Firstly, let me say that I think Martinez is a terrific manager. He’s honest, he acts with integrity and when his teams play well they are a pleasure to watch. I could imagine that, if he managed a team with better players than he has at his disposal at Wigan, he could do very well. If we accept that our players are, man for man, better than Wigan’s, then, if he gets the job, I believe he could possibly do well. But, and it’s a very significant ’but’, is he a risk we can afford to take? I’d suggest Bill Kenwright should think very carefully before appointing him and perhaps consider the following:

1. Team formation – his teams set up in a 3-5-2 formation, occasionally 3-4-3. The consistent feature of both formations is to have 3 at the back. Well, we have three great centre-halves at the club – Jagielka, Distin and Heitinga so that should suit us.

But hold on, let’s think about this in a bit more detail. Distin is 36. Heitinga seems to want out and has done for a while now. And Jagielka, is a fantastic defender who makes match saving tackles, but would he suit playing in a back 3? I don’t think he would. To play in that role you have to be a good passer of the ball who is comfortable in possession as other teams may play only 1 or 2 up front against the 3 and you therefore have time on the ball. As much as I appreciate Jagielka’s abilities, I would have to say that these are not his attributes.

And would Jagielka himself want to play in such a system next year? I doubt that he would in a World Cup year – a few memorable howlers like the Wigan players have made this year and he could kiss goodbye to his seat on the plane to Brazil. We read in the gossip columns that Moyes might be in for him and I’ve no doubt others may be interested as well; if I was Jagielka, I wouldn’t take the risk of hanging around if good opportunities arise.

If Martinez does come here, then I think the first thing he’d do is look to strengthen this area. Indeed, if Jagielka and Heitinga leave and Father Time catches up with Distin, then he’ll have to. Someone had better tell BK to find that chequebook that’s gone missing.

2. Baines/Pienaar – they are without doubt a great partnership and by far the most creative and consistent section of our team. Under Martinez, they will no longer play the same roles that they do at present with Pienaar playing in front of Baines, committing opposition defenders to get close to him so that Baines can have space to overlap or send in a cross.

Under Martinez, no-one would be playing directly in front of Baines and opposition defenders could concentrate on closing down his space as he will play higher up the field rather than starting his runs from a deeper defensive position. I don’t know how many goals have been created from the left-hand side of the team but I think it’s a fair proportion of the total goals scored. I doubt they would be as effective in either of the systems which Martinez plays. That’s one hell of a price to pay if I’m right.

3. Midfield – in a Martinez team playing with 3 central defenders you lose a midfielder. For me, the strength of the team this year has been the midfield. Many criticise Osman (unjustly in my view) and would probably welcome the fact that he is the likely candidate to drop to the bench with Martinez as manager. But perhaps they may not be so enthusiastic when they realise that it will be much harder for Barkley, Lundstram, Kennedy or any other young midfielder to find a place in the team as there is one less place in midfield.

Also, you need one or two of your midfielders to have pace as they will usually outnumber the opposition in central midfield and this gives the opportunity to break forward beyond the opposition backline. Who have we got? Gibson, Fellaini, Pienaar, Osman... mmm, not a lot of pace there. ("Oh for fuck’s sake!" yelled Kenwright when Roberto asked him if he could buy a new central midfielder, "Another player! Do you think money grows on trees?! Get on the phone to Moysey, tell him he can have Baines after all!")

4. Time – to change a whole style of play will take time for the players to understand the system that Martinez would want, and then get used to and learn to play that way. I’d suggest a couple of years of adjustment would follow his appointment.

Then, who knows, perhaps we could be hugely successful. But is that really a likely outcome given that we don’t have money to spend? The present team and style has come very close; if we had had a centre forward scoring 20 to 25 goal this season we would almost certainly have qualified for Europe and possibly the Champions League. So at this point there isn’t a whole lot wrong with the team and the style, other than the fact that we need a new centre forward.

Others have pointed out the poor performance of Wigan in recent years in struggling against and now succumbing to relegation. This is clearly a major concern but I have tried to assess the tactical consequences of a possible appointment of Martinez taking account of the current squad.

The appointment could prove to be a brilliant move in years to come and, if he is appointed, then he would have my wholehearted support from the start. If he is given time I believe we would eventually see a very attractive football team and possibly achieve success. But, his appointment would bring with it great risk, there is no doubt about that. Is it a risk we can afford to take? And, if we take it, are people prepared to give him time? Over to you, Bill.

Share this article


Reader Comments (132)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Derek Thomas
1 Posted 17/05/2013 at 06:43:45
Can we afford not to??
Peter Jones
2 Posted 17/05/2013 at 07:12:55
Your analysis made another Peter Jones proud no doubt :) I think you bring up some really important questions with regards to how we would change tactically under Martinez if he were appointed. Personally, I think a quality tactician is one that sets up his team to suit their strengths, rather than jam players into a system that they may not be comfortable with. Adaptability is key. Our team screams 4-2-3-1 because our players skill sets are suited for that formation and I think Martinez is smart enough to realize that. My biggest issue with Moyes was always his lack of rotation and his unwillingness to let the young players get some starts under their belts unless a veteran was injured. I don't see Martinez having that problem when he realizes that some of our Under 21s are quite promising and may add that extra firepower we need to get those extra few points to qualify for CL.
Mark Palmer
3 Posted 17/05/2013 at 07:15:08
Whoever is appointed will bring change. Inevitably, players will leave, new ones will appear and formations will suit the footballing ethos of the new manager.

The Moyes way improved our status in domestic football but we have no titles to defend. So, time is what we have and patience will be needed. I'd rather build a new team with a manager who is virtuous and has sound footballing ethics.

Martinez is my choice. He's less of a risk than Moyes was 11 years ago and his relegation battles will have taught him something, surely. If he's appointed I'm sending him a copy of Zulu to show him how to defend. New back four of 'Hooky', Caine, Baker and Sandbag. Blue tunics instead of red, of course!

Tony Marsh
4 Posted 17/05/2013 at 08:54:21
Mark (#745) — I don't agree that Moyes improved our status in domestic football. He did change people's attitudes towards us from a plucky Stoke-type side to an "Ah Bless 'em, the way they try without money" type attitude.

Even Moyes's own comments were cringeworthy and became an embarrassment. The "knife to a gunfight" being one of many. We need a manager who will adopt a brand new ethos and football philosophy that must transmit through to both fans and players alike.

We must stop feeling sorry for ourselves and try to forget what others have or don't have. Above all else, we must embrace youth as we can't compete financially. Youth and better scouting system abroad are essential for the next manager — No more Brits, that's a definite.

Seb Niemand
5 Posted 17/05/2013 at 09:20:17
Martinez is this year's Mike Walker. No thanks.
Eugene Ruane
6 Posted 17/05/2013 at 09:24:06
"Martinez: Can We Afford to Take the Risk?"

Well, I'll tell you what.

Give me a list of the risk-free managers and I'll get back to you.

Andrew Ellams
7 Posted 17/05/2013 at 09:31:57
Spot on Eugene. I think people are hugely overestimating how Everton are perceived from the outside and think some perfect solution is going to walk through the door.

The realistic view is that our best hope is young manager who has already cut his teeth elsewhere and is ready to move to a bigger club. So from the famous list of 19 we are looking at somebody like Martinez, MacKay or Poyet. Possibly one of the German managers that have been mentioned this week, Tuchel or Favre.

Alternatively we may attract somebody who has made some sort of reputation in a European leagure and sees a move to England as his next step. I can't see past Pereira here unless you count Lennon.

I could write a long list of pros and cons for all of them but none are without risk.

And yes, I steered well clear from internal promotions because for me the risks are far too great.

Barry Rathbone
8 Posted 17/05/2013 at 09:11:11
The appalling zeitgeist of "anti Martinez" among the usual closed minds results from proving the dour defensive principles of the new Man Utd manager ineffective.

Destroying us at Goodison, running the Champions ragged when it REALLY mattered, and lifting the cup in the process was supposed to be impossible.

Relegation was INEVITABLE given Wigan's circumstances – primarily Whelan closing the chequebook and the annual forced sale of star players.

Martinez somehow deferred the inevitable by a few years by choosing to play exciting football – and that is the key. We have defensive expertise by the bucket load; our requirement is pace, verve and a different mindset.

He is the man.

He's served his time in the Prem not just a 12-month stint or even worse no experience at all (huge gamble!) and his Wigan arrival makes our departing hero's look like easy street.

Immediate funding, Rooney, a wage differential and sheer club size that impartial observers would never ignore.

Of course we must take him – IF HE WILL COME!

James Martin
9 Posted 17/05/2013 at 09:57:17
'usual closed minds' Barry? Stop trying to make the new managerial appointment an opportunity to re-draw the battle lines between those who favoured Moyes and those who wanted him out. Moyes is going now, whether you liked him as a manager or not has nothing to do with how people will feel about the new manager. Some people have doubts about Martinez because of the exact opposite of all the things you just said. When the pressure was on them in the league and they still had a chance of staying up (Swansea at home) they choked. Everyone on here knows Martinez is good in one off big games but he has no league form which is why some people are concerned.

Yet again you make this mistake of presuming that Moyes' defensive expertise is just going to last under whoever the new manager is. This may not happen the back 4 will need replacing eventually when Distin goes and if Baines moves on.

When the new manager comes in if he is the continental type of supposed free flowing football then you can't somehow claim him as yours i.e the antithesis of what all the Moyes lovers always wanted. Equally if he's perceived to be some sort of backwards British coach then you can't claim that all the Moyes lovers will now be satisfied and immediately form a Malkay/Stubbs/Hughes out group along the line sof the MOB. When the new manager comes everyone will have to make their own choice on him depending on how he does. Stop trying to re-start a fight that's finished.

Also Martinez is never going to play Anichebe in midfield - sorry.

Steve Pugh
10 Posted 17/05/2013 at 09:50:24
I know that this is a bit simplistic but please bear with me.

Experts believe that an average manager will achieve a league position equivalent to the clubs wage bill. Martinez has done just that.

If he does the same at Everton then we will finish 9th or 10th, losing a couple of million pounds in the process. Eventually this loss will need to be offset, most likely by reducing the wage bill still further. And so begins the spiral.

I know that it might not happen, I am only going off what has happened in the last few years. I also know that some fans will happily sacrifice league standings for a trophy, but one trophy does not guarantee more, Alex McLeish, Bobby Gould, even Joe Royle, all won trophies and then went down hill. Royles post 95 highlight winning the division 2 play offs.

David Graves
11 Posted 17/05/2013 at 10:09:55
Peter the whole premise of your argument is that Martinez will only play one system that wont suit our current first 11. Really??
You even suggest that the Baines/Pienaar partnership would be broken up because they couldn't be accommodated in his usual formation. Nonsense.
Brian Harrison
12 Posted 17/05/2013 at 10:22:05
I think it will be a massive risk whoever we get and that is probably why the fanbase is so nervous not really knowing which candidate to back. Looks like Martinez is one of the favourites, but his league record is terrible and are we moving the club forward by appointing a manager who has got his team relegated. I find it quite amusing that Barry Rathbone is backing Martinez and states that because of the lack of funds it was inevitable that Wigan would be relegated. Yet when people said how well Moyes had done with little money he said that was just an excuse, funny how people move the goalposts.

I think there is no doubt Martinez plays attractive football, but is it winning football, and for those who say I would rather watch a team play Martinezs way would soon change their mind if we were always in the relegation zone. Also people say well he will do better at Everton because we have better players and who brought the players to Everton not Martinez. He has had enough time at Wigan to have produced better results, you only have to look at Swansea whos manager has had less time than Martinez also won a trophy and spent less money than Martinez.

Finally Martinez keeps persisting playing 3 at the back it doesnt work in the Premiership and maybe thats why your teams concede more goals than anyone else.

Paul Foster
13 Posted 17/05/2013 at 10:32:38
Time to repost something from James Martin:

Wigans PL finishes before Martinez:
10th
17th
14th
11th

When Martinez came in:
16th
16th
15th
18th

I'm struggling to see the evidence that he is a "terrific manager". Good bloke, full of integrity. But he's just relegated a club that Paul Jewell and Steve Bruce had pushing for a top 10. It's an utter myth that he fought against the odds to keep Wigan in the Premier League: he relegated a club (and nearly relegated them on 3 other occasions) that had previously looked like cementing its place mid-table.

Chris Gould
14 Posted 17/05/2013 at 10:24:43
You cannot play beautiful Barcelona-style football unless you have Barcelona quality players. Wigan played pretty good football and lost most weeks. They conceded a ridiculous amount of goals without scoring freely even though they apparently play great attacking football. Martinez is naive and took Wigan down because he tried to make some poor players play a style of football that season after season produced a relegation battle. Martinez never compromised, basically never adapted. Moyes may have been negative but he was often effective because he was acutely aware of what his players were capable of and was more interested in getting results than playing a style of football that only works if you have world class players in your team. I don't believe Martinez would bring us success. I think everyone would very soon be bitching about the amount of goals we would concede. We have played attacking football this season and not been able to find the net because our forwards have been poor. Martinez won't improve that, and he won't attract a high caliber of player to our club or be able to afford those kind of players anyway.
Dennis Stevens
15 Posted 17/05/2013 at 10:23:47
Steve #787 - I don't think Royle did too badly after winning the Cup, when the following season [his one & only full season at Everton] he improved our league form even further from the miraculous relegation avoiding run the previous season & had Everton finishing in 6th place - one place higher than Moyes' Magnificent Seventh in his first full season. Although the following season wasn't as good & Johnson & Royle had parted company before it's end, so was Moyes' 2nd full season when we finished a lowly 17th, it can happen when a new manager is making changes to style & playing staff. Who knows how we would have fared if Royle had been at the club for over 11 years? It may not be your intention here, but I've noticed a few comments of late seeking to belittle Joe Royle as manager in comparison to Moyes, possibly because his name keeps rearing up as the last manager to win a trophy for the club. To me this 'Yeah, he won the Cup - but ...' view is a distortion & disrespectful toward a manager who came in at a critical time & did an excellent job.
Brendan McLaughlin
16 Posted 17/05/2013 at 10:37:42
Interesting stats Paul #791
It seems that Wigans "inevitable" relegation only became inevitable after Martinez was appointed...
James Martin
17 Posted 17/05/2013 at 10:57:00
In the name of balance it should be recognised that Martinez was given less cash than Jewell or Bruce. But Jewell's and Bruce's performance belies this myth of 'its only WIgan a rugby town they only have 20 people at every game even being in this legaue is a miracle for them'. That's not the case, they're just yet another example of over 38 games season after season cash is king. Wigan have been here 8 years, how long do they have to be here before they're recognised as a premier league club and not some third division rugby side? They have been for a long time a premier league club paying premier league wages to premier league players - some of them who are very good. Their historical status can't be used as an excuse for why they went down in just the same way our historical status isn't going to magically propel us up the table above City and Chelsea. All that matters in football is the recent past and Martinez had an established premier league side and progressively dorve down their league position. That is the only irrefutable fact. You can talk about playing style, squad value, legacy and all of that but the cold hard facts are that Wigan were a premier league side when he took over and now they're not. He dismantled an agricultural team that knew how to stay in the division and rpelaced it with a team that supposedly plays good football but doesn't know how to win enough games.

You have to combine good football with winning enough league games to show progression and he just doesn't do that. He won a trophy but so did Mcleish - both followed it by relegation. Their CVs read the same yet because one apparently has a philosophy this makes one a great manager and one a dinosaur.

Colin Glassar
18 Posted 17/05/2013 at 10:56:50
Poyet is now becoming one of the favourites now. I suppose the Martinez bashers will now turn their attention to him and begin the destruction of his reputation as well.
Ged Simpson
19 Posted 17/05/2013 at 11:15:13
Poyet out !
Steven Telford
20 Posted 17/05/2013 at 10:53:57
Facts of great concern

1) Consistently worst league record than predecessor
2) Every season in a relegation Dog fight
3) Relegated this year
4) All done with a Similar net spend to Moyes
5) All done on a Similar wage bill to EFC

All number based, no opinions.
If there is one to be made, Can somebody put forward a numeric case for him?

Seriously, the anti Moyes people could not stand to have Moyes rated based on inputs relative outputs, and now they are all coming out of the wood work to praise Martinez for precisely that.
I don’t know if other people feel different, but I won’t swap 10 FA cups in exchange for losing top flight football. Cups come with a degree of luck, leagues measure aggregate quality

The only argument I see for Martinez is, that some people think he is pretty good. Maybe he is, I am not saying they are wrong, I’m just say I can’t see why how they come to that conclusion.
The work he did at Swansea gets mention, but surely we cannot overlook the fact that Swansea seem to have done better without him, and better than the team he went on to manage.

Barry Rathbone
21 Posted 17/05/2013 at 11:14:06
Paul problem with using stats in isolation is it's stupid.

Just ask United re Moyes appointment.

Thanks for proving the closed minds comment - ditto Brendan and James.

".......as 2 short planks" comes to mind.

Graham Mockford
22 Posted 17/05/2013 at 11:16:40
Barry #776

But his record is just not good enough, week-in, week-out, across a four-year period.

The playing exciting football is a bit of a media myth. His appalling defensive record is there for all to see but Wigan's goal scoring record is not much better. A paltry 164 in 151 games (the dour defensive one managed 220 in the same period!)

Winning the FA Cup is an achievement and I thought Wigan played really well against us and Man City. The question must be: If he had such talented footballers at his disposal, why could he not get them up for the 38 games that got them relegated?

Paul Foster
23 Posted 17/05/2013 at 11:24:49
Barry, that's just a really silly comment. In what way are those stats in isolation?! They are put side by side with his predecessors - both of whom had a similar budget and both of whom outperformed him in the league. The context is both historical and financial: Wigan, on a very similar financial footing, were becoming a recognised mid-table team. After Martinez took over they dropped several places flirted with relegation 3 times and dropped out.

But if you still think the stats are in isolation, what context would you like to add that would make Martinez' record at Wigan look better? Seriously, please feel free to provide some. I'm guessing your thinking about the kind of context that you never allow to be applied to David Moyes' reign. You know, financial backing etc. Unfortunately for you, the numbers make Moyes look good and Martinez woeful.

As for "just ask United re Moyes' appointment", their reasoning was quite simple and very rational: they looked at the stats. Given resources and the situation he inherited, Moyes has drastically over-achieved (Everton's spend puts us 4th from bottom over the decade) year after year. Given resources and the situation he inherited, Martinez has drastically under-achieved, culminating in an embarrassing relegation.

Sam Hoare
24 Posted 17/05/2013 at 11:41:07
Barry, did you seriously accuse others of having closed minds?! Unbelievable. Your refusal to even discuss some of the negative aspects of Martinez's history is testament to your hypocrisy.
Mat Fearon
25 Posted 17/05/2013 at 11:23:15
Barry, unlike you to come out with an offensive comment. Why are they others "thick" just because their view is different from yours?
Can you explain to me why their relegation was inevitable? Why could Martinez not get Wigan to finish above Villa, Southampton, Newcastle, all of which are very average teams with little cash to spend on new players.

And just be clear, I am undecided re Martinez. The relegation issue is a key consideration though.

Kev Johnson
26 Posted 17/05/2013 at 11:34:33
How's this for size?

When clubs appoint a new manager, what they are often (not always, but often) buying is PROMISE. I would say that is exactly what Man Utd have done with Moyes, because the man has won nothing in 11 years at Everton and has little European experience. They obviously reckon he has the necessary skills to take a step up. In so far as he is unproven at their level, he is a risk.

The same applies to Martinez. Some of us believe that RM has the ability to manage at a higher level, based on his previous performance working under certain restrictions. Furthermore, we think that he has the right character for the job, that he would represent our club well and get us playing a style of football which (a) we could be proud of, and (b) has a reasonable chance of achieving success, in our terms. I'd say this parallels Man Utd's appraisal of Moyes.

Steven Telford
27 Posted 17/05/2013 at 11:46:27
Barry, if "the problem with using stats in isolation is it's stupid"
Can you see that there is also a problem with ‘not using any stats?

As well, "in isolation" from what exactly?
The polite request has been for the Martinez advocates to call forth some of their own stats. Is that an unreasonable request?

If Martinez gets the job, I will back him all the way.
But don't you think Pereira seems a better choice if we could get him?

Eugene Ruane
28 Posted 17/05/2013 at 12:02:25
Sorry but the whole managerial mathematics thing of "THAT+THAT+THE OTHER=THIS" is nonsense imo.

Simply doesn't work and can't be applied to football management - EVER!

99% of managers who have won stuff, have gone on to fuck up at other clubs and from time to time, managers who've fucked-up at one club, have become successful at another (er..probably) (nb: stats from the University Of Please Yourself, California)

Whoever we get (particularly given the money he WON'T have to spend) it WILL be a gamble.

Will he like the players?

Will the players like him?

Will the players RESPECT him?

Will he bring in good/shit players?

Will he train them too hard/soft?

Will his family be able to settle? - and a thousand more questions that nobody knows the answers to.

Real Madrid saw another team win the CL, they spent millions to recruit that team's coach and gave him a team containing some of the world's very best players.

Result?

A team from Germany wins the CL.

Or try this, Chelsea get rid of an interim coach (Di Matteo) who wins them the CL and replaces him with someone they think is better...who puts them into the Europa. He then goes to another team who could finish higher than the team he just left.

There's some science to it but it is NOT science and luck and a whole load of intangibles play a part.

Ok, can you improve your chances with the 'right man'?

With money, definitely - but we haven't got any, which decreases our choice re the right man

My advice would be simply to prepare yourself for a name that is going to make you react as follows.

"You must be fucking JOKING!!"

Dennis (793) - Agree completely re Joe Royle.

As for Martinez and Wigan's defensive record, if appointed he's hardly likely to turn up and fuck about with a defence that is working a lot better than the last one he had (is he?)

I'm NOT touting Martinez by the way, I personally like the cut of Pereira.

Although at least with Martinez, I'd get the satisfaction of sending off a lovely letter off to Whelan

( gist - "Fuck you big club blah blah wooly-back nob-head blah blah Tory Thatcher-loving twat blah blah pie-scoffing dolt blah blah etc waffle boring broken leg story blah blah" etc)

James Stewart
29 Posted 17/05/2013 at 12:19:34
Wigan play 4-3-3 for the majority which isn't all that different from 451 when attacking. They switched to 532 with wingbacks on occasion but surely a plan B is a good thing to have?
John Ford
30 Posted 17/05/2013 at 11:53:36
Kev J

I get the 'promise' idea and have never been tied either to managers having won things (not many do) or having had premier experience. The issue I have with Martinez is that his reputation is based on keeping a poor team up plus playing good football.

Wigans half dozen best performances of the season, including tis year undoubtedly at out place in the cup, would make a great highlights package but most of the time they are complete crap. They are highlight friendly and get undue credit for their rare but outstanding performances. Id also worry about any team not giving due attention to defence. If you cant pick a decent centre half you've got problems.

James Lauwervine
31 Posted 17/05/2013 at 11:42:33
Barry, you make the 'closed mind' comment then show that yours has shutters down, bolts across and fucking guard dogs all around it. Well my 'closed mind' doesn't see any evidence at all that Martinez would improve us. Please enlighten me.
Kev Johnson
32 Posted 17/05/2013 at 12:55:04
John — I'm basically in favour of Martinez, but I have to admit that he worries me too! Wigan's defense has been a shambles at times, there's no denying. In a nutshell, though, the worries are outweighed by an excitement and optimism at the thought of what he could do at Everton. For me, whatshisname too often erred on the side of caution, and I've had enough of that, I really have.

As regards, teams being "highlight friendly", well, that is a larger issue. I have a couple of friends who are Chelsea fans and they always raved about Tim Cahill. They made him sound like the best player on the planet. I replied that he was "MotD-friendly". Basically, they only saw him when he was scoring a goal (or having a near miss) on the telly. I countered that when Cahill wasn't scoring, he wasn't doing that much, apart from unsettling defenders and being generally combative; what's more, he could only play in one position and his selection sometimes distorted the way our team played.

So, yeah, highlights can be deceptive. The thing is, the only two times I've seen Wigan play 90 minutes they have been terrific! Who here can say they have watched ever Wigan game? No one.

Barry McNally
34 Posted 17/05/2013 at 13:29:05
If his name was Robert Martins he would have been sacked by Wigan a long time ago.

Hopefully BK doesn't buy DW's set-up.

Graham Mockford
36 Posted 17/05/2013 at 13:38:37
Eugene,

I agree with a lot of what you say. Martinez could turn out to be a really successful manager.

However, when you appoint someone to any job you are usually looking for evidence of previous performance i.e results and potential to develop. My unscientific gut feeling is he would be a disaster. Just because he has some great defenders at his disposal,and Everton's current back four are as good as any in the PL bar none, doesn't mean he couldn't fuck it up by playing a different formation or asking players to do things differently.

I hope you're wrong about the next manager but I'm with you in having a horrible sinking feeling of BK doing it on the cheap. Pereira for me too.

Steve Brown
37 Posted 17/05/2013 at 14:15:36
Top 6 Premier League sides don't appoint managers who just got their teams relegated, regardless of their 'potential'.
Scott Hamilton
38 Posted 17/05/2013 at 14:22:00
Plumed gobshite Robbie Savage reckons we should get Benitez:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22562419

Colin Wainwright
39 Posted 17/05/2013 at 14:18:08
Don't get me wrong, I'm not too sure about Martinez myself, or anyone else for that matter, and although Moyes did my head in from time to time, I was never one of his biggest critics.

But.

You have all got to see the irony in some of DM's most ardent supporters, accusing Barry Rathbone of having a closed mind re Martinez' faults.

John Ford
40 Posted 17/05/2013 at 14:34:41
'Plumed gobshite'........surely deserves a prize under the plain english awards.

Paul Mackie
41 Posted 17/05/2013 at 14:41:47
Barry (776)

"Relegation was INEVITABLE given Wigan's circumstances primarily Whelan closing the chequebook and the annual forced sale of star players."

Then please explain to me (and believe me, I'm all ears for this one) how you think Martinez will take us further given that exactly the same circumstances apply to Everton?

Jay Harris
42 Posted 17/05/2013 at 13:52:38
An average of 6 wins out of 38 league games over the last 4 years says enough to me about Martinez.

He is too carefree and his team plays the same way which is why they let so many goals in.

The worst defensive record in the Prem.

Worse than Reading or QPR.

Is that a CV for managing EFC???

If so how far have we fallen.

We should really be looking at Rijkaard, De Boer, Hiddink etc.

We need to look up rather than down.

Steve Pugh
43 Posted 17/05/2013 at 14:37:08
Dennis 793, I certainly wasn't intending to belittle Joe Royle. He is just there as proof that winning a trophy doesn't automatically mean that you will win more. I also thought that having him in there would stop people accusing me of only mentioning small club managers.

Scott 866, another reason not to get him.

Colin 867, Barry was actually accusing others of having closed minds, they were just throwing it back at him.

Eugene 821 Of course it's all a risk, but as a business you try to minimise the risk. I guess that clubs would do this by looking at a managers history, I fear that Kenwright does it by asking a series of questions and adding up the numbe of Yes answers he gets.

Phil Walling
44 Posted 17/05/2013 at 14:46:06
Guess it would be like appointing a CEO who had just seen his company go into liquidation.

However my information is that Martinez to Everton is already a done deal and we are merely being required to see out the first act of another of BK's productions....

Joint Producer: Dave Whelan, who needs to keep his punters sweet as well.

Opening schedule and supporting casting next week, I believe...

Ben Jones
45 Posted 17/05/2013 at 14:53:44
I think with point No 1, Heitinga could be that ball playing centre half, as his distribution is easily the best part of the game. Then I can see Distin and Heitinga on either side of Jagielka.

Duffy for back up, and I think Hibbert could easily play the right side centre back of the 3. We would need one more centre back, or two if we sell Heitinga.

But look at the positives, firstly with the system, it would mean more support for the striker, which will be good for Jelavic, and could get him scoring. Baines and Coleman are ideal wing backs for the system, with Oviedo as a good backup for the left, and even Stones on the right, who played right wing back constantly for Barnsley last season.

We would need a few players granted, an athletic centre midfielder for one, a couple of good centre backs, and possibly another two strikers. Fellaini would not suit the system, so I imagine he will be sold if Martinez was.

I think it's doable, and I think the article points out the negatives of the system, but not really the positives. I think it could work, and it looked promising against Stoke, where the system looked good.

John Ford
47 Posted 17/05/2013 at 15:05:15
Declare your source please Phil W
Eugene Ruane
48 Posted 17/05/2013 at 15:17:55
Steve Pugh (876) - "Eugene 821 Of course it's all a risk, but as a business you try to minimise the risk. I guess that clubs would do this by looking at a managers history. I fear that Kenwright does it by asking a series of questions and adding up the numbe of Yes answers he gets".

My advice, forget what 'clubs' do, focus on what WE will do.

The truth is, what a good way is, or what the right way would be, is irrelevant in our case, for two reasons

1) Kenwright - a man who will ALWAYS find a way to get it wrong.

2) Money - we don't have any.

You say 'as a business you try to minimise the risk'.

True but only if YOU are the right person to make the choice and you can AFFORD the right choice.

If you are the WRONG person AND skint, chances are you fuck up (nb: we know soft-lad is skint and even former BK cheerleader Dodd now thinks he's the wrong person).

What happens anywhere else, or what the right plan might be, simply does not apply here.

This is Everton, this is Kenwright and if all of us have learned just one thing in his time 'leading' us, it is that in just about any situation, he'll fuck up.

I'm no fan of Martinez and would not be dancing around if he was appointed.

However I WOULD see it as..um...'damage limitation'..to a degree.

What I mean by that is simply that Martinez is NOT Mark Hughes - or any of the other dozen or so dead-beats who I seen suggested.

Personally I think, if after the appointment has been made (and given who's in charge of our club) if Evertonians can say "Well...I suppose it could be worse", we've probably had a result.

Kevin Tully
49 Posted 17/05/2013 at 15:53:44
Martinez now out to 5/1.
Andrew Ellams
51 Posted 17/05/2013 at 15:55:33
Can people say what results they expect to see from a new manager and what timescale you would consider reasonable to achieve it. Maybe that would help scale down the list of potetial new men.

I would still expect the club to be in the top 7 after season 1 because I believe that the clubs included in that group are starting to pull away from the rest of the league in terms of quality.

Seasons 2 and 3 I would want to see the new mans footprint stamped well and truly on the club in regards to tactic playing staff etc. and closing the gap on the top 4.

I really do think the new person needs to have a real crack at the cups from day 1 too. Winning a trophy would help keep fans onside if league form dips beyond expectation (within reason obviously).

Eugene Ruane
52 Posted 17/05/2013 at 16:23:00
Andrew (904) - "Can people say what results they expect to see from a new manager and what timescale you would consider reasonable to achieve it"

If they haven't won anything in 11 years we should fuck em off.

Andrew Ellams
53 Posted 17/05/2013 at 16:32:44
Eugene, once bitten and all that
Gary Carter
54 Posted 17/05/2013 at 16:39:36
A well thought out and constructive argument. But to cut to the chase
1) NO he's shit
2) His team concedes about 2 goals a game
3) His team fights relegation every season without fail other than this season where he actually achieved it
4) See all the above
Chris Leyland
55 Posted 17/05/2013 at 16:41:46
Andrew (904) I say if the new manager finishes 16th, 16th, 15th and 18th in his first 4 years as manager, winning an average of 6 games out of 38 a season and with an average goals scored of just over 1 a game and a massive negative goal difference each season, then he shouldn't be anywhere near being allowed to stay as Everton manager. But, then again, I'd say someone with that record shouldn't be anywhere near being considered as Everton manager in the first place.
Gary Carter
56 Posted 17/05/2013 at 16:43:48
Kev Johnson 836 no one needs to see every Wigan game, football is a results based industry, his results are shocking and culminated in him getting Wigan relegated. His results record was worse than Paul Jewells and Steve Bruce's FFS !! Don't see anyone championing either of them for the Everton job
Andrew Ellams
57 Posted 17/05/2013 at 17:02:14
Chris, I asked what you would expect from the next Everton manager and not what has Martinez achieved in the last 4 years
Robert Collins
58 Posted 17/05/2013 at 17:00:48
SOMETHING FOR THE ANTI MARTINEZ MOB:

There's an important game on May 25th (I think it's called the Champions league final??), one of the the managers, he's called Jurgen Klopp committed the terrible sin of getting his club (Mainz 05) relegated from the Bundesliga while playing attacking football in the hope of keeping them up, he left them after 7 years without bringing them back up to join his current club. Borussia Dortmumd had a significant faction within their fan base that thought he was a terrible risk and they should choose an established big name manager, luckily for the club and fans they have a decent chairman/board that will roll the dice and they did with Jurgen Klopp!

There's far too much read into this Wigan relegation, if the ManU board felt the same as the anti (we refuse to be open minded about him) Martinez camp, Moyes would not have gotten his chance at ManU. Remember, he's never won anything and he's had over 40 attempts to beat one the old Sky 4 teams on their own grounds, while having also having 22 attempts at domestic cup competitions and never looking like we had that killer touch (let's not even mention Europe!).

For what it's worth I think he will win a few things with ManU, some prems and a cup or two considering the state of the competition: ManC, Chelski and the rest of us are in ( and also with the help of their money and Robin Van Persie). Although I think he will be found out in Europe when he faces the big boys.

For those looking at the club through rose tinted specs, it's time for a reality check. We are a has/was been club that has huge baron periods between winning things (even before the EPL came into existance!), we have a very loyal and loud crowd, it's not massive (but decent sized by prem standards) that gets behind its team, an old stadium with character that desperately need replacing and finally (and most importantly) if you were to prize the lock of Goodison war chest you'll find a few emaciated hungry mice and some rusty old coins. Whatever profits we make go straight back out and not into the afor mention war chest.

We are limited in the people (of quality) that will come to us, If they are a big name, they'll want a big salary and even bigger transfer budget. I'm praying that some of the favourites as layed down by the bookies: Stubbs, Neville, Poyet, Lennon, Mackay and Weir are not considered by our board, they have no experience of EPL management or its pressures (it's probably a tougher league to survive in than the one Moyes started in).

There ain't many candidates when you filter out the wild cards (Laudrup will not come!), you're left with the likes of Allerdyce, Clarke, Di Matteo, Jol and some potentially expensive foreign imports. Being relegated is not the end of the world and the good thing here is that it happened elsewhere, someone else experienced the negatives and misery, while we get a manager who will have learnt something and fucking will not want to learn it again!

Peter Jones
59 Posted 17/05/2013 at 16:24:56
Jurgen Klopp went down with Mainz 05 and then failed to bring them back into the Bundesliga before being appointed Dortmund manager. That seems to be working well for Dortmund. I'm aware that they make a significant amount more money than Everton and every circumstance is different. However, Dortmund's success is fundamentally built on the development of young players, which is something of a specialty for Martinez during his time at Wigan. Somehow I doubt he'd be relegated if he didn't lose Valencia, Diame, Rodallega, Moses, N'Zogbia.... As many love to point out, Everton don't have much cash to spend. But we do have a host of young players that have potential and need development. Barkley, Duffy, Stones, Vellios, McAleny, Junior, Kennedy etc. The only way we can improve our squad/money situation is through player trading. Martinez not only has a good eye for young talent, but isn't afraid to play them. Couple that attribute with the many top footballers we already have in the first team and I don't see why people are so pessimistic about him possibly becoming manager. Only a few things can happen.

1. We strike gold with some of our prospects and cash in to buy some world class players.
2. Some are good rotation players and give us the added depth we needed to qualify for CL.
3. They aren't as good as people think, and we continue finishing 6th-8th in more entertaining fashion.

Regardless of what the outcome would be, at least we would have made the attempt of being proactive and adopting a philosophy that is about longevity, rather than moaning about the money we don't have to purchase known commodities.

Colin Glassar
60 Posted 17/05/2013 at 17:11:34
It's no use lads, the anti-Martinez brigade have made up their minds. Martinez is rubbish despite the fact that his £11m team outplayed £200m worth of players.in the FA cup final.
Steve Brown
61 Posted 17/05/2013 at 17:14:25
Martinez is rubbish Colin because he has just got his team relegated. As Chris says "if the new manager finishes 16th, 16th, 15th and 18th in his first 4 years as manager, winning an average of 6 games out of 38 a season and with an average goals scored of just over 1 a game and a massive negative goal difference each season, then he shouldn't be anywhere near being allowed to stay as Everton manager."

So it's not that he has been a poor manager for one season, he has been a poor manager every season. And to think you like so many championing Martinez used to bash David Moyes week in week out for getting us a top 10 finish every season. You really don't know what you're talking about do you?

Robert Collins
62 Posted 17/05/2013 at 17:27:38
Peter Jones @ 941 and Colin Glassar @ 944

Sad thing is, he might not want to come us, he has to have an outside chance of the Chelski job if Moyes landed the ManU job.

Think it through? There's no way Chelski would ever be relegated with their squad (if he was their manager) and he might just get them playing good football, Chelski and Roman both seen what he did to City, give him a decent squad to begin with and you never know? Chelski will roll the dice as they proved with AVB. If I was Martinez I would be waiting to see what happens before making any decisions.

This could be a long summer!

Brent Stephens
63 Posted 17/05/2013 at 17:35:19
Colin, there are lots of sides who team cost less than £11m who have beaten teams which have cost megabucks. It happens. Many in the Champs League, Div 1, even Div 2. What do their managers do in the round is the question (Round, now there's a name!).
Graham Mockford
64 Posted 17/05/2013 at 18:10:43
Peter Jones

You're absolutely right. 1,2 and 3 could all happen however you omitted

4. We could become a really easy team to beat and get relegated.

Which of the 4 did Martinez achieve in his time at Wigan?

Wayne Smyth
65 Posted 17/05/2013 at 18:14:01
Steve Brown @ 955.

Comparing Moyes and Martinez directly, like you have is utterly pointless. I wonder whether it is infact you who have no idea what you're talking about.

Look at SAF's huge list of titles. Look at Moyes empty trophy cabinet. Therefore because Moyes has won fuck all, he must be shit. Lets forget that SAF had a massive number of years at his club compared to Moyes, and that he had vast resources to call upon every year compared to Moyes. You see where I'm going?

Martinez may have got wigan relegated after 3 years, compared to Moyes finishing generally in the top 8, but the fact that Martinez kept Wigan in the league that long and playing good football is a testament to his management skills, given the paucity of resources available to him, the fact he was managing probably one of the most unfashionable clubs in the league, and because he had to sell his best players each season.

Lets not forget that he has actually gotten swansea promoted before he joined Wigan as well as the recent FA Cup. You don't win championships if you're a shit manager.

Also, take a look at the table. 5 points separate 11th from wigan. Its very, very tight down there and wigan have finished a whisker behind the likes of Sunderland, Newcastle and Villa, all of whom are much more wealthy and desirable clubs.

Truth is none of us know whether he would be a success or not. I can only speak for myself, but I was never critical of Moyes for his league finishes. My problems with Moyes were more to do with his mentality, the poor standard of the football over his tenure, and his plan to move us forward which involved ignoring our academy and blackmailing the club to take on further debt.

Back to the original post, it seems the entire article is premised on the "fact" that Martinez will play 3-4-3 if he joins. I think it more likely he will pick a formation to suit the players at the club, and if the players change over time, his formation may change too.

I'd also offer a counter argument to those who say we can't take a risk. Our club is not a major club to most managers. We're not going to be poaching an established coach from a uk or foreign club involved in european competition.

We need to take a risk on whoever we bring in if we want to move forward. We're not in a position to take the safe option if we want to win things and regularly challenge for european spots.

Barry Rathbone
66 Posted 17/05/2013 at 18:24:26
Graham, at the beginning of every season who would your money be on to get relegated ...us or wigan?

Hardly difficult, they've been one of the bookies favorites every season since getting promotion.

On the more adventurous theme, who would you put your last fiver on given a choice of us or Wigan to win the cup?

David Booth
67 Posted 17/05/2013 at 19:07:27
NO: he got Wigan relegated.

How on earth can anyone want him as our next manager?

Christopher Timmins
68 Posted 17/05/2013 at 19:27:18
Martinez or an in house job, to me it's a no brainer, Martinez. If you want another 11 years of Kenwright getting away with murder then you want an in house scenario, someone who feels so incredible lucky to have the job that the last thing they will do is bang the table looking for funds.

Moyes needed funds in January and did not get them and now he is off paint it whatever way you want.

Robert Collins
69 Posted 17/05/2013 at 19:48:42
David Booth @ 010

And Jurgen Klopp got Mainz relegated playing attacking football but was straight away given the job by Borussia Dortmund, where he built a team from youth and now they're in the Champions league final. What does that do to your opinions of relegated managers.

Chris Leyland
70 Posted 17/05/2013 at 20:22:25
Robert (033) - let's go for Harry Redknapp then he's just got QPR relegated and he also got Southampton relegated but he also qualified for the Champions League with Spurs, where he got through the Group stages into the latter rounds, and he has won the FA Cup with Portsmouth. Therefore, he has all the qualities you could ever wish for all rolled up into one.
James Martin
71 Posted 17/05/2013 at 20:59:10
'It's no use lads, the anti-Martinez brigade have made up their minds. Martinez is rubbish despite the fact that his £11m team outplayed £200m worth of players.in the FA cup final.' - Colin once again stop trying to split this site into two camps. You could equally argue that the pro-Martinez 'brigade' have made up their minds despite his dire league form and impending relegation. One side isn't in some way more enlightened than the other. We're discussing potential new managers - no one has been offered the job yet. If Martinez did become our manager he'd have my backing in the same way that Moyes did until I deemed him not up to the job. Everyone on here has the right to that decision making process. Just because some would rather not see him offered the job at all doesn't make them as Barry would say 'close-minded'. You could make that argument about anyone - lets get Ricky Tomlinson in -who knows what could happen it could get wild, if you express any notes of caution then you've got a closed mind a bit like any manager who doesn't concede 3 goals a game in the hunt for ineffective attacking football. This is a ridiculous viewpoint. Some people don't consider him good enough for Everton and they've every right to voice that opinion. Its not close minded - equally I could say you and Barry lack the ambition that the 'anti-Martinez brigade' (that you have invented) show, but it owuld be a ludicrous accusation just like yours is. Everyone on here wants the best manager for Everton - some don't think that's Martinez. That's not because he's not Moyes, its a judgement based solely on his own merit but some people are desperately trying to portray the old Moyes supporters as somehow forming an anti-Martinez brigade and trying to draw up the old battle-lines. Let it go.
Robert Collins
72 Posted 17/05/2013 at 21:03:03
Chris Leyland @ 041

What you said about Harry is not all true, did he really get QPR relegated? Don't be silly!

You also didn't say he demands a fortune to spend wherever he manages, isn't renowned for developing youth (something we have to do (we've got no money)), Redknapp and Martinez are completely different beasts and Redknapp is only responsible for one relegation (QPR were long gone with that team of wankers before he arrived: naughty boy Chris!).

Not a very good example on your behalf really, he's been relegated and then gone on to do reasonably well, all be it as a bit of a spender. This backs up what I said?

Chris Leyland
73 Posted 17/05/2013 at 21:42:18
Robert - I was actually using Redknapp as a way of illustrating the fact that there is no one perfect mould of manager and that Martinez polarises opinion. Some people want Martinez because they see his apparent potential and choose to evidence this with his FA Cup win on a smaller budget than other clubs. Others see him as a hyped-up 'sexy' foreign manager with a very, very poor record in the top flight and a relegation to his name.

Some says Moyes over-achieved as use his net transfer send as evidence yet use Martinez's record to beat him despite his small budget he had to deal with. Others excuse Martinez poor record because of his small budget whilst criticising Moyes because he apparently under-achieved but don't account for his small net transfer spend.

Brendan McLaughlin
74 Posted 17/05/2013 at 21:44:57
Oi!...Rathbone #804
"......as 2 short planks" comes to mind"
You fecking suggesting I'm short!!!
Mike Iddon
75 Posted 17/05/2013 at 22:46:36
James Martin #799 the most lucid comments on here re: Martinez so far. The defending of his team in a relegation must-win game against Swansea reminded me of our 1st half against Wimbledon all those years ago; somewhere we should never be again. It was fucking terrible.
Robert Collins
76 Posted 17/05/2013 at 22:53:50
Chris Leyland @ 069

We all appear to be ready for a verbal punch up on this subject (it's sad, but the subject is so important).

"I was actually using Redknapp as a way of illustrating the fact that there is no one perfect mould of manager."

I totally agree with that statement.

A case in point is Pardew, last year very nearly got Newcastle into the champions League and this year very nearly sent them into them down into the Championship.

The margins between failure and victory are so fine in the prem, it's difficult to see the good from bad managers (but the odd Mark Hughes does pop up with a complete cluster fuck).

If the truth be known I do have concerns about the Martinez defensive record, but I take the same attitude ManU have taken with Moyes. Although he hasn't won anything there's enough about him to use the superior sqaud and money at his disposal good use. If he puts our team out with the atitude his team had against ManC and combined with our superior defence and few of his own editions?

I made the following statement above:

"There ain't many candidates when you filter out the wild cards (Laudrup will not come!), you're left with the likes of Allerdyce, Clarke, Di Matteo, Jol and some potentially expensive foreign imports. Being relegated is not the end of the world and the good thing here is that it happened elsewhere, someone else experienced the negatives and misery, while we get a manager who will have learnt something and fucking will not want to learn it again!"

And it still stands, I have to say I think he is by far the best of a not too impressive bunch.

Barry Rathbone
77 Posted 17/05/2013 at 23:03:24
James, when you have a thread about Vitor whatsisname actually calling on people to unite under one banner then specifically nailing Martinez there is a problem.

Of the 3 front runners Martinez was, at the last count, at 16% with Laudrup ruling himself out. Many of us haven't got a clue about Vitor but know of Martinez good works in these leagues - Swansea and Wigan.

For some reason the FA Cup is completely overlooked now relegation has befallen Wigan but a good number of us see the "positives" outweighing the negatives in Martinez.

Far more pertinently they fit exactly the void in the playing problems of this club somethingS clearly spotted by 50% of the vote wanting "another way". Saying he's shit (as a fair number are) seems more of an agenda than an argument for a cup winner.

Colin Grierson
78 Posted 17/05/2013 at 23:15:21
Martinez talks with great honesty and clarity, his teams play an attractive style of football BUT, like Moyes, he harps on about the shoestring nature of his achievements.

I have been waiting for Moyes to leave for years and I want a replacement who sets his side up to win games. Imagine that! I can't think of anyone (available) apart from Martinez who fits the bill. I couldn't cope with a Moyesalike such as Lennon or Mackay.

It's not the despair; it's the hope...

Chris Leyland
79 Posted 17/05/2013 at 23:36:28
Colin Grierson, I totally agree that I want I manager who sets his team up to win games but I disagree that Martinez is a good example. Afterall, he has won 24 or so of his last 150 Premier League games as a manager. For someone apparently 'setting up to win' he must be pretty bad at it and can't really be held up as a good example. I want someone to be appointed who I will think 'great we've got someone with a bit of. Something about them here' and sadly, Martinez doesn't do it for me.
David Booth
80 Posted 17/05/2013 at 23:40:16
Robert (033), that one swallow doesn't make a Summer.

Are you suggesting that Klopp is a panacea for all relegated managers?

Mark Hughes must also be in contention then using your selection criteria?

We are aiming low with Martinez and after enough seasons in the top flight to create an impression, he has. And it's fighting relegation and, ultimately, getting relegated.

How on earth can you think he is the man for Everton?

Brendan McLaughlin
81 Posted 17/05/2013 at 23:46:07
Colin #094
If Martinez is the "great blue hope"....we're fecked
Robert Collins
83 Posted 18/05/2013 at 00:05:46
David Booth @ 098

"Robert (033), that one swallow doesn't make a Summer."

Correct, but that one single swallow with his Bundesliga championship and CL final blows away DM's 11 years and proves not all relegated managers are bad.

"Are you suggesting that Klopp is a panacea for all relegated managers?"

Your being a bit dramatic here, see my comment above ("not all").

Mark Hughes must also be in contention then using your selection criteria?

You haven't been reading my posts above, if you had you'd have seen I'm no fan of Hughes.

"We are aiming low with Martinez and after enough seasons in the top flight to create an impression, he has. And it's fighting relegation and, ultimately, getting relegated."

Who do we aim high with, you've only put two comments on here slagging of other peoples choices, but you haven't put your own up.

"How on earth can you think he is the man for Everton?"

Come on tell us all who "On earth" you think will save Everton FC. And be realistic Laudrup won't come and no Morinho's etc.

John Crawley
84 Posted 18/05/2013 at 00:11:21
Just on this manager's who have been relegated business, Benitez, Wenger and Klopp were all managers who got their teams relegated so you do have to look at things in a bit more depth. Saying that I still have reservations about Martinez and his organisational ability to set up a team to defend properly. Managers with experience in the Premiership I would pick Lambert, then Holloway, then Martinez. Foreign managers my list would include Tuchel, Beilsa, De Boer,Pereira, Bilic.
Steven Telford
85 Posted 18/05/2013 at 00:16:07
There is no Anti-Martinez Brigade. But there is a "Pro Facts matter Brigade". At least that's how I see it.

If you want to tout Martinez for reasons of personal intuition – do so. But, just have the honesty to openly admit that it is a preference is based “solely on intuition”, because if you cannot see the wealth of evidence against him, there is something deeply amiss with how you see things.

Maybe Martinez would be a great manager, if he gets the job, of course I am supporting him and wishing him well, but it if he does actually do well, it will be strongly against the flow of what he has already achieved in the EPL.

Jackie Barry
86 Posted 18/05/2013 at 00:34:59
I agree Steven, but I would feel way more happy about having Martinez in charge than with any of the in house names being mentioned, that just freaks the heck out of me. Now I am not a Martinez fan in all honesty, but we need somebody who has some kind of experience, Everton FC are not some non-league team.
Peter Jones
87 Posted 18/05/2013 at 01:38:48
Graham 985 – Seriously mate, I don't see how ANY manager currently in the Premier League could manage to relegate a team as good as ours. We literally field 9 senior internationals (relevant ones) most times we take the pitch, not to mention all the Under 21 internationals we failed to make good use of on the bench under Moyes.

We don't having fucking Paul Scharner and Gary Caldwell back there. We have Phil Jagielka and Sylvain Distin for christ sake. Is Martinez going to make them unlearn how to be amazing defenders? At some point you've got to be reasonable.

The man got relegated because the hurdle of selling off his best players every season was too high and his style of play wasn't conducive to grinding out 1-0 victories in a relegation battle. Thus his downfall.

The foundation Moyes has built through mostly solid player trading has left us in a safe position where we are no longer afraid of relegation because of the talent we have accrued. There is simply no way we will all of sudden find ourselves shipping 70 goals a season because our manager attacks more often, regardless of who he is.

Ian Allaker
88 Posted 18/05/2013 at 03:04:06
Peter, I remember a few seasons back people saying West Ham were too good to go down... they went down. Although I don't think anyone believes Martinez would take us down... into a lower league that is, just to a lower level and position in the PL.

Personally, I think we will suffer a slow decline over the coming years. Martinez won't make our players shite overnight but when the likes of Distin and Jagielka retire, shite players of the quality of Gary Caldwell and Paul Scharner that you mention will likely replace them. He hasn't shown himself to be too clever in the transfer market.

I predict we will be fighting relegation within 3 years if Martinez becomes the Everton manager.

Colin Grierson
89 Posted 18/05/2013 at 05:07:22
Brendan (99): I don't see Martinez as the great blue hope at all. I hope that if we get him then he proves to be the manager that those of us, as Steven (104) quite rightly says, who have a gut instinct about him, are proved right.

Chris (97): Out of all of the managers in the frame (and I take Laudrup out of the equation) I believe Martinez to have the most tactical nouse. I believe he set the template at Swansea, a team I have enjoyed watching over the last few seasons, only for others (Rodgers) to take the accolade. I'm not totally convinced by him but with some of the other names being bandied about by the bookies he would be my punt. Not all bets come in though.

Robbie Shields
90 Posted 18/05/2013 at 07:57:16
Brendan #99, for God sake will you grow a pair, you talk like a scared little child, I despair with this latest generation of Evertonians, they've been fed so much shite for so long that they are terrified of even trying to move forward. It's pathetic, why even bother?
Paul Andrews
91 Posted 18/05/2013 at 08:42:17
Robbie,

I agree 100%.
The way some fans are reacting is unbelievable....."that's it we will be fighting relegation in the next two seasons"......."the only way is down now Moyes has gone"
WHY?
We have got a great starting 10 if we put a decent forward in front of them we will score more goals and will improve our standing.
We have got some good young players coming through,with the increased tv money the new manager will add to the squad.
Stop crying face up to it Moyes has gone,lets get positive.

Graham Mockford
92 Posted 18/05/2013 at 09:07:37
Paul / Robbie

My issue is not getting a new manager, I thought the time was right for new leadership to hopefully take us further than Moyes could. I just don't see Martinez as that leader.

Matt Traynor
93 Posted 18/05/2013 at 09:15:01
Graham #140, there's a portion of the fanbase that, as able as Moyes is, were looking for a change in the belief that if the new manager is not able to over-achieve points/place-wise as DM did, then the heat will finally be on BK to do something.

It wasn't the "MOB" that drove DM into Man U's hands - he has long held an ambition for that job, and his period at Everton was seen as good enough by the Man U hierarchy. The fact is that BK is unable to take the club forward - not his fault if he doesn't have the money, but it is his fault that he's exhausted every line of credit and goodwill. No matter who the new man is, he'll reach the same ceiling DM did until BK et al have found the right people to take the club on.

Nick Wall
94 Posted 18/05/2013 at 08:56:42
Bottom line is that Martinez's results in the PL have not been good enough. Not as good as Jewell and Bruce and certainly not as good as David Moyes. And he's had 4 years to build his team. Appointing him would be a big step down for us.

Compare Martinez to another candidate for the job, Malky Mackay.

Mackay also defied the odds to get his team to Wembley, where they only lost to Liverpool on a penalty shootout. They were just a tiny bit of luck away from lifting the trophy.

Even more impressively though, after two years during which he's had to completely rebuild the team without any funds to speak of, he's led Cardiff to the Championship title. To do this he's had to get the most out of his players week after week - something that the likeable and personable Martinez seems unable to do. As far as tactics are concerned, my impression is that he's a much more astute operator than Martinez. I think some of the support for Martinez comes from fans who'd like to see Everton playing with more flair, fluidity and imagination than has generally been the case under Moyes. But at the end of the day it's about winning matches, and that's something that Mackay, who adapts his tactics from game to game, is well equipped to do.

Good article here on Mackay : http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22187777

Robbie Shields
95 Posted 18/05/2013 at 09:42:08
OK Nick, let's compromise aye. How about we give Martinez a crack at bringing sexy footy to Goodison and see if he can get us into the top 4. If it all goes tits up and we get religated we can go to plan B and get Malky Mackay in to get us promoted and back in the EPL and mid table mediocrity, sound fair?
Wayne Smyth
96 Posted 18/05/2013 at 09:53:32
Can we please stop all this "martinez in brigade" and "anti martinez brigade" bullshit and concentrate on the main points of the discussion?

Its like some of you are 5 years old and still can't get out of the name calling bollocks enough to actually put forward a coherent point. It really annoys the heck out of me. We're meant to be some of the most enlightened fans around.....my arse.

Steven Telford...you say that your opinions are valid because they are based on the "wealth of negative facts" against Martinez and those of us who think he would do a good job are just basing that on gut feel.

However, you've conveniently ignored all of the facts that don't fit your profile of martinez as a shit manager. All the things he's won and achieved during his career. It doesn't give your argument much credibility.

What I'd like to hear about is a manager who we have a chance of getting as an alternative to Martinez. There aren't many about that are available, would come to us, and we can afford. I suspect any candidate is either going to have a chequered history or lack of experience. Martinez seems a very good candidate in those terms.

Mike Iddon
97 Posted 18/05/2013 at 10:30:12
Looks like it may be an internal appointment: www.dailypost.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/next-everton-fc-manager-could-3868471
Colin Glassar
98 Posted 18/05/2013 at 10:31:57
Of course it will be one of Moyesy's boys who take over. That way, David darling, can continue to run the club, by proxy. This way BK will be able to sleep at night knowing that David is only a phone call away.
Richard Dodd
99 Posted 18/05/2013 at 10:32:05
I`m still being told by my Wigan contact that the job belongs to Martinez although he`s just as likely to bottle it as he did with Villa and RS as soon as Dave Whelan gets in his ear!
Then it`s an internal appointment with Neville or Weir as frontman with the present backroom staff.
Laurie Hartley
100 Posted 18/05/2013 at 10:16:56
Wayne @ 156 affordability shouldn't be too much of an obstacle. Our last manager came 16th in the top 30 list of highest paid managers. We should be able to get someone pretty good for that sort of money.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2239727/Top-30-best-paid-football-managers-world--Sir-Alex-Ferguson-England-boss-Roy-Hodgson-Jose-Mourinho-tops-list.html

Everton is a great club with a great tradition, passionate fans and some top class players on its books. That would attract the attention of a certain type of personality.
It seems to me availability is the real stumbling block. But that's on a surface difficulty - Bill Kenwright should go out and head hunt a top manager for the club. He should be bold - even outrageous. Let us not play down the fact that EFC finished 6th in the best football league in the world. Add that the fact that they were only beaten once on their own turf this season and we start to look like a very attractive proposition.
I wish I could give the team talk before tomorrow's game at Chelsea - I would tell them to go out and play their hearts out to attract the attention of their next manager - perhaps someone special.

Patrick Murphy
101 Posted 18/05/2013 at 10:36:22
Bill Kenwright's 'I won't let you down' comment to David Moyes is not what I personally want to hear from the Chariman of EFC,. I know they respect each other, I know they have a close working relationship but this is a cut-throat business as DM will find out when he walks into OT. If this love in between the Chariman and the MUFC manager elect continues , I can see the board at OT getting a bit twitchy about it.

Bill Kenwright is responsible for the running of Everton FC and although he personally may owe thanks and gratitude to David Moyes, Everton FC does not, we have paid him handsomely, we have given him a good send-off and on the whole we wish him well in his professional career, but come Monday morning that should be the end of it.


Colin Glassar
102 Posted 18/05/2013 at 10:55:09
Great post Patrick. This love-in between two grown men is slightly off putting and creepy IMO. One thing is respect and gratitude but these two are like two, doey eyed love struck teenagers. Ffs be men and go your different ways with a bit of dignity, not blowing kisses at each other.
This is not homophobic as I don't have a problem if they both come out and declare mutual love for each other but how long is this departure going to continue? Will there be a open top bus parade for Moyes? Will bk commission a statue of him? Will bk get prem permission for Moyes to run both clubs? Etc, etc, etc.......
Kev Johnson
103 Posted 18/05/2013 at 10:54:03
I saw that comment, too, Patrick. I thought it was revolting. Kenwright always gave the impression he was overseeing Moyes FC, but I fondly imagined that would end when DM went. Not so, it would appear.

It goes beyond friendship and respect, it's more like obsessional romantic love. "I will always love you, David, even though you have left me and found someone else". Get a grip, Kenwright. Your responsibility is with Everton FC, not its former manager.

Steven Telford
104 Posted 18/05/2013 at 10:53:30
Wayne #156
Ok, you counter my facts of performance and finance with claiming I ignore, quote:
"All the things he's won and achieved during his career."
I welcome a furthering of the debate by politely asking please can you be more specific. Then we will have something to weigh against what many of us here seem to agree are the most see as the most important facts. That of his abysmal league record, and that this record goes side by side with the financial truth that he has the same sort of Money as Moyes.

To be honest, I can see us going through a few managers over the next few years.

Brendan McLaughlin
105 Posted 18/05/2013 at 11:12:32
Two men who have worked extremely well together for eleven years saying complimentary things about one another as their paths finally diverge....fecking shocking!
Colin Glassar
106 Posted 18/05/2013 at 11:14:36
I feel sorry for the next manager, whoever he is, tbh. I can imagine love struck kenwrong haunting the corridors of GP with his laments for his darling David, "oh, if only David was here, David would know what to do, ooohhh, that never happened when my beautiful David was here" etc.....
Wayne Smyth
107 Posted 18/05/2013 at 11:43:18
Laurie, I agree about the wages. I was referring specifically to compensation, such as the reported £10M required for Laudrup, sorry I wasn't clearer.

Steven, how about:

* an FA Cup Win
* promotion(with swansea) via winning the league
* keeping wigan in the league for several seasons despite being among the least wealthy and desirable clubs and losing his best players each season and not playing percentage football.
* developing young players discarded by other clubs(McManaman for example, who Moyes got rid of).

I'm sure there are other plus points to Martinez, but I think those alone make him a serious contender.

Kev Johnson
108 Posted 18/05/2013 at 11:49:24
Anyone know what Martinez's salary is, and what compensation would be due to Wigan if we got him?
Wayne Smyth
109 Posted 18/05/2013 at 11:48:36
Steven, Martinez has not had "the same sort of money as Moyes" Wigan spend about half of what we do on wages.

Spending on transfer fees(which is I assume what you focused on) is only a part of the picture of what manager has to spend. If Moyes spent the same on wages as Martinez managed, then he'd probably have a £20-£30M transfer kitty.

Eugene Ruane
110 Posted 18/05/2013 at 11:49:24
From this morning's (spit) Telegraph.

Moyes: “I wouldn’t answer to whether it should be internal or external because it would be unfair"

Followed by..

"I would always recommend the people who are around me. A lot of them know how the workings of the training ground is, how we move things forward and the restraints the club has, so it is easy for them to deal with that"

Hope that's clear - not saying whether it should be internal or external but..it should be internal.

Great point about the 'workings of the training ground' though and one I never even considered.

I mean think about it, any manager coming in from outside would see the training pitch and the gym and immediately think "What the FUCK are they!?"

Same with bibs and balls and cones, someone from outside wouldn't know where we keep them so it makes SO much sense to make the appointment internal.

(tuts, rolls eyes, sighs, mutters as sarcastically as possible.. 'how the workings of the training ground is')

John Ford
111 Posted 18/05/2013 at 12:37:15
Wigan spent 38m wages in the year to June 2012, we spent £63m. My concern is that Martinez dropped Wigan from mid table results by his predecessor to annual relegation candidates.

Scrabbling about to avoid relegation has included clusters of teams of similar financial stature, e.g Blackpool, Swindon, Wolves and they've just managed to squeak above these teams, until now of course.

I'd rather look elsewhere. I guess if he was appointed my reaction would be.......meeeh ok, which applies to most of the names mentioned.

Robbie Shields
112 Posted 18/05/2013 at 12:43:36
Eugene, I really like your posts, you cut through the shit and expose the naked truth. I personally find it embarrassing, humiliating and patronizing that Moyes even has the audasity to even comment on the selection process for our next Manager. WTF has it got to do with him?

Piss off, Moyes, your future (limited as I believe it will be) is with United, a great club, great team, great fans, great ground, they will not take the shit you've given us for the last 7 years (Thanks for the first 4 BTW), they are used to attack, win, entertain, you are about to be found out IMHO big time.

In Martinez I Trust

Steven Telford
113 Posted 18/05/2013 at 12:36:54
Wayne (#182):

There seems to be some debate on the wages issue. And when you think about it, Martinez predecessors had the same constraints as him, and actually achieved more.

Great that he got Swansea promoted, but his EPL recorded is more significant in terms of assessing if he is fit to take over at Everton. One FA Cup does not cut it for me. While it’s nice to win a cup, they come with a huge element of luck. Moyes has been very unlucky here. This year should have been ours.

I appreciate the facts you offer, but still on balance feel that case for Martinez is not IMHO that strong. I would MUCH prefer Pereira. I won’t complain if he gets the job, but that is more because the list we are looking at is painfully uninspiring.

Steven Telford
114 Posted 18/05/2013 at 13:26:56
Martinez has an EPL win ratio of 29%
Ian Allaker
115 Posted 18/05/2013 at 13:22:38
Obviously we would all want someone like Pelligrini or Laudrup or Klopp but the most realistic choice that we could afford and who is out of work is Martin O'Neil. He is "a winner" which many of the ToffeeWeb faithful believe to be a necessity when picking the next manager.

He has European experience, PL experience and has managed a similar size club to Everton in Aston Villa that have dropped like a stone since his departure and showed he was almost able to match Moyes in the league consistently. He has also proved to be good in the transfer market admittedly with more resources than Everton are used to but I believe he could adjust

Sunderland are too trigger happy when it comes to sacking managers, they sacked Bruce before O'Neil who did better than Martinez at Wigan and has just done a brilliant job with Hull. I am confident if O’Neil was given more time at Sunderland he would have survived the drop and then took the club forward over the following seasons.

Martinez is small time and weak. Do people honestly think that we will start to play great football if he arrives? suddenly Jaggs will start passing the ball out from defence like a cultured CB. We need our players to play to their strengths not forcing them to do things that they are not comfortable doing. The system and style need to fit the players not the other way around.

Kevin Tully
116 Posted 18/05/2013 at 13:36:06
We are all looking at this from the wrong angle. Ask yourselves this, what is Kenwright looking for in his next managerial appointment?

It certainly won't be 'Who can take us into the Champions League?' as he sips his Merlot with Jenny by the fireside.

His fist concern will be appointing someone who will not, under any circumstances, rock the boat. Our press office have a full time job on their hands, trying to keep our finances out of the mainstream press. They don't want a manager who will start banging on about financial pressures - Moyes dropped a few hints, but his main line was 'the Chairman gives me everything he can.'

Wages will also be a major consideration, they will try to cut costs, so forget about anyone coming here on a similar pay scale to Moyes, it's not happening.

Keeping the status quo - our board budget for a top half finish in the P.L. we are all looking for someone to take us to the next level. The next level unfortunately requires money and ambition, do you think that any of our current Board want to invest their personal wealth?

I'm sorry to say, we will only appoint a new man who will keep his trap shut, and manage a top half finish for a couple of million less than Moyes was earning for the priveledge. The Liverpool Echo are reporting that 4 of our back room staff are being interviewed next week ( Stubbs, Irvine, Sheedy & Ferguson) along with Martinez.

Take your pick from those, or a Malky Mackay type, someone who can't believe their luck they have landed the Everton job.

Ross Edwards
117 Posted 18/05/2013 at 14:42:55
What is Kenwright's criteria people ask? Here it is:

Yes man — he has to agree with whatever lies I come out with
Has to be recommended by my Davey luv
In-house — continuity of my Davey luv's legacy
Scottish — so "we can continue in the Davey luv tradition"

We don't want Jonathan Foreigner invading our shores — just a simple pronounceable British name that I can say properly, like Weir or Stubbs

Most importantly: I don't want to let My Davey luv down

[Bill breaks down in uncontrollable sobbing...]

Colin Glassar
118 Posted 18/05/2013 at 14:46:47
Kevin Tully, I fear you might be right. I've been saying for ages that BK's only ambition is prem survival. He definitely won't want a manager who will ask difficult questions regarding finances, budgets etc... Moyes was his perfect decoy. Moyes shielded him from those tough questions. That's why I think a groveller like Neville will get the job. I have no doubt that BK will say it was all down to saint David for giving him a moment of divine insight and seeing that he had the perfect replacement right under his nose without realising it.
James Stewart
119 Posted 18/05/2013 at 15:32:36
We can't afford not to take the risk on Martinez.

A Stubbs or a Weir is a truly scary prospect.

The lack of ambition in the recruitment process as been truly staggering but I have come to expect it from our Blue Bill

Wayne Smyth
120 Posted 18/05/2013 at 16:28:04
Steven, I'm not sure you can dismiss the wages issue by saying its debatable...and then not debating it!

Its clear that Martinez is spending about £25M per season less than Moyes and he is spending amongst the lowest in the league. I'll be glad to hear which part of this you think is debatable.

I'll admit his teams are more defensively prone than many, but you can offset that against the fact that he has virtual no-bodies playing good football, which Moyes could not manage for 90% of his tenure with much better players. Personally I think we have better players than Wigan so I can envisage that his style of football could quite easily result in top half finishes.

I also agree with James Stewart. The thought of an internal appointment sanctioned by Moyes is probably the scariest of all outcomes(with perhaps the exception of Mark Hughes or Sam Allardyce).

Graham Mockford
123 Posted 18/05/2013 at 17:27:35
Ross / Steven

His actual win rate is 25% across 4 seasons. Whichever way you look at it that is the worst record of any manager in that period.
You can argue stats until you are blue in the face but my biggest concern is his inability to get results on any sort of consistent basis. How can a group of players who are capable of putting both us and City to the sword perform so miserably on so many occasions.
It is quite interesting many people's perception of Mackay. I think people just assume another version of Moyes but actually I think he might have some potential. Certainly he set his Cardiff team up in quite a progressive fashion and they won the Championship at a canter.

Wayne Smyth
124 Posted 18/05/2013 at 18:20:40
Graham, Moyes hasn't been Mr Consistency in many respects, either.

His league placings ultimately have been consistent, but for most seasons under his leadership we'd spend the first 4 months worrying that we'd be relegated and the next 4 months dragging ourselves up for Europe with one of the best records in the league. Don't forget this season is the first in many where we've actually started brightly.

We'd also beat teams like Man City and fail against the likes of Reading or Norwich quite regularly....exactly the same pattern you lay at Martinez door.

Colin Glassar
125 Posted 18/05/2013 at 18:43:59
There's talk that Martinez will go to man city as Pellegrini's assistant and that Neville and Stubbsy will take over at Everton. I hope you are all happy with this. Let the bk circus continue.
Ross Edwards
126 Posted 18/05/2013 at 18:47:35
Well, if it is Weir or Stubbs I will throw myself headfirst into the Mersey. You can join me if you wish.
Colin Glassar
127 Posted 18/05/2013 at 18:54:25
Got yer trunks ready Ross?
Ross Edwards
128 Posted 18/05/2013 at 19:02:26
I might have a pray to the messiah.... but he's a red devil now isn't he? Damn.
Barry Rathbone
129 Posted 18/05/2013 at 18:51:36
Colin, just couldn't see Martinez being number 2 anywhere despite the monies.

I happen to believe Whelan on "other offers" re: Martinez, anyone capable of reading between the lines sees his work at Swansea and Wigan without resource as unique.

The only downside him coming here and doing well is Real Madrid or similar laughing at Kenwright and snaffling him as soon as.

Mind you whoever we get that will happen if they win something - fucking desperate it is.

Colin Glassar
130 Posted 18/05/2013 at 19:07:07
I can see him going to Man City, Barry. He's just turned 40, and he'll be working with one of the best managers in the business but who's getting on a bit, so I can see Martinez taking over Man City in 2-3 seasons and a lot of people on here saying, "I always wanted Martinez". They know who they are.
Ross Edwards
131 Posted 18/05/2013 at 19:12:22
I think you're right Colin. With the technical director there being Spanish (what's his name, Taki something or other?) I think it is going to be Pellegrini and if as you say Martinez goes to be number two, he would benefit from that experience. Thanks to that drama queen and our shambolic board, we could say in future that we missed the boat if Martinez goes there.
Colin Glassar
132 Posted 18/05/2013 at 19:16:49
I can see city dazzling us next season with sexy football under Pellegrini and Martinez while we watch Neville and Stubbsy shouting from the dug out, "get rid of the ball Johnny, belt it upfield Tim, run after it Naisy, don't fall over Vic, run everyone, run". It will be a joy to watch.
Ross Edwards
133 Posted 18/05/2013 at 19:23:41
If it is Weir, expect a lot of Scottish rubbish coming over to join Naismith. Oh God, I've just realised, WE COULD HAVE NAISMITH UP FRONT NEXT SEASON!! Oh the shame.
Steven Telford
134 Posted 18/05/2013 at 22:54:53
Wayne, when I said There seems to be some debate on the wages issue, I mean different figues have been tabled by different people. I am not sure which are the best sourced, buut if indeed Martinez wage bill was actually much lower, I have no qualms about withdrawing it from my reasoning. Maybe you don’t believe me, but honestly I am not advocating anything other than a debate based on facts.

I am certainly not trying to unduly put Martinez down.

Wayne Smyth
135 Posted 19/05/2013 at 11:23:15
I'm curious to know what other figures have been mentioned steven? All the figures I've ever seen show wigan operating on a far smaller budget than Everton, and both clubs provide the vast majority of turnover to the manager to spend as he will. Can you link to anything else you've seen or that was posted by others?

Reading into todays reports, I am really really scared that the idiot in charge of our club will appoint a nobody without managerial experience to the hot-seat. Just because they happen to have some link to the club.

Its entirely possible that Everton will be competing with Man Utd next season if DM struggles. The Man U squad is actually not as good as Chelsea or City and you can easily imagine them finishing about where we are now.

On that basis, allowing DM to have a say in his replacement, is akin to asking turkeys to vote for christmas. Its entirely in his interests to prevent us from providing any kind of threat, which would make it easier for him to get his mits on our better players and also continue the myth that he actually did a magnificent job for us that no-one else can replicate.

Ryan Sloan
136 Posted 19/05/2013 at 12:43:48
Just a point, I am not stating I want Roberto Martinez, but does anyone ever think of the 12th man (ie, the crowd)? Wigan barely have one; your crowd can raise your team. Villa & Sunderland have big crowds. I am sure this factor can lift your team when the chips are down, and can help you when your at the wrong end.

I am not saying it keeps you up, but when I think of our great escapes in the 90s, the crowd definitely had an effect. But, then again, Wimbledon had one man and a dog and stayed up for ages, albeit the Stoke City of the late 80s to 90s, and played dour football.

Graham Mockford
137 Posted 19/05/2013 at 13:31:15
Wayne #351

I will refrain from your re-writing of history because comparisons with Moyes are pretty pointless. He has gone, what really really matters is who we select as the next manager.
There are plenty of candidates most of whom are not worth the risk. There are actually many worse than Martinez but that does not change my opinion that he is not good enough and does not possess a track record worthy of managing our club.
One from Pereria, Poyet, Favre or Mackay for me.

Robbie Muldoon
138 Posted 21/05/2013 at 12:37:30
Surely then Martinez should have learned some big lessons this season because of relegation. I think he has the positive mind set needed but he will have to change his approach, because obviously in the league it wasn't right.
Brendan McLaughlin
139 Posted 21/05/2013 at 12:48:07
Robbie
"obviously in the league it wasn't right"...no doubt; nor was it right in the previous few seasons when Wigan were constantly embroiled in relegation battles because they couldn't keep a clean sheet. Pity, for Wigan, he didn't learn them "big lessons" sooner.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb