After the Leeds loss and the ensuing debate about whose fault it was – manager or players – I got to thinking: “What exactly does a manager DO and to what extent is he responsible for results?” In a roundabout way, it reminded me of an article Yessar Daou wrote for TW a month ago: Football Manager Stole My Life about a new book inspired by the popular PC/Mac game. Ive never played it, but I have laboured enjoyably over a couple of online football management games, plus Pro Evolution Soccer, which is primarily PS2 gameplay but has strategic elements to it, particularly transfers.
Virtual football management and real life. Theyre not the same thing at all, but theres a link. So, heres my question: if you were looking at the current EFC set up, how would you “play” it if it were a football management game and you were solely responsible for success or failure?
Ill give you an example: after the Elland Road non-performance, people generally dissed Magaye Gueye. OK, so what do we do with him?
(A) Keep playing him until he gets better (if that ever happens);
(B) Give him more game-time in the reserves and work him harder on the training ground – eg, practicing crosses (will that work?);
(C) Sell him now (for not much money);
(D) Play him a bit more then sell him for a decent fee as soon as he starts playing well (profitable but rather self-defeating);
(E) Play him in a different position or with different players around him (risky and it involves messing with the team).
Playing EFC MANAGER, its your decision.
Any decision will have a knock-on effect on the rest of the set-up. If you decide to sell him now then you will have wasted money on buying him and training him up and will have to rethink EFCs development policy. Is there any point getting young players from overseas (like Gueye and Velios) and spending resources on bringing them to maturity and getting them to play in a “semi-English” way? Maybe not, in which case you can save money on training facilities and spend it on something else... Buying tried and tested players? Improving the lower league scouting system? Infrastructure – improving Goodison or moving elsewhere? Higher salaries to keep your best players? A revamped merchandising outlet to make more money from the fans, or a new Media Community Centre to communicate with supporters better and encourage the sense that were all in this together?
There are all kinds of angles, but the one Im most interested in is EFCs development strategy. Last season we sold Wallace and Forshaw for nominal fees, let go of Nsiala and offered Baxter the kind of deal he obviously felt was eminently refusable. Thats four young EFC reserves who are now playing in the lower leagues. Did we in some way gain from all that, or did we just lose money nurturing them for years and then letting them go? We also loaned out Duffy, Bidwell and Garbutt, and this season Bidwells gone again and Barkely, The Great White Hope, is on loan too. I think Ross B will come through to be a regular for us, but I can see the other three being sold for small fees to lower league teams, just like Wallace & Co. According to the O/S, Bidwells been at the club since he was 11: so, how much does it cost to train him up for eight years? Less or more than well get if we eventually sell him to Brentford? I dont know, but I imagine well make a loss.
Playing EFC MANAGER, thats the kind of thing you have to sort out. Oh, and dont forget, in this scenario you are still answerable to the Chairman (but hes not, repeat not BK)... and, of course, to the fans, who are mad about their club but bloody hard to satisfy - just like us lot!
Reader Comments (22)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
3 Posted 27/09/2012 at 20:59:53
4 Posted 27/09/2012 at 21:02:45
It was a cup tie atmosphere and required experienced players who could win the right to play.
It is totally inconceivable that 2 young lads (Gueye and Junior) could come into a shambolically put together team of strangers and be expected to do well.
As regards EFC manager I believe it is too early to judge Junior and Barkley but IMO Gueye is a decent fringe player who needs help stepping up to the Premiership pace.
The gap between reserve football and the premier league is a chasm and needs to be thought about in players development.
5 Posted 28/09/2012 at 08:58:43
6 Posted 28/09/2012 at 10:06:04
YES (B) "Give him more game-time in the reserves and work him harder on the training ground – eg, practicing crosses (will that work?)". It might just work but I'm doubtful. But in the meantime it keeps him out of the 1st team, and does provide at least some cover should we have a mas of injuries - our squad is thin. And Oviedo would come in before Maggie May if we did have a mass of injuries. So, short term, Option (B) but medium term Option (C) - sell.
NOT (C) "Sell him now (for not much money)". The (small) amount gained doesn't bother me. But thin squad, so cover needed.
NOT (D) "Play him a bit more then sell him for a decent fee as soon as he starts playing well (profitable but rather self-defeating)". Playing him more just continues to show others how poor he is so we won't get a decent fee. He won't start to improve. Playing him means leaving eg Peanuts out! Seriously weakens the team.
NOT (E) Play him in a different position or with different players around him (risky and it involves messing with the team). I think his deficiency lies in basic skills not being played out of position. He's had our best players around him so no others will improve him.
7 Posted 28/09/2012 at 10:00:41
Ian - the leg transplant idea is an excellent one, but surely financially ruinous?
Mike - yes, a genuine option. But, as I said, loaning players out doesn't seem to particularly pay off for us. True, it worked for Osman a few years back. Coleman, too, but maybe that just showed that Seamus is a top-quality Championship player? I fear that might also be true of Duffy and Bidwell. Garbutt is better than that, from what I can tell.
Jay - I agree, but that's the problem isn't it? How do Junior and Gueye improve if they don't play? Does a 15 min sub appearance help all that much? (In my school, youth club and Sunday League career, I only appeared as a sub once - and I scored the winner! But not everyone can be a super-sub like me!) It's not always easy to get into the game, I imagine, and you're more likely to get on the pitch if the team is either chasing a winner/equaliser or two up and cruising - and neither of those conditions are normal
8 Posted 28/09/2012 at 10:34:52
The HT substitutions lay the blame firmly at Moyes' feet. He picked the wrong team and should have hooked them after five or ten minutes - but that will never happen. Even then, there's a difference.
Putting Junior in that position was clearly DM's fault, but Gueye's faults had to be his own. He's been with us a long time now and he has been given game time. For me, I can only hope that Moyes has had a 'Saha' moment - when he subbed him after an hour against Blackburn I thought - he's on his way out. He was.
Leg transplant? I think I saw his first GP sub appearance and he looked lean, fast and sharp - like Drenthe was, a good prospect. For whatever reason, being with us seems to have done him not much good. I generally complain that we (and most English clubs) train our players to be marathon runners then wonder why they can't sprint any more. Any special promise Gueye had may well have been ground out of him as he has been put through the same mincer as everyone else.
And that, Kevin, is my two-penneth about development policy. It may well be one area where we get things very wrong.
Football clubs are not democracies, but cushions on the balcony at least give some the opportunity to register how they would vote if they had one. But apart from the expense of providing them, surely these days safety helmets would also have to be provided for those in seats below. Nice idea. Non-starter.
9 Posted 28/09/2012 at 11:57:01
10 Posted 28/09/2012 at 12:04:24
Brent - you say: "NOT (C) "Sell him now (for not much money)". The (small) amount gained doesn't bother me. But thin squad, so cover needed." But that's my point, mate - if you're playing a football management game, the books HAVE to balance - or you've lost! It's not a question of just gaining a small amount, it's the fact that so much money has already been spent on Gueye, for example, that it's kind of necessary (?) to recoup some of that with a decent transfer.
Keith - although I imagine Michael was kind of joking there, the cushion idea is not as daft as it first sounds. Again, if EFC Manager was a real game then YOU (The Boss) would have to take into account everything, including the comfort of the fans. I mean, it's not something that would occur to DM or BK in a million years, is it? But fans have a different perspective. Maybe some people's enjoyment of the game is ruined by having an aching arse! If that gets bad enough (and we're not winning the league and cup double), maybe some will stop coming to the game. It's a tiny detail, but not 100% irrelevant.
11 Posted 28/09/2012 at 12:34:37
Have to return to real life now, the "War Office" is calling from the kitchen. She wants me to wash the dishes. I keep saying I'm not that multi-talented.
12 Posted 28/09/2012 at 13:10:00
13 Posted 28/09/2012 at 17:28:06
The HT substitutions lay the blame firmly at Moyes' feet."
I disagree, to pick one implies the others aren't to blame. Manager and players were all equally culpable for that performance. A manager should be able to bring players in and expect them to be more motivated as they have a chance to prove themselves. This didn't seem to happen.
14 Posted 28/09/2012 at 18:38:46
Gueye, however, has much more experience and should have put in a performance of some kind. He produced nothing. He let his manager and the rest of us down. As others have said, even given the chance to play with our strongest line-up he brings nothing, one good goal - nada mas.
I firmly believe that Moyes has to learn from this, as I said, have another 'Saha moment'.
15 Posted 28/09/2012 at 23:41:51
Have to develop him in the reserves and loan him out for sure. Can't go selling him while he's still a diamond in the rush. We usually take advantage of teams who are throwing away players they don't feel have what it takes!
You make a very good point regarding the spending on the development of a player from a young age. It's funny though, take out Rodwell I can't remember anyone since Rooney who has come out of our academy and been capable playing first XI consistently. Hopefully there's Barkley and many more to come!
16 Posted 29/09/2012 at 17:12:10
17 Posted 30/09/2012 at 14:29:21
Mind you, much easier said than done.
18 Posted 30/09/2012 at 14:53:25
19 Posted 30/09/2012 at 15:04:21
20 Posted 30/09/2012 at 15:43:39
Generally, they're impressed by his technique/range of passing, but the problem seems to be that he's playing in a two-man central midfield in a struggling team, and so is having to drop incredibly deep where he isn't half as effective. There's been some talk of needing to change the system to accommodate him by playing him off the striker.
He apparently is absolutely woeful at corners (not sure if he takes them for our reserves, but he seems to take them all for Wednesday), but got a lot of praise for stepping up and banging in a good penalty against Bolton.
Overall, the comment I keep reading is that he'd be absolutely quality in a team with other talented players, but right now is just not what Wednesday need. He doesn't yet have the confidence, the experience, or the physical presence to run a game from the centre of midfield in a poor team.
Dunno if Everton will agree to extend his loan which must run out fairly soon, but it does seem to be a better deal for us than them. Dave Jones seems to have unwavering faith in him (or Moyes has demanded playing time as part of the deal) so he is getting 90 minutes each week which has got to be good for his fitness.
And while I'm not sure playing for a sinking ship is a great thing for the confidence, it should hopefully toughen him up a bit, and convince him to up his game so he doesn't end up playing for teams like Wednesday permanently...
21 Posted 30/09/2012 at 19:08:02
I'm late because I seem to have been seduced by footballing delights - Barcelona is only up the road from here - but luckily my internet service wasn't disrupted by the violent storms and I saw at least half an hour of football as it should be played. Don't tell me it was only Southampton. Their mistake was that they tried to play football against us. Might have worked a long time ago, not now.
And last night in the 'Si Tapas Bar and Lounge' might account for part of this note from me mum too.
Yessar - you do make it sound a bit like the slave trade. I dislike agents with a vengeance, and I suspect Moyes comes from a similar Salvation Army type background to mine. I also suspect that he hopes his way into heaven is by doing good works with Magaye Gueye. God bless the lad, but hands up anyone who is pleased to see his name on the team sheet.
And then there's the Barkley thing. When I grace Fallowfield with my presence, my MCFC mates (and they are very good lads) ask me deep searching questions like 'why have we bought Rodwell?' There's quite a few French persons around here and I have become adept at the gallic shrug. Don't ask me pal, in a gesture. And I can't help but think that Ross B, different though he is, was also the biggest lad in his year, got into the team, played more, got better.
While all the time, little Leo Messi was being totally overlooked.
There's a reference to Newton in there for those who also think deeply about physics. It seems to be Si Tapas time. See you next Wednesday, with a bit of luck.
22 Posted 30/09/2012 at 20:45:06
God knows why Barkely is taking corners. He's pretty good in the air, I think, so he should be trying to get on the end of them not taking them. Note to Dave Jones: playing him off the striker is the way to go.
As you say, Alex, at the very least the experience will toughen him up.
Keith, maybe George Green is going to be the next big thing? I mean, the next small thing. No, that's wrong: the next big small thing... Or maybe it's the next small big thing? At any rate, the next thing.
23 Posted 30/09/2012 at 21:02:45
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.

2 Posted 27/09/2012 at 20:38:10