The Mail Bag
The long ball truely is dead
Comments (38)
Ten conscutive passes by the toffees for Pienaar's goal vs Bolton. The Moyes long ball tactic is well and truely dead, methinks.
Everton have become far more of a passing possession team than they have been — not seen since the days of Kendall's and Harvey's management.
This was the way Moyesie always wanted the team to play. Now he has the players to do so and it is being shown on the pitch and he has said so himself. Not an Arsenal yet but very refreshing, more effective, and far more enjoyable to watch.
Mick MacManus, Posted 21/03/2010 at 23:13:29
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
The new Arsenal ?
But i agree Mick we are passing the ball better, a lot of that is better players certainly in the midfield and last seasons exponants of the hoof ball Hibbo & Yobo are currently out of the side , i know Jags can hoof it but if those around you are passing it can have an influence.
Moyse was screaming at Jags to shorten it up through out the first half on Saturday, Hibbert, Neville, Yobo and Distin are all guilty of defending too deep.
Thats when I dont get Moyse, he likes or at least tolerates defenders seeking the security defending deep, yet he berates them for hoofing it .
Only when Moyse realises that a low back line = hoofball, will we completely snuff it out. Tim Howard has to play a part here, he has to bully his defence into play higher up the park.
You are right though Mick, things are improving. not many sides are playing better stuff than us.
When people around the country realise Everton are the Sky Sunday match, they are quite pleased these days, its not so long ago when the only people who were happy we were on, were the people involved in the antiques road show, we did wonders for their ratings
We have quite a 'steely defence' and we just need to develop fluidity in the teams movement off the ball, then we will have a team that can win things.
All the problems we had at the start of the season were not due to the amount of injuries we had but because Arteta was out and then Pienaar got injured. These are the two players that make Everton's midfield tick.
Only difference, Neil is sort and to the point.
Pienaar is key, we need a pacy wide player this summer and that's all for me. Bring back Donovan. Pacey wide player means balance and also means we won't be utterly fucked if Pienaar gets injured and then we have to play Osman on the flank.
It's not about being negative, it's about being realistic. I want us to GENUINELY compete for top 4 and have a realistic chance of winning the Europa League, not just qualify for it and then embarrass ourselves against the first half decent side we face as we always do.
Too much backslapping at rank mediocrity goes on amongst Evertonians it seems, it's just not for me.
The Bolton display was woeful, we got the points, the end. I'll take the points for sure but I won;t delude myself that we will ever get anywhere performing like that though, because we wont.
We have got knocked out of the FA Cup by crap opposition through not applying ourselves properly, we got knocked out of Europa by crap opposition because our manager hasn't got the first clue how to set a side up to compete in Europe, and we are adrift of our direct rivals Spurs and Aston Villa in the league because we have thrown away a hatful of points against poor opposition. Explain to me which of those criticisms are "mindless".
And, before you get the 'injuries' excuse out, do me a favour; Go and look at the line-ups against Burnley (A), Wolves (H), Stoke (H), Birmingham (H), Fulham (A), Hull (A), Bolton (A)... and tell me why in your opinion we weren't good enough to win those games, injuries or not.
I put it that the team was plenty good enough to win those games but a poor attitude and poor tactics cost us dearly, and putting them in context now, have cost us our season. Yet at the time, the manager was happy to hide behind the excuse of injuries. I was at the games, they still hurt me now. The performances were dire, completely unacceptable.
Each to their own of course but IMO winners remain focussed and winners retain their desire at all times.
Making excuses will get us nowhere, we need to see where we have gone wrong and put it right. There has been a really poor attitude at this club this season where, when things go wrong, we reach for the excuse manual and it's simply not good enough.
We have wasted a season and now it seems people are backslapping because we are finally getting results we absolutely SHOULD be getting. "2-0 against Bolton is good", you say.... Well, no. It's acceptable to me, nothing more. Look at the team we put out compared to theirs and it's what you should absolutely expect.
The difference between me and you, because I am still hurt from our overall failure, is that instead of just looking at the result I look at the display and in truth it was very poor.
Unless we want another season like this one, full of abject surrender and disappointment when it really matters, then I really don't see how sweeping poor performances under the carpet helps, even in victory.
It offends me when people call me 'negative' because I am not, I am simply determined and ambitious. I could as easily call everyone who is being 'positive' a bunch of losers, because they take a pride in failure that I simply cannot.
Although I thought on Saturday we did actually try to play football, scored two superb quality goals, and should perhaps have had at least two more but for extremely dogged defending. It was a professional, ground out result in the end. Could've been better? Yes, of course.
But I only remember a few hoofs early on. Distin, one of the worst offenders, was actually playing it forward mostly on the ground... and even getting forward himself on the odd occasion.
It has been a mostly dreadful season in my book, apart from the obvious hilights. A final flourish for the run-in will mask that, of course, but the lack of a real winning attitude from the top down tends only to confirm our own "small club" mentality.
Next season has all the makings of a tremendous opportunity for Moyes and Everton Football Club; but without that wining mentality it could all be for nought yet again.
We are trying to compete in an uneven playing field, but recently there has been some evidence that we are finally making progress. I am not going to stick the boot into Moyes just now and certainly wouldnt describe this as a dreadful season. Disspointing yes! Relegation would be dreadful, finishing in the top half should be at the very bottom of our aspirations, but lets not get over zealous with our criticisms.
You see, I encounter this problem regularly. When I try to make what I consider a valid and balanced argument as to some of David Moyes's and his team's failings, I get a comeback that takes things to a ridiculous extreme, which I can only assume is meant to detract from the real issue.
I don't expect us to compete with Chelsea or Manchester United, they have world elite bracket players that we can neither attract, nor afford. I DO expect us to compete toe-to-toe with the likes of Villa and Spurs though, there is no reason why we should not.
The 'finance' argument is only valid to a point and, unfortunately, some of those who are hyper-sensitive to any Moyes criticism again take things too far.
Moyes deserves absolute credit for his dealings in the transfer market, I don't think anyone can dispute that. The wheeling and dealing he has done that has ultimately allowed us the finance to bring a higher calibre of player to the club, yet retaining a low net spend is remarkable.
The thing is, you cannot hide everything behind that. You cannot hide the poor performance of class players behind that.
On the pitch when I see Arteta, Pienaar, Yakubu, Saha, Baines, Howard, Jagielka, Fellaini, Heitinga, Rodwell etc etc, I see a VERY talented bunch of players. I would suggest that batch alone I have quoted there would have a market value in the region of £110-130m.
Therefore, that is the level of performance I expect from the team. Yet, when defending David Moyes, all of a sudden the likes of Pienaar and Arteta are only worth £2m again!! You see the problem?You cannot have it all ways.
Either he has bought fabulous players at knockdown prices, and we get and should expect fabulous performances — which we know they are capable of — or in actual fact he has just been average in the market and these players aren't actually that good after all...
We need to decide which it is though and set our standards and expectations accordingly.
Personally, I think we have a great squad now, packed with footballers, and packed with ability. What I don't think we have currently is a manager who quite knows how to maximise the benefit of that footballing talent and who is still too obsessed with work-rate and 'percentages'.
One, maybe two, of that Sporting Lisbon side would get into our Everton team yet they embarrassed us in Lisbon, as I predicted they would. That wasn't down to injuries, it wasn't down to finance and it wasn't down to a lack of talent or ability.
It was down to us having a lack of that fundamental respect that you need to have for possession of the football when playing in Europe, and despite this being our (4th??) consecutive attempt at it, the same basic mistakes are being made over and over again, and that frustrates me.
NSNO doesn't have to mean we must be THE best. It should still mean we strive to be the very best we can be though. This season we haven't, and that hurts.
It all comes down to "top" players. We have good/average players in our side that can occassionaly look fantastic; whereas the other top teams have good/excellent players in their side that can consistently play well. That is where we fall down and that is why we all wonder which Everton will turn up on match day. Yes it's to do with poor management and tactics sometimes but it is also due to some of our players not hitting the top of their game consistently.
Hopefully this pre-season we will actually play someone of merit and get our team ready for August, not November and hopefully we will not have the horrific injury list and I hope against all hope we don't end up with another Lescott saga with Pienaar.
Martin's right, look at all the teams EFC is distinctly better than, even just to watch. But we're a couple years past the "Hey, we're not one of the shit teams anymore. Isn't that great?" point. When we were a relegation-threatened side in the past, I'll wager DM wasn't getting ripped like this as he developed EFC and starting the club moving up the Table. But we're not that team anymore.
Without trying to speak for Neil and others here, I would be frustrated too seeing an obviously talented side alternating good and poor showings. Yes, we did well in EPL February, but the difference between us and the ManU's is no longer talent, it's getting after the 3 points over and over. Of course they don't win every game. But they're consistent in their determined play every game. ManU opponents have their hands full for 90 minutes. I'm frustrated too in the up and down play. The talents clearly there. So what's missing?
Here's my take, accepting first that we have talented players everywhere, including the bench, which I believe true. Also, I'm not picking out any particular EFC player, because I've only become a fan since Donovan came on and haven't seen enough to judge.
But I'm a lifetime sports fan in sports-mad America and winning teams have some things in common as do teams that are talented but the talent never adds up into a top team (very common, almost the norm, in the NBA).
1. Some players only try hard against the top teams. They tend to disappear against like or lesser-talented due to lack of some external (playing a top side) stimulant.
2. Some talented players simply aren't good under pressure. Not referring to this missed pass or that poor shot. Everyone does that. But some do NOT want the ball around them when performing well means the most.
Our performance game-in, game-out probably indicates that we have some guys who fall into 1 or 2 above. In both cases, DM is most important. The 1's have to be pushed to game after game consistency. The 2's have to go.
Again, ManU provided the perfect example yesterday against the RS as opposed to our showing. RS did all the same things they did against us. Ferguson sends out Park and Fletcher for their zeal, discipline, and courage. Good athletes, pretty good talent, nothing special.
But SAF signed and played them for the qualities I listed, which can't be taught. Gary Neville has them and played, and he's not even that good a player. Giggs, Scholes, Neville, Carrick, Rooney? Various talent levels with Rooney up top. But all of them have that inner fire that Ferguson likely keeps stoked but they came out of the womb with that fire lit.
That's the gap EFC needs to close to challenge consistently for 2011 Silverware. And without talking for anyone here but me, I think the main reason for all the frustrations (relentlessly) expressed.
I totally agree that at times Moyes's tactics have cost us games we should have done better in and certainly our cup exits this season have been hugely disappointing. But you can't ignore the good results and undoubted progression of our football this season. We out-played Arsenal at the Emirates as well as Chelsea and Man Utd at home. We have played at times some really quite breathtaking football.
Of course its upsetting when we are inconsistent and when this brand of football evaporates for hoofing but every team (possibly except Arsenal) will resort to hoofing when put under the right sort of intense pressure.
I choose to forgive the inconsistencies on account of an unsettled team and an evolving system of football. You choose to concentrate on the bad results and moments of inconsistency. Hence I am 'positive' and you are 'negative'.
Neither is right or wrong but both need to be balanced.
From my seat in the Gwladys, I see, week-in, week-out, fullbacks hoisting the ball aimlessly forward from right in front of the dugout. Not once have I ever seen him chastise them. Quite the opposite in fact, he has been picked up several times on TV by the pitch-side mikes shouting "hit the frontman"!!
I can quote him from a few years back when Joseph Yobo tried to pass a ball into midfield which was intercepted and we ultimately conceded from; "I've told Joseph, a centre half's job is to get the ball as far away from goal as possible".
I'm sorry but the excuses don't wash any longer. With a group of really talented football players there is still no sound basis of a footballing side here. Yes we can do it in patches, how could we not with such talent?
The real acid test though is when the pressure is on. That pressure can be two-fold, pressure to win and physical pressure on the field. On both counts, we fold like a deck of cards.
Maybe it is Steve Round who needs to go, I don't know. What I know is that David Moyes's team does not have the full commitment you need to playing what I call 'proper' football that every successful team at the top level has.
Of course it is good to be able to 'mix it', but that is to mix it by choice... not to shit bricks every time an opposition player gets within 5 yards of you because you know the manager will give you a good bollocking if you try to pick a pass and lose possession!
Maybe he will change... maybe he won't. I certainly know what I see though, home and away, and it is nothing to do with perception.
Unlike you, I haven't been to every match in the last few years, but I reckon I see 1 in 3 live. Living down south, I also get to see a lot of Spurs, Arsenal, West Ham and Chelsea. Believe me, only Arsenal from the southern bunch have played football as flowing as Everton at their best this season. In recent weeks, the Baines-Pienaar-Arteta triangles have been just stunning to watch - better than anything I've seen at Goodison for a long, long time (rewatched the Hull game the other night - the movement is glorious).
Where I think we need to improve is in terms of consistency. We passed Arsenal, Chelsea and Man Utd off the park in the space of a month but played awfully against Liverpool in the middle of those games too.
But look around us in the league and I think it's fair to say we're playing better football than the vast majority. Villa are hoofball merchants (the big-man/big-man combo of Heskey and Carew is O'Neill's favoured partnership), Tottenham's midfield is still pedestrian despite the £200m they've spent on it (they'd love Pienaar and Arteta, that's for sure), and Man City - despite everything they've spent - haven't scored a decent team goal all season.
It's easy to shout for a better quality of football, but the truth is we're doing it better than most every week at the moment. We've been the form team in the Premier League since January and, on our day, play a brand of football most can only dream of.
Moyse told Jags several times to "shorten it up" on Saturday. He may be careful, but he ain't stupid, he knows the midfield he has assembled is at long last realising its potential and will have too much for most teams between now and the end of the season, do you really believe he wants to even things up with 50-50 long balls ?
In the original post Mick doesnt proclaim us world champions, he merely points out our style of play is much better to watch, he`s right , it is. Only somebody who HASNT watched Everton over the past few years would claim our football hasn't improved, these past 3-4 months
As for the accusation the DM team play the long ball, to my mind the juries still out, because like Neil Steel, I go to all the home games and I’ve watched an awful lot of long ball in DM’s reign. But in his defence, Moyes doesn’t set his team that way, and he certainly doesn’t long ball-type players. A perfect example of a long ball manager is Martin O’Neill, all of his teams have at the heart a big target man who can hold the ball, quick wingers and two hard working centre mids, and give him his due he puts out successful teams-but only to a point, because there’s no plan ‘B’ with O’Neill.
Moyes has never tried to replace Ferguson, even though at various times Heskey & Crouch were available and he has always tried to buy or in our case get a loan deal for classy footballing midfielders as opposed to work horses, and given the financial restraints that he’s been under, he’s done exceptionally well
It's Steve Round's fault. Hahahaha.
Seriously, that 'argument' is the lamest of the lame.
Sure, there are some fans who patently haven't a clue what they are on about. There are others who understand the game intricately, like me.
Understanding football isn't black magic and it's not all that complicated if you understand the basics.
The old 'why aren't you a manager then' argument is simply pathetic though. Look at all the managers in the Premier League, more or less every manager in football... even in the non-league. What is the connection? They have all had a career in the game.
Just because you have more physical footballing talent than somebody does not automatically give you a better understanding of the game though, does it? But the man on the street will never have that chance, because that's how football is. A closed shop.
Without a profile from playing football there are few who would ever have the opportunity to manage so please, be serious.
I repeat, we are getting better at passing the ball around and if a long ball doesn't come off, it's hoofball, rather than misplaced. As a player, I could put a ball on a sixpence but if the forward doesn't make the expected run, I look a cunt.
Again though i would try and see the bright side and say that certainly for his first few years he has been concentrated purely on results. Given the paucity of options the need to keep it tight and snatch the 3 points when able to required a dour hoofball sort of football the majority of the time.
You do concede that we have moved on from this but a caterpillar doesn't become a butterfly overnight. We played some great football last season and have played some top teams off the park this season.
Players like Jags, Yobo and Neville and Hibbert are always going to put some punts in when under pressure...thats what they've been taught to do their whole football careers. But surely the inital post was right is saying that we have at times played some great stuff in recent times and if we carry on progressing as we have over the last 3 seasons or so then next season could be quite exciting.
So basically Neil you are saying that you aren't a manager because you don't have a profile from playing the game. Is that not a bit lame after telling us how "determined and ambitious" you are a little earlier in this thread!
I do agree with a few of the points that you have made, but I think that you need to be reminded that you are not the only person who goes home and away, and I have been watching exactly the same football as you week-in, week-out. I do see signs of a vast improvement in our football of late which makes the above statement somewhat crass and rather baseless.
Anyway, Shaun....if it came across that way, I apologise.
I was just making the point that when you sit through dirge displays each week they are harder to forget than if you only see the good stuff, maybe 7 in a row at Goodison.
I have seen some truly horrific performances this season, inexcusable ones that I really can't explain, and it is some of these that have ultimately cost us our season.
Maybe I will write an article on my feelings soon because I have more to say that we could cover in this one thread and I really don't think I can do my point justice.
I think people can get the gist of what I'm saying though.
We need to start playing football and controlling games on a regular basis given the players we have, not just turning up when the pressure is off or when the opposition go down to 10 men, like on Saturday.
I have catalogues full of examples of what I say. Take for example Chelsea and United at home...when did we start playing? When we went behind. Expected to lose, pressure completely off at 0-1... Everton start playing!!
Anfield, Liverpool in awful form, everyone fancies Everton.... pressure ON! Liverpool go down to 10-men... yet still control the game.
Everton are an embarrassment and fold like a deck of cards.
The list is endless, we are bottlers. Personally, I don't think it's mental. I feel that it's down to the fact that we are not well enough rehearsed at shifting the ball around at pace or under pressure, and when taken out of our comfort zone, or put into a position of a high profile game we are EXPECTED to win, we never fail to come up short.
But then I guess I'm just negative. Next year, next year will be the one!
Its when we play poorly and win, and most importantly when we get our noses in front we stay there, will we progress to that next mythical level
If he's such a purist then why Heitinga in midfield and Distin at the back? I'm a Moyes apologist (if I need a title) but I think this decision is holding us back. Less likely to lose, but not more likely to win. Bolton was nearly the game where it all came undone and he would have been open to criticism... personally I think he's getting away with it right now, based mainly on a fear of opening the team up to what Sporting did to us.
We have midfield options and I dream of Heitinga at CB... don't be afraid of taking the next step Davey.
Anyway, I'm somewhere in between the two sides... It was obvious that our play was going to improve with the personnel we had coming back... and the balance that Donovan brought to the side...
But there's still a hell of a lot of poor management that runs contrary to the good stuff... wrong players, players out of position, players not getting played on merit, head scratching substitutions etc, etc...
Moyes may not be actively seeking to stifle the natural game of the current creative players... but he adds to it indirectly by some of his decision-making.
Our finish this year (regardless of place or position) setting the standard for the Fall.
CYOB
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.


1 Posted 22/03/2010 at 03:31:19
Report abuse
What I will agree with is we seem to have a more mixed style. Which is a positive. I got a little bit pissed off that whenever we score direct from a long ball, it's described in the various media as "X controlled a hopeful punt, and finished well" (look at Saha's second against Chelsea). Yet whenever one of the Sky Darlings do it (Liverpool and Chelsea are prime exponents of this), it's "a wonderful long pass to...."
People who recall the 85 Championship team may recall that we were a very direct side - straight at them from kick off. But, boy they could pass as well. And tackle. The 87 side was good, efficient, but somehow not as entertaining.
Even in the "modern game" (whatever that is), I think you need to be able to mix it up according to how the game is going, who you are playing, and how both sides are playing.