Season 2012-13
Opinion
Talking Points
BBC Bias... Again!
Just a very quick point from something that really annoyed me this morning.
I'm not sure how many TW readers are also 5 Live listeners, but I usually wake up for work to their breakfast show.
At just before 8 am today they had a short segment on the derby. The studio guests, announced in order - Liverpool obviously first - were Dietmaar Hamann and... Nick Barmby. Could the biased old beeb not have found one single former player with Everton-only connections to represent our side in this little debate?!
The discussion itself was short and banal and mostly seemed to focus on Merseyside unity and Hillsborough, plus of course some talk of whether Rodgers is now making an impact after they beat the Ruskis last night. Nothing whatsoever about Everton.
The final insult was when each was asked what the result would be. Hamaan went for a draw. Barmby said he therefore felt pressured to pick a winner. After a beat, he said he thought Liverpool would win. I'd forgotten how little respect I had for the treacherous fool, but all the feelings of betrayal swiftly came flooding back!
None of this is news of course — BBC coverage of LFC always borders on the sycophantic. But this morning was particularly galling. To borrow Keegan's famous phrase, I will love it, love it, if we beat them on Sunday...
Mark Boulle, Posted 26/10/2012 at 10:46:43
Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
374 Posted 26/10/2012 at 13:49:24
376 Posted 26/10/2012 at 14:20:20
377 Posted 26/10/2012 at 14:30:35
Love TW.
393 Posted 26/10/2012 at 16:03:38
If you've never listened to that odious twat Alan Green reporting on an Everton match, especially a derby, then I urge you to tune in to Five bloody Live, or whatever programme the cretin happens to be on just now, and try to say that there is little to get annoyed about. Me? I was apoplectic.....
[A sudden, usually marked loss of bodily function due to rupture or occlusion of a blood vessel.]
397 Posted 26/10/2012 at 16:32:54
This particular hyper-senstivity is becoming an embarrassment.
398 Posted 26/10/2012 at 16:33:49
Hopefully we will do our talking on the pitch.
403 Posted 26/10/2012 at 16:54:22
It's wrong to stereotype but It wouldn't surprise me if the paedo-protecting Beeb position Rogers' "plight" ahead of starving African children and destruction to the rain forest soon.
They must have a gobshite template for recruitment at that club.
It's a perfect match every time.
Whining bastards.
Come on lads. Let's stuff them on Sunday. Two or three nil and a Naismith Special on Suarez in injury time.
You owe us after last season.
Give them something to whine about.
Rant over.
For now.
405 Posted 26/10/2012 at 17:14:00
Check this and have your head exploded:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20102766
I don't know where to start...
407 Posted 26/10/2012 at 17:23:29
Didn't take long to become 'one of them' did he.
408 Posted 26/10/2012 at 17:20:03
409 Posted 26/10/2012 at 17:12:23
Questioning the established order of Liverpool, Utd and the FA denies them access and affects their jobs and their equally overblown salaries.
Fuck 'em.
410 Posted 26/10/2012 at 17:26:01
412 Posted 26/10/2012 at 17:19:03
BBC News Business segments now go to people for comments on the economy or whatever are by pure coincidence the same bank that sponsors our loveable neighbours.
It is very annoying to me personally and most people who are not of the red persuasion that many of the News 24 main news reporters are self-confessed lovers of LFC. Even when viewing a children's programme with my nephew in March, the Scottish presenter, with some puppet in tow, said he was really hoping that the RS would win away to Blackburn as he was an avid Red supporter.
With so many supporters of so many other clubs I have yet to hear someone confess to supporting any of those other clubs
I think the more likely explanation for bias is that those people that do support them, never miss an opportunity to promote their club or complain in large numbers to Offwatch or whoever about the plight – good or bad – of their club.
As I and no-one I know has ever been asked about my viewing preferences I assume that those who voice their opinion or partake in phone-in's are seen as the target audience and as such programme makers will pander to their preferences and prejudices. I could of course be wrong, but that would make more sense to me than believing that 50-75% of the British public support the dark side.
