As a first-time poster, I was hoping to put forward an idea worthy of discussion without over-stepping the bounds into heresy. Apologies in advance if I do.

The idea first came to me at the time of the Heysel tragedy, in the form of a conviction that Everton FC needed to distance itself from the heap of shite that carried the name of our city on the world football stage. The shock of those events, for me, was compounded by the fact that I happened to be working with a large group of football fans of many nationalities, including a number of good-natured Italian lads who, for once, failed to produce the shoulder-shrugging black humour that might normally have been their response to a tragedy beyond their comprehension.

They all knew I was an Evertonian but, like the majority of international football followers, probably didn’t make the connection between Everton and the city of Liverpool. Nevertheless, as one who was born and bred in Liverpool, I couldn’t help witnessing their sorrow without a nagging feeling of guilt by association. It was the only time in my life when I came close to being ashamed to call myself a Scouser.

Now, I know the hierarchy at Everton would never have used the occasion to take the moral high ground, and I know it would only have been a token gesture, but it would have given me great personal satisfaction if, from that time onwards, the club had implemented a policy of wearing our ’away’ kit at Anfield. The unspoken message ( though something that would become ’common knowledge’) being that we may come from the same city as Liverpool FC, but we’re nothing like them.

That was then, and this is now, and our problems with ’The Victims’ in recent times have been mostly on the field of play (though their continued support of Suarez, and their ’win-at-all-cost’ mentality, is beginning to rekindle feelings expressed at the end of my last paragraph).

Like many of you, I don’t think I could bear to witness another cowardly performance at Anfield, it just drains the life out of me. I share the exasperation of supporters who have, in other threads, called for a change of mindset of the players going into a derby game, but I have no idea how this might be effected. I’m certainly no psychologist, as I’m likely to demonstrate with the question: Would wearing our ’away’ kit have any bearing on the players, the fans, or the occasion?

The intention from our side would be to treat the Anfield derby as ’just another away game’, and I do recall a poster on a past thread mentioning that our black kit looks “menacing”, but would it have any positive psychological impact, or would the Redshite view it as a ’lowering of the colours’ before the game has begun? Is it worth dispensing with years of tradition to give it a try? ... Are the stocks already being prepared for me?

At the very least, it should get the ’pundits’ talking about us instead of about Liverpool before the game. And, if I’m being brutally honest, it might lessen the pain for me if the players are not wearing the Royal Blue as they trudge off the field after another embarrassing capitulation.

Share this article


Reader Comments (60)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Matthew Williams
1 Posted 29/04/2013 at 15:17:29
If we can finally get a win there, I'd have the lads playing in skins! Whatever it takes to end this fucking voodoo the RS have over us.

On a similar note, I hate the lads playing in all Blue, we not only look like Chelsea, but it always brings back bad memories of being knocked out of cups or being fucking hammered playing decent teams, like Arsenal & Leeds years ago & who we still struggle against today!

Chris Wilson
3 Posted 29/04/2013 at 15:33:31
As much as I'd love to say "yes let's treat the derby like a normal away game" .... It isn't ! There could be no greater moment for a boyhood blue like Ossie, Barkley, Jags or Bainesy to score a victory over the RS at Anfield in the royal blue. To know that they have finally overcome the Moyes/Anfield demon and guaranteed us to finish above and to do it in our beloved Blue & White.

I think the problem is not with the kit, the approach to the game, the build up, or the "it's just another away day" mentality... The problem lies with DM not wanting to lose so badly that we rarely look like winning at the place.

Andrew Rimmer
4 Posted 29/04/2013 at 16:04:44
Why not give it a try. I like the sound of that. It also might hide any black armbands that the redshite and many other football teams seem to constantly want teams to wear these days.
Kevin Hudson
5 Posted 29/04/2013 at 16:01:11
Re - your INITIAL motivation for proposing this...

I think your idea is hateful, crass, and born out of very poor taste.

We cannot be seen standing shoulder-to-shoulder with them over Hillsborough, only to then adopt an official position re: Heysel....and take it upon ourselves to remind/ taunt/ protest or 'distance ourselves from,' them about it at EVERY (or even one) single Anfield Derby.

It would seriously poison the city, to say nothing about the reputation of Scousers.

If a change-strip was proposed exclusively for a sporting, psychological reason, then THAT theory is worthy of debate, but for me, it would lessen the sense of theatre & history associated with the fixture.

It has to remain Red versus Royal Blue & White.

Ross Edwards
6 Posted 29/04/2013 at 16:21:53
I agree Kevin, no need for that suggestion. I don't think we should decend towards the scum who mock disasters like Hillborough or Munich.
We are a class football club with excellent fans and we should not turn this into a Heysel mocking day.
It's always red v blue, as Kevin rightly said, and it should always stay that way.
Simon Jones
7 Posted 29/04/2013 at 16:21:24
Surely you rise above all non-football (i.e. off field) matters and carry on like you always have. That sends the strongest message.

I worked in London at the time of the 9/11 atrocities. On 12 September, I took the tube and went in to to work as normal despite all of the worry at the time.

If this is your first post, then perhaps you should think a bit longer and harder before you write your second one.

Patrick Murphy
8 Posted 29/04/2013 at 16:35:27
Maybe we should wear all yellow as that would be the colour most appropriate given some of our displays over there, black is the mood I will be in if it is yet another token gesture of beating them on their own midden.

I see that Juventus have no problem with their city rivals who they haven't lost to in 18 years god forbid it takes that long for us to win over there.

Ernie Baywood
9 Posted 29/04/2013 at 16:43:48
Even table football is blue v red. It's good v evil. Blue to me, will always be the exact opposite of red.
Niall MacDiarmada
10 Posted 29/04/2013 at 16:49:19
When in actual fact orange is the opposite to blue... look up the colour wheel.

Though I do agree with the sentiment – 'treat it as an ordinary away game' and wear the away strip.

Brian Williams
11 Posted 29/04/2013 at 17:39:07
I don't see a problem with wanting to distance yourself from association with those who composed the minority of mindless animals involved in the causeof the Heysel disaster whatsoever, who wouldn't want to distance themselves from them....but by doing something which sends out that signal to ALL associated with the RS is wrong.

I think it's better to wear the Royal Blue and not be drawn into petty point scoring by methods that most might find distasteful in the extreme, and if there was anything that would re-ignite that sorry time, bringing it to light again would be part of it.

Just give them a footballing lesson in Royal Blue for fuck's sake...........PLEASE!

Mark Pierpoint
12 Posted 29/04/2013 at 18:02:07
The initial assertion that it should be worn to show that we are from the same city but not like them I don't really get? doesn't wearing a blue kit denote that. The spite that would also be involved in this is not really appropriate either. Heysel was a tragedy for Juventus fans and the families of those deceased; to simply jump on the bandwagon for some cheap point scoring isn't on. I don't really know why this article was even published to be honest.

On the psychological advantage of wearing black, not sure. If there was any impact on the Liverpool players it would be outweighed by the feeling of inferiority our players seem to have as soon as they step on a pitch with them, so don't worry.

Peter Thistle
13 Posted 29/04/2013 at 18:25:45
Have we ever won wearing the black kit ? I can't remember us ever playing well while wearing it. Maybe it gives the players a bad vibe.
Paul Ellam
14 Posted 29/04/2013 at 18:31:47
I don't really care if the players are stark bollock naked as long as they win the chuffing game!
Danny Broderick
16 Posted 29/04/2013 at 19:24:50
This is the worst post I have ever seen on ToffeeWeb. A cheap and small-minded post.
Peter Leslie
17 Posted 29/04/2013 at 19:20:18
Agree with others that we've too much class to drag Heysel into it. Those thoughts should be kept to ourselves.

But the black kit for the sake of invoking a psychological change in the players is an intriguing idea. Black represents serious, dark intentions, and it looks boss, so maybe it might have some subliminal effect?

We could really throw them for a massive loop and do it for Anne Williams in lieu of armbands? Wreck their heads that would, as well as one in the eye for Thatcherites and denialists everywhere.

Don't mind so long as we win, or at least kick fucking lumps out of the red bastards trying.

Dennis Stevens
18 Posted 29/04/2013 at 19:37:41
I have to echo the comment of Danny Broderick #775

It's a bit of an embarrassment to see such an excellent site tainted in this way.

Ste Traverse
19 Posted 29/04/2013 at 19:45:44
Don't agree with the OP. It's a thread in poor taste in my opinion.

Changing to black for any other reason is worth consideration. But not the reasons Mr McArdle has given.

Ross Edwards
20 Posted 29/04/2013 at 19:53:24
Saying that we should change to protest about Heysel to make a point is a bit like putting on a Nazi uniform and goosestepping along Goodison Road, to commemorate Hitler's birthday.
Poor taste and I expected better from a member of ToffeeWeb.
Mark Pierpoint
21 Posted 29/04/2013 at 19:54:50
Think it is important to add Mr Rimmer's equally reprehensible comments to the criticism of many on here also
Luke Berry
22 Posted 29/04/2013 at 21:12:14
There was no need to reference Heysel in this post. I agree that it was crass and misguided for you to post that however you have a right to your views and opinions and for that I won't lambast you.

On the subject of the psychological factor, I agree wholeheartedly. There is nothing I know of stipulating that we can't play in the all black kit, and yes psychologically speaking I believe it could unnerve them much like their all red kit unnerves others. There is a lot of evidence to suggest that colours that teams play in affect the outcome of their results, I believe it would be quite intimidating seeing a see of black swarming around the pitch, black as a colour has long had an intimidatory quality to it. I say give it a go.

David Hallwood
23 Posted 29/04/2013 at 21:14:04
Disagree with Patrick Murphy (#716) we should always play in Blue at Mordor, but maybe with a yellow stripe.
Tamhas Woods
24 Posted 29/04/2013 at 22:02:19
Ossie and Baines... boyhood Kopites

Jags supports Man Utd.

Blue for the derby, end of thread!

Ray Roche
26 Posted 29/04/2013 at 22:54:27
Are you the McArdle who played for Alsop Old Boys in the Zingari in the early 1970's?
John Gee
27 Posted 29/04/2013 at 23:06:36
Tony McArdle, Pay no attention to moralisers, it's great to see an article on here that isn't a 'Moyes: shite or God?' type of post.

I can see where you're coming from, I think. You've had up to here (hand to head) with the shit that's coming from the shite. All the 'woe is me' bollocks and their lack of self awareness that makes them try to claim Heysel was also a tragedy for themselves. Not to mention Suarez, Southport DJ's, Whealen's niece, Stirling's ex et al.

I disagree with you post though. Blue is our traditional colour and we should play in it whenever possible. I also think that wearing our home kit might have an infinitesimally psychological edge over the black kit as it might put into the players minds our home form.

Plus, it's not our place to condemn a section of their support or leadership, they should be doing that themselves.

Dick Fearon
28 Posted 29/04/2013 at 22:40:02
It was my one and to date, only, trip to my home city. It coincided with a derby at Anfield. desperate for tickets you can imagine my delight at receiving two complimentary complimentary tickets care of Bill Kenwright God bless him.

This meant my wife who travelled to Blues away games could also come to the game.
We will never forget the Super Super Kevin Campbell song and little Jug Ears handbags with the massive Westervelt.

The final whistle sounded for our one nil victory and the sight of shattered Kopites trudging home dragging their banners on the ground to the accompany of massed singing from our end of Always Look On The Bright Side Of Life.

My hopes for a repeat of such glorious moments at this weeks game are only tempered by the fact that dour Davy is our manager this time around.

John Gee
29 Posted 29/04/2013 at 23:26:16
Sorry, my post was so full of typo's. I meant Infinitesimally SMALL psychological edge. I'll let you fill in the other missing words and letters yourselves. I like challenging people!
Eric Myles
30 Posted 30/04/2013 at 06:45:54
Chris #685, "There could be no greater moment for a boyhood blue like Ossie, Barkley, Jags or Bainesy to score a victory over the RS at Anfield in the royal blue"

Baines supports them not us.

Tony McArdle
31 Posted 30/04/2013 at 08:13:35
I'm embarrassed and shocked in equal measure at some of the reactions to my post. I've been frantically searching through it to find the part where I said: “Let's wear the black kit at Anfield to remind the kopites of the Heysel tragedy, and rub their noses in it.”

I couldn't find it because it's not there, and I wouldn't dream of advocating such contemptible behaviour!

For those who started heading for the pitchforks at the mere mention of Heysel, please calm down and do me the courtesy of reading my post properly and from the perspective from which it was intended.

For a start, it was clearly in two distinct parts, hinted at by the paragraph which starts: “That was then, and this is now......” with the main thrust of the article being the latter part, and how the wearing of the black 'away' strip might affect the psychological approach to the game (nb: no mention of Heysel, and no intended connection with the black of the kit and a suggestion of mourning for the victims of that unfortunate event, as some respondents seem to have deduced).

“Okay, so what was the Heysel reference all about?“ — I hear you say. Well, as a first-time poster, it was intended (in the absence of a formal introduction) to hint at my vintage and at the length of time the kopites have been a thorn in my side. As I explained in the OP, given my situation at the time, that terrible tragedy was a watershed moment for me, and my distaste for all things Red reached another level. At a time not too far removed from this, Blues fans had enjoyed a memorable and trouble-free night in Rotterdam, and had received due praise for their behaviour. However, I believed the events at Heysel had the potential to cast all Scousers in a bad light.

It was in this context that the idea of wearing the 'away' kit at Anfield first came to me. Please note once again, I said the “away” kit — not a black kit — nothing to do with a false display of sympathy or mourning for those who lost their lives at Heysel, in a cheap attempt to score points over the kopites. Not at all.

For me, the wearing of the 'away' kit at Anfield would have been an attempt to symbolise a trip to that God-forsaken arena as a journey into a different mentality, a different culture, a different sense of decorum (now there's a word that needs to be revived, if ever there was one)... A philosophical away game, for want of a better description.

For those who will insist that the first part of my original article was an unnecessary preamble to what was intended to be a light-hearted thread, I respect your opinion. I must admit to an 'epic fail' on that count, but I hope a careful re-reading of the article would show that it's not the sacrilegious shite that some people have taken it for.

Tony McArdle
32 Posted 30/04/2013 at 08:19:35
John Gee,

Thanks for the support. I was beginning to feel like Jake and Elwood at the Cook County Assessor's office.

Tony McArdle
33 Posted 30/04/2013 at 09:16:03
Kevin Hudson,

In the rush to defend my original post I've evidently missed what should have been glaringly obvious.

Your assertion that the original idea was “hateful, crass, and born out of very poor taste”, I would probably agree with in retrospect. But it was a knee-jerk reaction to the outrage I felt at the time, and for which I make no apologies.

I do apologise for failing to grasp your point that a policy of wearing our 'away' kit to Anfield implemented at the time of the Heysel events would INEVITABLY serve to memorialise the tragedy... regardless of the colour of the kit and any other intended purpose.
Consider me suitably chastened.

Simon Jones.....
Thanks for the advice. I'll probably take it.

Tony McArdle
34 Posted 30/04/2013 at 10:29:19
Ray,
No, I'm not the McArdle you refer to, but I'd be grateful for more details. If some of these responses are anything to go by, I may have to try and pass myself off as him if questioned on the street.
Anthony Flack
35 Posted 30/04/2013 at 10:46:20
Not a great idea lowers us to the level you're trying to highlight. Keep on posting and do not be put off by feedback which can be a bit ripe..

I hate LFC and I think as an institution it is very adept at damaging itself. I hate all their players to varying degrees but I cannot hate their fans crikey I know lots of them and they even have plus points, give to charity go to church pay taxes etc. It is not right to to associate the fans as a whole with blame for Heysel and as for Hillsborough never go there...
.

Dave Lynch
36 Posted 30/04/2013 at 11:00:20
Lets take Hillsborough out of the equation.

Everything else those bastards are involved in either ends in pain for someone else or hands them an advantage.

Heysel, bent refs, whinging when they didn't qualify for the CL, Suarez and the fact he is a misunderstood saint.

Never has a club dragged the name of football and this city through the dirt as much as these bastards and not once was it their fault.

I fucking hate them with a passion that cannot be believed.

Phil Bellis
37 Posted 30/04/2013 at 11:21:09
I will never forgive those whose vile actions resulted in 39 people going to a football match and not coming home

Have LFC, as club or business, ever acknowledged any wrongdoing, ever? for anything?

Recently, over a discussion with a kopite over Heysel (I never brought it up) his whole viewpoint was that LFC had telex'd (ask your grandads) UEFA to complain about the venue and the selling of tickets to Italian-based fans living in Brussells so....
So what, said I, that doesn't justify what happened
His reply "yer doin me head in" - whatever that means, followed by a flounce
I see nothing wrong in reminding them of and maintaining "Justice for the 39"

Their years of supremacy in the past have made the majority of kopites (whatever attributes they may have as "people") the most obnoxious, self-serving, blinkered, up-their-own arses, wallowing in faux pathos, deluded gits going

Latest example, a direct quote re Suarez, "We Liverpool fans are not being allowed to move on and the witch hunt against our star is reaching outrageous levels. It's time to draw the waggons in and look after our own".

Bollocks to the whole lot of them - all fur coat and no knickers

Gary Reeves
38 Posted 30/04/2013 at 13:38:58
I think the original post was slightly tongue in cheek,so I've no comment on the black kit issue. I do though, disagree with people saying that Heysel is not "up for discussion" or,it's somehow "below the belt" to bring it up. I can tell people's ages by the their dismissal of the events on that night in Brussels. I was in Rotterdam the week before,and I watched Heysel unfold on TV - it's wasn't pretty viewing!. . The rest of the Country remembers,so don't let them palm you off with that Scousers together shite - "one of those things,Lad!". The ones who were there know the facts,and as for the Hillbillys around the pubs in Town,watching Sky! Well they should learn them.
Gary Reeves
39 Posted 30/04/2013 at 14:37:54
Mark Pierpoint - People on the forum will judge what is reprehensible or not,so you should allow people their say. For what it's worth,I'm not that fussed on your summation of Heysel as just "a tragedy for Juventus fans" - is that matter closed then,Mark? Is that it? Andrew Rimmer has a point with his black armbands for this,minutes silence for that,and now minutes of applause in the 25th minute for the groundsman's Gran,WTF! It all becomes meaningless,and I'll show my sympathies in my own fashion,thank you very much,without that faked,forced camaraderie.As Norman Tebbit said last week "Of course Mrs.Thatcher was divisive.Some are sheep,and some are goats."
Patrick Murphy
40 Posted 30/04/2013 at 16:40:32
I was just reading a little book about Everton Kits, which gives a brief history of shirts worn and colours etc, I hadn't realised that a stipulation for FA Cup matches before the war was that both teams wore a changed strip, hence Dixie and co wearing white shirts in the 1933 Final and they had used the same colours when playing Newcastle in an earlier round at Goodison.
Gary Reeves
41 Posted 30/04/2013 at 17:06:31
Teams of the same colour were still BOTH changing (for Cup games)until the 70's Patrick. Noteable games for us were the '68 Cup Final,and the 1971 home tie against Colchester.. I'm not sure it was a hard and fast Rule - more of a Gentleman's agreement,to even out home advantage in a knockout game.
James Marshall
42 Posted 01/05/2013 at 14:26:39
They could wear pants & vest for all the good it will do. The colour of the shirts doesn't mean shit.

I'm banking on the law of averages allowing us to stiff them on Sunday.

3-0 blues.

Nurrrrrrse!

Andrew Rimmer
43 Posted 01/05/2013 at 18:12:44
Thank you Gary. you saw my point. A while ago played 4 matches in a week. Each with a minutes silence. I refused to come out for the 4th as I had already been ordered to pay my respects in the 3 previous. I shall deal with loss in my own way thank you very much.
Fergus McCarthy
44 Posted 01/05/2013 at 18:22:26
The derby game was the first where two teams ran out together. I remember it well in the 1960s and that first true derby for 11 years in 1962 when RS had come out of 2nd Division. 73,000 Scousers yelling support in good humour.

Heysel did spoil a lot and I have every right to be a Bitter Blue. I do separate that from Hillsborough big time. However, I have found RS supporters try to put the two together to somehow muddy the facts about Heysel. I do not speak to them anymore.

The most recent Suarez incident with him biting is easily forgiven as "red mist" and a moment of stupidity, and passion common in sport. I cannot forgive that player for the diving to get players sent off and gain penalties, because that is calculated and has no place in sport. That should be punished a lot more.

Let's smash them on Sunday.

Mark Pierpoint
45 Posted 01/05/2013 at 22:03:21
I'm sorry, Gary and Andrew, but I don't think that a suggestion that a team wears black on the basis that it hides an armband is particularly in the spirit of the game. The comment may be tongue in cheek, Andrew, I don't know you, and whilst there probably are too many silences these days, I find it hard to believe that people would find the wearing of an armband so annoying that they would feel the need to cover it up.
Andrew Grey
46 Posted 01/05/2013 at 23:18:44
I quite like the black kit, wouldn't hurt to give it a go!

Tony, if you are not the 'McArdle' that ray referred to, are you our club photographer?

Tony McArdle
48 Posted 02/05/2013 at 05:28:33
Andrew Grey,
No mate, I'm not that McArdle either.......I wish ! 'Club photographer' sounds like a really sweet way to earn a crust.

Hmmm....I've been called "dead common" before, but I never thought it referred to my name.

Ray Roche
49 Posted 02/05/2013 at 07:15:09
Well, which McArdle are you, then?

Imposter.

Tony McArdle
50 Posted 02/05/2013 at 07:32:11
I'm the one who wishes I hadn't hi-jacked my own post by mentioning the "H" word, Ray.
Ray Roche
51 Posted 02/05/2013 at 08:41:35
Don't worry about it Tony, welcome to ToffeeWeb.
Gary Reeves
52 Posted 02/05/2013 at 10:21:20
Mark Pierpoint - Well Mark I wasn't really commenting on the black kit/armband situation. I stated before that I took it as being tongue in cheek. I joined the argument when you called someone's post "reprehensible." This is a forum for debate,not a Militant Tendency meeting - where opinions are shouted down. For me the Heysel episode will be up for debate until our Red friends start campaigning for "Justice for the 39" - which I don't anticipate,anytime in the near future.
Alex Willett
53 Posted 02/05/2013 at 10:54:14
Everyone should know by now, it was not Liverpools fault. Nothing ever is. As for the kit, blue all day against that lot !
Gary Reeves
54 Posted 02/05/2013 at 13:05:17
Tony McArdle - Yes,my friend,the "H" word is a no,no in Scouseland. I know a Red who never misses the "H" rallies,who actually received a nice comp.claim after "H" 'cos a "Police horse stud on his foot!" (it didn't). And another who sports a permanent torch badge,who boasts about bunking-in,in Athens with a Saveaway!. . And the other "H" (in Brussels) was of course,just one of those things. You know we're gonna argue this stuff for ever,but for my part. . .well,I just hate bad manners!
Andrew Rimmer
55 Posted 02/05/2013 at 17:21:01
Each to their own eh?
Tim Welsh
56 Posted 02/05/2013 at 17:20:23
I'm not going to wade into the Heysel debate. I'd rather talk about the psychological effect of kits.

The kit may or may not have an effect on the team and its performance – though I think certain colours have a practical impact on a team's performance (remember Man Utd's grey kit at Southampton), but does the kit have a psychological effect on the fans?

I HATE the all blue kit. I associate with failure, and we seldom excel in that dreadful combination. I would like to see a degree more individuality, imagination and nostalgia. If there is a clash with shorts or socks (and by the way Everton ARE blue, white , white), then, instead of substituting blue for white, why can't we substitute black for white, or even yellow like we did back in the late 60s and early 70s? I suppose the fact that I have bothered to say this must mean it DOES have a psychological impact.

Like I say, if I see the all-blue kit, my optimism plummets. Colour is used as means of testing patients' psychological states by using the Luscher test, so it clearly has a resonance at a subconscious level. Nevertheless, I wouldn't care if we wore shite brown as long as we beat the RS.

Patrick Murphy
57 Posted 02/05/2013 at 17:37:18
I believe that the colour of the kit does have an impact on officials why else would teams who play in predominantly red kits have such a good record all around the world - I did read about this a long time ago but can't remember where - Of course it may mean that more teams play in that colour so perhaps the outcome isn't so freakish. I liked the Gold and Black combination we have used on occasion, but I'm not as averse to the all-blue kit as you Tim. Although admittedly I can't readily think of an occasion when we have scored a major triumph wearing that combo.

I suppose it's all a matter of taste.

Ray Roche
58 Posted 02/05/2013 at 19:11:12
Tim, we've played in all manner of colour combinations over the years, I particularly liked the Amber shirts and Blue shorts, but we also looked good in the white shirts/black shorts we also used in the 60's. Mind you, the shirts were without all the crap logos, flashes etc. that spoil the simplicity of kits these days. I'm becoming a grumpy old get.
Roman Sidey
59 Posted 02/05/2013 at 23:32:59
Tony, are you the McArdle that lives/lived in or around Nambour in the past seven years?
Tony McArdle
60 Posted 03/05/2013 at 04:28:40
Gary Reeves,

I appreciate your having recognised the intended tone of the article (024) and jumping to my defence in the face of Mark Pierpoint's criticism, but then you go and mention the other "H" word (598). Bad move ! ( winces, turns head away and sucks air through pursed lips ).

Tony McArdle
61 Posted 03/05/2013 at 04:40:25
Roman,

No mate, I'm not that fella either. Although I have had a long-term connection with Australia in my time, I've never been to Nambour.

Tony McArdle
62 Posted 03/05/2013 at 05:11:43
No worries, Ray (565). I'm not going to take it to heart.
In fact I've already started to develop a perverse pride in producing “.....the worst post......ever seen on ToffeeWeb” at my first attempt, even though I believe that opinion was formed on the basis of a misunderstanding. So it goes.

Amongst the replies from those who managed to focus on the intended theme of the piece, I was surprised at the number who would be willing to give it a go. Apparently, a suggestion which involves tampering with the history and long-held traditions of the derby fixture is not the “heresy” I imagined it might be, in the opinion of some.
Of course, whether a change of strip would bring a different dynamic to the fixture could only ever be a matter of conjecture, as I believe the idea wouldn't go down well with the majority of fans, nor would it be considered for a nanosecond by the club.

Anyway.......for Sunday......... C.O.Y.B !......'KIN GERRINTERDEM !!

Roman Sidey
63 Posted 03/05/2013 at 21:21:04
As an Australian, I find the full (All) black kit fecking intimidating. On that basis, we should wear it at every home game. Additionally, was one of our earliest kits black with a red sash? I hate Essendon Bombers as much as the next bloke, but it's not an ugly kit.

As someone has mentioned too, the blue and white shorts is a lot better than all blue that we wear away.

Roman Sidey
64 Posted 04/05/2013 at 03:38:30
And by home game, I meant to say away game.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb