Season 2012-13
Opinion
Talking Points
Europa Cup Opportunity
There has been a lot of talk before about the merits/demerits of us being in the Europa Leaqgue next season. It provides great "European nights" under lights at GP and the players seem to like it but it also can be energy sapping and affect our League campaign. Some people think it could be a poisoned chalice (à la Newcastle) while others see it as a stepping stone to the Uefa Champions League.
What I was wondering was, if we do qualify, whether it would be worth using it to give some of our "under-utilised" players more of a run? Based on our current squad, then players like Mucha, Hibbert, Heitinga, Duffy, Oviedo, Hitzlsperger, Barkley, Vellios & maybe Junior would be in the running for spots with some regular first teamers to fill in the gaps. That should still be a pretty good team, would give these guys (who have a point to prove) some real competitive action and limit potential damage to our PL campaign.
I guess the danger is that we lose and get knocked out earlier in the Europa League. I could live with that. Not sure what others feel?
Ciaran Duff, Posted 16/04/2013 at 01:36:12
Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
995 Posted 16/04/2013 at 05:33:14
I'd hope we would not simply just play weakened teams as a matter of course, but we do have a squad even if it is shallow in terms of quality. We'd just have to pick the team with our priorities in mind and if the worst thing to happen was that players like Barkley, Stones etc got some experience then so be it.
996 Posted 16/04/2013 at 05:49:43
But if we only finish 6th, can someone clarify if we'd still qualify if Chelski were to win this year's tournament?
012 Posted 16/04/2013 at 08:04:06
We have zero chance of winning it, so the only point of the league is to qualify for Europe.
So to then only play our kids and fringe players defies sense. What is the point of our existence as a club if we don't try and win things?
017 Posted 16/04/2013 at 08:37:34
019 Posted 16/04/2013 at 08:50:11
European experience is vital, and it is still a draw for some players. The competition itself has too many games, but as the OP says, it keeps squad players happy, and is a great chance to try the youngsters in group games.
We need all the exposure we can get, and if we take the dark side's place in this competition, bring it on I say.
021 Posted 16/04/2013 at 08:50:57
As things stand, that is Arsenal, Swansea, and Wigan. (This assumes that Man City will remain in the top four for the rest of the season; if they don't they will go in the Europa League.) If Chelsea win this year's Europa League it will not help us. If they finished outside the European placings (ie, 6th) they would qualify as well as the team in 5th.
025 Posted 16/04/2013 at 09:00:59
PS: There is also a way into the Europa League via the European Fair Play League, EUFA give a Europa League berth to teams from the top three nations, based on bookings, sendings off, etc. England are currently 4th in the table. However, even if we were to rise up to 3rd there are several teams above Everton - Southampton, Fulham, Reading, Norwich and Lpool. Eligible teams have to play all of the qualifying rounds, which means that games start about three weeks after the season finishes.
027 Posted 16/04/2013 at 09:12:41
We have to finish 5th to qualify for Europa Cup, 6th just won't to do it.
I agree with Kevin Tully, we need to develop European experience, we can't use it as a big exercise in giving multiple fringe players games . The quality of teams now in Europa Cup is excellent and you can only put in one or two fringe players per game.
029 Posted 16/04/2013 at 09:15:19
It's the only thing this weak Board has got right: retaining our place at the pig trough, especially with that shower in charge, as we'd find it extremely hard, in my opinion, to get back.
Until we get professionals in the boardroom and/or a change in playing style, survival is the primary objective – unambitious, uninspiring, but true.
038 Posted 16/04/2013 at 10:03:20
Playing on a Sunday may also see us on TV a little more, that should be good news for the coffers.
040 Posted 16/04/2013 at 10:12:31
043 Posted 16/04/2013 at 10:44:47
045 Posted 16/04/2013 at 10:36:11
Whilst I agree with your conclusions, you are not quite correct in the order you have given for Europa League qualification. The three places go to:-
a) FA Cup winners - straight into the group stage
b) 5th place in the League - into the final qualifying (play-off) round
c) League Cup winners - into the penultimate qualifying round
The difference to your analysis is that if the FA Cup winners qualify for the Europa League, the runners-up do NOT get the place. This is why, until the recent semi-final, we were hoping that Chelsea would win the Cup and finish 5th. Now we need City to finish 5th and nobody thinks that is going to happen.
Until it becomes mathematically impossible, I'm still hoping for 3rd!
049 Posted 16/04/2013 at 10:58:33
I said "the FA Cup Winners or - if that team has already qualified for the Champions League or Europa League by Premier League placing - the FA Cup final losers".
You disagreed and said "If the FA Cup winners qualify for the Europa League, the runners-up do NOT get the place".
I don't see the difference!
050 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:06:33
Read what you said carefully!
You say that if the FA Cup Winners have qualified for the Europa League by Premier League placing, the FA Cup final losers get the place.
I said that they don't.
051 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:12:12
053 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:18:39
If you have a good team like Spurs, then it's no problem. If you're overrated and have a terrible manager like Pardew, then it can find you out.
Ultimately more opportunities to watch Everton at night, more money, and more exposure can never be a bad thing.
054 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:20:37
055 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:14:10
Past form, even including this January, shows they will not invest/take a measured gamble to help Moyes progress the team. I fear we'd go into the draining Europa marathon with our usual limited resources, jeopardising PL placing.
It's a real problem – put out a "junior" team and face early exit, thereby negating the advantageous points you raise, or try to win the bloody thing and take a chance on it not impacting too badly on PL performance.
056 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:16:21
As for raising the profile, didn't happen last time, players want £100k min and CL.
Mini bonus in doing the RS a bad turn.
057 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:25:20
058 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:30:32
059 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:32:19
061 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:38:25
I think what I said @ 025 is right as regards the Fair Play league.
063 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:40:08
064 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:39:13
I would definitely like to see UEFA drop this system whereby the clubs that get knocked out of the CL get a free ride down into the UEFA. They've had their chance at winning the CL and, like us, fuck it up, why let them have another chance of European success?
073 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:40:06
COYB
075 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:52:54
1) The format replicated that of that CL, more knockout less league style.
2) CL teams didn't automatically enter after being knocked out of their competition, this cheapens it in my opinion.
3) No fair play entry, see above.
4) More money available, particularly for reaching the latter stages.
5) A CL spot for the winner.
Can I run UEFA now?
083 Posted 16/04/2013 at 12:20:41
I have checked on the prize money and, while nothing like the CL, it certainly has improved. There are graduated payments for qualifying for various stages, winning games, group winner etc. The overall winner gets €5M (used to be €1M before I think). So, not to be sneezed at.
In terms of the squad, I think that we need more rotation. I'm not talking about fielding weak teams but there are certainly players who deserve more match time (Oviedo is the one who stands out for me) and the EL would be a good chance to do that.
084 Posted 16/04/2013 at 12:28:05
130 Posted 16/04/2013 at 14:49:20
If we qualify, we're gonna need to get some more numbers in.
... If they give RS a Uefa place based on fair play after all the diving, cheating, racism, moaning, sacking and hanging out their own signing to dry then I'm off. I won't be renewing my Sky and ESPN subscription and that will be me finished with football until it straightens itself out.
133 Posted 16/04/2013 at 15:10:38
I think I've got it now.
136 Posted 16/04/2013 at 15:16:07
Lost all remaining credibility when 3rd place group losers in the CL were shunted off into this competition. So what is its value? Equal to a QF place in the CL?
And its no stepping stone to anything. Boro, Fulham, got to the final... we played three seasons in a row and its status quo.
In my opinion the number of games in the Europa expanded to nullify the hindrance of the number of CL games the top teams need to play and keep their position safe in the league.
I don't know anyone who wasn't happy with the old three tournament set up... except of course the money men.
137 Posted 16/04/2013 at 15:28:35
152 Posted 16/04/2013 at 16:37:54
Ciaran, the only problem with the FA Cup winners getting a CL slot is that, over recent seasons, we would have had Portsmouth entering it and possibly some of the losing finalists like Cardiff, Stoke City, the Shite etc, if the winners were also automatic CL qualifiers. I mean, if the Shite can slither in after finishing out of the qualifying places who knows how far UEFA would go to allow them in again.
I'd like the Champions League to be just that. A competition for Champions, run as a knock out comp, with the Europa League elevated to the 2-4 placed teams in other leagues with more money allocated to it.
174 Posted 16/04/2013 at 17:56:47
195 Posted 16/04/2013 at 19:00:05
"It's amazing how many people are still baffled by Europa League qualification. It's not that hard."
:)
343 Posted 17/04/2013 at 02:31:14
Ray (152) - I would only give the UCL spot (maybe the 4th spot) to the winner of the FA Cup - not the runner up even if the winner already qualified. In that case I think that clubs would take it far more seriously and not sure Portsmouth etc would have won it if that was the case back then. I am saying this IF the FA actually want this competition to retain its importance. As it is, I feel it is becoming the next Lge Cup.
345 Posted 17/04/2013 at 01:47:05
445 Posted 17/04/2013 at 13:30:34
It is
Winners of the FA Cup
Winners of the League Cup
5th Placed Team
Now if the Winners of the FA Cup are in the top 5, it is runners up of the FA Cup - except when the runners up are ALSO in the top 5, in which case the team in 6th also go into the UEFA League
If the Winners of the League Cup are in the top 5, then the highest placed league side not in Europe take that place.
So this year - as we stand
League Cup = Swansea
FA Cup will be Wigan because even if they lose, City are in top 5
League place = 5th place team
Last Season
League Cup = Liverpool
FA Cup Chelsea (finished 6th); League place = Newcastle.
Chelsea then won Champions League and replaced Spurs in Champions League so they had to go into Europa League
2010-11 Season
League Cup = Birmingham
FA Cup = City beat Stoke but in Champions League so Stoke took the place
5th Place = Spurs
574 Posted 17/04/2013 at 23:32:43
582 Posted 18/04/2013 at 00:23:18
What if Chelsea finish 5th and win the Europa?
587 Posted 18/04/2013 at 01:44:39
638 Posted 18/04/2013 at 12:23:12
Also I don't know many fans who like the Thursday/Sunday cycle of games, again neither the Uefa or Cup Winners were played on Thursdays. Also the prize money is pathetic compared to Champions League revenue. So he has downgraded his own competition to a point where fans seem uninterested in turning up in any great numbers to watch these games.
His idea of third placed teams in the Champions League are allowed to enter is another disaster, as the fans of these clubs see no merit in this competition having been eliminated from the Champions League. He might have made it more interesting if the winners of the Europa Cup were entered directly into the group stages of the following years Champions League.
643 Posted 18/04/2013 at 12:42:36
The answer is, UEFA will decide when it happens depending on who they fancy being nice to at the time.
657 Posted 18/04/2013 at 13:40:40
659 Posted 18/04/2013 at 13:44:15
How can the FA possibly justify a 5:15pm KO time for the Cup Final, it spoils the whole thing for those supporters lucky enough to see their team in a Cup Final and whether they win or lose a long journey home for both set of supporters - for this year at any rate. The FA says it is a legitimate KO time because it has become usual for football matches to kick off early in the evening on Saturday's.
661 Posted 18/04/2013 at 14:16:51
666 Posted 18/04/2013 at 14:14:33
Play the kids and exit as fast as possible would be my response.But I wouldn`t be likely to attend any of the matches anyway.
Urhh!
680 Posted 18/04/2013 at 16:04:31
682 Posted 18/04/2013 at 17:31:59
Arsenal 4th 68
Everton 5th 64
Spurs 6th 63
RS 7th 60
I can see us maybe going 2 better if we win at Anfield I can not see Spurs getting more than 63 unless they really get back in the groove Wigan and Stoke away plus Chelsea And City.....
684 Posted 18/04/2013 at 17:48:54
Further I heard of my mates friends dog that a team has to be registered to enter the Wuropean competitions and Wigan have not registered.
Ian
751 Posted 18/04/2013 at 16:04:31
930 Posted 19/04/2013 at 17:30:26
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


994 Posted 16/04/2013 at 05:35:40