Whatever the reason, you do have to question why we are forced to pay good money to an organisation that is far from impartial and worse still has sucked up to our neighbours for nigh on 40 years.
415 Posted 26/10/2012 at 17:45:52
"But it is also important to stay calm. I think the referee has a big part to play in that. The history of it shows there has been a lot of red cards but I hope that this weekend we might start to get a decision that goes our way for once."
I would like to see Everton get ONE decision given in our favour... I have waited over 40 years, so I won't hold my breath. Maybe all the negative vibes by Blues fans can be encapsulated by this breathtaking claim by a Reds manager who hasn't even got his shoes fully under the table before proclaiming that the match officials are spoiling his plans and it is so unfair that a team like Everton are above his in the table; obviously something must be fundamentally wrong with the match officials.
I wonder how you can get to that alternative reality, as it seems that the Evertonians there are having a far better time on derby day than us in the real world have endured.
416 Posted 26/10/2012 at 17:48:46
We don’t sit together and for the 90 mins I hate them more than anything that lives or doesn’t. Thereafter, I tolerate them, but only by biting my lip. Other than sharing a city, we have nothing in common with the club or what is stands for. The quicker they piss off to Scandinavia, Ireland or Cornwall, the better.
417 Posted 26/10/2012 at 17:37:11
420 Posted 26/10/2012 at 18:10:50
https://faq.external.bbc.co.uk/templates/bbcfaqs/emailstatic/emailPage
422 Posted 26/10/2012 at 18:28:19
I am beginning to wonder whether some of the senior people in the club aren't avid readers of ToffeeWeb... Does anyone know for a fact if this is actually the case?
423 Posted 26/10/2012 at 18:26:24
425 Posted 26/10/2012 at 18:39:59
I've lost track of the times Moyes has said something which seems a direct result of comments I've read here.
426 Posted 26/10/2012 at 18:39:20
427 Posted 26/10/2012 at 18:54:44
429 Posted 26/10/2012 at 19:12:21
If David Moyes puts out a side on Sunday that, from the very first second, sets out with the intent to destroy that odious team, then the BBC will report it like it is.
430 Posted 26/10/2012 at 19:21:11
Let's steamroll these cheating " we deserve to win the league " bastards.
They have got David Brent for a manager FFS !
We will win 2-0. Believe.
432 Posted 26/10/2012 at 19:26:51
I remember reading some expose on how the top clubs treat referees at their home games, United used to give them a club watch and get their kids free shirts, some other clubs like to take them on tour with them. Unfortunately, the referee has a greater say than anyone in these games....
If it's Everton v Swansea, then football is allowed to commence and we duly win. If it's Everton v Liverpool, then the ref will undoubtedly intervene in some form or other.
People can blame Moyes all they want for his derby record (which is bad) but some games have just been beyond anyone's control: the Clattenburg derby, the Atkinson derby, the game at Goodison when Mascherano got a deflection with the one shot they had all game and Reina made save after save in one of the most one-sided Goodison derbies in recent history.
You only have to look through any derby compilation to see the number of horrendous tackles from that lot that have gone unpunished. Unfortunately the ref is king in these games and any influence that can be exerted on him should be, Liverpool are masters at any form of the dark arts and the BBC have long been their weapon for this.
Their piece the other week on MotD on why Suarez deserved a pen when they blatantly ignored the images in front of their eyes to make his claim was embarrassing. To contrast that immediately with the one dive Jelavic has probably made all season was just enraging.
435 Posted 26/10/2012 at 19:44:34
I couldn't give too shites about what Rodgers says. Maybe they have been hard done by, Moyes moaned after the QPR so I guess he's a moaning bastard too.
I hope no non-blues are on reading this.
436 Posted 26/10/2012 at 19:38:13
We know Match of the Day has long been complacent. Personally I think Lawrensen and Hansen give Everton a lot of credit, but even if they don't... big deal. The producer decides what game to show and they're dictated to by what teams 'draw the biggest audience', which, by popular perception, doesn't include us.
But so what? Rodgers is doing exactly what Moyes has done this week, angling as much as he can to get a bias in his favour from the ref. If we can see it you can be damn sure the ref can too (except Clattenberg).
If your team wins you forget the ref. If we lose then we naturally look for reasons - or scapegoats - our own players shortcomings, other players cheating, or the ref being shit/biased. Not always the case (except Clattenberg).
If we win on Sunday I don't care if they project the footage on Hansen's arse as the credits toll at five past midnight. And if we lose, unless there is a real glaring bias, I hope I won't blame the BBC, Brendan Rodgers pre-match talk, Tony Hibbert not really being a right-back, or the fact that referees are "biased" or "easily influenced by men in red shirts" etc etc
(except Clattenberg)
438 Posted 26/10/2012 at 20:00:02
FUCKING COYB.
443 Posted 26/10/2012 at 20:14:04
There have been games where we haven't deserved to take something, regardless of referees decisions against us, but there have been many games where we have been treated harshly, even when playing better than our opponents.
But as I stated earlier, I honestly cannot recall a Merseyside Derby which has been won by Everton on the back of a mistake by the officials. However, I can remember a great many that we haven't won due to errors made by the officials.
If people think that we have just been plain unlucky with decisions, then fair enough, but I would argue that the odds of one team always being on the wrong end of those errors in their local derby is tantamount to picking the winning lottery numbers 3 weeks on the trot.
Put it this way if a referee gives us something we don't deserve, you can bet that he won't be allowed to forget it, as the media especially Auntie Beeb will ensure that it is highlighted over and over again.
I hope he gives them every decision and we still come out on top, that would be really sweet.
444 Posted 26/10/2012 at 20:36:23
Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but EFC have been denied 4 solid points (from 3 goals) by piss poor refereeing decisions this season, but is there any article anywhere this week showing Davey Moyes crying over lost points, and just wishing for a bit of luck?
This sort of shit non-story just plays into the mind-games managers, with journos so lazy they're happy to print any old crap coming from a footballer's or football manager's mouth.
I'd put money on a decision going the way of Liverpool on Sunday just to make up for it.
To be honest, it makes me glad that Moyes doesn't do it — one of the few...
446 Posted 26/10/2012 at 20:25:24
449 Posted 26/10/2012 at 20:42:26
The AJ derby, that was a destruction.
453 Posted 26/10/2012 at 20:38:23
You are almost right on the money. But to be absolutely correct: we need to hurt, humiliate and then destroy them (all in the football sense of course).
456 Posted 26/10/2012 at 21:25:37
471 Posted 27/10/2012 at 01:38:14
No need to invoke the Trades Description Act.
Why are you all STILL surprised?
480 Posted 27/10/2012 at 07:21:44
On Sunday we start with 11 v 11. Moyes picks that team, sets the tactics.
Let's see what determines the result in the end.
495 Posted 27/10/2012 at 09:38:04
496 Posted 27/10/2012 at 09:43:47
502 Posted 27/10/2012 at 09:56:16
It's a bit strange really that in a period we have had a competitive team we have not been able, other than on three occasions, to raise our game — especially considering the good record we had in the 90s when quite frankly we were shit.
We can moan all we like about refs, bad luck, BBC bias or el fucking niño for that matter but let's be honest with ourselves: we have not been good enough in these matches and that's I hope what Davey is telling the players tomorrow — they owe us a performance.
519 Posted 27/10/2012 at 13:05:23
I was thinking more along the lines of 5/6 nil.
That's what I want to see before I die.
539 Posted 27/10/2012 at 14:55:53
549 Posted 27/10/2012 at 16:32:02
634 Posted 28/10/2012 at 00:54:06
Very rarely, IMO, is a derby about the football played.
677 Posted 28/10/2012 at 08:48:20
Mirallas on the right and Coleman on bench please...
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


369 Posted 26/10/2012 at 13:32:41
Coming from an organisation that were shit-scared of outing Jimmy Saville shows they are a bunch of tossers. It's what happens on the pitch that matters.