally applies and that is the taxman always tends to win.

Am by no means an expert but you always tend to pay the highest rate. E.g. if the rate in the UK is 40% and in Oz 50%, you'll pay 40% to the UK and then 10% to Oz. If its the other way round you pay 50% to the UK and nothing to Oz, you just dont get taxed 'twice'. There a different types of income, tax rates, rules etc but you get the general idea.

I actually know somone who turned down a US passport as she had not intention of ever living in the US and didn't want to have to pay US tax for the rest of her life.

James Flynn
431   Posted 05/06/2012 at 22:59:06

Our taxes rates here in the States are much lower than 40-50%. Even for millionnaires.
Eric Myles
444   Posted 06/06/2012 at 02:59:39

Dennis #299, the income tax rate in Saudi is 0% so no 'netto' required.
Anto Byrne
446   Posted 06/06/2012 at 03:29:40

Eric, he would pay tax in Aus if he was deemed to be resident in Aus although working abroad. Very complex tax laws here unfortunately. Carbon Tax, Mineral Tax, we might live in the lucky country but we certainly pay for the privilege. Still, it's middle of winter almost and it's a lovely sunny day, blue skies hanging over my head, I've got five hundred miles to drive. I'm a whiskey rock 'n' roller...

COYB.
James Stewart
502   Posted 06/06/2012 at 13:27:55

Agreed the figures on this article don't add up. I think there is some truth in this though judging by Cahill's comments on the Middle East.

Good luck to him I wish him well. Feels about the right time to move on for both parties. Cahill is also the highest earner apart from Fellaini now.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb