Last summer, I did an article which predicted where Everton would finish, based on the comparative value of the playing squads — Premier League Squads: We will finish 12th. After a lot of twists and turns, I ended up being out by one place. Luck or skill or stating the bleeding obvious?  You decide…

This summer, I have done a similar bit of guesswork and come up with a probable 9th-place finish (within a range of 8th to 12th).  

Reasons below – with the (much despised?) TransferMarkt squad values as a bit of a guide as to the different tranches within the Premier League.  I know TransferMarkt has its flaws but those same flaws affect all clubs in much the same way – and it’s independent too – which ToffeeWeb readers are not. So, warts and all, it does represent a decent guide but (as the analysis below shows) doesn’t tell the full story by any stretch.

€1B(+) squads

This is the super league that already exists.  The seriously rich bastards with incredible squads and academies too. Might not all finish Top 4 mind you, but certainly should do.  Chelsea are the weirdest amongst this lot but Man City are waning and no longer have anything like the best players anymore.

1.     Arsenal
2.     Manchester City
3.     Chelsea
4.     Liverpool

We won’t get into the Top 4 Premier League placings.

€700M to €920M squads

These are the pretenders to the Top 4.  Spurs look very good out of this lot – with a manager who actually knows how to organise a defence now in charge of a very good squad closing in on the Top 4.  In Muani, Tel, Simons and Kudus, they have added serious talent to an already strong squad appallingly managed (in the Premier League) by Postecoglou.

Man Utd continue to be weird. Newcastle are probably weaker without Isak, their one true world class player (and I don’t buy the idea that they’ve materially improved the quality of the squad overall).  Whilst Spurs are looking up, Man Utd and Newcastle risk dropping down.

5.     Tottenham Hotspur
6.     Manchester Utd
7.     Newcastle Utd

It seems very unlikely we would break into a Top 7 Premier League placing.  There’s a gulf of €250M difference between Newcastle at the bottom of this tranche and us.  That is two new right-backs, a holding midfielder, a new first-choice left-back, and a striker of real quality.  It makes a big difference.  

Getting Top 7 would require some very serious overperformance.  There are likelier candidates than us in the tranches below.  Still, stranger things have happened. If we pick up early momentum and get lucky with injuries, then it is possible.

€400M to €600M squads

Nottingham Forest are really going for it.  Whether it is sustainable is another matter but they have continued the heavy year-on-year spending and now have a really good squad, ready for their European adventure and what appears to be an ambition to spend their way into a Big 8 (as West Ham and Villa have previously attempted). They might make the Top 7 again – but you also get the sense they are gambling their way into the Champions League – and if they don’t make it, they could be seriously screwed in a year or two.

Brighton are weaker than last year and the jury is out on Hurzeler. Aston Villa are sinking like a stone and are unlikely to get anywhere near 5th place this season.  They seem to have helped prove my theory that money attracts players – not the Europa League.  Crystal Palace and Brentford could have really difficult seasons ahead.  

These three could struggle to make the Top 10 despite having good squads still, and some players who would certainly lift our side (Guehi, Munoz, Wharton, Mateta, Mitchell at Palace in particular). However, if you are no longer on an upward trajectory, you are on a downward trajectory — and (as we’ve seen) that is really tough.

8.     Nottingham Forest
9.     Brighton & Hove Albion
10.   Aston Villa
11.   Crystal Palace
12.   Brentford

We should definitely kick on into this group – despite our squad being ranked in the tranche below.  Indeed, some of these clubs (especially Brentford after Mbuemo and Frank… and possibly with an unhappy Wissa) could even find themselves in a relegation fight.  We’re unlikely to finish above all of these clubs, however, since they do still have good players and / or good managers.

€300M to €400M squads

We are the only club in this group on an upward trajectory. Bournemouth have sold big and despite reinvesting, have not replaced with the same quality. However, they are still pretty good and have a good manager.

Fulham have weakened an already small squad and made essentially no replacements. Much will be expected of young Josh King. They will rely on Silva (a good manager) to keep them out of trouble.

West Ham and especially Wolves look shaky. The spending has stopped, many of the stars have gone (Kudus, Cunha and Ait Nouri). 

13.  Bournemouth
14.  West Ham Utd
15.  Everton
16.  Wolverhampton Wanderers
17.  Fulham

All of these bar us and Bournemouth are at genuine relegation risk.  That said, West Ham still have Bowen and Paqueta and plenty of other good players.  It would only be managerial incompetence from Potter that could take them down.

We have top quality in Pickford, Branthwaite, Grealish and Ndiaye – but glaring weakness at full back and a small squad overstocked with central midfield players (and light in other areas).  Barry and Beto will be a handful and score goals but will also look rubbish at times. We look too slow and too narrow and it will cause us problems over the course of the season.

It has been a good window (especially by contrast with the extreme cost-cutting since 2021) – but a weird window too, let’s be honest. Although Mykolenko and O’Brien have their moments, they would be strong candidates for the worst full-back pairing in the Premier League.  

It’s staggering we haven’t bought at least one right-back… just staggering.  Maybe Moyes has seen something in Nathan Patterson or even Roman Dixon that meant we didn’t sign the player(s) we have appeared to need since Coleman broke his leg.

€240M to €300M squads

18.  Leeds Utd
19.  Sunderland
20.  Burnley

Leeds are only €3.5M off having a £300M squad and a fully fit first XI is really not that far off us (as we saw from the close match-up – player for player – in our opening game).  

Sunderland have a whole new (almost exclusively French-speaking) first XI, including some very good players who would walk into our First XI.  Indeed, they have in Hulme, Geertruida and Mukiele – three right-backs who are all better than our (non-existent?) right-backs.  Both Leeds and Sunderland have a decent chance of staying up (probably at the expense of Wolves).

Burnley have the weakest squad by some distance – and although they were mean defensively in the Championship, they just won’t be able to maintain that against the quality attacking sides of the Premier League. They will surely go down. Who cares though?  The important thing is that we are well out of this now and should be nowhere near the relegation places for the course of the season.


Reader Comments (35)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()


Michael Kenrick
1 Posted 03/09/2025 at 21:23:07
Nice tabulation job, Robert.

But how do you get us from our rightful place of 15th all the way up to 9th? Or is that the Everton fan in you fighting the system?

Robert Tressell
2 Posted 03/09/2025 at 21:52:08
Michael - the article seems to be introduced with this "Squad valuation is perhaps one of the strongest predictors of relative success, or lack of it, in the Premier League."

I didn't write any of that. An editor must have done so.

It's important because that is not really the point of the article.

The point of the article is that I expect us (because of the fortunes of others as well as our own situation) to materially overperform the valuation of our squad - which is still very low if you compare it to other Premier League clubs.

Ian Bennett
3 Posted 03/09/2025 at 21:56:37
I think there's some more obvious things to look at.

The team can score, the team can keep it tight. It can fight it out, it can be a difficult team at a fierce home ground, and is now picking up away wins at a good regularity we haven't seen in decades. Wolves, Newcastle, Palace, Forest, Fulham, Brighton, off the top of my head in a small number of games.

The home form will improve, but winning away is hard at at any level. We are a tough unit, and have an experienced manager that knows the game. A fair number of the defeats have come from narrow defeats where theres been a single player error or poor officials. Slim margins, and with game changers, that could change further for the better.

These are all positive things, and in my opinion are more valuable than some hipsters choice at left back or right back. They might be less pleasing on the eye, but a defensive right back or left back like Mykolenko or Obrien would probably take a team like Brentford, Brighton, more forward, as they wouldn't concede at the rate they do. The back 4 can see a game out.

I am expecting a good tilt on the cups. The strong line up the other week has already shown the hand that Everton are serious for the cups. 10th on the league is par. Below that, it will be a disappointment. 8th a strong build in the first full year of the Friedkins.

Robert Tressell
4 Posted 03/09/2025 at 22:07:27
Ian, I can't tell whether you agree with the article or not – but you seem to draw the same sort of conclusion anyway. I say we'll finish 9th – and you seem to be going for 8th to 10th?

You mention cups. I hope we take them seriously too. We can beat anyone in a one-off cup tie and should approach it that way.

There's no glory in finishing 8th to 10th – which will be about our limit this season (7th at a real push). But there is glory in a cup win – and it would really launch us into something special at the new stadium.

John Raftery
5 Posted 03/09/2025 at 22:11:00
Given the significant uplift in our attacking quality, 12th would be disappointing. An 8th-place finish is definitely at the top end of most sensible expectations.

The European commitments of the likes of Forest and Palace might have a negative effect on their league form. In that regard, our home game against Palace on 5 October, 3 days after their Europa Conference League tie with Dynamo Kyiv in Poland, will give us an indication of how well they can cope.

Si Cooper
6 Posted 03/09/2025 at 22:17:16
During the transfer window there were posts that suggested that Roma had a surfeit of full backs and we might benefit from some intra-stable trading.

That went quiet, presumably because we weren’t that interested in them or vice versa. Should that attitude change after the transfer window has shut is there a way of exploiting it?

I read that Sevilla terminated Kelechi Iheanacho’s contract by mutual consent to make it easier for him to find another club and then he signed for Celtic. Could Roma do that for one of their players if he assesses his current competition and decides he’s got a better chance of being a starter for us than at Roma? Or are there rules in place that prevent such a thing from happening?

Michael Kenrick
7 Posted 03/09/2025 at 22:22:34
Surely you jest, Robert.

You have banged your drum relentlessly that our place is determined by squad valuation, and that it's virtually impossible to break out from the straight-jacket that imposes.

You structured the article accordingly. Are you now saying it's not as important as you have told us previously? That somehow we are going to jump up six places — for no apparent reason?

Robert Tressell
8 Posted 03/09/2025 at 22:48:43
Squad quality, Michael. That's the key thing. And a lot of that comes down to money unfortunately (something we have had very little of).

The independent valuations form an interesting point of reference. You'll note I've mentioned aggregate net spend too once or twice. And spending levels year on year too. That's a good indicator of upward trajectory or downward trajectory. This summer, there have been some abrupt changes on that score.

Yes, as Ian says, there's a lot to unpack with this sort of thing. But I'm not writing a thesis here (you'll be pleased to know). I'm just using the valuations as a guide – and saying how and why I think we'll over-perform that valuation.

Some of that is because we've started to correct a crap squad by spending again – coincidentally at a time when other peers are having to switch off spending and dismantle good sides. Some of that is because I think Moyes will over-perform. But I think he's also limited by serious flaws in the playing squad still (something else I like to labour Michael – the lack of pace and width which imposes tactical constraints).

Martin Reppion
9 Posted 03/09/2025 at 23:24:36
Si #6,

As I understand it, a player must be a free agent prior to the transfer deadline to be able to sign for a new club during the closed season for transfers.

If a player is released after the deadline, he must wait until the next window to join another club.

Paul Griffiths
10 Posted 04/09/2025 at 03:45:55
Robert (8): You still haven't answered Mr Kenrick's question directly (he's asked it twice):

"But how do you get us from our rightful place of 15th all the way up to 9th? Or is that the Everton fan in you fighting the system?"

Colin Glassar
11 Posted 04/09/2025 at 07:14:47
As the late, great, (I hope he’s not dead) Phil Walling used to say on here, eleventeenth is where we’ll finish.
Phil (Kelsall) Roberts
12 Posted 03/09/2025 at 08:03:42
My version is always trajectory over the previous 38 fixtures (that takes out easy opening fixtures.

Even after 3 games, Villa have already dropped 6 points from last season (hopefully 9 after the next round of fixtures), Brighton 5, Wolves 4 and Brentford 3. On the other side, Bournemouth are up 5 and Merseyside clubs up 4.

At the moment, 7th is 61 points. We are at 52 and in the middle pack of 61-52. I expect Spurs to bridge the gap (they were 28 points down last season) and Amorin or his replacement should sort out Man Utd (-18) so 3 from 5 at the bottom, 4 from 4 at the top, 3 to get the remaining Euro spots and the rest of us to scramble over the places in the middle.

By a quirk of Spurs winning the Europa League and getting into the Champions League, we ended up with 8 European places. Can it happen again?

Andrew Merrick
13 Posted 04/09/2025 at 08:13:16
Interesting look at things, money definitely talks loudly in the obscenely rich Premier League.

I get what you say about trajectory, there is a mindset with that, upwards being positive.

Looking at your 8th to 12th grouping, I can see Everton there this season, because we have the potential for that now.

My concern would be the back 4, and that may be our Achilles… let's see.

Ian Bennett
14 Posted 04/09/2025 at 08:26:26
As I understand it, the club will be having a good go at the cups. There's a desire to lift the mood at the club, and this is a fair way of going about it commercially, prestige, for the players, manager, CEO, owners, and fans. It also provides a shortcut to Europe with competition from Top 7 being fierce.

In terms of the article, I think it misses the overall form the club had from last season, and a structure that worked. Yes, the pre-season was difficult. But the form in the league seems to have carried over. And that's a huge part of football. Probably equal to perceived valuations.

Leicester, when winning the league, had stumbled on a formation and style that got the best from its players. And Everton have a little bit of that under Moyes despite the cat calls from the mob that will never have him. Winning and losing is a habit. A mental mindset that has a huge bearing on sport.

I think the comments on full-backs being weak will have little overall impact on where we finish this season. There's enough quality and footballing nous to deliver 9th with limited full-backs. They wouldn't score or assist that much, but the goals conceded will be typically one or lower with a settled back 5.

Our ability to score goals now gives us a good chance of 1 to 3 points in each game. The side that finished 4th wasn't amazing, nor was the Liverpool side that won the European Cup the same season. But they battled it over the line.

If I rewind to Lampard, I couldn't see a goal scored. And we were wide open, where you could see us conceding a couple of goals a game. That's changed.

The article covers where we will finish, with valuations being the piece that dictates much of that. Form, settled system, game-by-game tactics, injuries, and luck will have an equal bearing.

9th for me is par. A Top 8 finish and a cup would e a job well done. A sub-12th finish would see questions asked if Moyes is moving the club forward from the core.

Peter Mitchell
15 Posted 04/09/2025 at 08:34:53
Very interesting article, Robert.

However, I was under the impression that the biggest correlation between expenditure and league position is the expenditure on wages. An analysis of that would be interesting by way of comparison.

Ian Jones
16 Posted 04/09/2025 at 08:35:57
It's funny how we look at our defence as if it's the weakest area.

Last season, I think we started with 4 defeats conceding 13 goals, an average of 3.25 goals per game. We responded well and some how ended up with 44 goals conceded, an average of 1.16 per game.

4th best defence. We've got the same defence plus the addition of Anzou. Whether some players like Jake O'Brien are the best choice for right back is questionable but we did ok with what we have.

The fly in the ointment this season is that we appear to be stronger going forward so our focus may have altered meaning our midfield and defence will have to be more aware if our attacks break down.

That, and the fact that I believe our new pitch is longer than GP meaning there are more gaps to fill and defend. Also, whilst GP was tight and could have affect the opposition, our new ground looks great to play in and that also means for opponents.

For me, I'd take a Top 10 finish with an optimistic cheeky 6th/7th place.

Stu Darlington
17 Posted 04/09/2025 at 08:40:26
An interesting approach Robert,and one which certainly provides a great discussion vehicle.
You’re right of course squad value will usually provide a good guide to where a team ought to finish in the league,after all the top players are going to attract the biggest transfer fees and that’s why the richest clubs go for them.It’s absolutely necessary to keep them in the competitions that bring in the biggest money.
As some posters have already pointed out,other factors sometimes come into play and these can bring about some apparently rogue results.I refer here to Sunderland and Bournemouth who at the moment seem to be punching above their weight re squad value.It may not last,but Leicester certainly proved an anomaly a few years back.
As for Everton, despite bringing in some quality players this window our Achilles heel for me is still the size of the squad.
Injuries and international competitions can leave us very vulnerable and that will mean we will have to depend on guts, fighting spirit and a canny manager.
There are a number of other factors impossible to predict that can also come into play,some that will affect our club directly and some that will affect clubs around us.
All in all I expect us to finish 8th or 9th this season while playing more exciting football than we’ve seen in a while!
Phil (Kelsall) Roberts
18 Posted 04/09/2025 at 09:06:28
We look too slow and too narrow???

Slow maybe - but that is either over 10 yards (and that was me) or over 50. But you only need the latter if you are attacking or defending on the break.

Narrow - yes. Against Brighton Grealish often went 5 yards infield. Same for Ndaiye. It was noticeable the 50 yard cross-field passes from Michael Keane because Ndaiye was so hugging the right touchline (and Grealish the left) that the full backs were leaving 30+ yard gaps and could not cover to intercept. Of course if they man to man marked, then the centre was unprotected for KDH and others to come through. I think we were narrow but this season should see a change - and we have Dibling to add.

Andrew Clare
19 Posted 04/09/2025 at 09:08:46
Our biggest problem now is our defence.
They looked good when we were scraping out points because our attack was playing defence as well. Now that our attack is playing attack because it’s a proper attack our defence is more exposed.
Hopefully the addition of Rohl may alleviate some of the pressure on our defence in tighter games.
We need to get into Europe so that we can improve the squad more next summer.
Sam Hoare
20 Posted 04/09/2025 at 09:30:11
It’s very early days and a somewhat fortuitous win against Brighton has rose tinted our start to the season.

As you say the lack of reinforcements at the back, especially at RB, and in CDM are pretty staggering. Instead we now have to play our best player from last season out of position. It was a strange window.

For me 12th still looks par. Think the spread in the league might be shorter this season with all the promoted teams looking capable of upsetting the odds. The squad looks slim still and an injury or two could derail us especially as we only really have 3 centre backs with O’Brien first choice at RB.

There’s potential in this team and crucially much more creativity now (especially if Dibling develops quickly) but top ten would feel like a good achievement to me after the perennial relegation struggles.

Peter Mitchell
21 Posted 04/09/2025 at 09:41:36
Sam - I don't think the win against Brighton was fortuitous at all. Just look at the Brighton v Man City game - City missed a hatful of chances before Brighton scored, but Brighton deserved that win, just as much as we deserved the win against them. If you take your chances you win, if you don't, you won't. That's the EPL.
Liam Mogan
22 Posted 04/09/2025 at 09:46:21
We were slightly fortuitous not to be 2 down before we scored the first, but we did deserve to win.

Both you chaps are correct!

And it was a fantastic day at The Hill

Sam Hoare
23 Posted 04/09/2025 at 09:48:40
Peter, by that logic no team is ever lucky or unlucky. Only the goals matter. And that’s the bottom line of course; but I like to also look at the underlying performance and the reality is that although we played well Brighton missed a penalty and another easy chance that 8 times out of 10 they would score. They also hit the woodwork twice.

It’s early days to judge this team and how successful or not the window was and I’m trying not to get too carried away by this early optimism!

Andrew Ellams
24 Posted 04/09/2025 at 10:06:45
I'd be more confident had we signed an actual RB but I think this is going to be an odd season in the PL and a lot more competitive top and bottom and clubs will finish outside of their natural place.

I wouldn't be surprised if we got a bit of a surprise relegation.

Scott Hamilton
25 Posted 04/09/2025 at 10:33:40
Robert, presumably Grealish is factored in as costing either ‘zero' or the £12m that his loan will actually cost us?

If so, our squad valuation is a bit of a red-herring.

As someone else mentioned, player wages are probably a more accurate reflection, although I'd deduct 10 points from the estimated total of any team Potter manages and add 10 to the Shite's, on the basis that they always get the rub of the green.

Peter Mitchell
26 Posted 04/09/2025 at 10:44:05
Sam - totally agree about not getting too carried away too soon! Sorry to be pedantic, but Brighton did not miss a penalty - Pickford saved it, which is his job (and he's very good at it!).

A missed penalty is when the penalty taker misses the goal (one of my pet hates is when commentators in particular refer to missed penalties when the keeper has actually made a save).

Anyway, I think we can just tighten up defensively, then we are going to have a good season (we had a shaky start defensively last season as well, but sorted it out and we have more attacking options this time around).

Mark Stone
27 Posted 04/09/2025 at 13:47:12
Scott, that’s incorrect Grealish is valued at€28m so it’s based on the market value of players in your squad.
Mark Stone
28 Posted 04/09/2025 at 13:48:39
Just looking at that transfermarkt
Arsenal currently have these injuries:
Saliba £80m
Ben White £45m
Norgaaard £11m
Saka £150m
Havertz £65m
Jesus £32m

Sum £383m

So their treatment room is currently worth more than £14m more than our entire squad

Scott Hamilton
29 Posted 04/09/2025 at 13:49:26
Thanks Mark.

€28m?! That’s about £24m. He’s worth much more, surely?!

Mark Stone
30 Posted 04/09/2025 at 14:11:48
Priceless as far as I’m concerned, Scott!
Rob Hooton
31 Posted 04/09/2025 at 00:15:13
Ian, 16, regarding pitch size. I believe clubs can change the pitch size and markings, as long as it is within the specified limits? Not sure if this can be changed game to game, however the head coach does have a say in the matter and generally instructs on this.

Good piece, thanks, Robert, I've enjoyed reading the debate. I agree with much of your analysis, I'd be quite happy with 8th right now but you never know how the season will pan out. We'll need to punch up above our current financial weight to do it, but the signs are (hopefully) positive.

Our defence was great last season and we've replaced Young with Aznou in the back line, we are still short at right-back and may need luck with injuries etc but could be okay.

Eric Myles
32 Posted 05/09/2025 at 02:25:13
Robert, the anomaly in your comparative post last season is of course that you had Spurs and Man Utd in the 5th to 8th group when they finished well off that.

So it shows that anything can happen, and will hopefully happen to our former neighbours this time round.

Si Cooper
33 Posted 05/09/2025 at 17:47:16
Historians may be satisfied with simply considering the final score but an analyst surely should take missed opportunities into account when assessing a game?

My pet hate is the apparent belief that hitting the woodwork somehow has more worth than any other miss.

But just as any near misses are noteworthy in any sort of risk assessment, the number of clear opportunities the opposition has to score, whether taken or not, has to be addressed and the coaching staff and players will scrutinise each one and work on how to try to eliminate them going forwards.

David Ellis
34 Posted 06/09/2025 at 16:03:18
I enjoyed the analysis but, as the author mentioned, modelling on value of squad is not that great at predicting table positions.

Firstly, there is the ‘magic sauce' of how the squad interacts with each other and the impact of the manager (which we saw last season at Everton).

Secondly, and more fundamentally, the value of a player depends on their age as well as their ability, because the valuation has to include how long the player is likely to remain at peak or decent form.

So Grealish and Gana would not be worth as much as say Dibling or Röhl but are currently much better players. It maybe that this age depreciation effect evens out across all the squads in the league, but it maybe that it does not.

As Peter Mitchell (15) pointed out, a better correlation (according to Deloittes) was between league position and wages; rather than squad value. Wages is a truer reflection of the market value of a player in the current season.

Robert Tressell
35 Posted 06/09/2025 at 20:26:13
There isn't a massive difference between the squad values table and the wages tables.

It's like this:

The Big 8

This correlates to the Transfermarkt top 8 squad values except for Villa. Villa are in trouble because they are saddled with big wages despite their squad deteriorating.

1. City £189m

2. Arsenal £168.8m

3. RS £ 155.3m

4. Chelsea £ 147.1m

5. Man Utd £ 145.3m

6. Spurs £ 127.1m

7. Villa £ 106.6m

8. Newcastle £ 101.7m

The mid table

This broadly correlates to the Transfermarkt squad values mid table clubs.

This again shows Forest going for it. They really are. Whether it is sustainable or not I don't know. But they seem intent on spending their way into the Champions League.

We are not so far behind in 11th place. However, we're further from Newcastle in 8th place (£31.4m) than we are from Burnley in 20th place (£28.5m). It shows just how far ahead those big 8 spenders are on all fronts (and why Villa are in a real pickle).

9. Forest £ 87.6m

10. West Ham £ 72.9m

11. Everton £ 70.3m

12. Fulham £ 69.8m

13. Leeds £ 64.9m

14. Palace £ 64.1m

15. Bournemouth £ 59.4m

16. Brighton £ 58.9m

17. Sunderland £ 54.1m

The Bottom 3

It's no surprise that these are 3 of the main relegation favourites. Burnley stand out as the lowest wages and a really poor squad. Wolves are in big trouble. Brentford too possibly. Although they have a good overall squad - who replaces the goals of Wissa, Mbuemo and Toney of recent years. A lot is expected of Igor and Ouattara. If they fail, Brentford could easily go down.

18. Brentford £ 47.9m

19. Wolves £ 43m

20. Burnley £ 41.8m

Basically, 9th would represent over-performing squad quality and wages by a decent measure. But it also represents a glass ceiling of sorts. If you go beyond 9th, you are having to outperform clubs with materially bigger, better and higher paid squads. The challenge is steeper with each place you go beyond 9th.

Eric # 32, you are quite right - Spurs and Man Utd were hilariously terrible last season. Spurs won't repeat that. Man Utd, Newcastle and Villa could all have difficult seasons though - but are all probably still odds on to finish top half.

Really, outside of the big 8 wage spenders it's us and Forest who look well placed. Forest just have a better squad though - and a pretty sensible (Moyes-esque) manager.

We need another window of spending - and spending at competitive £150m ish levels - to get back into genuine top 7 contention.


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


How to get rid of these ads and support TW


© ToffeeWeb