Having just about calmed down from Saturday’s debacle let me try and present a rational view of events.

Wigan came to Goodison worried about some of our players and adopted a very simple and basic approach namely:

  • They funneled back over the half way line and conceded the ball in our half. Their wide players sat 5 – 10 yds behind the halfway line with full backs sat a further 10 – 15 yds behind.
  • The effects of these tactics were two fold. Firstly it denied space behind their back 4 and nullified the effects of Piennar / Baines and Coleman / Mirallas. It restricted the opportunities to get behind and put crosses into their box from the line forcing us to cross from deeper and more diagonal.
  • Secondly it made us play down the middle through the centre of midfield and gave Distin and Heitinga an awful lot of ball at the back.

I genuinely think this was their approach before they saw our team selection, the selection of Neville just shone a massive spotlight on our inadequacies. Wigan knew that to counter this we had to be able to do some or all of the following (plus others):

  • Our second forward (Fellaini) had to drop into the space between the middle and the forward line and pick up the ball and create openings – play like a number 10 – not his forte.
  • The midfield had to drive forward at pace pulling out their defenders creating space in behind their central defenders- no pace with Osman and Neville
  • Move the ball quickly and accurately not allowing them to set up their defensive pattern – not hoof ball but fast interactive passing through central midfield – as above
  • Our midfield needed the ability to take people on centrally and disrupt their pattern, making their wide players come in to cover and then expose the flanks – again as above
  • Our central defenders had to step forward with the ball in a way that forced their midfield to come out and stop them. – Distin with the ball at his feet is a liability

None of this is rocket science but the challenge for the man paid around £4M per year was to come up with any one of the above, or any of his own alternatives. Whilst I may only have the old prelim coaching badge I know that the basic principle of all coaching is to play in a way that stops the others doing what they want to do but more importantly to play in the way you want to play. If they play in an unexpected way (Wigan), or indeed change their tactics in the game, then we should change ours to counter their approach.

So what did Moyes do?

  • Firstly he picked a team that had no pace, guile or energy in the centre of midfield.
  • He watched for 25 mins as Neville and Osman picked the ball up easily, pass it square SLOWLY and without threat, whilst Wigan funneled back.
  • Then he stood like a frightened rabbit in the headlights between the third goal and half time and did nothing (£4m a year???)
  • His great master plan after half time was to put Vic on and hit longer balls hoping for a knock down or a break.
  • Then he brought another midfield player on who also lacks pace, doesn’t dribble and drive forward, but is a better passer.
  • Finally he put another central midfielder on for 10 mins who does want to drive forward but kinda pointless so late.

So where does this leave Moyes and his tactics?

  • After 11 years we have one style of play that if its countered we appear to have no plan B let alone C,D or E
  • We do not possess players in the squad who offer alternative options i.e. wide players who can dribble and cross, midfield players with drive and energy, attackers who can play intelligently. I’m not suggesting Messi’s or Mata’s just good premiership players that offer alternatives or youngsters who have the potential to do this.
  • Moyes only alternative when we are losing seems to be long balls, do we ever see a change of formation, do we go to 3 – 3 – 4 with 2 wide players?

Once we were 3-0 down there was only one way out of the hole, bold adventurous attacking play. Yes we might have conceded again but I would rather have gone down 5-3 than the whimper of an excuse that we saw in the second half. 11 men defending a corner summed him up – no alternatives, no creativity, no imagination, stubborn and defeatist. When he then says it was ‘one of those days’ and cannot see the flaws in his tactics or his ability to adapt, it is not just arrogance its blind ignorance. I can’s see the wood because of the tree in my eye !!!

So the media darlings may be changing their tune and some are questioning his tactical ability. As many of us have been saying for years he knows how to avoid defeat but does not know how to win. 11 years and no trophies (and never really close), 11 years without a win at the Sky 4, 11 years of the same way of playing and the same tactics.

The saddest thing in all of this, is that Saturdays result put 2 nails in the coffin for me:

  1. The so called bigger teams will be saying thanks but no thanks and his chances of moving on have now diminished dramatically
  2. His arrogant refusal to accept any responsibility for either the selection or the tactics means that when he re-signs we have years more of the turgid dross he keeps serving up.

Renewal of my 2 season tickets? Hmmmmmmmm...

Share this article


Reader Comments (71)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Paul Gladwell
1 Posted 12/03/2013 at 20:00:37
Summed it up perfectly Jim, so simple certain things, everyone back for corners etc. but we are thick aren't we? We are told to shut the fuck up you don't know how good you've got it....bollocks, and I have had another day of emails off the cheeky pricks not to mention that gobshite Anichebe crying on, this the same prick who showed an attitude of 'don't blame me it was over before I came on so why should I care'
Never have I wanted not to go a game on Saturday and if they get a result It will make me even more angrier, fucking cheats the lot of them.
Tony Pickering
2 Posted 12/03/2013 at 19:55:19
Good article.

"We do not possess players in the squad who offer alternative options" ...

is the only part I could really take any issue with. Moyes has proved himself tactically limited - despite having built a semi-decent squad ( yes, not just the favourites he picks regardless of form)

Moyes had Ovideo, Barkeley, Velios and so on, maybe not world beaters, but surely enough variation to change things around - even without knowing for sure what the reserve or academy players are like on the big stage.

My main problem is that he seems to rely exclusively on the 'tried and tested' - even if they have failed - and not take any risks. All credit the guy as his approach has avoided the relegation battles we had for years, and for making us look up instead - very welcome - =, but now is the time to develop as a boss and as a team.

Maybe give youth a chance - even if at times they disappoint - attempt new tactics and for goodness sake think outside the one striker system unless he can get a striker who is suited to it - not something we have had - perhaps forever. (Despite the modern love of the system)

On the change manager front - I have often= thought it a good idea, without complete conviction we would do better.

However, now I am convinced it is time for him and us to try new pastures. They may be greener. However... crystal balls are in short supply here!

Tony J Williams
3 Posted 12/03/2013 at 20:19:48
For such a tactically inept manager, he managed to fool quite a number of other teams since he has been here.... just saying like!
Joe McMahon
4 Posted 12/03/2013 at 20:33:25
Tony - FFS - he's had eleven bloody years to do it in, what other manager in top league history has that that amount of time to win yes you've got it - nothing..........just saying like!
Paul Gladwell
5 Posted 12/03/2013 at 20:32:33
Not in many big games he never Tony and then there is the Shrewsburys and Brentfords, two of numerous cup exits against utter shite.
Joe McMahon
6 Posted 12/03/2013 at 20:38:17
not forgetting Shrewsbury Town (the year they got relegated to the conference)
Danny Fitzpatrick
7 Posted 12/03/2013 at 20:24:00
Some good points Jim ... the core problem is he has never trusted the players. His players. His team.

Whenever it comes to the crunch he reaches for the comfort blanket of negative , destructive tactics. This is what has served him so well, especially in 2004/2005. The problem has been that as the quality of the team has improved steadily over time, the players strengths have been increasingly at odds with his approach. There were signs at the start of this season that his thinking was changing, e.g. He wasn't spitting feathers at our lack of clean sheets and seemed more focused on developing a more progressive style. However as soon as results dipped, mainly due to a combination of tiredness and some key players out of form, he reverts to type and calls on his 'loyal soldiers' like Neville.

There's no mystery to any of this - he confirms as much in every single interview he ever done.

Paul Gladwell
8 Posted 12/03/2013 at 20:39:18
At the end of the day, he's done a decent job stabilising us but history will show only one or two things in future times, worst points record and least amount of goals scored in a season is it?
Kevin Tully
9 Posted 12/03/2013 at 20:40:35
Moyes plays not to lose (his words)

I don't know if you could see it on the T.V. against Wigan, but watching Mirallas asking should he stay up, and then having to get back in our box when they had a corner was soul destroying.

He is no better than the like of Allardyce, whose record matches Moyes when he was at Bolton - top 8 League finishes, last 16 in Europe, and a cup final.

His record at the end of this season may be 48-0 at you know where, so if any of his supporters can explain how we are supposed to be a top 8 club with THAT record, they understand football much more than I ever will.

No doubt a decent man, but he was incredibly lucky to land in bed with a board who could afford top eight wages, with no remit for any tangible success.

Nick Entwistle
10 Posted 12/03/2013 at 20:53:41
There's no remit for success with what is in fact joint 9th wages. Once you go beyond 7th the wage increase is massive. And transfer budget.

The whole 'lucky to land in bed with a board who could afford top eight wages, with no remit for any tangible success' line repeated over and over is just condescending.

If the board demanded this tangible success, what would that represent? Beyond though the lottery of a cup win.

That by the way the 6 teams above Everton now have won 17 domestic cups in Moyes' time, compared to the 4 won by the 86 other league teams.

I think when you include the word tangible, unfortunately, best of the rest is it.

Paul Gladwell
11 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:01:08
And could you ever see Mirralas or Pienaar doing anything defensively from a corner? I mean the fool does not even throw these midgets on the two posts, we don't do that either and every week in the echo Kendall questions this as its guaranteed to save you a few goals each season.
Nick Entwistle
12 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:04:46
That's to Kevin by the way.
Kevin Tully
13 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:04:49
What about Europe's second tier competition Nick- even Fulham & Middlesbrough managed a final in that competition, both with very poor sides, not even supposed to be as good as Moyes' Everton.

What about the 6-1 home defeat to Arsenal on the opening day of the season, or the record European drubbings?

Nick Entwistle
14 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:11:34
No. Not buying that. I'm asking for what this tangible success would represent were the board wanting more that mere survival, not individual matches.

We got to a cup final too you know.

The fan survives on his dreams, the board deal with expectations.

Kevin Tully
15 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:17:57
Buy whatever you want to Nick, but until his supporters acknowledge his soon to be 48-0 record, record losses in Europe, and the fact we have been in the relegation zone and much as we have, it's difficult to have a sensible discussion about his "achievements."
Gary Poole
16 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:01:12
Jeez – I love the self proclaimed tactical nous of all you keyboard warriors. Managing a Premier League club is clearly so easy. All you need is to have watched footy for a few years, (or maybe even played for a pub team on a Sunday morning) and there you are – you're ready to go...

I'm amazed that all these clubs pay top dollar for all these qualified charlatans when some of the experts on this site would be available for a fraction of the cost.

However, I suspect the reality is quite different and you do need a bit more nous, experience, leadership, qualifications and a hundred other qualities – apart from simply being able to spout off with the benefit of hindsight.

I mean, how on earth has Moyes ever got to 4th, 5th or 6th in the top league when he is clearly so inept?

I can only assume that he has fluked it for the past 10 years and the likes of Martinez, Allardyce, Lambert, O'Neil, McDermott, Holloway, McCarthy, Hughes, and a whole host of others have simply been consistently unlucky by comparison......

Nick Entwistle
17 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:33:59
We're not discussing achievements. That much is evident. We're discussing what tangible success would represent.

Ian Bennett
18 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:39:13
Not choking, once. Cup, champions league, europa, big away game, take your pick.
Kevin Tully
19 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:40:24
A Cup, further than last 16 in any European competition, successful youth policy, a better record against Liverpool, tactical flexibility, a playing style to admire, better value for money, not shitting your kecks when playing ANY big team away from home, scoring more goals...........
Nick Entwistle
20 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:46:40
The choking and not winning away to big 4 is what success isn't. If they never happened, they wouldn't represent real success either.

You want CL Ian, so do 6 other teams with more and better players and more money to fix things in January. How do we get there?

Nick Entwistle
22 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:47:40
Kevin, apart from the cups which are a lottery for any team outside that top 6.

Everything else you mention isn't tangible success. It is merely gripes against the manager.

If Moyes landed in bed with a board that demanded tangible success, what would that represent?

Maybe you avoid the answer and deviate because you don't want to say Moyes has pushed this club as far as anyone can.

Barry Curran
23 Posted 12/03/2013 at 22:31:44
I have always given full support to our managers, even Walter Smith, and that took some doing from an Irish Catholic but I realized when their time was up and, as sad it, is to say Moyse's time has come.

Not signing until he knew where we finished in the league or cup, to me, was so he knew what cards he held for a pay rise. Now he has no cards left to play.

It's time to call his bluff and tell him sign or go as it is only hurting the team.

Ian Bennett
24 Posted 12/03/2013 at 21:50:31
Nick - honestly I don't think we can without a visionary board with deep pockets. Plenty of clubs make up the numbers as also rans, and we are one of them.

That's not to say we shouldn't try. If it was me you have to wheel and deal a lot more. Buying anyone without a resale value has to stop, as it just buggers the club up later. If we are paying 8% on the debt, it's fair to say we need to be selling for at least 35% 4 years later just cover the servicing of interest - Distin, pienaar? The club has to be run as a sensible solvent enterprise, maximising commercial opportunities, paying down debt. Leaving money on the table like Chang, Nike etc is a joke, as is not having a strategy to clear the debt and the £5m P&L hit with it.

Mental toughness is an issue. We lack leaders on the pitch, always have done. The fact we are reliant on a 36 year old with limited skill/mobility speaks volumes. I think we have upped the skill rate, however you can put plenty of comments next to our squad - goes missing, ricket in them, etc. Who can rally the troops? Who can change the course of a game if it's slipping away? Who won't make a ricket if we are under pressure and see a game through? I am not talking of just Distin, I am talking of the tony hibbert derby when he brought gerrard down for a penalty rather than bring him down on half way line. I am talking ian turner shitting himself when 2-0 up against united. Neville firing in own goals. Go through every season for years and you will find tails of woe. Defeats snatched from the jaws of victory.

3-0 down on Saturday after 40 minutes, would any other top 6 club thrown the towel in so quickly?

Tony J Williams
25 Posted 12/03/2013 at 23:06:48
"A Cup, further than last 16 in any European competition, successful youth policy, a better record against Liverpool, tactical flexibility, a playing style to admire, better value for money, not shitting your kecks when playing ANY big team away from home, scoring more goals..........." - This applies to about 16/17 of the teams in the Premier League too
Kevin Tully
26 Posted 12/03/2013 at 23:53:30
Including little Swansea Tony?
Tony J Williams
27 Posted 13/03/2013 at 00:03:18
Yep, even them Kevin
Paul Andrews
28 Posted 13/03/2013 at 06:26:33
I would settle for actually being entertained by an attacking style of football.Not many occasions you can say that has happened in 11 years.
If,as many on here,say we can't bridge the gap due to the wage and transfer gap why do we have to play frightened football,rigid hold what we have get a goal and defend the edge of our own box style of football?We need a manager who takes a chance,not scared to risk a defeat by going for a win.The difference may just may be we finish a position or two lower but are entertained every week.On the other hand we may just may finish a position or two higher.Hand on heart how many of you are bored with David's style of football over the 11 years?
Tim Jones
29 Posted 13/03/2013 at 07:32:51
Here is how to judge Moyes 11 years. When he joined we had an aging squad that was going nowhere when he leaves we will have an aging squad thats going nowhere. That is his crowning achievement after 11 years in charge and this from a man who promised a 'YOUTH' policy so that we would never again have such an aging squad. You are a total FAILURE Moyes go and go now,
Paul Gladwell
30 Posted 13/03/2013 at 07:55:53
Gary Poole, the reason we are not footy managers is because yes we could never do what Moyes and co do, he is where he is because he did the hardwork through the years, but does that give you and others the right to slate supporters who question certain bog standard tactics like leave one up front at corners as you take two defenders with you? What other team does this? And the results of this? We have conceded from a corner on numerous occasions and have never scored from breaking away from a corner.
You don't need to have done countless footy courses to know this system fails, but hey, all us paying customers who paid to witness that shambolic showing (did you)should be quiet, we're welders, office workers and milkmen we no nothing.
James Morgan
31 Posted 13/03/2013 at 08:17:22
Paul G, bang on.
Brian Waring
32 Posted 13/03/2013 at 08:44:32
Gary Poole, you don't need a coaching badge to see that Neville is shite, and that Vic (who had come into a bit of form) should be starting because Jelavic is shot, that Osman is too lightweight in the middle of the park, that you don't bring 11 men back for corners etc, that when your 3 down you try and change things instead of just standing there with your arms folded like a tit.
Kevin Tully
33 Posted 13/03/2013 at 08:59:31
Gary Poole, what is wrong with Allardyce's record at Bolton?

If Holloway manages to bring Palace up, wouldn't getting 2 teams promotion into the P.L. constitute an excellent managerial record?

Come on, you know more than us will ever know about football.

Phil Gardner
34 Posted 13/03/2013 at 09:39:36
What was it Carlo Ancelotti said when asked which manager he admired most (tactically) and which manager made him have to think hard (tactically) in matches....?
Sam Hoare
35 Posted 13/03/2013 at 10:25:46
Moyes is not perfect but to say he is tactically inept after taking us up the table and outperforming pretty much every other financially comparable team in the league is inaccurate. Accusations about how he sets up his teams in cup matches or derbies for that matter have a fair grounding but you can't really complain that much about his overall league results.
Andrew Ellams
36 Posted 13/03/2013 at 10:50:18
Next season is going to be huge for Everton. The current top 5 will still be up there, I fear a big improvement for our lovely neighbours, I think Newcastle will come good and Swansea look on the up. If you add to that the fact that somebody like WBA will probably have a good season, where does that leave Everton? If things don't improve over the summer then a top half finish may be tough
Nick Entwistle
37 Posted 13/03/2013 at 11:17:40
We've been hearing a top half finish will be tough for years. You may forget, but we will also be there. I don't know how much this new Sky deal will change things but having heard (maybe incorrectly) of £250 extra over three years, surely that allows us maneuverability in the transfer market which has been the main cause of our recently floundering.

Kev Johnson
38 Posted 13/03/2013 at 11:23:15
Nick: as someone has already said - on the TalkSport thread, I think - the extra TV money won't make any difference because it's all relative. All Premiership teams will get it and so all will have more money to spend on transfers and wages, consequently prices will be driven up. We won't be any better off, relative to other teams in our league. It will widen the gap between the top division and all others, that's all.
Paul Andrews
39 Posted 13/03/2013 at 12:21:43
Nick @759

£250 extra over 3 years?
That is a big improvement on the £0 Mr Chairman and his board have invested in the club in10 years.
We should spend it wisely though.How about a new lawnmower?

Nick Entwistle
40 Posted 13/03/2013 at 12:26:09
Of course wages will go up, and transfer fees too. But to say it will make no difference is wrong.

There will be money in our bank to make transfers. That is not the case right now. And those transfers and wages also include potential players from foreign markets.

It will be though interesting to see how chairman spend this money knowing and seeing wages destroy Premiership clubs in the past. If wages go up and transfers to in direct correlation I would be surprised.

Robbie Muldoon
41 Posted 13/03/2013 at 12:31:22
Great objective analysis of Saturday's nightmare show. The scariest thing is the point you make about Moyes staying on due to lack of interest from elsewhere. I think I will stop following until he has gone if that happens, it will just be too much to bear.

One little disagreement though, you say we have never really been close to winning anything. The 2009 FA Cup Final must surely count as close, but I know what you mean!

Craig Walker
42 Posted 13/03/2013 at 13:39:34
Paul Andrews (724) - Absolutely spot on. The reason we've slipped in the league is the frightened performances against Norwich (home and away), Southampton (away), QPR (away), Wigan (away) etc. The last time we played well was the defeat at home to Chelsea at the turn of the year.
Brian Hill
43 Posted 13/03/2013 at 14:05:03
Barry Curran, you wrote:

"I have always given full support to our managers, even Walter Smith, and that took some doing from an Irish Catholic".

What does that mean?

Andrew Ellams
44 Posted 13/03/2013 at 14:13:12
The money will make a difference, there is no doubt about it. At the very least it will mean we can get involved in the transfer market more often and larger chunks generated from player sales will go to transfer pot rather than the bank.

How much it will benefit is down to how well it is spent

Phil Bellis
45 Posted 13/03/2013 at 14:21:37
C'mon Paul (774) you know Nick meant £250,000
Unfortunately, Bill has "ring-fenced" this cash to pay for the repair to the broken step we were shown during the Kirkby debacle, new blue gravel and, of course, safety helmets for those sitting directly under the soon-to-fall-down stands
Paul Andrews
46 Posted 13/03/2013 at 16:49:44
Phil,

£250k?
They spent more than that on the famous lawnmowers in the last accounts.
It`s a lot less bovver wiv an `ovver

Denis Richardson
48 Posted 13/03/2013 at 19:45:20
The money will make a difference as it will (at the very least) allow us to beef up the squad with (hopefully) decent players from overseas, as opposed to spending over inflated amounts on English players.

I just hope and pray its not Moyes who's given the purse strings come June, but a young manager with European experience and a more attacking mindset.

Utterly bored watching the shite dished up regularly and passed off as 'entertainment'.

Phil Gardner
49 Posted 13/03/2013 at 23:30:52
....the answer, as the subject of the post appears to have been forgotten, was 'David Moyes'. Very high praise indeed from one of the World's most respected, decorated and talented coaches. Discuss....
Robert Collins
50 Posted 14/03/2013 at 11:36:32
Jim Hourigan

Hello Jim,

Impressive article and totally correct.

Within in minutes of the kick off I could see Osman was overwhelmed in midfield, he's not a tackler, he's half a flair player who has a good game every so often sitting behind the forwards.

Both Gibson and Hitzeslberger should have been on, Gibson and Hitzeslberger would have given us some bite in midfield and also Hiztlesberger ( a decent ex German international) can carry the ball forward pass or shoot.

I just seemed obvious to me and the people around me. I would rather have had Boy George or Julian Clarey on the sidelines, they would have had more fight and go in them than Moyes. Moyes is everything people are saying about him on here.

I have to say Kenwright is watching this and is desperate for Moyes to stay if the statement to Stan Collymore is to be believed.

It's all doom doom!!! Does anyone have any Prozac?

Ross Edwards
51 Posted 14/03/2013 at 13:17:08
The last thing we all want here is 5 more years with this idiot in charge. He does not have a clue. You see managers like Mourinho using Plan B and C if A is failing, and make changes but with Moyes we have to wait before the match is loat before he is pressed to make changes.

The fans have realised (except Doddy) that we are stagnating and that a change must be made if we are to progress further. He obviously thinks that he is bigger than the club and that he is using us as a stepping stone. But he isn't. It's time the board and Kenwright gained some courage and sacked Moyes or not offer him a contract in the summer.

About Bill, what did he think of the performance against Wigan? If he is a real Evertonian, he would have sacked Moyes straight after the final whistle or maybe even after that derby capitulation last season at Anfield.

Kenwright and Moyes Out!

Robert Collins
53 Posted 14/03/2013 at 14:31:44
Kenwright said:

"David will decide in his own time, if he decides to stay we will do everthing possible to make it happen!"

Just try to imagine if he stays for another 5 years, that's a potential 16 fucking years with Moyes:

64 attempts at winning away at the sky clubs with no success
32 attempts at winning a domestic cup with no success
Whatever debacles await in Europe? Remember we've only gotten into Europe 4 out of 11 attempts and been dumped out, while Middlesborough and Fulham went all the way to the final.

How is Kenwright getting away with it?

Tony J Williams
54 Posted 14/03/2013 at 15:27:01
Ross, whilst I do agree that plan B is a sub at 70 mins, the comparison with Mourinho is a little daft. His plan B, C - Z includes players on the bench that would stroll into our first team.

I am sure that if we had any decent players on the bench, our plan B may happen earlier......but we don't

take for example Saturday, Our bench was Gibson, Anichebe, Barkley, Duffy, Naismith, Hitzlberger and Springthorpe. That whole bench cost about £500,000.00. Where is the Plan B in there?

Robert Collins
55 Posted 14/03/2013 at 15:58:52
Tony,

How much did the Wigan bench cost?

Robert Collins
56 Posted 14/03/2013 at 16:03:15
We weren't playing Barca, there should have been a plan B and the ability to use it.

Moyes though, only has plan A and refuses to change in any way.

Colin Wainwright
57 Posted 14/03/2013 at 16:06:08
The problem on Saturday was that he got his Plan A wrong.
Robert Collins
58 Posted 14/03/2013 at 16:10:29
And then didn't know how to correct it (plan A).

Then thinks to himself "Oh fuck I've got no plan B !!!"

Tim Jones
59 Posted 14/03/2013 at 16:22:50
All of the morons who are wishing and hoping that the 'new' TV money will make a difference conveniently forget that this money will go to ALL premier clubs not just to Everton. Which will of course leave us in exactly the SAME position as we are now with regards to our competitors.
Steve Carse
60 Posted 14/03/2013 at 16:45:36
Tim 126, I think you're ignoring the different ways the money could be used, ways that could improve the fabric of the club eg by clearance of some debt or by reconstruction of parts of the ground. Of course since everyone will be getting it it'll mean wages being bid upwards but,as ever, we'll be looking for that extra money to be spent wisely on astute purchases and attractive, though not ridiculous, salary offerings. If we're better at this than others then we'll improve more than others. That is always the way.
Patrick Murphy
61 Posted 14/03/2013 at 16:51:57
Steve we need the money to replace many of the players due to their age,Tim Howard is 34. Tony Hibbert 32. Sylvain Distin 35. Phil Jagielka 30. Phil Neville 36. Leon Osman 31. Steven Pienaar 30. add to this list the players who are likely to leave or be sold Baines, Fellaini Hitz, Hetiinga.

Distin, Howard Jags and Pienaar ,will probably remain fist team members, but what does that leave us with?
Mucha - Hardly a class replacement for Howard
Coleman - still developing,
Stones - potential not proven,
Duffy - Potential not yet proven,
Naismith - Probably not good enough for PL,
Barkley - Potential - not proven,
Jalavic - Out of form for most of this season,
Anichebe - Potential - unfulfilled probably not PL standard.

Gibson - Injury prone
Oviedo - Potential - Not proven
Mirralas - good enough - will he stay injury free and will he want to stay


So whoever the manager is come June there is a major overhaul required and that will cost us money, any ideas of bringing down the debt would be gambling with our PL status.

Tony J Williams
62 Posted 14/03/2013 at 17:24:29
Robert, it wasn't their bench that was the problem.
Paul Johnson
63 Posted 14/03/2013 at 17:24:16
He has never had a Plan B. The 2009 FA Cup final was the classic example. Never in a million years did we plan to go one up inside a minute, so we were fucked for the next 89 minutes.
Robert Collins
64 Posted 14/03/2013 at 17:35:05
Tony J Williams @ 132

it wasn't their bench that was the problem -????

Robert Collins
65 Posted 14/03/2013 at 17:37:26
Tony J Williams @ 132

If you're trying to say the Wigan bench was just plain better for a much smaller price, I agree.

Also It looked to me, only plan A (didn't work, could get it work) and no plan B.

Ross Edwards
66 Posted 14/03/2013 at 20:03:43
Tony, the reason I mentioned Mourinho was that he used substitutions at the precise moment against United which ended up swinging the game Madrid's way. I'm not saying you should compare the options Jose has to what we have, but all I'm saying is that at least Mourinho is willing to adapt to a plan B or C in order to change a game, unlike Moyes who rigidly sticks with hoofball, presumably in the hope the opposition die of boredom.
Roman Sidey
67 Posted 14/03/2013 at 13:02:52
Phil, Ancelotti said that about Moyes? My guess is because Moyes does set his team up not to lose - makes him think about his own tactics at how to beat us. That doesn't mean he's a great manager. It means he's tough to beat. A great manager wins those games. I know we beat Chelsea a few times, but there's a lot of games we haven't won because he has set up not to get beat.

The thing about this "respect from his peers" shit, is that those managers are making their mind up over two games. That's the only time they ever have to think about Everton. We watch them every week, and understand that setting up not to lose against Chelsea is exactly what he does against Southampton, QPR and Oldham.

Ross Edwards
68 Posted 14/03/2013 at 20:24:46
Phil
Ancelotti isn't exactly covering himself in glory at PSG, is he? He is struggling to a title which in reality should be a doddle, with all the dosh he has spent, and wasn't he the manager of the team which shamefully surrendered the Champions League to Liverpool in 2005?
Phil Gardner
69 Posted 14/03/2013 at 23:32:45
Ross, what I do know is Ancellotti is a highly regarded tactician. Last time I checked PSG were top of their league. As for the Travesty of Istanbul, you can hardly blame him for that. His team utterly wiped the floor for 105 of 120 mins of that match with Cloven FC, a more comprehensive footballing lesson you'll never really see in a CL final. When Satan himself is in the opposition dug out, whaddya gonna do?
Fran Mitchell
70 Posted 14/03/2013 at 23:46:15
Ross: Ancellotti is one of the great managers in world football. It is highly amusing that chelsea sacked him (and Mourinho) and have Benitez in charge instead.

He has won the Champions League twice and runner-up once (and only lost due to freakish events on the night) as well as winning Serie A and the Italian Cup. he then won the double at Chelsea in his first season and finished 2nd in his second season.

None of this makes his assessment of Moyes true or false, but how can one criticise Moyes for not being good enough then criticise Ancellotti, it's like going 'Osmans crap, so's that Xavi fella'...It makes your opinion worthless

Roman Sidey
71 Posted 15/03/2013 at 04:41:45
Tony, I'll tell you how good our bench was in list form:
Gibson - should have started
Anichebe - should have started
Barkley - could have started, did well when he came on
Duffy - some think he should be starting
Naismith - can't play, fair play to you
Hitzlberger - could have started
Springthorpe - N/A

Moyes is so oppressed to have starters and actual good players on his bench. Forget the fact that Vellios and Oviedo weren't even on the bench...

Eric Myles
72 Posted 15/03/2013 at 04:59:58
Ian #664 "Leaving money on the table like Chang, Nike etc is a joke, as is not having a strategy to clear the debt and the £5m P&L hit with it."

That 5 mill loss is a figure from 3 years ago Ian, last year it was 9.5mill loss, this year it will be greater.

Paul Andrews
73 Posted 15/03/2013 at 06:57:38
I think it would have been increased to a loss of £19.5 million without the Arteta money Eric.
Not entirely sure on that one.
Ross Edwards
74 Posted 15/03/2013 at 13:14:32
I admit now Fran and Phil that my comment seemed a bit haphazard and stupid, I only looked at two facts about him and ignored his outstanding achievements. I would have him in a flash over Moyes anyday.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb