This result was not due to a superb performance from Germany except in the sense that they took full advantage of an opportunity presented to them. Germany play to a rigid system, the main element of which is denying the opposition room to play and breaking quickly. Generally this works very well for them and helps to conceal the fact that they have some very ordinary players. So rigid is their system that, when they meet opposition that has the ability or nous to ask them to change their system during a game, they canÂt do it. They met such opposition in Algeria who were very unlucky not to beat Germany.
The game last night reminded me in many ways of EvertonÂs victory over Sunderland a few years ago by the same score... a game in which every deficiency Sunderland possessed was exposed in one period of 90 minutes. This is basically what happened to Brazil last night and Germany took full advantage and they should be congratulated for that but the fact is Brazil are a very poor team. More importantly, the players themselves must know they are poor.
GermanyÂs victory last night was assured once the second goal went in. Brazil knew then that they could not climb the mountain ahead of them, that they were not going to play in the final in their homeland and that for many of them their international career and reputation had ended. From that point on there was total psychological collapse and there was nobody on the pitch in a yellow jersey capable of taking charge, nobody fancied the ball and their defence, lacking a controller, fell apart and presented Germany with chance after chance which, for the most part they took. Brazil allowed them to stick to their game plan because they were so poor they could not make Germany feel a need to rethink it.
The look of surprise on German faces when the third goal went in was a wonder to behold because they knew then that Brazil had totally collapsed and that they had nothing to worry about. It became a doddle of a game... and yet, a few days earlier, they had been outplayed for much of their game against lowly Algeria. This says a lot about not only how poor Brazil are at the moment but how flattered Germany were by BrazilÂs ineptitude.
Germany will find it a lot more difficult against Argentina or Holland.
There have also been a few comments above about how poor England were in their three games in this World Cup but I donÂt see it as being as bad as some people make out. EnglandÂs number of chances made was not overtaken until the end of the quarter finals. They also led the possession tables until after the Round of 16 had finished, at which time they (the England players) were all on the beaches so they donÂt give the ball away more than anybody else.
No, the problem with England is not so much the players but the managers, whoever they are, who always feel obliged to play contingents from the top clubs, even if this means hammering square pegs into round holes all over the pitch. Remember all the attempts to get Gerrard and Lampard in the same team... even to the point of playing Scholes on the wing on one occasion?
The other problem is the managerÂs inability to identify when a player can no longer hack it or never could hack it. Gerrard should never have been on the plane and Henderson should never have been considered. Neither Jagielka nor Cahill are good enough and like all centre-backs they need protection from midfield and there was nobody able to provide it until Lampard played in the final game...
So why have Gerrard and Henderson there when they canÂt do it? This led to the centre-backs deficiencies being horribly exposed. Nevertheless, the future looks brighter there with Stones coming through, a good defender and somebody who will be able to carry the ball out of defence and link up the back four with the midfield... providing that isnÂt coached out of him as being too risky.
The best English goalscorer we had in 1966 was Jimmy Greaves but Alf Ramsey played Geoff Hurst, much to the angst of the media of the day, because he fitted better into the system Ramsey wanted and it paid off. Greaves was a far better player overall and from a much bigger club than Hurst yet Ramsey was not afraid to say "Sorry, son, you donÂt fit what IÂm after." Would this happen today? ... No chance – the blue-eyed boy would be in there come what may.
IÂm not as pessimistic about England as most are. But I would be more optimistic if England had a forward-thinking, progressive manager who was not afraid to step out of the well-worn groove and do something adventurous. The problem is: the one who springs to mind is spoken for and he ainÂt going anywhere!
If Sturridge (especially) and Rooney had scored one each of the sitters they were presented with, England would have gone through in second place in the group. Who knows what might have happened then? With the confidence gained, even with a few players in there who really should not have been there, the outcome may not have been so embarrassing.
1 Posted 08/07/2014 at 20:01:29
Germany win in 90 mins.
6/1.