Identifying a new owner for Everton FC is the greatest challenge facing this club and sadly the vast majority don’t understand why this is the biggest threat to the wellbeing of the club.

There’s far too much posturing over “be careful what you wish for”, “better the devil you know” and, most bizarre of all, “I’m happy with how we’re run, look at Portsmouth, look at Leeds, look at Liverpool.”

Yeah, look at them but let’s not look at City or Chelsea or Arsenal or Spurs; let’s not look at the trophy cabinet that hasn’t been troubled since 1995, excluding the war years the most barren period in the club’s history. Yeah, let’s not look at those inescapable facts on the pitch and, heaven forbid, let’s not look at the real facts off the pitch because a prospective owner won’t either, will they?

I can understand the argument that Bill Kenwright isn’t as bad as some owners, just as I can understand he’s not as good as others, but let’s not dismiss the fact that he’s not the same as any chairman of any other Premier League club because nobody else has misled the fanbase on such a mammoth scale. You can perhaps give him the benefit of the doubt over the ground failing its safety certificate; maybe some over-zealous minion thought the drunken knobhead fans were thick enough to believe it... What can’t be excused is the whopper told over the £52M we were receiving from Tesco towards the cost of the stadium, you know that irrevocable cheque, the deal of the century, how we couldn’t afford a new world class stadium without the benevolence of Tesco; you remember don’t you? You’ll also remember it turned out to be slightly misleading as instead of £52m we weren’t getting an actual penny; did I say misleading?

How another EGM wasn’t called as soon as this fantasy was disproved and it became known that the folly had cost the club millions is beyond me, but... ah yes, I remember now: the getaway plan had already been executed, the plan that ignored the wishes of the thousands of people — fans who owned over 30% of the club — and favoured the few who owned the majority of the shares. If you know your history…bollocks, the club was set up so such an event as this couldn’t happen; but there you go — it did!

So keep clapping and telling people to "be careful what you wish for"; keep believing that Bill and the rest saved the club, that after his socks had dried out and he’d bought a decent pair of shoes that he put his house on the line for the club... but just remember: whilst you may believe the bollocks, the new owners won’t; they’ll look at the facts and the facts are these.

They’ll look at the asking price then they’ll look at the standard document used to measure the health of the business, the balance sheet, and they’ll see that since the current owners “saved the club” the balance sheet has deteriorated from being one with £20m of assets to over £35m of liabilities; they see a negative balance sheet, they won’t listen to the lame excuses over the players are undervalued, that’s the same at every club, and then their offer price will be reduced. Then they’ll look at the business\’s ability to generate revenue and their own experts will scratch their head at the Kitbag deal and the kit supply revenue that all other clubs enjoy; they’ll look once more at the offer price and reduce it again whilst the current owners eagerly point out the new £35m plus a season windfall from the new TV rights deal whilst their advisor points out that a rising tide lifts all ships and will want to know why the company secretary has left the building.

Thankfully I’m no longer worried about all this; as I’ve said before, I’ve accepted you’ll get the Everton you deserve. I’ll just go to Goodison tomorrow with real Evertonians who have no need to explain their credentials and I’ll support the club as I’ve done for all of my life and enjoy the day.

I can see people are worried over the future; it’s a distraction from being worried over their own future, their jobs, their families, their relationships. If asked about Everton and new owners, I always say it’s the biggest task facing the club and that all those clubs who have failed spectacularly, the clubs people are so keen to mention, I always point out that the root cause of their catastrophes lie with the previous owners who greedily took the money and ran. If you are worried, and I can see that you should be, I’m just past it.

Here’s a little tip to decide if Everton’s current owners will get it right this time: Forget the guys in the bedsit, forget the twelve interested parties that disappear every year, just take a sheet of A4, draw a line down the middle, write the headings Failures and Successes on each column, list them, and see where the balance of probabilities lie in this board finding the right future owner.

Enjoy the game…


Share this article


Reader Comments (88)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Michael Kenrick
Editorial Team
1 Posted 30/12/2012 at 19:35:56
I make no apologies for fishing this out of the thread where Colin posted it last night, before today's game (and giving it a title that could probably be improved upon).

By common ascent, it is a gem.
Jay Harris
2 Posted 30/12/2012 at 20:04:01
Colin, agree with every word including questioning if we (Evertonians) really care.

After watching the pathetic penguins applauding Kenwright last year, I gave up trying to put forward my views on a deceiptful buffoon of a man who does not have the morality to be Chairman of any club — let alone Everton.

However, I'm thinking Moyes may bring this era to a sorry conclusion at the end of this season and then Kenwright's support will quickly diminish, regrettably preceded by the club's demise.

Brendan McLaughlin
3 Posted 30/12/2012 at 20:16:56
Jay..."pathetic penguins"...& your views weren't universally welcomed.....unbelievable!
Richard Jones
4 Posted 30/12/2012 at 20:12:26
Colin says everything I feel, it makes me sick to the stomach when I hear the be careful what you wish for brigade and the happy clappers at the Villa game last year. You see to me Bill Kenwright is supposed to be one of us and yet he bullshitted us and tried to force a move on us that would not have benefited us one jot!! and what makes it worse is he tried to lure us into it with £52 million windfall from Tesco's that didn't exist , pop concerts and corporate events that were never going to take place, world class stadium, best travel facilities etc. Why did he do this.... I believe he was going to benefit from the £52 million windfall on his balance sheet.

I can feel myself rambling on now and Colin puts his feelings together far better than I do, but it makes me feel numb inside that such a large proportion of us let this fake get away with running our club into the ground off the pitch, in politics they say a country gets the leader it deserves. I hope one day that all those happy clappers don't have to take a long look in the mirror and think about what they have allowed this regime to do. I know a great many of us will be able to hold our heads up and say we tried to tell you and the evidence was right before your eyes.

Patrick Murphy
5 Posted 30/12/2012 at 20:46:42
I haven't seen all of his interview on the official website, but there was plenty of grattitude shown to David Moyes and his work ethic, but as you might expect there was no mention of what lies ahead.He did say how much he admires people who appreciate what they have got - maybe it was a message to David Moyes that the grass is not always greener.


if Bill regards Everton in the same way as he regards his theatre productions, i.e. fill the seats, put on a passable production and don't worry too much about the quality of the cast, then he has to realise that Everton FC aren't a one-off, here today gone tomorrow production and deserve far far more consideration.

Only time will tell whether Bill has been good or bad for Everton FC, but you would have thought after 13 years in the hot-seat we would have had a clearer idea.

Kevin Tully
6 Posted 30/12/2012 at 20:46:55
Did anyone see Sunday Supplement on Sky Sports this morning?

They were discussing the future of Moyes and looking at the game today.

The football writer from the Sunday Express, John Richardson, who covers the North-West came out with the following shite:

"Bill Kenwright puts absolutely every single penny he has into that club to help David Moyes."

How the fuck can anyone concerned with the football world get something so badly wrong?

Is the press hospitality that good at Goodison? Are the press barred for daring to tell the truth?

We know Echo journalists have been banned for probing into the club's affairs, but I find it astonishing the truth has not been published in a national newspaper.

Patrick Murphy
7 Posted 30/12/2012 at 21:02:57
Kevin, I wonder how many people outside of Evertonians, want EFC to be a proper challenger to the elite clubs. It is not in the interests of those favoured clubs to have anyone outside of themselves regularly competing for CL places and silver-ware, even Man City with their financial clout are finding it difficult to find a place in the hearts of the football intelligensia. Man City pre-investment, were also a club that the press liked, but they were never considered to be taken seriously as likely challengers to the established status-quo.

Look at the scrutiny that Chelsea, Arsenal, Tottenham and Liverpool get when the results go awry, the press are all over them, maybe not LFC this season as they are in a transitional phase. Compare that to what Everton's coverage is likely to be, 'only to be expected given the financial constraints', 'they have been punching above their weight 'etc etc.

With this in mind is it any wonder that the Everton board of directors are given a fairly easy ride as regards press scrutiny. We have had a better press for our performances this season, but I'll know that EFC has truly arrived at the top table when the football writers sharpen their pencils and start looking for bad news stories.

Paul Jamieson
8 Posted 30/12/2012 at 21:14:46
Colin, it speaks volumes when the owner of TW reposts a comment of yours as a thread in it's own right! Let's hope the tide is turning with those who control Independent EFC fan websites like TW (I say independent as there are some like Kipper who have been outed as club propaganda outlets).

It takes a brave person to stick their head above the parapet to show others what's happening outside their own little bubble and I for one heartily applaud KEIOC, The Blue Union, The People's Group and anyone else who is prepared to fight for OUR ONCE GREAT CLUB.

The question now has to be, do the owners of said websites and the "stalwarts of the local free press" want to stick their heads up or do they want to remain in their bubbles? I hope it's the former and the encouraging signs are there to see with TW; so far...

Michael Kenrick
Editorial Team
9 Posted 30/12/2012 at 21:27:17
Oh Paul...

If only you knew a little bit of history.

Col Noon
10 Posted 30/12/2012 at 21:22:37
RE : Investment/Takeover - Paul Tyrell Director Of Communications today tweeted the following tweets when asked about our mystery man Richard Tolman.

@TyrrellPaul: @johnmerro1 @sgwtaylor I know who David Tolman is, but who is richard Tolman? And we re not involved in any discussions with David Tolman.

@TyrrellPaul: @shaunsmithefc sorry Shaun. i/we have not heard of him - and there are currently no new developments in relation to investment.


So we can all breathe easy as our buffoon of a chairman and band of merry men continue to do.... Whatever it is they do. Which as far as I can see is absolutely nothing at all. Disgraceful in my opinion.

Barry Rathbone
11 Posted 30/12/2012 at 21:14:15
Fans generally aren't that arsed about football anymore the erosion of genuine competition being the killer but a surfeit of other interests and the horrendous cost has made it a bit of a joke to be honest.

It's become a pastime rather than a passion.

At Arsenal yesterday the commentator mused about hordes of fans leaving early it was 6-3 a blinding game and sure enough Arsenal scored again, never used to happen.

The unassailable "it's all about money" needs breaking by a club from the pack - Southampton, Swansea, us!

Until then this generation will continue to echo the fraudulent assertions of managers and media their youth oblivious to what's really happening.

"Prioritising" games, selecting your second 11 is not trying your best but the obscenity is justified by said motley crew because the truth would eat at the root of the money tree.

Yes Evertonians don't care enough, but the reality is seeing Lineker sold and Kendal tripping off to spain made some look suspiciously at the club. The likes of Agent Johnson, Kenwright, Moyes and Rooney just look worse with every historical revelation.

The consolation, if that's the right word, is every club is the same.

Paul Jamieson
12 Posted 30/12/2012 at 22:19:03
Michael, I'm not having a dig I promise – I'm just disappointed that more hasn't been done to help those fighting the good cause that is the future of our club.
Tony I'Anson
13 Posted 30/12/2012 at 22:21:20
Do we care anymore? Yes we do.
Gavin Ramejkis
14 Posted 30/12/2012 at 22:27:00
A great piece, Colin; to all the naysayers — seriously, ask yourself the question Colin asks about those two columns and the mystical £52m debunked at the DK hearings... then, using the quote from John Stuart Mill's inaugural address to the University of St Andrews: "Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing."

Apathy is a terrible crime to leave future generations nothing but memories and questions of why didn't anyone speak out.
Brendan McLaughlin
15 Posted 30/12/2012 at 22:36:30
"fans generally aren't that arsed about football anymore"..they ain't fans then Barry
Robby Daniels
16 Posted 30/12/2012 at 22:40:37
Well said, Gavin!

Chelsea didn't beat us today.... Bill did, and Bobby Earl and the rest of them.

They have been beating us for years....

Throw us a fish.....

Clap clap clap.....

No, we don't care enough.....

Steve Jones
17 Posted 30/12/2012 at 23:47:22
Do we care anymore? Yes.

Do we think stamping our feet and having a tantrum, with cake, will make one iota of difference on this board? No

We don't have to agree with Colin Fitzpatrick to care about the club. It really isn't 'with us or against us' despite some here seeming to think so!

Patrick Murphy
18 Posted 30/12/2012 at 23:54:17
If Everton were on a financial even keel, I don't think so many people would be sounding the alarm bells. But we're not in a healthy financial situation and the truth is that some of us are concerned that the actual position is far worse than we are being told.

Until we know those details in full, a mistrust of the board will continue to fester, surely it is better to raise these concerns when things are going fairly well on the pitch, because if we wait for the results to go bad and then start criticising the board, many people will accuse the 'alarmists' as having an agenda against the club itself and undermining the team on the pitch.

For many of us there is never a good time to question the motives and leadership of the board, but as Gavin quite rightly said it is incumbent on current Evertonians to ensure that the club is run in the correct manner and we are duty bound to preserve the club so that future generations can enjoy the same privileges of being Everton supporters.

I agree that it is difficult to know how to tackle the current situation, but that doesn't give us the right to bury our heads in the sand and ignore it and hope the problem goes away all by itself.

We are not mushrooms, we don't like being kept in the dark. Sometimes silence speaks volumes.


Paul Jamieson
19 Posted 31/12/2012 at 00:24:03
Strange how one of the founders of Kipper comes on here to beat to the drum of Everton's Board. Strange you might think, until you see this photo – http://t.co/GNkIavBo – and see one of Kipper enjoying hospitality with Mirallas and Felli that is! Is this the Club repaying them for deeds they willfully undertake against the very fans their fanzine is meant to represent?

Michael Kenrick, this photo is EXACTLY what I was talking about earlier.

Barry Jones
20 Posted 31/12/2012 at 00:25:13
Steve, I hardly think Colin is stamping his feet and having a tantrum. It reads to me like a well measured summary that’s been well articulated by someone who most of us know isn’t a keyboard warrior like his critics but has had a go over Kirkby and the finances over many a year.

When the last accounts came out, I gave them to my accountant. She told me that, at first glance, the business was in a very dangerous situation and asked for copies of previous years accounts which I managed to obtain off the net back as far as 1999. She came back and confirmed that the business had been chronically starved of any form of investment, only surviving on profits from disposals and explained that the balance sheet had been essentially wiped out over an eight-year period, that income remained static apart from TV revenues, and interestingly enquired as to why the operating costs doubled and remained at that level when the explanation given appeared questionable?  

I fell off my seat today reading Elstone in the programme saying we’re a well run club and talking about awards won by Everton in the Community proved it. Sounds like a drowning man clutching at anything – a bit like a couple of posters on ToffeeWeb to be honest.

with colin looking like throwing his hand in, I suppose we can rely on the shareholders and the Fans Forum to stand up for the ordinary fans...
[shakes head and goes to bed.]

Derek Thomas
21 Posted 31/12/2012 at 00:44:43
Colin spot on; If the naysayers can't or won't do the A4 thing, let them instead do a piece in the style 'Life of Brian'. I'll start....

Apart from appointing Moyes, which was Walter's idea, what's Bill Kenwright ever done for us?

Off you go, Pengiuns.

Steve Jones
22 Posted 31/12/2012 at 01:32:07
Barry,

You misunderstand. I was not saying that Colin is having a tantrum here.

I'm saying that protest marches seemed the only thing on offer from the Blue Union/KEIOC (i.e Colin's) direction in recent times. Amounting to little more than tantrums from a modest percentage of the matchday fanbase. There appears to be some upset that this didn't attract more support and that we were all guilty of propping up the board because of it!.

Me, I find the idea there that we either do things "Colin's way" or we are in some way "bad Evertonians" laughable. I accept that's not 'on message' for this site though and that, if I don't immediately say 'I hate the board' three times I am a stooge, sycophant, apologist and belong on Kipper!.

There just seems to be a pool of Evertonians (some heartfelt ones at that) that are under-represented here... these are ones that want no part of the current, undeniably failed, board but don't see what, real, constructive options the Blue Union/KEIOC offer and don't feel they speak for them. Colin's piece seemed dismissive of some good, solid Evertonians, whose opinion on the correct way forward differs — and that is out of order.

Michael Kenrick
Editorial Team
23 Posted 31/12/2012 at 02:06:27
Paul, we've been staunchly independent since the start. In fact early on, I changed the subtitle of the site from "Unofficial Everton Website" to "Independent Everton Website" for good reason.

We've given publicity and space to a variety of groups such as Goodison for Ever-ton, Investors in Everton, and Everton Fans Trust. More recently, we gave lots of coverage to KEIOC's efforts to tell Evertonians the inconvenient truth about Destination Kirkby, and we published and discussed numerous initiatives by Blue Union. We are also right behind Tony I'Anson's efforts to promote Trust Everton, although that seems to be taking a long time to reach fruition.

So you can understand, with this history, that I might get a little prickly when you say you "hope the tide is turning with those who control Independent EFC fan websites like TW." I won't speak of other sites but that insinuation re TW is way off base.

David O'Keefe
24 Posted 31/12/2012 at 02:43:05
Steve, on some issues there are no shades of grey; sometimes it's just black and white. What I do find objectionable is your infantilisation of Colin and the BU supporters, ie, 'Tantrums'. After 13 years of failure, lies, and the Kirkby con, we have a lot to be angry about and in truth it's been rather restrained.

Now Steve, if you want to offer some sort of third way, I'm willing to listen, but I have not seen or heard of it. The only alternatives have come from the BU/KEIOC section of the fanbase that you decry for having a tantrum. I'm going to ignore the ideas emanating from Elstone for reasons that you have probably heard many times.

Like Colin I'm exasperated and had my fill of discussing the same issue with fans that are unwilling to discuss the issues affecting the club's long-term future and getting nothing but abuse served up with dissembling and evasive BS in return. It drives you crazy and, like Colin, I would rather do something else with my life.

Peter Fearon
25 Posted 31/12/2012 at 02:10:12
You don't need a piece of A4 paper with a line down the middle to see that the failures outnumber the successes on and off the field these many years. However, it is also true that in the absence of an Arab potentate, US multinational, Thai billionaire or the like, Everton must do business the old fashioned way, stretching credit, increasing earnings by getting into Europe and so on.

The fact is that we have been enjoying some success so far this season and so some of the shrill criticisms and anger of seasons past have been somewhat muted, which makes me wonder why this has been raised again now in such divisive form?

In truth, Kenwright may not want to let go of the club. I can't really blame him for that although I doubt he is turning legitimate big money investors away. Perhaps a top four finish will attract an investor who thought previous performances suggested too much work and money was necessary to improve matters. I hope so.

The fact Kenwright's critics often forget is that Everton has not been an especially attractive buy in recent years. We have been loaded down with debt, unattractive mediocrities on the field, located in a shrinking city dominated until recently by another club – and in a stadium needing at the very least a massive overhaul. Oh, and fans who think they already own "The People's Club". Not a great ad.

Things are improving – slowly, too slowly. I do still care who owns the club, but I care more that we are playing some of the most attractive attacking football we have played for years and we are fighting for a place in the Champions League. I'll take that for now. That doesn't make me an apologist for Kenwright or a 'naysayer', whatever that means in this context.

Matt Traynor
26 Posted 31/12/2012 at 06:36:56
I read Colin's piece as basically saying we need new owners, not investment, but unfortunately neither is on the horizon because the price and conditions attached to any sale are prohibitive.

Or in short, the Greatest Evertonian and his cohorts are looking to make a fucking great big profit?

Bearing in mind the claims down the years that ours was the original leveraged buyout, with club debt jumping by £20+ million in the year after the £20+ million purchase from Johnson et al, I'm (not) surprised that more haven't questioned the motives of the larger shareholders. I wouldn't be against them making a small return, but given their apparent absence of actual direct injection of their own money, I begin to wonder whether it's people really liking a "chancer" doing well for himself, even if it is ultimately at our football club's expense?

Steve Guy
27 Posted 31/12/2012 at 08:12:53
Thank heaven these issues are actually being discussed again. They haven't been given enough (if any) airing for most of the calendar year and that's clearly because the team's success on the pitch has served as a welcome distraction. But distraction is all it is. We still have to sell to buy, we still eke out an existence in a decrepit stadium, we still have an owner who will talk about anything but the financial health of the Club and who ignores his own shareholders.

What has happened to the Blue Union? Broken up by the apathy toward real change at our Club? I hope not. Perversely the team's great performances on the pitch this year could end up contributing to the longer term demise of EFC by suppressing criticism of the Board and BK in particular.

Dave Lynch
28 Posted 31/12/2012 at 08:54:05
let's face it.
Bill will sell to anyone if it will garuantee him the profit he wants from the sale.
His over-valuation of the club I feel is the stumbling block but the minute some one is mug enough to stump up the cash he is asking for he will sell and I bet he wouldn't give 2 toots on a ragmans trumpet who it was.

Patrick Murphy
29 Posted 31/12/2012 at 09:12:42
I've just read on wikipedia that a young Bill Kenwright played the part of Shylock in Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice...make of that what you will.
Barry Jones
30 Posted 31/12/2012 at 09:30:47
Steve Jones – forgive my confusion as you posted  in a thread discussing Colin's post which is nothing to do with protests or as I now understand what you call tantrums.

I suppose when you don’t want to talk about a subject  its always best to attempt to change the subject, like Elstone talking about the club being well run by pointing out the awards won by Everton in the community prove it. A new low in desperation as far as I’m concerned so lets not talk about the boards terrible performance and telling lies, lets talk about fans protests and suggest that in some way the fans should offer a solution.

I never thought a protest was a solution to anything. Aren’t protests just a method to draw attention to something?  If my memory serves me right what was on offer was a solution to the problem of being unable to find the right buyer – get someone else to do it like other clubs have. See it works, I’m not talking about our boards terrible performance and lies I’m talking about protests.

Why do people feel it’s the fans responsibility to deliver a solution to Evertons problems anyway? Isn’t it like a smoker blaming the oncologist who diagnoses terminal lung cancer for not being able to offer a cure? Who is responsible for the cancer, the doctor or the person who has smoked 60 a day for forty years? Lets not shoot the messenger just because you couldn’t see what others could.
Gavin Ramejkis
31 Posted 31/12/2012 at 09:50:43
Other than taking hospitality freebies and running propaganda for the club "it owes" Steve can you give any examples of anything bluekipper has done? Nothing like the football quarter it seems.
John Audsley
32 Posted 31/12/2012 at 09:48:01
I don't think Bill really wants to sell and I don't believe for one second that anyone is really out speaking to people about a possible takeover. Kenwright loves the limelight far too much to give it up and as long as he has Moyes he wont need to.

Bill, Woods and Earl haven't put a penny into EFC and this Transfer window represents a real chance to improve the squad and push on

It wont happen and never will and Kevin Tully 048, John Richardson is a friend of Kenwright and always spouts off about him giving blood to EFC

But if fans want to clap and cheer a man who hasn't invested anything into EFC and cannot understand how 20+ Million disappears under "other operating costs" well.....................

Steve Jones
33 Posted 31/12/2012 at 09:15:21
David O'Keefe,

You said: "What I do find objectionable is your infantilisation of Colin and the BU supporters, ie, 'Tantrums'. After 13 years of failure, lies, and the Kirkby con, we have a lot to be angry about and in truth it's been rather restrained."

Dont you understand though, that to many, infantile was exactly the way those protests came across...just as the ones at Newcastle, Anfield and Blackburn did?.

They may have served to allow angry fans to vent, but, to fans who wanted a more constructive answer to their clubs problems or those who got to the despondent stage a bit before Colin and yourself there would be little support. Colin appealed to angry fans...still does....his problem is that, despite the best efforts to stoke up anger, most of the fanbase wants to see a credible plan to move us forward....not a thousand angry fans and a cake.

Give them something constructive to rally behind and the fans will be there, but, don't go having a strop when people see that you are offering nothing and that the only comeback is 'well were doing something'. There is a bit of a stink of 'der volk not being big enough to deliver on der fuhrers vision' about that!.

Steve Jones
34 Posted 31/12/2012 at 10:11:28
Barry/Gavin

The point under discussion appeared to be a lamenting of the lack of support that Colin was feeling....hence his handwringing missive?.

The question was expressly asked do Evertonians care....I answered it. No more no less. I made no points here about the board or Kipper....save for saying that it is possible to find the board a joke but not subscribe to the concepts Colins 'team' proposes...especially the FQ!.

Is staying on topic in a thread such a crime here?

Gavin Ramejkis
35 Posted 31/12/2012 at 11:15:07
Steve you raised tantrums and cake despite it not appearing anywhere in Colin's piece, glass houses and all that
Dave Lynch
36 Posted 31/12/2012 at 11:03:17
Steve.

The bigger crime is going round in circles, a topic opens new doors for discussion which I think you will agree is the way debating works.

Or maybe you would rather have MBE write one of his long winded ramblings about how the club is so well run and how we should all be grateful for Bill and his band of merry men.

We could then all doff our caps like the subservient sheep the club want us to be, who knows, one day we may never need AGMs. Oh sorry, he's stopped them already!
Steve Jones
37 Posted 31/12/2012 at 11:37:51
Gavin,

Fair comment I did, but, I'm trying to pick out what this lack of support Colin is talking about is and the only thing that seems to fit is the KEIOC/BU thing?. If thats not what he's talking about I'll apologise fully now. I cant see anything else that has changed to drive him to such an abject position though.

If it is that all I want to do here is point out that there are more Evertonians unhappy with the board than there are that support the BU/KEIOC stance. Try to make it a 'with us or against us' deal and that is something thats not going to sit well is it?.

Dave,

Again though mate my point on this thread isn't about the debate....its about this idea that there are only two positions valid in it. For want of a better description - Bills Way or Colins Way!. What happens if you swallow neither?. There are a lot of Evertonians that fall between those two stools...the insinuation is made here that those in the middle ground are directly culpable...that we 'get the Everton we deserve'. Like I said that sounded just a bit like a statement of Evertonians not being up to the 'Fuhrers vision' to me and I didnt think it fair comment.

Alan Clarke
38 Posted 31/12/2012 at 10:39:02
I've been very anti-Kenwright in the past and joined in with the Blue Union protests. This season, though, I feel different.

It's not because I have any new found love for Kenwright. He's still a shithouse of the highest order for all the reasons Colin states. It's because the alternative is just as shite and football in general is shite. Man City are now held up as the shining beacon of how to be successful and win things. But I wouldn't swap us for them.

Living in Manchester, I get to speak with a lot of City fans and they're not enjoying it. Their stadium is soulless, their players are overpaid mercenaries. Do you think Tevez gives a shit about their club or it's fans? Do you think lescott really wanted to play for Man City? Or did he just want to play for money?

Absolutely nothing about their club now resembles the Man City they grew up with. They are a Premier League franchise who just happen to play in light blue and happen to be based in Manchester. Yet we seem to think they hit the jackpot. They haven't, all they've done is sold their soul. They are now manufactured not born.

I used to think Evertonians lacked ambition and just weren't arsed and that's why they put up with Kenwright and years of Moyes' style of zombie football. I was wrong. Evertonians truly care about their club. They care about the traditions and everything that the club represents. Moyes gets that. He's built a team of players who seem to get it.

Our club still has it's heart and soul. It still has that special match day feeling going to Goodison. It still has local lads in the team. It still has local fans who feel connected with the club and observe the same match day routines that their dads and their dads before them observed. Go and read the Evertonians on twitter today saying how proud they are of yesterday's performance despite losing. Read how proud people are that our team nearly did one on a team of mercenaries that contains 2 players worth more than our whole squad. A few years ago I'd have been livid at that attitude but I'm with them now. I still will moan about Moyes but I'd rather finish 8th with what we've got than finish 1st and have a club like Chelsea or Man City.

I don't think people give a shit about Kenwright but they do give a shit about the alternatives. Right now every alternative doesn't look too appealing.

David O'Keefe
39 Posted 31/12/2012 at 13:25:50
So Steve Jones has responded and has not offered a third way? Theres a term for Mr Jones conduct its called concern trolling, I agree with Colin, but he's not offering anything constructive apart from a Foootball quarter and get the professionals in to facilitate the sale of the club.

I'm not going to ask for the third way solution between sticking with Bill and opting for the BU/Keioc solution because you don't have one. I actually prefer the Kenwright apologists to your BS they're honest even if they're wrong.

Sam Hoare
40 Posted 31/12/2012 at 13:36:18
Good post Alan Clarke. Even though i'm from London born and bred I feel the same way. I feel proud to be an Evertonian and the way we go about our business. I think Moyes is not only a good manager but a man with dignity and integrity. Not sure I can say the same about Kenwright.
Patrick Murphy
41 Posted 31/12/2012 at 13:39:17
David O'Keefe's use of the term Concern Trolling had me stumped so I looked it up and it means,

'In an argument (usually a political debate), a concern troll is someone who is on one side of the discussion, but pretends to be a supporter of the other side with "concerns". The idea behind this is that your opponents will take your arguments more seriously if they think you're an ally. Concern trolls who use fake identities are sometimes known as sockpuppets.'

Sorry for those of you who knew exactly what David meant , but I didn't and I wanted to show others like me what it meant.

Thomas Lennon
42 Posted 31/12/2012 at 11:42:19
At this time of year, we often take a look at what we have achieved over the year, get a bit maudlin over a glass of whisky and promise ourselves we will do better next year. Things that have minimal chance of success at the cost of maximum effort tend to get dropped.

However, football without passion is nothing and Colin is a passionate man — he will be back. He has the next issue of the accounts (imminently) to look forward to after all... though, as he claimed to have notice of last year's results well in advance and did a fair bit of gloating about them, perhaps he has already got wind of them this year?

On the back of that piece of A4 perhaps you could write down the successes and failures of KEIOC Blue Union too. My opinion is that the interview with Kenwright was a disaster but they certainly seemed to get us a better PR man in charge in the end. We got a fair measure of the commitment of support for the 'kick out the chairman and the board' and suggest they employ a third party to sell too, which will probably wax and wane with every season. The claim '5000 are staying away in protest' has collapsed this year even though financial times are harder than ever.

Why? Because football fans are the ultimate optimists, why would we keep supporting Everton if we were not? Colin and one or two others are our touchstones when times are harder. Our fortunes will fluctuate, like yin and yang they are eternal partners. Colin's 'we are all doomed' is no truer than Elstone's 'Things have never been so good'.

Where do we go from here? Ultimately Everton will have to change radically to compete for the top again and there will be many things we won't like about it. Everton were one of the last to hold AGMs as massive companies take over most clubs. Everton currently bridge a gap between the old and the new worlds of football, one day we will have to make that jump into the future and it is unlikely to be popular with everyone.

Let us assume KEIOC get their wish and we get a change in management/ownership plus investment. That in all likelihood will come from a large investment group or company who will be about as likely to listen to fans as Glazer & Co do to Man Utd fans. Ticket prices will only go one way. It would be sensible to impose some limitations on the powers of a new owner then? Isn't that exactly what Kenwright wants or are KEIOC going to throw us to the wolves?

There is a fundamental contradiction that none of us can get around: to get more money we will have to give up the club to a body that must raise the maximum amount of money from its fans in order to win something. That would limit the access to the club of many potential KEIOC supporters. Or we can stay where we are and hope for a modicum of success now and then, quietly building consistently year on year with no real hope of massive success?

Will someone come in and offer us even £10 -20 million a year without such control? Unlikely and by imposing that limitation on buyers we are narrowing down the number of buyers likely to approach us — exactly what Kenwright has been accused of doing.

KEIOC argue for exactly the same thing as Kenwright but paradoxically without due consideration for the future of the club's fans. Given the options most opt to sit on their hands and can't be said to be apathetic while doing that.

Paul Jamieson
43 Posted 31/12/2012 at 14:03:35
Steve Jones, one of the big differences between what happened at Newcastle, Blackburn and Liverpool is that the owners didn't hide what they were doing and it was readily understandable what they were doing. At Liverpool, for example, they loaded the club with debt which essentially crippled the ability to compete, it didn't take a genius to work that out and it wasn't denied.

With Everton you have a guy telling the world he's the greatest Evertonian, telling Boys Pen stories, how he put his house on the line to save the club, and how he came up with the Deal of the Century from which Everton were getting £52m towards the cost of a stadium. All lies. All disproven.

Now he's telling us He's Not Heavy was his mums favorite record, sadly it's the boy who cried wolf syndrome. If the fans don't believe him, how will perspective buyers? — the answer is they don't; that's why nobody will pay the asking price needed to pay off how the shares were financed.

Talking of the Football Quarter, another thing Colin doesn't mention, that's all about the redevelopment of a ground in a redeveloped local area isn't it? — exactly what Liverpool have realised is the way forward whilst we just talk about looking at unamed sites and having a stadium designed, laughable really.

Steve are you Steve Jones from Kipper, yes or no?

David O'Keefe
44 Posted 31/12/2012 at 14:02:54
Ok Thomas before Colin responds your not entitled to your own facts about Keioc that you have reached on the basis of no research.

http://www.keioc.net/index.php?page=our-aims

The above link may help.

Richard Jones
45 Posted 31/12/2012 at 13:55:32
Steve, a few are confusing you with the guy who runs kipper, don’t know why you haven’t put them straight, you’re just an internet warrior who’s been on here for years and likes to mock anything and everything that’s against St Bill. Funny you mention the FQ which is all about redevelopment and regeneration of deprived areas in line with local policy, you must be gutted that it’s been embraced by LFC who are redeveloping their ground instead of building a new one, building a hotel from a street of terraced houses which includes a council regeneration programme for the immediate surrounding area. Redevelopment and regeneration and a hotel in a deprived area, you’ve mocked it for years. I don’t know why but I get the feeling that I doubt you even know your way to Goodison.

Lets face it you have proven you just don’t like Colin / KEIOC or the blue union but unlike them you offer nothing, you mock their attempts to unravel the lies and misleading info you remind me of the guy who Tom Hughes and Colin had an almighty argument with about redeveloping Goodison in the football quarter and it turned out the guy built roads for a living and was basing his opinions on his own industry and when pushed put forward that his own idea of saving Everton was to build on the garden festival site and have ferries bringing in fans, the place was pissing itself.

Its easy to criticize from behind a keyboard, its different when you provide accurate explanations and try to offer alternatives, you’re clearly irritated that Colin has earned some respect here, you’re slip is showing mate.

Steve Jones
46 Posted 31/12/2012 at 14:47:05
I've no idea who runs Kipper Richard. The name is scarcely uncommon... little I can do about that.

Last I heard it was acknowledged by all parties that the board had already engaged people to sell the club. The idea was that the sticker price on the club was too high. Seeing that the 'team of professionals' would still have that price dictated to them by the people owning the shares I don't see how the 'new professionals' would fare any different? When's ground breaking on the FQ and haven't Liverpool just decided to build their own hotel as part of their stadium redevelopment... Whoops... whoever saw that coming?!

An absence of a better plan doesn't mean a bad plan should be the way forward... it means you keep working on the better plan. Designing roads, things that have to work, cope with predicted future loadings and endure does give you that perspective!

Once again though the intent here was, on topic, to point out that the 'with us or against us' was bang out of order and if you're all wondering why your support ran out you don't have to look far for the reason. As the villagers seem to be sharpening their torches and lighting the pitchforks, I'll leave it there before I get called nastier names than 'Concern Troll'... whatever the fuck that is all about!

Happy frothing lads.

Colin Wainwright
47 Posted 31/12/2012 at 15:18:31
Again though Steve, you criticise the "for or against us" approach, insisting there must be a better third way, yet refuse to give any idea as to what you believe this is.
David O'Keefe
48 Posted 31/12/2012 at 15:30:55
Colin Wainwright that third way is not on today's agenda. Mr Jones is clearly looking to cause BU/Keioc types to froth at the mouth. Just one problem here: our concern troll is the one frothing like a cappuccino dispenser.
Dave Lynch
49 Posted 31/12/2012 at 15:40:44
Or a bottle of Cresta. [One for the oldies there, boys!]
Gavin Ramejkis
50 Posted 31/12/2012 at 15:44:14
Dave, to the tune of the old R Whites advert

He's a not so secret bullshit merchant
R Bill
R Bill
He's been trying hard to sell Everton 24/7 - yeah right
R Bill
R Bill
R Blue Bullshitter

Colin Wainwright
51 Posted 31/12/2012 at 15:47:55
Maybe David. I just thought he might like to give us his opinions. If I remember correctly, when the FQ plans were launched, Steve was vocal in his condemnation of plans to build a hotel complex on the site, insisting there was no demand for this. Now LFC have decided there is and intend to include a hotel in their stadium plans, he uses this to deride the FQ team. " Whoops... whoever saw that coming?!".

Tony I'Anson
52 Posted 31/12/2012 at 15:50:07
Michael,

The team at Trust Everton would like to thank Toffeeweb.com and all other Everton fans' forums for the collective support given over the last 12 months. The project is still active and, agreed, taking a long time to come to fruition. For those who are unaware of the aims and objectives of Trust Everton, please refer to the website, www.trusteverton.com with the opening statement:

"Trust Everton’s mission is to see the future of Everton FC secured for the current and subsequent generations of Evertonians. The initial rationale for Trust Everton is to explore thoroughly the feasibility of a supporters’ vehicle providing sustainable long-term funding for the real-estate assets of the football club. The two that spring to mind are the training ground and the stadium."

To the diaspora of Evertonians across the world, have a great New Year's party and look forward to an exciting and positive 2013 for our great club.

Christine Foster
53 Posted 31/12/2012 at 15:35:14
I can fully understand Colin's perspective, I myself stepped back from "my crusade" as Michael once put it, not because it was the focus was misplaced but because of the lack of countless times that people would expect to be delivered with an answer to all our issues on a silver platter by those who are only privvy to a tenth of the truth.

Our job as fans is to get behind the team, every person I know who claims to be an Evertonian does this. Some are only concerned with how the team plays and not a care in the world as to how the club is run or who owns it as long as the team plays well.

Some care for our future, can read warning signs even with the little information we are privvy too, some, from experience, see how truth is substituted by spin and deceit, the problem is of course many don't.

The club claimed to be wronged by the fans and shareholders in daring to ask uncomfortable questions and their solution is to prevent the opportunity to ask again. If you know your history then you will know that this was exactly the situation that the club sought to prevent in its foundation, shame on a board who changed the constitution for their comfort and benefit.

The fans and share holders of this club have no voice or platform to ask the probing questions, many care little to be heard anyway. Many think we do not have a right to enquire or demand explanations. Every shareholder does. Whether the board likes it or not, having a majority shareholding does not give the right to stifle discussion.

I do not believe for one moment that BK or his puppet master cronies have the best interests of the club at heart, he may be an Evertonian but the pursuit of money is paramount.

Everton Football Club is not a well run business, despite what pundits say, we sell to survive, Moyes cannot succeed in such an environment. He will go, but will it break BK's heart or his wallet?

Colin Fitzpatrick
55 Posted 31/12/2012 at 16:25:32
Thomas #169 I'm sure you've been told before but you're a little premature ;-) I'm not going anywhere nor have I said that I'm going to stop posting, all I said is that I don't care anymore about the lies and the spin like I used to, I don't care that you've written a post that misrepresents the deeds of keioc, they had nothing to do with the kenwright interview nor any claims of 5, 000 missing fans, although when you eventually see this years ticket
income revenue will still be down, I'll leave you to work out why.

What do the accounts say this year? Easy, I could write next years at a push!


I have no idea why you class me as a merchant of doom, I'm merely pointing out that the evidence proves that the current owners are only concerned about one thing; that the prospective owners may be good or bad is secondary no matter how much work goes into projecting the myth
in place of the reality surrounding the incumbents.

I honestly have no idea what you're on about with your ramblings on limitations on the oowers of new owners and most of the other stuff; btw don't Arsenal hold agm's?

Instead of worrying about keioc's successes just write down your name, blacktop jones, Martian (rip) and any other lunatic on here and for their
accomplishments just write fuck all in large letters!

The match yesterday was prophetic in that it was representative of Everton's struggle in the premiership; guile and determination gets you only so far, ultimately money counts but it was all very entertaining anyway.

Hope you all have a happy and prosperous new year.

Colin Fitzpatrick
56 Posted 31/12/2012 at 17:02:28
Apologies for the typing, doing it on my phone!
Ian Bennett
57 Posted 31/12/2012 at 17:27:31
So the options:-

1. Hope bill gets his price from a rich yank/oilgarch - unlikely
2. Fans collectively vote with their feet slashing income, and forcing bill to lower his price. Leading to fire sale of players as covenants get busted - unlikely
3. Hope some fan wins euro millions to buy bill out and finds he is bill mk2, as he needs twice the win to unpick 40 years of a lack of investment - unlikely
4. Nothing happens, the slow death continues with the fan base shrinking and ageing. The best players get sold when they show any promise.

Fuck me it's depressing.

Brian Denton
58 Posted 31/12/2012 at 19:20:46
Ian, possibility 5 is that the Sky model goes tits up, but I guess that is the most unlikely of all. People who follow clubs with proud histories, a passionate fan base, who get good crowds (eg us, Villa, Newcastle etc) may realise that every season they start with a 0% chance of winning the League. Perhaps they will then question why they support the whole rotten edifice.

Not holding my breath!

Danny Broderick
59 Posted 31/12/2012 at 19:20:43
Why do some people suggest we must either get a billionaire owner,or else an idiot who wants to pour his money down the drain, which is never going to happen? Why can't we get a good businessman, who will clear our debt and run us as a club that breaks even?

This is the option for us to explore – the only option. For this to happen, we need to know – officially – what the asking price is, because we have been let down by the media, who refuse to ask this question.

Could this be an avenue for the Blue Union to pursue? Get this information out into the public domain and it would at least get the ball rolling... but I fully accept it would need a campaign to prize this figure from the board. But surely even people against the BU could not begrudge a campaign to find out how much our current board are looking for?
Peter Warren
60 Posted 31/12/2012 at 19:34:30
I'm with Colin: the problem with our club lies with the current owners, but I'm past caring and just support our club now.
Phil Roberts
61 Posted 31/12/2012 at 19:38:21
People in glass houses should not throw stones... so, because nobody else has misled the fanbase on such a mammoth scale. I think there are a few chairman who have... Bill, perfect? — No. But not the worst.

Secondly, the football writer from the Sunday Express, John Richardson, who covers the northwest came out with the following shite:

"Bill Kenwright puts absolutely every single penny he has into that club to help David Moyes."

Probably true on the simple basis that he has not that many pennies...

So have your moans – when will we go for a supporters trust a la Barca? – but don't just think it is Bill that tells lies or does not present the truth.

Ian Bennett
62 Posted 31/12/2012 at 19:42:57
Danny, it's going to take £45m to clear the debt, £15m to buy Finch Farm, and roughly £60 to £120m to buy the shares. The squad needs £10 to £20m spending on it, and probably £50m on a new stand to boost the revenue, although income will fall during the build. The commercial deal with Kitbag has a further 7 years to run, with the business losing £5m in cash terms but this includes £4m of interest.

Tempted?

Peter Laing
63 Posted 31/12/2012 at 19:41:06
Danny the price fluctuates according to Bill when asked directly on skysports last year, however what the shifty fucker didnt say was what price range we are talking, I suppose he would have needed Green's permission before divulging on that.
Danny Broderick
64 Posted 31/12/2012 at 20:09:39
Ian,

We don't need to do all of that straightaway — you could also have said we need a new stadium, £100 million investment in the squad etc. What I was trying to make clear is that it's the debt which needs attacking.

Of course we would be better off if we could buy the training ground. Of course we would be better off if we could build a new stand/ ground etc. Likewise, invest in the squad. But none of that is going to happen without a billionaire owner.

The more realistic way is to find out the asking price - we need transparency, or else there will always be a split in the fanbase.

By the way, your figures are well out. It wouldn't cost £50 million to put another tier on the Park End. And we could always let the manager sell to buy, instead of the 'selling to survive' we have seen. At least that way he would be able to re-invest the funds and, with his track record, I would back him to do quite well — so much so that we might even be able to buy Finch Farm one day.

But that day doesn't need to be on Day One for new owners. Not if we get the right people in at a realistic price — but once again, it all comes down to the price.
Ian Bennett
65 Posted 31/12/2012 at 21:23:05
Danny - I never said you needed to do it on day one.

Day 1 - It will cost at least £60 to£120m to buy the shares, and £45m to clear the debt. That gives you a break even club for £100 to £150m.

Day 366 - It would make sense to purchase the training ground - £15m that adds another £1.3m to the bottom line profit, plus Moyes will need some players £10 to £20m. We have just burnt through £125 to £185m before looking at the ground issue.

Whether its 10p or £50m makes chuff all difference when the business is struggling to make £5m from all of the above. Who is going to sink that sort of cash?

Colin Wainwright
66 Posted 31/12/2012 at 21:29:12
Phil. Let's get one thing straight. Kenwright has not invested ONE penny of his own money in Everton. Whether he has any or not is a side issue.
Colin Wainwright
67 Posted 31/12/2012 at 21:35:28
Phil @ 254. "So have your moans – when will we go for a supporters trust a la Barca? – but don't just think it is Bill that tells lies or does not present the truth."

So who else has lied to you Phil?

Tony I'Anson
68 Posted 31/12/2012 at 21:33:17
Why do you need a billionaire to buy Finch Farm Ltd? It's for sale by a third party for o/o £15.5m. Trust Everton are still looking to buy it as per website objectives.
John Audsley
69 Posted 31/12/2012 at 21:41:29
Phil,

Bill hasn't put a penny into EFC and clearly does not have a clue how the accounts at the club work either.

Are you saying you're happy to have him as Chairman in comparison to other unnamed chairman at other unnamed clubs????

He is a proven liar who is incredibly lucky to have Moyes as his manager.

Still, he's a blue though......

Danny Broderick
70 Posted 31/12/2012 at 23:52:58
Ian,
You might be right with your speculative asking price (£60-120 million). But if it was at the lower end of that scale, that makes a total price of around £100 million having cleared the debt.

That makes us a club that breaks even, with a cash injection due in the next few years from the TV deal. Suddenly, we would be a club that could possibly make a profit. With good housekeeping, finding new investment and keeping the wage bill under control, we would be facing a much brighter future.

Please don't fall for the club spin that no-one will buy us because we share a city with LFC, no-one is buying football clubs, recession, banks not lending, etc. 17 of the 19 clubs we face in the Premier League this year have been bought out while Kenwright has been in charge. A savvy businessman could come in and exploit our Premier League status, and that of our international players, without running the club at a loss like the current lot.

Happy New Year anyway! ... I know what I'll be wishing for!
Ian Bennett
71 Posted 01/01/2013 at 09:14:44
I am no supporter of Bill Kenwright, I can assure you. I log on every day dreaming that he has been bought out, and that someone has the resources and business acumen to turn our great club around. That we don't live in fear of selling our latest bright thing, and that we can compete rather than be a team that makes up the numbers. I dream...

However, the two elephants in the room are the stadium issue to boost revenues, and the price bill is placing on his shares. Other clubs have been bought and sold, that neither have the same stadium issue, the same debt issue, or an owner who is looking for a significant sum for his shares.

Bill cannot afford to give it away, and we can debate whether he wants £20m, £50m, or £100m, the simple facts are the shares based on the above spend and return on offer are probably worthless. Look at the clubs bought and sold:

Aston Villa, withno debt and decent stadium, £60m
Leeds £52m
Wolves £10 (that's ten pounds)
Newcastle £133m with decent stadium.

Unless you are crazy why would you buy Everton over the above??? To get it all sorted is going to cost what £200 - £300m? Not all on Day 1, but that's the possible outlay.

Yes, the TV rights will increase revenue. But this will happen to everyone. I think it's pretty unlikely that the club will get to retain this windfall in any case – what has changed over 10 years of giving it all to players and agents? FairPlay is about break-even, not profitability.

Perhaps you are right. Someone will come in, spend £100m to buy it. Carefully invest in the playing squad, rebuilding the stadium from the increased TVrights, boosting commercial revenues, exploiting overseas opportunities whilst keeping a lid on player wages. I dream...

David S Shaw
72 Posted 02/01/2013 at 10:25:46
I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the fans who did care have lost a bit of faith in our own supporters leading to disillusionment with the club as a whole.

Are Everton the same club and fans that you fell in love with? Or are we seeing what our fans have always been like? ie excuse makers?

Recently there's been a bit of a backlash against anyone who makes an effort for the club such as the Blue Union, they must wonder why they bother.

Christine Foster
73 Posted 02/01/2013 at 11:11:03
David, there are always people who do not see life as you do ( not you personally that is) there are always those who will fight change, always those who have a vested interest in making money rather than change things for the better. There are always some who say its too much, too big a problem or it's just too hard.

In any normal business I would say that the rights of the owners would always take into consideration of its customers, but not football and certainly not Everton FC.

The power resides with a few, to the ignorance of legitimate smaller shareholders, very little to make a fuss about there, except the club was set up with express considerations to ensure that all shareholders have a voice. This board have broken that covenant of trust. For that alone they deserve criticism and for the deceit shown to those same shareholders and supporters they deserve to be replaced.

Change is never easy, never accepted with good grace, never fully understood by many. Many fall by the wayside, but some are always ready to pick up the colors once again, to keep a board honest, to keep a club successful and to keep change to the forefront of expectations.

Direction of change Is entrusted to directors who should account for the business viability over personal gain, who should encompass its and involve its customers through honest communication.

If there was ever a reason to question the boards integrity it has been over the Kirkby debacle and the inability to secure our future. We need to change as supporters and keep asking the uncomfortable questions, even if the truth is uncomfortable too. Only that way can we go forward together as a club and as a fan base.

Richard Larnder
74 Posted 02/01/2013 at 13:03:50
Why are people obsessed with adding the amount of debt on to the value of the club? The company is worth what it's worth based on how much cash it generates for the owners of the equity, which last time I checked was almost £nil.

Adding the debt on to the cost of the club would be like paying more for a house on which the vendor has a large mortgage.

If the value of the club is £100m, then the Board can expect to return £50m to the owners of the equity (assuming the debt is in the region of £50m).

Either the acquirer pays £100m to receive a debt/cash free entity (the vendors paying back the banks) or they pay £50m and assume the debt (assuming the banks don't force the former).

Either way, the above points to the shares being with very little in economic terms. Any 'value' to them is purely through the goodwill associated with owning a (brilliant) football club.

Christine Foster
75 Posted 02/01/2013 at 14:58:07
Richard, you're right. In any normal business this would be so. However, in this case, it is nowhere near as simple as you portray. The reality is that a controlling interest of shares are for sale, or for that matter, maybe not a controlling interest!

In this case, the major shareholders want an excessive payment based on potential or future worth. Irrespective of any debt the club is carrying, that is independent of any money paid for shares.

I do not expect any new buyer will automatically pay the debt, not at all.

What happens when a new person / group has a controlling interest is up to them how they manage the costs and debt going forward. Once you understand this, it becomes clear that the sale of the club is not dependent on levels of debt or any stadium, it's the initial, upfront payment to the major shareholders for their shares.

Money for nothing.. That's the stumbling block and always has been.

Richard Larnder
76 Posted 02/01/2013 at 15:45:17
Christine,

So, you're buying x% of the equity of a privately held business. Are you trying to suggest that the price of x% of equity is the same, regardless of how much debt the entity has?

In Everton's case, there's a group of senior credit providers creaming £Xm of cash from the business. Cash that would otherwise flow to the equity holders. Of course it reduces the value of the equity as it reduces the future (residual) cash flow.

My point is that whatever the value of the business (individual share value being business value divided by no. of shares), this value is reduced by the value of the debt. It doesn't matter whether you're buying 100% or 10% of the equity.

Whichever way you look at it, a buyer is paying a premium purely because they are acquiring a famous football club. Unfortunately the current shareholders think this 'brand' is worth more than the market does.

Guy Hastings
77 Posted 02/01/2013 at 16:24:52
Alan 161 - my sentiments entirely.
Christine Foster
78 Posted 02/01/2013 at 22:56:27
Richard, no I am not trying to suggest that debt has no influence over value of shares, indeed I believe I said as much in my first sentence, this does not, and indeed has not, influenced the currents boards perspective that they see the potential value of their shares as being higher than a realistic value, (of a normal business)

This is why, I believe, there is little traction in the boards stance, which is to maximise their return on shares which is not necessarily in the interests of the club itself. One would have to therefore assume that the value placed on their shares by themselves, no one else, is not justifiable and is preventing any group or new owner from investing.

With respect to the debt management, their may be far better financial solutions, such as consolidation all debt into long term debt, sponsorship offsets etc. I would not expect the club to be suddenly debt free on arrival of a new owner, I would expect them to have sufficient funding and financial clout to broker a better debt restructuring at lower cost to the club.

You last paragraph I totally agree with.

Robin Cannon
79 Posted 03/01/2013 at 14:00:50
It's possible to believe strongly that we would benefit from a change of ownership AND subscribe to the "be careful what you wish for" point of view.

I don't, in any way, want Everton to become a vanity project for some oligarch or oil fund. Whether it would bring us greater success or not, I just find that whole route a saddening indictment of English football. The Chelsea/City type situation has put me off football in general; not simply because they're richer than us and can buy better players, but because of what it says about the game in this country overall.

I do, however, want Everton to change hands. I want us to be run by a person or group who can invest a reasonable amount of money but, far more importantly, can turn us into a well run and self-sustaining team and business for the long term. A strong financial and commercial entity that acts as the foundation for consistent on field success that *isn't* dependent on the interest of a single individual and whether they choose to throw a chunk of cash into the transfer kitty.

Of course, the long term ideal would be to take our model from Germany, and have a well run business that also looks towards part-ownership from the fans, but that may be completely wishful thinking.

Lee Smith
80 Posted 03/01/2013 at 14:14:56
^ This Please !
Kevin Tully
81 Posted 03/01/2013 at 14:53:29
Robin / Lee,

Ask yourselves this - Would you like to see the faces on the Liverpool fans as we knock the 6th goal past them at Anfield, after all the years of pain they have inflicted upon us?

That is what Man City fans witnessed at Old Trafford.

Robin Cannon
82 Posted 03/01/2013 at 15:09:58
Oh, I'm sure it'd be great fun taken in isolation. But ultimately, done like City have done it, not really. What's the point? May as well just play Football Manager and tweak the settings so that you've got a billion pounds to spend. There's no development, there's no growth towards something special, there's just a scattergun approach with no financial consequence, and that seems far less rich as an experience.

Ultimately, if the only way for Everton to gain success were to give up all that Everton actually are, and all that they mean, then I wouldn't want it. And for me, that's pretty what the Chelsea/City model is.

Lee Smith
83 Posted 03/01/2013 at 15:41:55
Kevin, fair point, but just to add to what Robin above just stated (which again I agree 100% with).....

As much as it sometimes gets on my nerves constantly hearing about our players talk about the 'team spirit' etc. (Phil Neville, I'm looking in your direction), I would much rather listen to that, than read reports like I did this morning about Mancini publically fighting with one of his 'star' zillion pound players during training, or have to put up with greedy gits throwing tantrums * cough * Tevez * cough *. I think as soon as you start throwing money at something, you do lose the essence of the Club.

Don't get me wrong, I want Kenwright out, yesterday if possible (and take them self-serving shit bags Earl and Green with you), but I wouldn't want the Club to be turned into a plaything (more than it as already by Kenrwight anyway!).

Colin Glassar
84 Posted 03/01/2013 at 22:28:28
Great article. Agree with every word.
Frank McGregor
85 Posted 09/01/2013 at 21:26:40
EFC — do we care anymore? Answer: NO — more interested in the current excellent performances on the field which has been provided by the board and David Moyes.

I do realise that we require new ownership; all the keyboard jockeying in the world is not going to make a bit of difference to the current owners.

I find it amazing that people who set themselves up as financial experts on the club's business with meaningless reports find so much space on this site.

Finally I wonder how supporters would feel if we got Hicks and Gillete or maybe a Randy Lerner from Villa to run the club.

Ian Smith
86 Posted 10/01/2013 at 14:19:38
Guess this has died a death as there's been no updates/further updates or critic messages...
Steve Smith
87 Posted 12/01/2013 at 01:10:20
Now now Colin, I have read all of your posts with interest over the years, and some I absolutely disagree with, some I absolutely agree with, and some with mixed feelings, but now you're telling us you don't care any more? MY ARSE!!! Of course you do! But also glad to know you can go to the games, and sit back and enjoy it.
David Johnson
88 Posted 15/01/2013 at 21:57:14
And I've read yours. Concern Troller hits the nail on the head.
David Johnson
89 Posted 15/01/2013 at 22:00:33
Alias Smith & Jones

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb