I had a bet a few years back with a kopite “friend” when Rooney still played for Everton, that Wayne would score more goals for England than Michael Owen. At the time, this was a very ambitious bet because Owen was perhaps at the peak of his powers. Owen is still England’s all-time top goalscorer in competitive games with 25 goals but Rooney is gaining at a steady pace and is on 24 competitive goals and is also now 6 goals behind him in all England matches including today’s goal.

Anyway, I was looking at the other top 20 England goalscorers while checking on my bet and I was very impressed with the goals-to-game ratios of former Everton players such as Gary Lineker and Tommy Lawton. Unfortunately Dixie Dean didn’t quite get on the list although his goals-to-games ratio is the best, scoring more goals than games played (18 goals in 16 appearances).

I was wondering if anyone managed to see or know of anyone who saw Tommy Lawton and Dixie Dean play and who was the best? I know Dixie is known as the greatest but a large chunk of Tommy Lawton’s career was lost due to the outbreak of the 2nd World War so who knows how good he could have been? Tommy hardly seems to get a mention on here, it is always Dixie Dean and Alan Ball. Is Lawton deserving of more respect?

Top England Goalscorers

Goalscorers with an equal number of goals are ranked with the highest to lowest goals-per-game ratio.

#	Name	Career	Goals	Caps	Position	Goals per game
1	Bobby Charlton	1958–1970	49	106	MF	0.4623
2	Gary Lineker	1984–1992	48	80	FW	0.6000
3	Jimmy Greaves	1959–1967	44	57	FW	0.7719
4	Michael Owen	1998–2008	40	89	FW	0.4494
5	Wayne Rooney	2003–	33	79	FW	0.4102
6	Nat Lofthouse	1950–1958	30	33	FW	0.9091
7	Alan Shearer	1992–2000	30	63	FW	0.4762
8	Tom Finney	1946–1958	30	76	FW	0.3947
9	Vivian Woodward	1903–1911	29	23	FW	1.2609
10	Steve Bloomer	1895–1907	28	23	FW	1.2174
11	David Platt	1989–1996	27	62	MF	0.4355
12	Frank Lampard	1999–	27	94	MF	0.2796
13	Bryan Robson	1981–1989	26	90	MF	0.2888
14	Geoff Hurst	1966–1971	24	49	FW	0.4898
15	Stan Mortensen	1947–1953	23	25	FW	0.9200
16	Tommy Lawton	1938–1948	22	23	FW	0.9565
17	Peter Crouch	2005–2010	22	42	FW	0.5281
18	Mick Channon	1972–1977	21	46	FW	0.4565
19	Kevin Keegan	1972–1982	21	63	FW	0.3333
20	Martin Peters	1966–1974	20	67	MF	0.2985

Competitive England Goalscorers

Goalscorers with an equal number of goals are ranked with the highest to lowest goals per game ratio.

#	Name	Career	Goals	Caps	Position	Goals per game
1	Michael Owen	1998–2008	25	53	FW	0.4717
2	Wayne Rooney	2003–	24	51	FW	0.4706
3	Gary Lineker	1984–1992	22	40	FW	0.5500
4	Alan Shearer	1992–2000	21	31	FW	0.6774
5	Frank Lampard	1999–	18	54	MF	0.3333
6	Bobby Charlton	1958–1970	14	29	MF	0.4828
7	Bryan Robson	1981–1989	14	43	MF	0.3259
8	Steven Gerrard	2000–	14	61	MF	0.2295
9	Geoff Hurst	1966–1971	13	18	FW	0.7222
10	Kevin Keegan	1974–1981	13	27	MF	0.4819
11	David Beckham	1996–2009	13	68	MF	0.1912
12	David Platt	1989–1996	12	29	MF	0.4138
13	Tony Woodcock	1978–1986	11	23	FW	0.4783
14	Jermain Defoe	2004–	11	29	FW	0.3793
15	Paul Scholes	1997–2004	11	39	MF	0.2820
16	Peter Crouch	2005–2010	10	21	FW	0.4762
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England_national_football_team

Share this article


Reader Comments (39)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Ian Allaker
1 Posted 07/02/2013 at 03:09:10
Some good audio here Lawton talks about Dixie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqXM9AFL_10

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1YuqyORRAM

Trevor Lynes
2 Posted 07/02/2013 at 08:05:28
I actually saw Lawton play against us at goodison when he was at Notts County.
They beat us 4-1 and Lawton won every ball in the air and still terrorized our defence.
I never saw Dean so its hard to compare them.
Lawton was good on the floor but not built as robustly as Dean.

I also saw Matthews, Finney and a sunderland great Shackleton.
I always remember Shack running rings around Cyril Lello who had the job of marking him.

They were all great ball players and the crowd paid to watch them as they were fantasic entertainers.
Our best at the time was Nobby Fielding who played in a pretty poor everton team which at times had Catterick at centre forward.
Catterick was pretty limited Im afraid.

Billy Liddell was one of the best ever Liverpool players and would have been a big star in any era.
He was very fast, direct (like Bale) and had a ferocious shot.

Every era in football has thrown up great players, I was lucky enough to see Pele when he was 17 years old, Florian Albert, Di Stefano, Puskas, Eusebio and Cruyf.
Unfortunately the media see football as only beginning with the premier league but the best ever national sides were the Brazil of 1970 and the Hungarians of the 50's.
Tackling has become a lost art.

Only a few of the present day footballers have entertained me as much as they did in the old first division.
Bale, Messi, Maradona and Ronaldo are standouts.

Martin Mason
3 Posted 07/02/2013 at 08:32:26
Trevor, I though the 1970 England team was equal to the Brazilian side
Brian Harrison
4 Posted 07/02/2013 at 09:11:22
Trevor Lynes

I like you saw all the names you mention except I didnt see Tommy Lawton, my Dad rated Lawton but in his opinion Dean was the better of the 2. For me Bobby Charlton was the best English player I ever saw he scored some fantastic goals and to this day I still don't know whether he was left or right footed.

Maybe time plays tricks but for me the players of the 60s was the most accomplished group were today I think more emphasis is placed on athleticism than skill, and thats why I think the players who played in the 60s were overall more skillful

Ray Roche
5 Posted 07/02/2013 at 09:45:16
Martin, I have to agree with Trevor, I was only thinking last night watching the match that the Everton side of 69-70 were as good as any club side I've ever seen but the Brazil side of 1970 World Cup fame were the best side by a country mile that has ever been. In my opinion.
Derek Thomas
6 Posted 07/02/2013 at 10:34:10
I agree Re Brazil. Also the 1970 England team were a better all round unit than the 66.

The Title winning sides, I have all 4 in a photo

Deadheat 69-70; 84-85

2nd ( only by a nose ) 62-63.

3rd (by a neck ) 86-87

The only way to settle the deadheat would (* moves from horseracing to snooker metaphor ) would be to play the best of say 41 frames. The 70 team would score more maximum breaks but the added bit of mongrel in the 85 team would, IMO result in 21-20 to 85

Martin Mason
7 Posted 07/02/2013 at 11:02:11
Ray

We played Brazil in the group stages and lost but it was very close and that was even with Geoff Astle at CF who missed a couple of sitters. That was in conditions that eminently suited Brazil rather than England and with the England team subjected to efforts to keep them awake all night and a trumped up theft charge against Moore. They were a great side which like the wonderful Everton side of the time collapsed soon after. They were a league above the side that won the WC in 1966.

Derek Thomas
8 Posted 07/02/2013 at 11:14:18
Too true Martin; the Brazil goal came on the back of a cynical foul on Ball, an elbow? not given, see video;

I think it was in the 1/4 final that we had 2 chances, one a ' Ball ' type chance that fell to Astle and one an ' Astle ' type chance that fell to Ball.

Taking off Charlton too early did us no favours either.

What if Westie HAD decided to go

Kev Johnson
9 Posted 07/02/2013 at 11:17:38
Martin - I remember that game so well. I watched it at my grandma's house, aged nine-and-a-half! It was a classic encounter.

The 1970 World Cup was so inspiring - in our primary school playground we started doing the sign of the cross after scoring, as a homage to Jairzinho & Co! I still can't believe we lost against Germany in the quarter final. It was one of those defeats - like the first cup final defeat against Lpool - that I don't think I have ever shaken off. If only Gordon West hadn't have pulled out of the squad! He'd have played instead of Bonetti (who had a nightmare) and we might have won.

Martin Mason
10 Posted 07/02/2013 at 13:28:53
Kev
Yes it was a fabulous competition and Brazil recognised that England were their greatest danger. We lost the group game to Brazil but they were just unfinished business that I really believe we'd have beaten in the final. Losing to Germany (also a great side) was possibly the biggest disappointment I've seen in football, a game we'd won easily and then somehow lost by underestimating them. Decided by an injury to our main goalkeeper and a dreadful performance by his replacement. What a time to be a fan then though when Everton and England were so brilliant. It's hard being a Rose Tinted Evertonian now but I'm still positive and it's possible that the national team are also in a resurgent phase.
Kev Johnson
11 Posted 07/02/2013 at 13:56:26
Here's a thought, Martin - could it be that the fates of Everton and England are intertwined? We had three players in the team for the Brazil match (Ball, Labone and Tommy Wright) and the same number against Germany (with Keith Newton replacing Wright). Maybe in order for England to flourish we need three Everton players in the starting XI? We've got three in the squad at the moment, so I suppose we're getting there...

I know a lot of people on TW don't care about England football team, but I do!

Ray Roche
12 Posted 07/02/2013 at 14:01:55
Martin, you make some good points regarding the quality of football in those halcyon days of the period 1969-70, at both club and international level, but I still think, for sheer exuberance and style, excitement and flair, the Brazil team were the greatest.Pelé, Clodoaldo, Gérson, Jairzinho, Rivelino, and Tostão,absolutely wonderful to watch. Sure, if Bonetti had been left on the bench (at Hyde Park) and West had decided to go I'm sure England could have done better than we did but we don't beat Germany so often unless we take them on at their National game.....
Trevor Lynes
13 Posted 07/02/2013 at 14:26:35
For pure footballing ability Brazil have been the most entertaining national side closely followed by the Hungarian side that played in the goodison group.
By then Pele was shot and Brazil ere no match for Hungary or Eusebios Portugal.
It was a shame to see Pele kicked out of the game.

Incidently Styles and a few other England players would have been sent off every week nowadays :0)

I always thought of Young as very similar to Tostao of Brazil and Vernon was like Rush.
A perfect duo as far as I was concerned..But they were Careys men and the Catt got rid as he did with Collins who was another great.

Almost every team in the top flight had at least one player worth the entrance fee.
I much preferred the old first division to the present set up where money is the B all and end all.
DM is doing a fine job of making ends meet but he is like mother Hubbard, the cupboard is always bare !!

Barry Rathbone
14 Posted 07/02/2013 at 15:00:06
Zenith of Global football 1970 - Everton and Brazil - it's been downhill ever since.

Anyone doubting watch the Brazil 4th goal in the world cup final against Italy.

Barry Rathbone
15 Posted 07/02/2013 at 15:07:42
Bobby Charlton by the way was the best england player.
Harold Matthews
16 Posted 07/02/2013 at 17:17:13
Yes,we were brilliant in 1970,and Alan Ball was out of this world. Pity Ramsey messed things up, taking off Charlton and freeing The Kaiser. Even worse, he put on Astle and left Peter Osgood on the bench.

The most memorable England player I ever saw at Goodison Park was Horatio Carter with the silver mop of hair. Playing for Derby County he ripped us to shreds, continually cutting through our defence like Lionel Messi. Even today the memory is still vivid.

As for the best England player. I wouldn't even try. So many good ones in different eras......and some, like Sir Stan, had their best years before the end of WW2....and let's not forget the best player Bobby Charlton ever saw, the late great Duncan Edwards who never had the chance to shine. The list grows longer.

Ray Roche
17 Posted 07/02/2013 at 18:01:31
Trevor, to be fair to the Catt he kept Young until his star had begun to fade in 1968 and Vernon until 65.Selling Collins, though, was a disastrous mistake.
Richard Tarleton
18 Posted 07/02/2013 at 19:21:43
I started being taken to the match in the early 50s and agree with much of what Trevor Lynes said about. In my opinion I rated Law and Finney as the best two players I ever saw. Best was great at Anfield, but Wilson kept him quiet against us. Law was simply magnificent and the only striker superior to Vernon. Finney could do every thing, I saw him destroy Everton in the first game of the season in 1955 when Preston won 4-0 and he was playing centre-forward.
As a duo Vernon and Young were simply brilliant and they didn't weigh twenty stone between them in an era when skill was often physically intimidated.
Catterick sold Collins, Vernon and Ball far too quickly.
I did see a few minutes of Pele in the 66 world cup before Portugal kicked him out, otherwise I only saw him on television.
Modern footballers are fitter and the game is much quicker , the equipment is totally different and the pitches are marvellous. Remember the army of "forkers" who came on at half time to try to get rid of the water on the pitch, but to be honest when I want o think of football heaven , it's 1962-3 and Gabriel, Young, Vernon and company are strutting their stuff and I'm watching them from my "spec" in the old paddock.
David Hallwood
19 Posted 07/02/2013 at 20:26:09
Just to disagree: for my money the best international side was the Dutch side 1974-total football and all that, OK they weren't the eventual winners, getting done by the more efficient and clinical German side. But the Dutch side was the nearest thing to poetry in motion that I’ve seen
Trevor Lynes
20 Posted 07/02/2013 at 21:50:44
David, Hungary actually changed the way football was played.
They ripped us apart at Wembley with Hidegkuti and Puskas.

The Dutch side were ttremendous but Brazil were like the harlem globetrotters of football.
They entertained but also won trophies.
Their defence was not that great but they always scored more than the opposition.
When they beat Italy they ripped them apart and Italy were reknowned for their defence.
Everyone has their own particular favourites but I fell in love with Brazil when they won the world cup in 1958 with a 17 year old Pele and Garrincha with the wonky legs.
They have slipped from grace in recent years and their football is no where near as fluent.

Mike Goodwin
21 Posted 07/02/2013 at 22:22:06
My late Dad, who saw Dixie score his 60th league goal in 1928, always maintained that Dixie Dean was a greater player than Tommy Lawton.

I don't know if it's true of other Evertonians of my Dad's era, but he did seem to resent Lawton for leaving Everton for Chelsea. I formed the opinion that he considered Dean to be a true Evertonian whereas Lawton just went wherever the money was.

He was also critical of Lawton in later years, when some years after he was given a testimonial by Everton in 1972, he was again in the news as being in financial difficulty.

My Dad was a real die-hard Blue and was perhaps a little unfair on Lawton, although he did acknowledge that he was a great player, just not as good, in his book, as Dean, and certainly, not as great an Evertonian.

Andy Crooks
22 Posted 07/02/2013 at 22:42:02
Martin, I agree about the 1970 England team being better than 1966. I believe that it was a very good England side that failed to qualify in 1974. They utterly outplayed Poland who, I believe , had a great world cup finishing third if I remember rightly. The sacking of Ramsay was disgraceful.

In those days football was so different that it was possible to cheer England on. A cap meant something. Does anyone remember the "Osgood for England" chants that Alf steadfastly ignored?

David Hallwood
23 Posted 07/02/2013 at 23:13:34
Trevor Lymes(#460) The Dutch side was the best side I've seen, I'm a tad too young to have seen the Hungarian side
Martin Mason
24 Posted 08/02/2013 at 04:14:56
I will always remember the second half of the 60s for being a magnificent era in British football, not only to see the brilliance of players like Best, Law and Charlton but to see a brilliant England side and a truly magnificent Everton side. I often think about the best players I've had the pleasure to see but for me it will always be Alan Ball from when he came to Everton until his star faded after 1970. He is recognised as having been great but I think that underestimates him. His pace, positional sense and range of passing was sublime and add to that the ability to score 15-20 goals a season he was the complete midfielder. That mop of ginger hair and the twinkling white boots, his love for the club and fans make him the standout player of all time for me.
Dave Roberts
25 Posted 08/02/2013 at 09:57:24
Martin

I totally agree. There were quite a few great players around at that time but at his best I wouldn't have swapped him for any of them, not even Best. I remember with clarity how depressed I was for weeks after he was sold to Arsenal and the first time I saw him playing for them on the old MOTD I felt sick to my stomach.

Mind you, he was never the same player for them and I remain convinced it was because his heart wasn't in it for them as much as it was for us. I went to Goodison to sign the book of condolensces and see his white boots just after he died and a 61 year old man....me....was crying! Stupid isn't it?

My best two memories of him? The FA Cup goal against the shite but even more so ( for me) his first game for us away at Fulham when he set the game alight and scored the winner. For me it was a greater memory even than the shite goal because as good as he had been in the World Cup Final that performance more than any other told me we had signed a cracker. A truly magnificent player who would have been just as good in today's game.

Once Alan Ball has touched you nothing is ever the same!

Kev Johnson
26 Posted 08/02/2013 at 10:10:17
David (438 + 476), I'm pretty much with you on that one. While the 1970 Brazil team were spellbinding, the Holland team of '74 are my favourite international team ever.

Let's be honest, it's all very subjective. Brazil were wonderfully exotic but, as a European, Holland played a type of football I could imagine playing myself - if only I were a million times better! I imagined myself as Johnny Rep, knocking in the goals - then, after the match, living a vaguely bohemian lifestyle that involved soft drugs, hard rock, progressive politics, sexually liberated women and... I don't know, a profusion of tulips.

To this day, I prefer a dynamic Northern European style of football to the tippy-tappy Mediterranean variety. I'm not a tough guy, but I find the current Spanish trend for playing nice little triangles, etc, just a wee bit... girly.

Dave Roberts
27 Posted 08/02/2013 at 10:32:44
Stuart Pearce thinks Ashley Cole is the best left-back ever to play for England. I suppose he is entitled to his opinion....which he may shortly have to change anyway once Baines gets established.

However, as a youngish man he has probably never had the opportunity to see Ray Wilson. For me he was the best left back ever to play for England and he and Cohen were the first full backs ( In British football anyway) to be expected to get forward and supply crosses in Ramsey's team of 'wingless wonders'.

Dave Roberts
28 Posted 08/02/2013 at 10:41:21
My favourite international team? Ally's army 1978.

I love alternative comedy.

Brian Waring
29 Posted 08/02/2013 at 11:03:49
The thing about Cole, he's done it on the world, european and premier league stage and done it consistantly for years and whilst Baines is the better player now out of the two he probalby has a fair way to go before he get's the same recognition that Cole gets.
Kev Johnson
30 Posted 08/02/2013 at 11:12:32
You're right, Brian. The other thing is that, in order to get forward effectively, Baines needs to have an active link with the left midfielder. Unfortunately, that's a problem position for England and when he's played he's had someone in front of him who is solely interested in attacking. Milner is the only one who plays WITH Baines. He (Milner) is a fairly limited player, but he is an intelligent team man and he knows what what to do when he's playing with an attacking full back.

I have to say, much as I dislike the bloke, that Gary Neville was an excellent RB. He just did the job, no fussing. He's definitely the best RB I've ever seen. I don't necessarily want a full back to be a supremely talented footballer. I want him to tackle well, show good positional sense and - now and again - get forward and put some decent crosses in. In other words, Tony Hibbert - but better!

Ray Roche
31 Posted 08/02/2013 at 13:42:45
Kev Johnson @532

A couple of good observations, there, the Holland side WERE a great team to watch and, yes, the current craze for the Spain "tippy tappy" sort of football IS a bit girly at times..... you sort of want Norman Hunter to hoof one of those midfielders into Row Z and get on with it. I still prefer the Brazil 1970 side though.

But the most accurate comment , for men of, shall we say, a decent vintage, is the proliferation of "sexually liberated women" available in Holland. Not PC, I know, but who gives a fuck? (apart from them....)

Dave Roberts @533. Good shout re Ray Wilson, some people are quick to state that Cole is the greatest etc., without having SEEN the greatest. Ray Wilson. And as modest a man as Cole is arrogant.

Denis Byrne
32 Posted 08/02/2013 at 15:40:18
I was at the Villa v Everton league cup semi in the 80's and after the game we walked for miles trying to find a pub away from the ground and ended up in this lonely old alehouse in the middle of a derelict wasteland. We were the youngest in there by about 50 years.

We got talking to the arl fellas (all Villa and Birmingham fans) and we asked them the same question (well, more generic), 'who was the best player you ever saw?'

A fantastic, informed and teary eyed few hours later the overwhelming agreement was that the best player any of them ever saw, was ... tar raa ... Duncan Edwards. It was a memorable night making friends with them wise old dudes, and we even got invited to the lock in after closing hours. Duncan Edwards, RIP.

Steavey Buckley
33 Posted 08/02/2013 at 22:21:21
Nearly a goal every 2 games from midfield a fantastic record. No wonder he is called Sir Bobby Charlton. A player who was never booked. And helped England to win the World Cup.
Derek Thomas
34 Posted 08/02/2013 at 22:07:03
Astle and Osgood, Ramsey chose Astle and so would Moyes, so for that matter would Gordon Lee, while Osgood was not quite Duncan MacKenzie, he was of that type, along with Bowles, Marsh and a few others.

Joe Mercer gave Bowles a cap or two so he would've gone for the less predictable Osgood option.

As has been stated before the 70 England team was a better unit than the 66. But while Charlton was 4 years older so was Beckenbaur... but in a good way, The Germans had improved even more, plus they had Muller.

England were masters of the current European International method. But game was just beginning to change in a slightly less defensive, more expansive way. The Germans had the beginnings of this going for them, as future years would show. England had peaked but Ramsey didn't know it, again, as future years would show.

Italy are and were for us always hard to beat, so the would be semi Vs them would not have been a walk over.

I doubt that it would've been a 7-goal thriller like the real semi-final

Brazil, always had the talent (and it must be said that talent deflected the eye from a ruthless, nay dirty streak that would've shamed Leeds at their worst and they still do that stuff, but people seem to have a blind eye to it... it's Brazil... wow, look at the quality.)

Any way Brazil, 1970 the year it all came together (a bit like Everton in 1970) The best all-round side on the planet.

Could England have beat them, they didn't in the group... well they might, maybe, once, but only if Brazil were not at the top of their game for some reason and we were.

1970; (the odd future high spot and hand of god notwithstanding) the peak of English and for that matter Brazilian and World Football.

Andy Meighan
35 Posted 09/02/2013 at 09:06:25
The Brazil side of 1970 were poetry in motion at times but, as someone posted earlier, they were helped by the conditions. Also, for me, the Dutch side of 1974 never get the recognition they deserved.

But I'm really shocked no-one has mentioned the Brazil side of 1982 widely acclaimed to be the best side never to win the World Cup. They couldn't defend to save their lives but going forward they were unbelievable. The names just roll off the tongue: Zico, Socrates, Falcoa et al (Why do Brazilians only ever have one name?) a truly great side...

But I'm in agreement with most: the England side of 1970 was superb and would have probably gone on to reach the final only for some poor substitutions and some shit goalkeeping by Bonnetti, who was a great goalie. And they weren't helped by the stifling conditions either, but some great memories there, lads.

Rob Sawyer
36 Posted 09/02/2013 at 10:59:53
My Dad saw Lawton and Dean play (albeit in Dean's later days) and throught Tommy was the better footballer. His fave player off all time was probably Bobby Collins.
Tom Evans
37 Posted 09/02/2013 at 16:21:47
These threads are always contentious in their make up and cause more arguements than they settle. But I must comment on what I saw and heard on Friday morning on the BBC Morning News programme.

They were discussing the composition of the stamps issued by the Royal Mail depicting players from the four Home Nations. The lady sports presenter suggested Dixie Dean merited inclusion. Bill Turnbull with a puzzled look on his face went "Dixie Dean"? – whereupon the lady with an equal look of disgust explained who he was.

Considering that show and presenters are resident in Salford, I am astounded he did not know about Dixie.

Martin Mason
38 Posted 09/02/2013 at 17:18:20
Ashley Cole the best ever England left-back. He's the best in back? I put Ray Wilson a mile ahead and Terry Cooper a league ahead. He's the best in 20 years, that's all.
Dennis Stevens
39 Posted 13/02/2013 at 21:15:29
It wasn't Bill, it was the other chap, Tom. I was gob-smacked that any professional journalist wouldn't know who Dixie was. Especially when you consider that there are more than a few cuktural references over the years & he was one of the historic football figures highlighted as part of Euro 96 as well.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb