Europa Cup Opportunity

 Comments (55) jump to end

There has been a lot of talk before about the merits/demerits of us being in the Europa Leaqgue next season. It provides great "European nights" under lights at GP and the players seem to like it but it also can be energy sapping and affect our League campaign. Some people think it could be a poisoned chalice (à la Newcastle) while others see it as a stepping stone to the Uefa Champions League.

What I was wondering was, if we do qualify, whether it would be worth using it to give some of our "under-utilised" players more of a run? Based on our current squad, then players like Mucha, Hibbert, Heitinga, Duffy, Oviedo, Hitzlsperger, Barkley, Vellios & maybe Junior would be in the running for spots with some regular first teamers to fill in the gaps. That should still be a pretty good team, would give these guys (who have a point to prove) some real competitive action and limit potential damage to our PL campaign.

I guess the danger is that we lose and get knocked out earlier in the Europa League. I could live with that. Not sure what others feel?

Ciaran Duff, Australia     Posted 16/04/2013 at 01:36:12

back Return to Talking Points index  :  Add your Comments back

Reader Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Robin Cannon
994 Posted 16/04/2013 at 05:35:40
Definitely. We've actually done that to good effect in previous years' Europa League ties; sometimes through necessity, but sometimes just because we'd already qualified from a group and had the opportunity to give youngsters game time.
Ernie Baywood
995 Posted 16/04/2013 at 05:33:14
An opportunity for silverware? I absolutely want us to be in it. There's a little status boost in being there (especially instead of our red cousins).

I'd hope we would not simply just play weakened teams as a matter of course, but we do have a squad even if it is shallow in terms of quality. We'd just have to pick the team with our priorities in mind and if the worst thing to happen was that players like Barkley, Stones etc got some experience then so be it.

Conor Waters
996 Posted 16/04/2013 at 05:49:43
One of the reasons why we failed so miserably in our only Champions League campaign (aside from Villarreal being a top side and Collina being a prick) was our inexperience in European competition. The Europa League is a stepping stone to bigger and better things. I would happily be involved in it again.

But if we only finish 6th, can someone clarify if we'd still qualify if Chelski were to win this year's tournament?

Derek Turnbull
012 Posted 16/04/2013 at 08:04:06
I'm bored of all the focus being on the Premier League. The league nowadays is rubbish.

We have zero chance of winning it, so the only point of the league is to qualify for Europe.

So to then only play our kids and fringe players defies sense. What is the point of our existence as a club if we don't try and win things?

Matt Garen
017 Posted 16/04/2013 at 08:37:34
As far as I can understand it, if Man City win the cup Wigan take the 1st spot at group stage as cup runners up not already qualified. The team finishing 5th will go into the play off round and Swansea City are already in the 3rd qualifying round by virtue of winning the League Cup.

Kevin Tully
019 Posted 16/04/2013 at 08:50:11
It's makes me laugh when some supporters look down on this competition – you would think we were in the CL most years!!

European experience is vital, and it is still a draw for some players. The competition itself has too many games, but as the OP says, it keeps squad players happy, and is a great chance to try the youngsters in group games.

We need all the exposure we can get, and if we take the dark side's place in this competition, bring it on I say.

Kev Johnson
021 Posted 16/04/2013 at 08:50:57
It's amazing how many people are still baffled by Europa League qualification. It's not that hard. Three places: they go to (a) the team in 5th, (b) the FA Cup Winners or - if that team has already qualified for the Champions League or Europa League by Premiership placing - the FA Cup final losers, (c) the League Cup Winners.

As things stand, that is Arsenal, Swansea, and Wigan. (This assumes that Man City will remain in the top four for the rest of the season; if they don't they will go in the Europa League.) If Chelsea win this year's Europa League it will not help us. If they finished outside the European placings (ie, 6th) they would qualify as well as the team in 5th.

Kev Johnson
025 Posted 16/04/2013 at 09:00:59
Oops. I'm behind the times - I thought Arsenal were 5th. Wrong. It's Spurs. Those seeking Europa League enlightenment need to swap those two teams in my post above.

PS: There is also a way into the Europa League via the European Fair Play League, EUFA give a Europa League berth to teams from the top three nations, based on bookings, sendings off, etc. England are currently 4th in the table. However, even if we were to rise up to 3rd there are several teams above Everton - Southampton, Fulham, Reading, Norwich and Lpool. Eligible teams have to play all of the qualifying rounds, which means that games start about three weeks after the season finishes.

Mike Oates
027 Posted 16/04/2013 at 09:12:41

We have to finish 5th to qualify for Europa Cup, 6th just won't to do it.

I agree with Kevin Tully, we need to develop European experience, we can't use it as a big exercise in giving multiple fringe players games . The quality of teams now in Europa Cup is excellent and you can only put in one or two fringe players per game.

Phil Bellis
029 Posted 16/04/2013 at 09:15:19
K Tully says "European experience is vital" —In what way compared to "PL survival is vital"?

It's the only thing this weak Board has got right: retaining our place at the pig trough, especially with that shower in charge, as we'd find it extremely hard, in my opinion, to get back.

Until we get professionals in the boardroom and/or a change in playing style, survival is the primary objective – unambitious, uninspiring, but true.

Kevin Tully
038 Posted 16/04/2013 at 10:03:20
Phil, surely the days of looking over our shoulders are over? I think a run in any European competition only breeds confidence, and it may force our hapless owners to invest in a larger squad – not having European football is an excuse to trim the investment in first team players.

Playing on a Sunday may also see us on TV a little more, that should be good news for the coffers.

Roman Sidey
040 Posted 16/04/2013 at 10:12:31
I remember when we were in Europe a lot of debate was centred around the financial side of things. Does anyone have a real idea of whether Europa League is overly beneficial to us financially in regards prize money, TV money, etc. I know a lot of the games for one reason or another pull lower crowds than the PL do, but how many do we need in Goodison for us not to lose money?
Ross Edwards
043 Posted 16/04/2013 at 10:44:47
Why not enjoy the UEFA Cup? Middlesbrough and Fulham have both got to the final so why can't we? We have no chance of winning the PL so why don't we fight on 3 fronts next season? We could blood some of the youngsters in the Europa and get them some experience.
Phil Guyers
045 Posted 16/04/2013 at 10:36:11
Kev (Johnson)

Whilst I agree with your conclusions, you are not quite correct in the order you have given for Europa League qualification. The three places go to:-

a) FA Cup winners - straight into the group stage

b) 5th place in the League - into the final qualifying (play-off) round

c) League Cup winners - into the penultimate qualifying round

The difference to your analysis is that if the FA Cup winners qualify for the Europa League, the runners-up do NOT get the place. This is why, until the recent semi-final, we were hoping that Chelsea would win the Cup and finish 5th. Now we need City to finish 5th and nobody thinks that is going to happen.

Until it becomes mathematically impossible, I'm still hoping for 3rd!

Kev Johnson
049 Posted 16/04/2013 at 10:58:33
Er, come again, Phil... (@045).

I said "the FA Cup Winners or - if that team has already qualified for the Champions League or Europa League by Premier League placing - the FA Cup final losers".

You disagreed and said "If the FA Cup winners qualify for the Europa League, the runners-up do NOT get the place".

I don't see the difference!

Phil Guyers
050 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:06:33
Kev

Read what you said carefully!

You say that if the FA Cup Winners have qualified for the Europa League by Premier League placing, the FA Cup final losers get the place.

I said that they don't.

Sam Hoare
051 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:12:12
Kev, Phil is right. The distinction he makes is that the FA Cup Europa place is better than the Premier League Europa place. That's why we sort of wanted Chelsea to win the Cup and finish 5th so that their place would go to 6th (possibly us).
James Martin
053 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:18:39
In 2007-08, our best run in the Europa League didn't hinder our league form. If anything, winning consistently just breeds more and more confidence.

If you have a good team like Spurs, then it's no problem. If you're overrated and have a terrible manager like Pardew, then it can find you out.

Ultimately more opportunities to watch Everton at night, more money, and more exposure can never be a bad thing.

Kev Johnson
054 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:20:37
Maybe I'm losing my marbles, but my understanding is this: if Man City win the FA Cup and finish in the top four then they go in the Champions League and Wigan go in the Europa Cup. In which case, the loser DOES qualify. Is that wrong?
Phil Bellis
055 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:14:10
Kevin T, I understand your position but mistrust the Board even more than you do.

Past form, even including this January, shows they will not invest/take a measured gamble to help Moyes progress the team. I fear we'd go into the draining Europa marathon with our usual limited resources, jeopardising PL placing.

It's a real problem – put out a "junior" team and face early exit, thereby negating the advantageous points you raise, or try to win the bloody thing and take a chance on it not impacting too badly on PL performance.

Derek Thomas
056 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:16:21
Yes I know it's a trophy to win and stick on the sideboard and we all want that...apart from the Euro nights and the away piss ups, the rest of it is shite, too many games for too little prize money at the end.

As for raising the profile, didn't happen last time, players want £100k min and CL.

Mini bonus in doing the RS a bad turn.

Ernie Baywood
057 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:25:20
No that's right. But if they didn't qualify for the CL, and instead qualified for the Europa (ie finished 5th) then Wigan wouldn't get the place. The 6th placed team would.
Richard Dodd
058 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:30:32
I bet some genius will find a way for RS to make the Europa League even if they finish below us in the Prem. Just you see!
Ernie Baywood
059 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:32:19
Fair play?
Kev Johnson
061 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:38:25
Ernie - OK, I get you. I stand corrected.

I think what I said @ 025 is right as regards the Fair Play league.

Gavin Ramejkis
063 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:40:08
Playing in European games also increases the club's quotient thus if at some later date we ever do get CL we stand a better chance of doing a RS and getting drawn against some part time one legged farmers from the back of beyond. The less you play in Europe the higher probability or certainty we'd get a draw against a decent team and battered.
Ray Roche
064 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:39:13
Roman, I can't offer any figures regarding the financial benefits of the Europa League, however, Platini was quoted a season or so back saying that the Europa should, and will, be seeing an improved monetary "package" that will make it much more popular to clubs who want to enter it.

I would definitely like to see UEFA drop this system whereby the clubs that get knocked out of the CL get a free ride down into the UEFA. They've had their chance at winning the CL and, like us, fuck it up, why let them have another chance of European success?

Bob Parrington
073 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:40:06
Ha! Richard, That's a real Evertonian speaking! I don't know how old you are? I am 64 and have been a blue since 5 years old. Over the past 25 years or so, I've seen the RS fuck us up a few times and, on occasions. So, I know where you're coming from with your post. Let's show the RS up for what they are — both on and off the field. WE are the best!!

COYB

James Morgan
075 Posted 16/04/2013 at 11:52:54
It would be a markedly better competition if:

1) The format replicated that of that CL, more knockout less league style.
2) CL teams didn't automatically enter after being knocked out of their competition, this cheapens it in my opinion.
3) No fair play entry, see above.
4) More money available, particularly for reaching the latter stages.
5) A CL spot for the winner.

Can I run UEFA now?

Ciaran Duff
083 Posted 16/04/2013 at 12:20:41
I agree James esp. about the winner getting a CL spot the following year. (As an aside, I think the profile of the FA Cup would sky rocket it the winner of that cup got a CL spot too.) Personally, I don't think that CL teams coming in cheapens the competition. It just makes it tougher for everyone who has qualified for the EL.

I have checked on the prize money and, while nothing like the CL, it certainly has improved. There are graduated payments for qualifying for various stages, winning games, group winner etc. The overall winner gets €5M (used to be €1M before I think). So, not to be sneezed at.

In terms of the squad, I think that we need more rotation. I'm not talking about fielding weak teams but there are certainly players who deserve more match time (Oviedo is the one who stands out for me) and the EL would be a good chance to do that.

Sam Hoare
084 Posted 16/04/2013 at 12:28:05
Kev 054. Yes. But if Man City won and finished 5th then Wigan would not get the place because Man City's cup place would take priority over their league place. So the distinction is that the runners-up get the spot if the winners have qualified for Champions League but not if the winners have qualified for the Europa League through their league placing. Clear as mud?
John Gee
130 Posted 16/04/2013 at 14:49:20
So If Man City who're 2nd fall to 5th but are the 1's who win the cup then the 6th placed team enter in the 2nd rnd of qualifying in 2013/14.

If we qualify, we're gonna need to get some more numbers in.

... If they give RS a Uefa place based on fair play after all the diving, cheating, racism, moaning, sacking and hanging out their own signing to dry then I'm off. I won't be renewing my Sky and ESPN subscription and that will be me finished with football until it straightens itself out.

Kevin Tully
133 Posted 16/04/2013 at 15:10:38
Let me get this right now - If Man U win the League and Swansea come 11th, but no higher, and Wigan beat City by five goals or more in the Cup Final, we would then need Arsenal to move back to Highbury because they get 60,000 or more at the Emirates - which means Spurs could possibly play Chelsea second to last game of the season, that also means 2 more fair play places are up for grabs if Fellaini doesn't butt any more Stokies. Happy days.

I think I've got it now.

Nick Entwistle
136 Posted 16/04/2013 at 15:16:07
Absolute cack, but fun competition to be in.

Lost all remaining credibility when 3rd place group losers in the CL were shunted off into this competition. So what is its value? Equal to a QF place in the CL?

And its no stepping stone to anything. Boro, Fulham, got to the final... we played three seasons in a row and its status quo.

In my opinion the number of games in the Europa expanded to nullify the hindrance of the number of CL games the top teams need to play and keep their position safe in the league.

I don't know anyone who wasn't happy with the old three tournament set up... except of course the money men.

Nick Entwistle
137 Posted 16/04/2013 at 15:28:35
Oh I forgot, well done Phil. I'm all for CL too... none of this Europa nonsense.
Ray Roche
152 Posted 16/04/2013 at 16:37:54
Ciaran Duff @ 083

Ciaran, the only problem with the FA Cup winners getting a CL slot is that, over recent seasons, we would have had Portsmouth entering it and possibly some of the losing finalists like Cardiff, Stoke City, the Shite etc, if the winners were also automatic CL qualifiers. I mean, if the Shite can slither in after finishing out of the qualifying places who knows how far UEFA would go to allow them in again.

I'd like the Champions League to be just that. A competition for Champions, run as a knock out comp, with the Europa League elevated to the 2-4 placed teams in other leagues with more money allocated to it.

Mark Jensen
174 Posted 16/04/2013 at 17:56:47
Ciaran, we tried that in the League cup this year and got beat by Leeds. Our squad depth is crap. I am totally against playing in this competition UNLESS we can get 5 or 6 quality players in, on top of any we loose, as Moyes recently stated. And the chances of that happening with this current board are...well, let's just see who are manager is next season. that will give you the answer.
Michael Dawson
195 Posted 16/04/2013 at 19:00:05
Kev Johnson (025) (049) (054) (061)
"It's amazing how many people are still baffled by Europa League qualification. It's not that hard."

:)

Ciaran Duff
343 Posted 17/04/2013 at 02:31:14
Mark (174) - Agree that we need more depth. All I am saying is that we can at least use it to give a run to some fringe players who many people are saying should be getting more of a run anyway (eg Duffy, Barkley, Oviedo). If we lose - so what!

Ray (152) - I would only give the UCL spot (maybe the 4th spot) to the winner of the FA Cup - not the runner up even if the winner already qualified. In that case I think that clubs would take it far more seriously and not sure Portsmouth etc would have won it if that was the case back then. I am saying this IF the FA actually want this competition to retain its importance. As it is, I feel it is becoming the next Lge Cup.

Roman Sidey
345 Posted 17/04/2013 at 01:47:05
Thanks, Ray. I agree that the third place CL team shouldn't be put into the EL knockout phase. However, I honestly think that UEFA only do it for logistical reasons, as their whole system revolves around the 1-16/32 principle.
Phil Roberts
445 Posted 17/04/2013 at 13:30:34
I got so confused before trying to work out if you correctly understood the rules about UEFA League qualification.

It is
Winners of the FA Cup
Winners of the League Cup
5th Placed Team

Now if the Winners of the FA Cup are in the top 5, it is runners up of the FA Cup - except when the runners up are ALSO in the top 5, in which case the team in 6th also go into the UEFA League

If the Winners of the League Cup are in the top 5, then the highest placed league side not in Europe take that place.

So this year - as we stand
League Cup = Swansea
FA Cup will be Wigan because even if they lose, City are in top 5
League place = 5th place team


Last Season
League Cup = Liverpool
FA Cup Chelsea (finished 6th); League place = Newcastle.
Chelsea then won Champions League and replaced Spurs in Champions League so they had to go into Europa League
2010-11 Season
League Cup = Birmingham
FA Cup = City beat Stoke but in Champions League so Stoke took the place
5th Place = Spurs

Clive Lewis
574 Posted 17/04/2013 at 23:32:43
I thought a place was given to a team who play in red and never walk alone becuase the gobshites are always boring people with the crappy tails about how good they are individually. ....... Is that not the case?
Jamie Sweet
582 Posted 18/04/2013 at 00:23:18
Sorry Kev, I must be thick. I'm still not 100% sure.

What if Chelsea finish 5th and win the Europa?

Chris Jones
587 Posted 18/04/2013 at 01:44:39
Jamie, I reckon all the N. Hemisphere TWebbers are tucked up in their pits dreaming about shutting di Canio up. Anyway, I think that if Chelsea finish 5th and win the Europa no extra place becomes available. I think that happens only if Chelsea win it and fail to get into Europe any other way
Brian Harrison
638 Posted 18/04/2013 at 12:23:12
Only Blatter and his cohorts could dismantle 2 very good European trophies as in the Uefa Cup and the Cup Winners Cup and turn it into the dogs breakfast that is the Europa League. I can't remember when these 2 competitions were going that any club fielded a virtual reserve side yet this seems to be the norm of most English teams that qualify.

Also I don't know many fans who like the Thursday/Sunday cycle of games, again neither the Uefa or Cup Winners were played on Thursdays. Also the prize money is pathetic compared to Champions League revenue. So he has downgraded his own competition to a point where fans seem uninterested in turning up in any great numbers to watch these games.

His idea of third placed teams in the Champions League are allowed to enter is another disaster, as the fans of these clubs see no merit in this competition having been eliminated from the Champions League. He might have made it more interesting if the winners of the Europa Cup were entered directly into the group stages of the following years Champions League.

Andrew Ellams
643 Posted 18/04/2013 at 12:42:36
The key is what happens if Chelsea win the EL this year and finish in top 4. Do the winners qualify next year and will that default to 6 if Chelsea qualify for the CL.

The answer is, UEFA will decide when it happens depending on who they fancy being nice to at the time.

Dan McKie
657 Posted 18/04/2013 at 13:40:40
No Andrew, I checked that myself. It says that if an English team wins the Europa League, but qualifies for europe via any other means, then no extra domestic place will be given.
Patrick Murphy
659 Posted 18/04/2013 at 13:44:15
Brian #638 All those organisations are concerned about is money money and more money. No consideration for those that go to the games, they all pander to the TV companies and like our own FA will do whatever it takes to keep the money flowing in to their coffers.

How can the FA possibly justify a 5:15pm KO time for the Cup Final, it spoils the whole thing for those supporters lucky enough to see their team in a Cup Final and whether they win or lose a long journey home for both set of supporters - for this year at any rate. The FA says it is a legitimate KO time because it has become usual for football matches to kick off early in the evening on Saturday's.

Andrew Ellams
661 Posted 18/04/2013 at 14:16:51
They also said 5:15 would allow more people to watch. I don't recall that being a problem before. And doesn't that make it even more difficult for the Asian market?
Phil Walling
666 Posted 18/04/2013 at 14:14:33
Were we to qualify-we wont- it would certainly show evidence of progress but that`s about all.I could probably get excited about it if it had a traditional home and away knock out format but all those `qualifying` games leave me cold.
Play the kids and exit as fast as possible would be my response.But I wouldn`t be likely to attend any of the matches anyway.
Urhh!
Stu Smith
680 Posted 18/04/2013 at 16:04:31
Wigan can turn down the chance to play in the europa league.
Anthony Flack
682 Posted 18/04/2013 at 17:31:59
Tried the BBC forecast

Arsenal 4th 68
Everton 5th 64
Spurs 6th 63
RS 7th 60

I can see us maybe going 2 better if we win at Anfield I can not see Spurs getting more than 63 unless they really get back in the groove Wigan and Stoke away plus Chelsea And City.....

Ian Smitham
684 Posted 18/04/2013 at 17:48:54
I think that Jamie has it right. I was told that if Chelsea win it, but are not in the CL, they qualify to defend the Europa in that capacity not creating an extra place for the PL but it does mean that 6th placed PL team get the place.

Further I heard of my mates friends dog that a team has to be registered to enter the Wuropean competitions and Wigan have not registered.

Ian

Stu Smith
751 Posted 18/04/2013 at 16:04:31
Wigan can turn down the chance to play in the europa league.
Thomas Windsor
930 Posted 19/04/2013 at 17:30:26
If Moyes would have put out a full team against Leeds and not have had his team beaten 3-0 by Wigan at home of all teams, this problem wouldn't have happened — we would be in Europe now anyway.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb