The Rumour Mill
Pranjic puts blame on Everton for failed move
After having seeing a move to the Blues collapse in January when, in the Croatian's words, his former club Bayern Munich blocked the transfer, Pranjic's hopes of playing in the Premier League were seemingly revived this month.
Yet, despite the 31 year-old going public with his anticipation that a deal was near completion, it's not clear whether there was ever sufficient interest from David Moyes.
Sporting Life cite quotes attributed to the wing-back to Sportske Novosti: "David Moyes publicly announced that he wanted me at Everton,"
"But then I got a feeling that things were moving too slow and I didn't want to wait anymore.
"I could have waited until the end of August but then Sporting knocked on my door and I knew right away that this is what I want.
"I could also have gone to Besiktas but Sporting was such a good option for me that I couldn't say no."
Pranjic signed a three-year deal with Sporting on Friday.
Original Source:
Sporting Life
Rumour source ranking:
1 = Poor; 2 = Fair; 3 = Good; 4 = Very Good; Empty (grey) = Unranked
Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
590 Posted 18/07/2012 at 20:01:47
591 Posted 18/07/2012 at 20:03:06
592 Posted 18/07/2012 at 20:04:02
593 Posted 18/07/2012 at 20:09:10
597 Posted 18/07/2012 at 20:23:50
Either we're looking for someone else or we don't have the money to pay for signing on fee/wages.
603 Posted 18/07/2012 at 20:41:56
By all accounts, it seems there has been no interest in him from Everton this summer, and it's mostly sour grapes from him. 31, and he's nearly 7 or 8 months older... I'm surprised we went for him to be honest. Makes you wonder if all this was blown up mostly in his own mind, from an initial inquiry that ended soon after the question, "How much?"
609 Posted 18/07/2012 at 20:55:55
612 Posted 18/07/2012 at 21:05:19
Paul Ferry, the floor is yours!
614 Posted 18/07/2012 at 21:11:30
627 Posted 18/07/2012 at 21:47:29
Moyesie's transfer record is regarded as among the best; he's cautious... but rightly so.
630 Posted 18/07/2012 at 21:54:38
634 Posted 18/07/2012 at 22:23:51
637 Posted 18/07/2012 at 22:53:57
638 Posted 18/07/2012 at 22:58:58
640 Posted 18/07/2012 at 23:20:11
If he thought an employee of a business was the one making financial decisions, no wonder "used to be" is part of how you described him.
642 Posted 18/07/2012 at 23:23:32
643 Posted 18/07/2012 at 23:21:53
I get frustrated with much as the next fan, but it's not Moyes I get frustrated with in regards to transfers. Fingers crossed on Peanuts! Coyb
646 Posted 18/07/2012 at 23:44:45
656 Posted 19/07/2012 at 01:05:38
660 Posted 19/07/2012 at 02:38:07
The real problem is the same as always: poor communication from the club leaves everyone guessing (and the suspicion is that that is exactly the reason for it). The club could have denied any current interest and if he was being considered but the club were waiting to see who else they could get (he obviously dropped down the pecking-order when Pienaar became a potentially viable proposition), or we need to reduce the wage bill before we can sign more players and he was left in limbo, then I don't blame him from looking after his own interests first.
The player was a free agent, therefore the deal should have been as straight-forward as Naismith's (assuming that the club were at all interested), barring haggling over personal terms, and he has simply exercised his right to sign for another club rather than hang around.
We all understand that the availability of funds may be a rate-limiting factor in the recruitment of players but, if we are losing out on players who could benefit us because club officials are not acting quickly enough, then all Evertonians should be concerned. The quotes attributed to Pranjic may not be true but, unless the club actually makes a statement to counter them, they will simply add to the impression that we are often slow to act (through choice or necessity) in the transfer market.
702 Posted 19/07/2012 at 11:43:58
And as for Moyes dithering, there's a balance I suppose between "splashing" the few pence he has and making as sure as possible that the player meets our needs. Then of course maybe it's due to us having to wait on the wage savings of the likes of Yobo before we can do a damn thing.
704 Posted 19/07/2012 at 11:52:53
The club can't come out and comment on all transfer speculation as much as it would be nice for the fans. It doesn't happen at any other club and it never will. If they were interested but waiting on Pienaar first, for example, then telling him he's second choice might scupper the whole thing. Similarly saying we'd desperately like to sign him gives him carte blanche to ask for whatever he wants and makes us look stupid if it doesn't come off.
I agree with Michael Kenrick, I would imagine this was an enquiry about a player who we were mildly interested in and his agent and himself have used it to try to engineer a move here or somewhere else. Players say things like that all the time, by all accounts Nuno Gomes saying we tried to sign him was met with puzzlement all round.
710 Posted 19/07/2012 at 13:32:05
719 Posted 19/07/2012 at 14:36:41
Ha confirmation that Bali Hi Barry was right all the time about Dithering Davey:
'He never decides on a player... he waits 'n' waits... he's got a stack of players on his desk'
There's at least two D words in that lot. 'Desk-bound'? 'Desk-comfy'? 'Desk-decider'? 'Decideless'? 'Desk-fullintrayemptyouttray'? 'Desk-warmer'?
Have we had 'doddering' yet PB?
This coming season might be the best 'D season' ever.
I'm very optimistic about season 2012-13.
Over to the former Dutch colonies.
722 Posted 19/07/2012 at 14:48:06
Deserved or not, EFC/David Moyes are perceived by many fans as 'dithering' over potential signings and missing out all too often. There may be wholly practicable reasons for this or there may be an element of indecisiveness that is a factor. What is apparently true is that we were close to signing the player in December, yet when he became available on a free transfer (no such thing, I know) is it likely that we had lost all interest in him? In a case like this, all the silence from the club actually says is that they are hedging their bets and a denial of interest would have been wholly appropriate if it were true.
Overall, it is unfair to attack a player just for saying he wasn't prepared to wait for an offer that may never come when he had concrete ones on the table, especially when we can't know if he is telling porkies or not unless the club choose to comment in this instance (not that they necessarily should).
723 Posted 19/07/2012 at 15:19:46
726 Posted 19/07/2012 at 16:03:47
I'm over it already!
728 Posted 19/07/2012 at 16:05:12
As part of your dissertation on this topic, you ask, "when he became available on a free transfer, is it likely that we had lost all interest in him?" I think the answer must be a resounding "Yes". That actually would explain the entire story.
No need whatsoever for the club to say anything... although if you'd been watching, you will have noticed that the local rags, in their role as trained lapdogs, did indicate early on in this replay of the Pranjic saga that there indeed was no interest from the Club.
I feel a big part of the reason we are talking about this is because we have a player here who has actually been open and upfront about the failed transfer process: that in itself is incredibly rare... and I believe a negative factor if you think about how closed-lipped David Moyes is about such things.
Go back to 1 February 2012, the day after the transfer window closed, and one Danijel Pranjic goes public with rage over Bayern Munich 'blocking' his move to Everton. If there had been any real interest, I suspect that was the point where all interest from Everton FC stopped dead (if not before, as I've said above). All speculation, I know... but I think this version fits the facts, with no need whatsoever for the Club to dignify his nonsense with a response.
[ps: Can you try to help us out here when you're typing in your posts: when you press the Enter or Return key at the end of a paragraph... hit it again just one more time before you carry on with the next paragraph? That way, it inserts an empty line. Cheers!]
732 Posted 19/07/2012 at 16:32:57
Free transfers are not free so its no surprise he won't be coming here. At 31 a player of his class would still command a hefty wage which we can't afford.
I was more disappointed to see Clyne sign for Southampton. Great young prospect and would have solved our RB problems.
736 Posted 19/07/2012 at 16:36:49
742 Posted 19/07/2012 at 16:32:45
Other than that, I just added that without a freedom of information policy from the club on such matters (not advocating, just commenting) it is always going to be the case that some people are going to see the glass as half full in regard to our transfer activity, and they shouldn't be attacked for that either as it is a genuine concern for those of us who would like to see the club move forward in the immediate future (rather than simply accepting the status quo whilst hoping for a big-money investor to come and sweep our troubles away).
765 Posted 19/07/2012 at 19:10:43
832 Posted 20/07/2012 at 07:47:30
Mercenary!! A whiner!!! Maybe he didn't want to be without a club – perhaps he wanted to ensure his career was still viable, perhaps he wanted to make sure that he was still in employment as a footballer? Have some of you considered that?
Would any of us in the same situation hang around waiting for an offer from one specific club? Or, when there is no offer from that club, would we look at other offers?
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


588 Posted 18/07/2012 at 19:56:25