Stefan Borson's deep dive into Everton's legal battle with Burnley

Do a Man City and keep it going for years and years without consequence.

If they get this £35M, we should sue for the loss of the parachute payment, Burnley received. After all if they are right, we should have been getting it, instead of them.

Ifs, buts, and maybes, is no way to making a ruling as the biased committee did.

True Jack, nowhere have I read about the legal principle that you can't benefit twice as a result of the wrongdoing.

The parachute payment should be deducted from our £35 million.

Although Borson's argument is that the payment is a further sanction for the wrongdoing.

Come on, Andy Burnham, lay into this corrupt FA

Gerry, for any Prime Minister, your suggestion is a sure-fire net vote-winner, but what do we know of our fellow Toffee Burnham? If he's not on ToffeeWeb, why not?

Or do the prolific freebies systematically given by the Premier League to MPs across the board for decades now prevent him from doing some good with his gigantic majority in the Commons?

The Premier League... What a mess!

Burnley — I hope you are relegated each season over the next 3 years. Bad sportsmanship and greed!

Sorry, Bob (#6), but Everton didn't vote against the introduction of such rules so are just as much to blame as Burnley.

What I find difficult to understand is what most clubs thought they would benefit by such rules rather than being stand alone entities, have there really been that many Bury's saved from themselves?

It most certainly hasn't introduced a level playing field and, if inflation in everyday life was roaring along as it is in the Premier League transfer market, then we'd be appointing two Prime Ministers at once to save time.

Pity football clubs don't have as much difficulty moving money out of the country as I have trying to move a little in...