Season › 2012-13 › News
A Message to Everton Shareholders
Quotes or other material sourced from Everton Shareholders Association
Reader Comments (23)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 06/12/2012 at 19:35:49
3 Posted 06/12/2012 at 20:40:10
Some have claimed, however, that he is a 'silent director' in all but name, and Bill calls him 'a good friend of the club'. I don't believe that the exact nature of any financial assistance he may have provided has ever been made public, has it?
4 Posted 06/12/2012 at 21:57:38
Can't imagine a fellow like him not being aggressive in business. Since any land development including a new stadium over there appears dead, maybe he's thinking of going the old-fashioned route. Build a winning club and they'll come.
Fingers crossed.
5 Posted 07/12/2012 at 07:36:05
People go on about 'dodgy foreign owners'.. for me Green's as odious as it gets.
6 Posted 07/12/2012 at 09:23:58
Why would he put his own hard earned into a football club that is a "black hole"?
No-one makes money from football clubs in England, the structure and blueprint is very different to that of the USA and our clubs are either playthings for the mega rich or money laundering scams, aka Chelsea.
I wouldn't blame him one bit for not putting a penny into us because I certainly wouldn't with Billy Boy at the helm.
7 Posted 07/12/2012 at 09:37:32
Will Kenwright make a loss or break even whenever he sells? or Earl?
Of course people make money from football clubs.
As for the phrase 'hard earned'....pppfftttttt!!!!
8 Posted 07/12/2012 at 09:45:09
You have got to admit that Kenwright is in a totally different position than most chairman: he bought the club with other people's monies and my guess is they are asking for way too much money for a club with no infrastructure, assets or vision for the future.
So... No, I don't think he will make a profit and I think they are looking to break even which in today's economical climate will be a big ask. But hey-ho the 24/7 search continues...
I will concede the 'hard earned' statement, I haven't woken up properly yet mate.
9 Posted 07/12/2012 at 10:11:23
10 Posted 07/12/2012 at 10:57:31
Now opening a loan shark company in the BVI and lending money at astronomic interest rates to a pillock out of his depth — that might be a goer.
11 Posted 07/12/2012 at 12:42:28
He's only sold 25% not the whole thing but that represents c£500m.
My heart says.. with FFP coming in, and Everton on the brink of potentially their most important transfer window of all time, it's now or never for potential investors. But my head says we'll announce the return of Victor Anichebe from injury on deadline day to be like a new signi.......
12 Posted 07/12/2012 at 12:42:14
Already we have seen legal, if not morally reprehensible tax avoidance by Green (Daily Mail) and a mirror reflection in BK, legal if not morally reprehensible abandonment of AGMs.
It's like watching Only Fools And Horses, Del Boy and Rodders...
What a pair of plonkers..
13 Posted 07/12/2012 at 13:11:30
So you think breaking even, that Kenwright and the others will sell for about £30 million?
I think you're ridiculously out of range... In my opinion, Kenwright, at the very least, will have tripled his initial stake.
14 Posted 07/12/2012 at 14:27:32
What do we owe Now after all the bridging loans, interest etc ?
15 Posted 07/12/2012 at 15:00:39
16 Posted 07/12/2012 at 15:25:03
And Dave Lynch, the EPL is awash in cash. It's TV contracts dwarf the other European top leagues put together. You think our owners don't take their cut off the top?
17 Posted 07/12/2012 at 15:58:49
What he paid for the club is cetainly not 'irrelevant'... in a calculation of his likely profit.
18 Posted 07/12/2012 at 16:01:27
Don't for one minute believe the Sky hype about it being the best and most exiting league in the world. The football by and large is mediocre at best and at times watching games like Stoke v Sunderland is anti-football.
Ciaran. What he payed and what it's worth now are very relevant, the club has been mortgaged to death, the ground is a shite hole, all assets have been sold off and... well, need I go on?
Any perspective buyer would have to pay well over the odds to cover what BB and his circus clowns owe or pay a reduced price and take on a massive debt with no collateral or viable assets other than the players.
In a nutshell. We're fucked.
19 Posted 07/12/2012 at 21:12:29
20 Posted 07/12/2012 at 22:11:06
See below:
Q: Which brings me to the Shareholders Association and their call for an extraordinary general meeting. What is the club's position on that?
A: Let's be clear with why we stopped. The meetings had become negative and had been hijacked. There was very little positive about them.Company law changed and we had the option to avoid that scenario.
On a personal level, I don't think I have ever turned down meetings with shareholders. I have suggested quarterly briefings with the shareholders' association. I am more than happy to meet shareholders to discuss the Annual Report and Accounts when published. I even offered to re-instate the shareholder forum.
As for the reasons for the EGM, I don't think any Club has explained its finances and strategies more comprehensively than Everton. And as I said we have a continuous dialogue with as much of our fan base as we can. We clearly want to have good, effective liaison with our shareholders and we value goodwill and constructive suggestions. Meanwhile, my door is open to any sensible dialogue and proposals.
Hijacked, negative? Why is that Mr Elstone?? Could it be that the shareholders didn't like the lies or lack of transparency? Or the fact that the major shareholders where embarrassed being exposed for what they were really up to?
The fact remains it was the club who chose to lie to fans and shareholders and the fans demanded answers, the arrogance persists to the detriment of every shareholder and fan. I wonder just how many other premier league clubs have changed their constitution to ban AGMs?
If he is so adamant that his door is always open, then prove it, reinstate the AGMs requested by the Shareholders Association, revert the company constitution back to where it was, be as open as any other club.
Disgraceful.
21 Posted 07/12/2012 at 21:38:32
If he was second in command and instructed to attract rich investors I have no doubt he'd have them lining up. Undoubtedly he has ability to charm with his gladhanding bonhomie just the sort to woo egomaniac billionaires.
But once he's got them in the office he needs to step away, there's something wrong with his terms and without pressure or accountability he has no need to compromise. It's exactly the Hicks and Gilette scenario pre-Anfield meltdown eventually resolved via a 3rd party.
I can see us going the same way.
22 Posted 07/12/2012 at 22:32:55
Yes, we weren't on the telly as much and attendances were down, but we did have a decent cup run and all of the above. It seems we are miles away from running at break-even, with no reasonable bid is ever going to be turned down. Gutted.
23 Posted 07/12/2012 at 22:32:44
Most theatricals of the level present thought he was a joke figure.
It seems he wants to play the part but is more Del Trotter than Sir Peter Hall — even in his own specialism.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


1 Posted 06/12/2012 at 16:32:41