One has to smile at the triumphalism of some of the Evertonians. Victories against a self-destructive Villa and a relegation candidate like Southampton have gone to their heads. We who have been following Everton for more than a quarter of a century know that a few back-to-back wins do not make a Champions League candidate.

I vividly recall the second stint of Howard Kendall as Everton manager. His second full season saw us win the three opening games, amongst these a memorable 3-0 trashing of Manchester United at Old Trafford. A return to the happy days, we thought... but how wrong we were! As it turned out, Kendall was as blinded by our past glories as the fans: he believed that, in bringing back the likes of Alan Harper and Mark Ward, he would usher in a new golden age, but it was not to be. Howard Kendall Mk II should go down in the annals of Everton FC as the Great Destroyer rather than the Great Redeemer; for this man was the epitome of reaction rather than progress.

Pat Nevin once stated that Colin Harvey was on the verge of great things, and I am inclined to agree with Nevin. Back then, we had a generational conflict: new players hungry for success, such as Tony Cottee and Martin Keown, were engaged in a backroom battle against players who had achieved everything there was to achieve: the likes of Kevin Sheedy and Graeme Sharp. A pub brawl between Keown and Sheedy – and this is a true story – should serve as a fitting testimony to the generational conflict. Sheedy apparently called Keown a "lousy footballer" and had his face punched by a seething Keown.

Harvey was doing his utmost to arbitrate between these two generations, but he was not brave enough to resort to a complete purge. He should have sold off the likes of Sheedy and Sharp, but he decided to work out a compromise between the past and the future instead, and therein the key to Harvey’s downfall is to be found.

I was a happy man when Harvey was sacked and I was ecstatic when I heard that Kendall Mk II would be his successor. Hindsight tells me what a fool I was. The more I reflect on my folly, the more do I admire Colin Harvey. This man, in spite of being sacked and humiliated, still consented to being Kendall MkII´s second-in-command. His love for Everton FC must have been truly infinite.

Colin Harvey, these are my words to you: I am ashamed of having praised your sacking; please forgive me. It must have been heartbreaking for you to see Kendall Mk II raze to the ground everything that you attempted to build. Yet, like a true stoic, you accepted it all.

Share this article


Reader Comments (24)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Derek Thomas
1 Posted 07/10/2012 at 07:21:55
We're none of us getting any younger and you never know the hour... So one apology to those who are living is worth more than reams of fine words after they are gone.
Nick Entwistle
3 Posted 07/10/2012 at 08:58:56
What is this? Japan apologising to POWs?
Brendan McLaughlin
4 Posted 07/10/2012 at 10:14:33
I despaired when Kendall went & we appointed Harvey. Promoting the assisant happened more frequently back then but (unless of course you were in league with the devil) it rarely, if ever, worked out. I also thought we let Kendall Mark2 go to early...we were sitiing around 7th/8th place and the Board wouldn't allow him to bring in Dion Dublin who was languishing in Uniteds reserves. Not saying Dublin would have been the final piece in the jig-saw but the did have a prettty good career and would certainly have improved us at the time.
Dick Fearon
5 Posted 07/10/2012 at 10:36:25
I stand to be corrected but wasn't Harvey due to have hip replacement surgery. This was at a time when that procedure entailed a much lengthier recovery time than is the case today.
Gareth Fieldstead
6 Posted 07/10/2012 at 18:23:55
Julian, hate to correct a fellow blue but we didnt win our first three games of the 92 93 season, we drew at home to Sheff Wed in our first game.

As for your point about Harvey, wouldn't the great destroyer be a little more apt for him rather than Kendall? We were languishing third to bottom when he was sacked, just having been knocked out of the League Cup to a very poor Sheffield Utd. This was only three years after Kendall left him a Championship-winning team.

Yes he was let down by the very players who professed they owed him everything, hello Graeme and Kevin R. But at the end of the day his transfer record was abysmal: Wilson, Whiteside, McDonald and Nevin to name but a few. Nevin talks about being verge of greatness but his sides' performances year on year after Kendall leaving only got worse.

As for agreeing to return as Kendall's Number 2, if you read his auto biography he states it was one of the worst decisions he had ever made! He reports that he should have made a complete break from the club. His legacy as a great footballer and coach at all levels for the club is preserved. His time as manager of the club is best forgotten.
John Daley
7 Posted 08/10/2012 at 03:05:13
Err, you seem to have things back to front. Harvey bought in a load of players not fit to lick their predecessors boots and shipped out a number of proven winners far too readily.

"new players hungry for success, such as Tony Cottee"
The only thing Cottee seemed to be interested in was personal glory. This was a player who never looked arsed at getting beat 3-1 as long as he scored the 1. He was also the epitome of a flat track bully. Banging in a hat trick against a lower league team in the Simod Cup but struggling to even look interested when the going got tough. Didn't he also shit out of taking the penalty in the Wimbleon game when 0-2 down, leaving Graeme Stuart to step up?

As for the claim that Harvey's team was " on the verge of great things"?. That claim can be shot down with two words: Mike Milligan.

Michael Brien
8 Posted 08/10/2012 at 07:29:49
Julian - our opening results in1992-93
Sheff Wed H 1-1
Man Utd a 3-0
Norwich a 1-1
Aston Villa H 1-0
Wimbledon H 0-0

It's easy from the hindsight of history to point to players that were brought in as not being as good as those who left. Did the manager have any choice in those who left e.g. Stevens & Steven ? Some of our heroes of the glory years should also accept their responsiblity for our fall from grace - it's too easy to point the finger at Kendall & Harvey. I remember at the time being appalled at Nev's behaviour at the match v Leeds - the famous or should it be infamous half time sit in. I wasn't impressed at the time and I am still not impressed now some 22 years later. No player, however great he is,or legendary is bigger than the club.Graeme Sharp is another - his goalscoring record in those seasons showed a rather dramatic slump.

No too easy to point the finger at Kendall & Harvey in my opinion - maybe some of our "legends" started to believe their own publicity and should have the decency to accept their responsibility for our fall from grace.

Andrew Ellams
9 Posted 08/10/2012 at 09:25:48
Maybe Graeme Sharp's goalscoring showed a slump because the quality of the players providing the service was not up to what it has been between 84-88.

Nevin and Whiteside were never Reid and Steven.

Phil Roberts
10 Posted 08/10/2012 at 09:50:34
Why are we talking about 92-93? HK Mk 1 left at the end of the 86-87 season. Colin Harvey left 11 games into the 90-91 season. Kendall then resigned 18 games into the 93-94 season having won the first 3 games and with us on 24 points. I seem to remember not being able to buy Dion Dublin was the issue. We then lost the next 6 and didn't even score a goal, Mike Walker came in as we gained 20 points over the last 24 games including 3 in the last game of the season.

So which of us cannot sing "And if you know your history" — and happy to be proved it is me if I am wrong.

Rob Sawyer
11 Posted 08/10/2012 at 10:21:19
I recall raising an eyebrow when I first read Pat Nevin's comments that the team under Harvey was on the verge on turning things around – but we will never know. Had Whiteside stayed fit (but by this time his knees were totally shot) or Snodin's hamstrings not been twanging who knows? Nevin was quality but some other buys (e.g. Milligan) were sub-standard.

Some of our established pros did suffer from diminishing returns and I recall Sharp in later seasons spending more time arguing with refs rather than delivering. In hindsight, the return of Kendall was an error but there was probably a more general malaise at the club as we entered the David Marsh years.
Lee Courtliff
12 Posted 08/10/2012 at 11:22:29
I never saw Kendall's first reign. I'm too young. But I saw his 2nd and 3rd spells.

To be honest I always thought he was a very poor memory. I just didn't rate him at all but my Dad kept singing his praises regardless of his stupid decisions like selling Beardsley. I still can't fucking believe that.

As for Harvey, I thought he was a bit unlucky. On paper his signings looked very good and we should have had a perfect blend of youth and experience. But it never worked out.

I do agree that some of the players should take some blame too. I saw Sharp play and thought he was nothing. Just nothing. Yet my Dad told me how great he was just a few years earlier.

I don't think Sharp was interested anymore but when he went to Oldham he banged in 15 goals in his first season. He didn't score that many for us in his last two seasons combined. Maybe three? Perhaps he just needed a change?

Overall I think both Harvey and Kendall are to blame along with a lot of other factors such as the Euro ban and the failure of the board to adapt to the new era but I don't think any one man should take the entire blame for our demise. Especially not one of the two men who made us Champions in the first place.

Andrew Ellams
13 Posted 08/10/2012 at 11:44:09
I don't think Kendall could have stopped Beardsley joining Newcastle. They were in the middle of the Keegan revolution and his first love. I for one was neither surprised when it happened or cast any blame.
Michael Brien
14 Posted 08/10/2012 at 11:45:28
I seem to recall that Whiteside scored 9 goals in his 1st season with Everton, which wasn't bad for a midfielder. I am not saying that Kendall and Harvey are without any blame – merely that some of the players should acknowledge that they didn't perform as well as they could do.

Maybe Nevin wasn't as good as Steven – but he was a decent enough winger and I think Sharp had enough creative players around him to have scored as a reasonable rate. In his last full season (1990-91) he made 24 appearances and scored 3 goals more in keeping with Rod Belfit.

And before I get accused of "Sharpy bashing", he was my favourite player of that era. But as I said, the players of that era need to acknowledge that they were partly responsible for our "fall from grace" and not just the managers.
Martin Mason
15 Posted 08/10/2012 at 12:18:16
Colin Harvey was dealt a very bad hand in that he had to follow a very successful manager and squad that was disintegrating fast post Heysel. He may or may not have recovered but was sacked anyway. The man is an absolute legend at Everton, arguably the finest footballer we have seen at the club and a fantastic coach and all round club servant. He's probably been the key man in Youth development at the club, probably the main reason for our success in the 1980s and a man that needs no apologising for. In my time, he was the white Pele and part of the glorious Holy Trinity who on one night in 1970 scored the goal to win any League Championship against West Brom at Goodison.

I lived in an area where my friends were mainly United and City fans and they were in awe of Colin Harvey in the late 60s. From what I remember he was glassed in the Championship season and we had a terrible run when he was out. I always wondered if he ever recovered properly afterwards and if that wasn't one of the reasons behind our amazing decline post 1970.

I salute you Colin, a great guy, a magnificent Evertonian and the most stylish English player I've ever seen.

Lee Courtliff
16 Posted 08/10/2012 at 12:58:39
Beardsley didn't request a transfer. Iy was entirely down to kendall whether he stayed or was sold.

Beardsley is on record as saying he didn't want to leave Everton.

A poor piece of management from Kendall. Unless my facts are wrong but I'm sure I saw Beardsley say he never asked for a transfer.

Cottee said in his book that the reason HK sold Peter was because he thought Everton played better with a staright 4-4-2 formation. Whereas Beardsley always played off the main striker.

Like I said, poor management. But he was probably pissed at the time!

Michael Brien
17 Posted 08/10/2012 at 13:32:00
Lee I think Beardsley was sold to bring in some money !!My late father had a season ticket at the time, and it was the only time I can remember him saying that if PB had been sold before the date for season ticket renewal he wouldn't have renewed his season ticket. What a pity we never saw Sharp and Beardsley in the same team. I think playing alongside Peter Bearsley may have rejuvenated Sharp's Everton career.

It's ironic when you think about it really that in the 2 seasons 1991-2 & 92-3 we didn't have a team that could match the " Glory Team" of 1984-7 but we had an individual player in Peter Beardsley who wouldn't have looked out of place in that great team.

Andrew Ellams
18 Posted 08/10/2012 at 14:00:47
Imagine a Beardsley playing behind Jelavic now.
Barry Stevens
19 Posted 08/10/2012 at 18:27:49
Beardsley was our best player by far at one stage. Can't remember what season it was but he single handedly carried our team.

Back to op Harvey had big boots to fill,and didn't do himself no favours with some of his buys. Steffan Rehn,Ray Atteveld,Mike Milligan anyone. Other buys struggled because of who they were replacing such as Neil Mcdonald for Gary Stevens.

A good player who I thought was underated. Scored one of the best Everton goals I've seen at the city ground. And Big Norm was excellent first season,think he ended up with about 14 goals. I remember in that season smashing Forest 5-0 under the floodlights of Goodison in one of the best performances I've ever seen from our boys
Lee Courtliff
20 Posted 09/10/2012 at 00:47:04
Maybe Micheal. But it was still a mistake to let him go.

He was a fantastic player and like you said,he could have played in our Championship winning team. Easily.

Trevor Thompson
21 Posted 09/10/2012 at 10:17:33
I never saw Sharp in his heyday but when I began watching him in the late 80s I never rated him whatsoever. I can't pin point why it all went wrong but I must admit our dealings in the transfer market was poor and this was before all the financial problems we have now. We also became a joke in the transfer market. I remember players like Dean Saunders, Mark Walters and Mark Wright snubbing us. It seemed like no one wanted to come to us...maybe they saw the downfall coming. I was quite young back then so perhaps we weren't considered big enough back then but I thought we were supposed to be considered a big club.
I do remember HK coming back and thinking the good times would be back but it didn't happen... come to think of it, it reminds me a bit like them lot across the park with Kenny D.
Martin Mason
22 Posted 09/10/2012 at 10:25:06
Trevor, from what I can see we were broke then too. We became small just as the EPL came along. We weren't equipped to gain anything from it except potential relegation.

Sharp was a great forward in his heyday, Beardsley was magnificent; anybody remember the WC when he played with Lineker

Gareth Fieldstead
23 Posted 09/10/2012 at 13:22:46
I always thought it was a combination of the two. A coach that was out of his depth as a manager that was reflected in his buys and championship winning players who felt it was beneath them to support the new players that were bought. As for Howard mark 2, some of his decisions were bizarre also. The sale of Newell, Sharp and McCaul and later on Beardsley didn't make sense especially when Johnstone was brought in. Having said that the side that beat Spurs so magnificently in the 95 semi was mostly Kendalls team, go figure! Nev, Jackson, Ablett, Watson, Unsworth, Horne, Stuart Rideout.
Danny Broderick
24 Posted 09/10/2012 at 22:19:34
For me, the players Harvey bought weren't as good as the players Liverpool bought. Pat Nevin might think they were on the brink of success, but in reality, while they bought Barnes,Beardsley,Aldridge etc, we bought Nevin,McCall,Cottee,McDonald etc.
Those players weren't as good as Liverpool's,that's where we started to slip. Harvey's recruitment wasn't as good as some of our rivals,though I will defend Cottee as a top notch striker. 99 goals in 200 games says it all.
Trevor Thompson
25 Posted 12/10/2012 at 13:12:45
A bit too young at the time, Danny, but I reckon some of those players mentioned had potential but ended up not being quite as good. I wonder if Nevin was our Barnes, McCall a replacement for Reid, Cottee our Rush? Not really sure about McDonald. I heard he was meant to be a bright prospect.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb