Brexit, what will happen now?

by   |   24/06/2016  106 Comments  [Jump to last]

As a Brit living in Australia, I have watched the events of the last 24 hours with interest. My opinion on whether this will be a good or bad thing for the UK is irrelevant, but I got to thinking about what the impact would be on English football and, more importantly, Everton.

Firstly, Brexit has no influence on membership of Uefa, so Europa league, Champions League and the Euros stay as is, with English clubs and the international teams remaining and participating in those competitions.

Secondly, movement of players to and from Europe will largely remain unchanged, at the first team level. Overseas players that want to move to an English club, will still be able to, as long as they meet the same criteria that non-European players have to meet, currently.

What will change is the younger European players, playing in the Premier League. Maybe we won't see the likes of Deulofeu, Robles, etc. Maybe we won't see Premier League clubs taking short cuts in development by buying up the young European talent, but this is not a bad thing. It will mean that English teams will have to develop local talent, and take it seriously. The likes of Dowell, Davies, Pennington and Kenny, will have more opportunities to stake a claim for a first team place. It might take a few years, but it could see a surge of local youngsters coming through the ranks.

Will it result in a reduction of the over-inflated wages that players get these days? Probably not. Will it diminish the appeal of the Premier League in terms of TV? Probably not, as there will still be the marquee players playing in the league. Will it mean Everton have an advantage? I think yes. We already have a well developed academy, so we have a jump on our competition, but I also think it will have a beneficial impact on the English (and Welsh, Irish and Scottish) national teams, because there will be a lot more local talent playing at the highest level.

It also means that the FA could instigate a cap on overseas players again, which will speed up this change.

So, my view is Brexit will be good for Everton, and also the home nation teams.

back Return to Talking Points index  :  Add your Comments »


Reader Comments (106)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Jay Wood
1 Posted 24/06/2016 at 09:34:19
I rather think the seismic change of the Brexit vote the world woke up to today will have far reaching impact on all clubs.

Transfer fees and wage deals have just got more expensive with the collapse of sterling on the back of the vote. Currency exchanges and the stock markets will inevitably stabilise and find their own levels, but this will have considerable consequences for all aspects of life in the UK including football clubs.

Patrick Murphy
2 Posted 24/06/2016 at 09:41:23
Jay,

It will certainly alter the landscape considerably in all areas and most definitely football. Of course nothing will change overnight as it will be at least two years before negotiations are completed which will give clubs breathing space to adapt to the new circumstances.

Trevor Lynes
3 Posted 24/06/2016 at 11:03:04
Brexit may cause lots of trouble for foreign players and managers who may all need work permits.

Business dealings in the short term will be affected due to uncertainty of the £.... and this summer's transfer market may well be critically affected.

Mike Allen
4 Posted 24/06/2016 at 11:08:33
Will Brexit make a difference when everything kicks in? Will homegrown players get a fairer crack of the whip? I assume any player outside the UK will need a visa and that would include coaches, etc.
Joe Clitherow
5 Posted 24/06/2016 at 11:45:18
Tony

Without trivialising the Brexit with football matters, it was all going far too swimmingly for us wasn't it, and didn't we all know something was just round the corner to piss on our British - Iranian chips?

Alan J Thompson
6 Posted 24/06/2016 at 12:34:51
If, as it seems, BREXIT succeeds and we have an Iranian accountant, who is also sponsor/major shareholder who made his fortune in Russia, that he can't, with the help of Players' Agents, find a way past this.
Steve Carse
7 Posted 24/06/2016 at 12:50:16
Brexit does not necessarily bring change. If the UK Govt felt so inclined (and I'm sure it would come under pressure to do so), it could exempt football from the normal rules governing work permits etc. The change would more likely be felt in the other direction ie British players looking to transfer into the EU, since they would no longer benefit from the EU free movement of labour rules.

More interesting is whether Bosman rules would still apply. Was this an EU ruling? If it was then presumably it would no longer be binding on what happens within UK football.

Ray Roche
8 Posted 24/06/2016 at 12:56:42
It's far too early for Brexit to have any effect on transfers, football business or work permits for overseas players. It will take more than this transfer window for any changes (if there are any) to trickle down.
Jay Wood
9 Posted 24/06/2016 at 13:22:08
The Brexit vote DOES have an immediate impact on transfer fees and salary demands on incoming players from EU member countrires (and others).

With the first crushing ballot return from Gibraltar in favour of staying within the EU, the sterling to Euro rate spiked in favour of the pound at 1.45. With the first overwhelming out vote from Sunderland the rate plummeted 20 cents to 1.20.

A 10 million euro player would cost ٤.9 million at the more favourable rate, ٦.1 million at the lesser rate. Agents will also seek currency protection on their client's (sterling) salary.

Brits retired overseas and receiving a sterling based pension from the UK, for example, will notice a considerable drop in the exchange rate with their local currency unless and until the markets stabilze and recover from the shock the British electorate delivered yesterday.

Ray Roche
10 Posted 24/06/2016 at 13:31:58
Jay,
we are still in the EU. We have only just voted to leave. We have to invoke Article 50 of the Treaty of Lisbon.

From the Telegraph,

"Triggering Article 50, formally notifying the intention to withdraw, starts a two-year clock running. After that, the Treaties that govern membership no longer apply to Britain. The terms of exit will be negotiated between Britain's 27 counterparts, and each will have a veto over the conditions."

I don't see how any transfers in the current window can be affected.

Ray Roche
11 Posted 24/06/2016 at 13:33:31
Jay, I posted my comment regarding the work permit situation, not the cost of transfers.
Brent Stephens
12 Posted 24/06/2016 at 13:36:09
Legal impact... not yet. Financial impact, indirectly through movements in the value of the pound, immediate but subject to change (either way).
Jay Wood
13 Posted 24/06/2016 at 13:41:41
Understood Ray. And I posted exclusively on the immediate financial implications of the vote to leave, with no reference to contract law and who can legally reside and work in the UK. That, as yet, remains unchanged.
Craig Harrison
14 Posted 24/06/2016 at 14:06:00
Will the Bosman rule still be enforce? Or will we revert back to pre Bosman?
Ray Roche
15 Posted 24/06/2016 at 14:18:53
Good question Craig. The Bosman ruling, although at the time a necessary evil, has now swung too far in the favour of the player, in my opinion, and their greed is fuelled by the odious agents who think only of their own pockets.
Andy Osborne
16 Posted 24/06/2016 at 14:20:35
If the Bosman rule was enforced by the EU, I am sure it is now written into UK law. That doesn't mean it can't be undone, in future. But, personally, I don't think it is right that a club can keep a player, sit him in reserves, whilst out of contract, because their asking price has not been met.

On the flip side, I don't think it is right that a player under contract can agitate for a move, a la Lukaku. There has to be a balance, and that might now be achieved in law given that the UK can determine its own laws.

Trevor Lynes
17 Posted 24/06/2016 at 14:25:03
No one really knows with any certainty what the Brexit move will do to Britain as a whole. Obviously business owners will be uncertain and the £ against the Euro will affect foreign players. It is the initial uncertainty which is causing scepticism. I am treating the Koeman appointment in exactly the same way.

Let's wait until the dust settles on our transfer dealings and see how the start to next season pans out. I am more in hope than before his appointment but the proof of the pudding is in the eating.

Brian Harrison
18 Posted 24/06/2016 at 14:35:34
As already stated, we have to evoke Article 50 to start the process of leaving. Then we will have 2 years before the break becomes complete. Cameron has said that he isn't going to evoke article 50 and that should be done by his successor. But reports in Europe are suggesting that their leaders are not prepared to wait till a new Prime Minister is appointed by October.

Greg Dyke, Chairman of the FA, has said that, as far as he is concerned, once we finally leave, the Bosman ruling will no longer be effective here.

James Hughes
20 Posted 24/06/2016 at 14:50:01
Then Greg Dyke continues to show he knows Sod all. Bosman was brought in to prevent clubs from refusing to release players whose contracts had finished but were not wanted. Thereby denying the player the ability to earn a living, or if you want to put it bluntly a slave to the club. As the club was no longer obliged to pay them as the contract had ended but refused to allow them to leave without recompense.

So I wish Twat Dyke good luck with that as restraint of trade is still covered by UK law

Phil Bellis
21 Posted 24/06/2016 at 14:50:21
Jay

Not to mention the People's Republic of Liverpool.. 59.2% - 41.8% to remain

Robert Elliott
22 Posted 24/06/2016 at 14:58:38
I think Liverpool should seek independence from the rest of the UK now. If nothing else it would certainly improve our chances of qualifying for the Europa League!
Craig Harrison
23 Posted 24/06/2016 at 15:26:46
Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought, prior to Bosman, a player could leave for free if he wasn't offered a contract on the same terms as the previous contract.
James Hughes
24 Posted 24/06/2016 at 15:30:47
Facts from Wiki

Jean-Marc Bosman was a player for RFC Liège in the Belgian First Division in Belgium whose contract had expired in 1990. He wanted to change teams and move to Dunkerque, a French team. However, Dunkerque refused to meet his Belgian club's transfer fee demand, so Liège refused to let him go.

In the meantime, Bosman's wages were reduced as he was no longer a first-team player. He took his case to the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg and sued for restraint of trade citing FIFA's rules regarding football, specifically Article 17.

Dennis Ng
25 Posted 24/06/2016 at 15:44:41
On Bosman, that would mean UK players are not subject to that ruling (hence pre-Bosman) while players under EU law would be still subject to it, right?
Anthony Hawkins
26 Posted 24/06/2016 at 15:45:21
Regardless of the outcome, nothing will change for several years.

I don't think anyone really thought the population of the UK would vote for Brexit and they have no plans outlined to implement the change. The government will need time to find a new leader and organise next steps. All this needs to happen before they engage for Article 50.

We're talking may be 5 years, may be more, before leaving the EU becomes anything close to a reality.

Jay Wood
28 Posted 24/06/2016 at 15:51:27
Phil @ 21:
and Robert @ 22:

"Not to mention the People's Republic of Liverpool.. 59.2 - 41.8 to remain..."

and Robert @ 22:

"I think Liverpool should seek independence from the rest of the UK now. If nothing else it would certainly improve our chances of qualifying for the Europa League!"

I could live with that!

John Hughes
29 Posted 24/06/2016 at 15:59:04
Would that mean all the Norwegians will have to have visas if they land in Speke?
Martin Nicholls
31 Posted 24/06/2016 at 16:17:07
Does anyone know exactly who (e.g. FA or government) introduced these artificial rules for footballers coming to work in the UK? I might be be wrong but is it not the case that a work permit is granted to any foreigner who has secured employment in the UK? If so, maybe that rule might now be extended to the football industry?
Martin Nicholls
32 Posted 24/06/2016 at 16:21:32
John (#29) - sadly the Brexit vote will have NO impact on the main RS fan base as Norway is not in the EU!
Roberto Birquet
33 Posted 24/06/2016 at 16:25:54
Our club has probably lost over 10% of its new wealth. So have we all.

As well as the right to live abroad - or soon at least, we are soon to lose our country as Scotland's nationalists will see their opportunity to split.

Rather than elect a govt to sort out problems like low pay, and high rents and house prices, we blow everything up.

Steve Carse
34 Posted 24/06/2016 at 16:35:00
And pretty soon, Roberto, we could well find that 10% depreciation is almost fully reversed. The financial markets love wild movements in values and will in certain situations like this do their utmost to make sure the instability is exaggerated. That's where they make their obscene profits.

Let's see what exchange rates are like in 6 months time before we start spouting off about permanent change to wealth or other economic measures.

In any event since when has a declining exchange rate been an unambiguous negative. Read up on your economic history.

Martin Nicholls
35 Posted 24/06/2016 at 16:35:46
Roberto (#33) - or maybe Moshiri's fortune is dollar/euro based so has increased 10%? Who knows?
Steavey Buckley
37 Posted 24/06/2016 at 16:42:11
Leaving the EU will give the UK more freedom to choose which laws they want and ones they don't. Under the EU, the UK has to accept laws that are not acceptable. So, the interests of the Premier League, like everything else in the UK, Brexit is a win-win situation.
Brent Stephens
38 Posted 24/06/2016 at 17:20:55
We can change or rescind all our laws based on EU requirements, including those relating to player contracts etc, but, as a BBC law specialist said today, that alone (tackling all our EU-derived legislation) would take all of the parliamentary time until the next election and probably well into the next 5 year period. My guess is that player contract legislation would be at the back of the queue?

I read recently that since the mid-90s, about 92% of our EU-derived legislation has been in accord with the UK's wishes, not against our wishes.

Brent Stephens
39 Posted 24/06/2016 at 17:26:45
Jay #19 "That said, as a Darwinist, I believe as with each species societies as a whole learn to adapt and evolve in order to survive and prosper."

Jay, it's the "survival of the fittest" bit that worries me! Some species die out!

Alasdair Mackay
40 Posted 24/06/2016 at 17:34:43
Is it that much harder for FC Basel or Galatasaray to get a transfer over the line? Or to sign foreign players?

I think it will make no discernible difference whatsoever. By the time we actually exit the EU, we will have it all worked out.

Fraser Auld
41 Posted 24/06/2016 at 18:02:55
I was thinking about Bosman as well.

Bosman was a European Court of Justice ruling, as the Supreme Court of the EU member states are bound by its decisions.

ECJ decisions are not binding on non-EU member states so once we leave the EU, ECJ decisions (including Bosman) will not be binding on the UK. We could rip it up and start again.

Personally, I think we'll end up with something very similar to the current position. Players are just employees on fixed term contracts, when the contract term expires they should be free to move, just as any other employee in the UK is. No way we will go back to the position pre-Bosman.

Brent Stephens
42 Posted 24/06/2016 at 18:10:31
Here's one discussion of Bosman, work permits etc and Brexit implications...

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/eu-brexit-could-have-big-consequences-for-a-premier-league-full-of-Link

Frank Crewe
49 Posted 24/06/2016 at 20:08:39

As someone who won't see 60 again, as far as I'm concerned, the old have sold the young down the river.

Martin Mason
51 Posted 24/06/2016 at 20:36:23
From an EFC point of view, Brexit is massive benefit because we will have a choice of using homegrown or EU born talent as we choose without the choice being equal. The opportunities for English players will increase dramatically which should really help the English national team.

Clive Rogers
64 Posted 24/06/2016 at 21:30:42
Colin #53
You can't any more, he's history.
Amit Vithlani
67 Posted 24/06/2016 at 21:32:53
Erm, I am not entirely sure the EPL is worse off from a weaker pound.

Reason? I don't believe the base currency for transfer fees is the Euro.

This is not like oil, which is quoted in dollars given the latter's status as the global reserve currency.

Last time I checked, the EPL spent the most amount on transfer fees on a net basis.

Since EPL clubs operate a sterling based budget, and dominate the scene in terms of transfers, it will be the sellers (exporters into UK) who will face a diminished value.

Furthermore, Barca, Real, PSG, Bayern may find themselves able to pay higher transfer fees and wages than the bigger EPL clubs, but taxation will also be a consideration for top players. Without the UK's contribution France, Italy, Germany and Spain will carry a higher load and may need to increase taxation.

Outside of these super clubs, even with a devalued pound the budgets of almost every EPL club will exceed its European rivals with the new TV money. On that basis, I think EPL clubs will continue to dominate the European transfer market.

The issue on whether there will be quotas depends on the final settlement on movement of labour. It will be in the UK's fiscal interest to allow migration of skilled/high net worth individuals from the EU, and so EU footballers could well find a path to the EPL relatively smooth.

One hopes so anyway. Our new found spending power should hopefully allow us to cherry pick the best talent available and ready to join us regardless of nationality.

A successful team full of English players is an ideal, but given that you would have to go back to the Lisbon Lions in 1967 to find the last fully home grown side to conquer Europe, the probability of collecting such a talent pool seems remote.

Peter Gorman
70 Posted 24/06/2016 at 21:37:59
Short answer to the OP and to those questioning the referendum in general; nobody knows!

Only certainty is the outcome of the vote so let's accept it and work on it.

Jackie Barry
84 Posted 24/06/2016 at 22:46:40
Very true. And I honestly couldn't care less. I just want to see new players come in at Everton and the new season to start.
Ian Riley
87 Posted 24/06/2016 at 23:34:00
No one knows what will happen? Let's hope all will work a little harder and prepared to pay a little more tax.

It may be a nasty divorce from Europe and some people may suffer. I pray those who voted out to get one over the government don't suffer the most. Immigration has been a fundermental part of our history and will be in the future. The day my country cannot reach out to those wishing to live and work here. Then it's time to leave.

The decision has been made. Right or wrong it's here. The only way it will work is to pull together.

Derek Thomas
91 Posted 25/06/2016 at 00:48:01
Frank @ 49; Not so mate, a quick check of the voting figures will show that, proportionally MORE under-45s didn't actually vote compared to the over-45s.

So it would seem that if they had got off their backsides, got their heads out of their iPads and Xboxes and voted... but no, they'll just make noises about how their mum should've woke them up and made them vote. After Ignoring 6 calls to wake up and - as usual, it will be everybody else's fault except theirs.

The Pound and The Euro BOTH dropped and in a couple of weeks will slowly rise and find a level again when the panic stops and the compromising begins, so I doubt there will be any real effect vis a vis transfers.

Eric Myles
93 Posted 25/06/2016 at 03:42:34
Amir #67, you say "I don't believe the base currency for transfer fees is the Euro" but that will depend on where the player is coming from.

If we want to buy a player from a EU club, we will (still) have to pay them in Euros, and most likely the players salary too, they won't want GBP. Similarly if they want to buy a UK player they will pay in GBP.

Eric Myles
94 Posted 25/06/2016 at 03:53:28
Martin (#51), the homegrown player rules won't change, they are a requirement of entry into UEFA competitions and are also a requirement of the EPL.
Tony Draper
96 Posted 25/06/2016 at 05:44:35
It won't change bugger all.

It's not like some Law Lord is now going to say "By the powers vested in me, it is my solemn duty to inform Everton Football Club Company Limited that the bid for Mr. Lionel Messi is hereby overturned. Everton Football Club Company Limited will now be required to employ, pay and play one Jimmy Krankie. Case closed, God Save The Queen !".

Liverpool, however, will be forced to employ, pay and play Lily Savage, who will "go down easy" and win them 50 odd penalties (but then insist on taking them him/herself, only to miss all of them).

Amit Vithlani
97 Posted 25/06/2016 at 07:15:59
Eric - 93 I have no idea if a player bought from the continent is paid for in Euros or in GBP. The transfer fees for English clubs are quoted in GBP and there is nothing stopping them paying sterling and then it becoming the receiving club's responsibility to convert into Euros.

If Everton do go out and buy Euros to pay for a player, it does not change the fact that their wage and transfer budget is based in pounds. If they have a budget to buy a player of 20m pounds which is worth 30m euros one day and 20m euros the next, this is only a problem if there is a queue of clubs willing to pay 30m euros. If the queue is dominated by EPL clubs then the selling club will find few takers for their price in Euros.

Only a handful of European super clubs have budgets in excess of EPL clubs. These clubs will buy 10pc or so of the players transferred?

The bulk of the demand for EU players will derive from the EPL. And with sterling based budgets, it will mean a correction in transfer fees in Euros.

The Euro is not the base currency for transfers as there is no such thing - it will come down to demand and supply and the demand lies with EPL clubs.

Eric Myles
98 Posted 25/06/2016 at 07:35:08
Amit #93, if a club in the EU trades in Euros they will want payment in Euros, they won't care how many GBP it costs.

Fees for foreign players are often quoted in Euros but UK press convert it to GBP so fans in UK can understand it.

Same if we bought a player from South America, e.g. Funes Mori, they will want paying in local currency and won't care how many GBP it costs

The GBP based budget of EPL clubs is their own problem if they do not have enough in Euros to buy a player.

Christine Foster
100 Posted 25/06/2016 at 09:32:41
The implications of the Brexit are enormous and will adversely affect the lives of everyone here in the UK as a result. For those who think that everything will be hunky dory in a short space of time, dream on. The implications for politics too are profound, the people have stuck two fingers up at the major parties and it would not surprise me if Corbyn follows Cameron out the door.

Football is no exception and whilst the fluctuations in currency are an inconvenience to the large clubs all it will mean is harder lines will be taken with negotiations. Once we have left the EU, where it will impact will be the movement of players around Europe, possible implications and difficulties for European players to play in the Premier league, after all, they will need a visa like any other potential European immigrant? What rules will apply? Its hardly likely in the short term that the UK will set up a separate set of Immigration laws to cover a couple of hundred short term contracts and players associated families. It will probably make it more difficult to comply. Free movement of labour has been rejected by the people of the UK and with it will come regulation to make it harder to get into this country.

You can split hairs with the reasons for Brexit, but the vote showed, once and for all, that the British people were fed up to the back teeth with the policies of austerity fuelled by an ideology of conservatism. Sadly, it wasn't about Europe. It was about power.

But this is not the place to debate perverse politics.. go read the Guardian for that!

Everton have an excellent academy that can produce gifted players and I hope the changes mean that more of the young players who are let go, have a better chance of making it to the first team. Free movement of players (contracts aside) make it attractive to live and play in the EPL, its more likely that overall we will see fewer players from Europe and the impact on the EPL may see it as less of a international showcase and more of a Bundesliga outcome.

Brin Williams
101 Posted 25/06/2016 at 09:43:47
'its more likely that overall we will see fewer players from Europe and the impact on the EPL may see it as less of a international showcase and more of a Bundesliga outcome'

a less attractive to the likes of SKY - thereby reducing club incomes from TV rights advertising etc. - not that we had much of that in the past!!

Amit Vithlani
103 Posted 25/06/2016 at 10:03:33
Eric 98

"The GBP based budget of EPL clubs is their own problem if they do not have enough in Euros to buy a player."

This is the heart if the argument. I would agree with you if there were more than 4-5 clubs on the continent who could compete with EPL budgets.

However, I don't think this is the case. EPL clubs dominate the rich list and the EPL as a whole accounts for the lion's share of net transfer spend.

By definition the EPL is a net importer. Unless the EU can export its footballers to a rival market, it will not be able to export the same volume as before unless transfer fees correct for Sterling devaluation.

In terms of what currency transfer fees are denominated in, I see no evidence of there being a set convention for which currency applies. Neymar's fee was paid by Barca to Santos in Euros, based on the public disclosures made in his tax case. If I am Man U negotiating with Santos, GBP could similiarly be the denomination. Its surely about who holds the balance of power in negotiations.

Christine Foster
104 Posted 25/06/2016 at 13:20:01
Phil Sammon
109 Posted 25/06/2016 at 13:49:16
Eric Myles...

The man who thought Moyes 'waited out' Fellaini's release clause so he could offer MORE.

You seem embroiled in every legal/financial discussion that ever ensues on TW yet lack some incredibly basic knowledge.

Eric Myles
111 Posted 25/06/2016 at 14:08:10
Phil Sammon, the man who himself proved that what I said about the Fellaini transfer was correct!
Phil Sammon
113 Posted 25/06/2016 at 14:15:27
Haha. Never fails to amuse me, Eric.

Why would a club wait for a player's release clause to expire before bidding? It made no sense then and makes no sense now.

Eric Myles
115 Posted 25/06/2016 at 14:36:32
Phil #113, simply so that they could bid a lower price, which is exactly what happened.
Eric Myles
119 Posted 25/06/2016 at 15:15:21
Amit #103, the buying power of EPL clubs has only been strong while the rate has been favourable for them. The EU does not have to export its players to another market, it can sell within its own market.

Now if an EPL club cannot afford the €100 mn fee of a player and only wants to pay €80 mn because of exchange rate fluctuations, then the selling club can just sell at the higher price domestically. Or maybe the reduced price will make it more attractive to other clubs within the EU?

It will ultimately be the player's decision as to whether they want to be paid in Sterling or Euro, and my bet is they will want the club to take the currency risk.

Eric Myles
120 Posted 25/06/2016 at 15:24:39
Amit, it would also depend on whether the clubs hold multi-currency bank accounts. The few bigger clubs that buy and sell between UK and EU regularly might do, but the majority would only have their local currency accounts.
Andy Osborne
121 Posted 25/06/2016 at 15:34:12
Putting aside all the pros and cons for the country as a whole, it seems clear to me that that Brexit will have an impact on football in the UK. Less European players, higher wages due to exchange rate, lower quality of player, less TV revenue are all things that people have mentioned. I take a slightly different view.

Less European players means more opportunities for young UK players. Less TV money will start to roll back the artificial inflation in transfer fees and wages that is currently happening. It seems to me that transfer fees are high across Europe because EPL clubs are rich, and wages are high, for the same reason. If there was less money in the game due to exchange rate, or less TV money, then transfer fees would fall, as would wages.

Bringing it back to Everton, whenever there is less money in the game, we seem to be able to compete better, the financial playing field might be leveled a bit more to allow us to shine.

Andy Osborne
122 Posted 25/06/2016 at 15:40:24
Lyndon, I am not sure why so many posts have been "moderated" and deleted in this thread. Colin's post 119 seemed fine to me, or maybe I am missing something.
Michael Kenrick
Editorial Team
123 Posted 25/06/2016 at 15:46:23
Andy, you asked a very pertinent question about how Brexit may affect English Football and Everton in particular. We're just trying to keep the thread on that topic.
Brent Stephens
124 Posted 25/06/2016 at 15:47:02
If you bid lower than the amount in a release clause, and before the release clause expires, I assume the club "owning" the player can decide whether or not to accept the bid? They don't have to accept the bid (as per the release clause) but neither are they prohibited from accepting?
Andy Osborne
125 Posted 25/06/2016 at 15:48:01
Thanks for the response, Michael. I understand.
Colin Glassar
126 Posted 25/06/2016 at 16:15:53
Didn't realise it was just football related Michael. So I guess all our foreign players will have to think about getting work permits in the near future then?
Amit Vithlani
127 Posted 25/06/2016 at 17:18:43
Eric 119 - true to some degree re multi currency accounts. The super clubs are global franchises with revenues in multiple currencies, although in the case of the EPL, sterling related broadcasting revenues form the lion's share, so foreign currency collections likely to be small.

Tax rates are also an important consideration. The UK has a lower top rate of tax than say France. Zlatan Ibrahimovic for example may find himself better off on a net basis in the EPL even with the devaluation.

I still believe EPL dominance in the EU transfer markets will not be affected, as only 4-5 clubs have the budgets to outspend the top 10-15 clubs in the EPL. But we will see I guess...

Martin Mason
129 Posted 25/06/2016 at 20:16:27
The stars are aligning very well for Everton now with getting Moshiri on board and now the Brexit referendum result. It should stop teams just buying success but will play to our strength of developing players plus a newly found ability to pay a lot of money for a few top class players rather than a team full.

It all depends now on how the agreements are on movement of footballers but what I see is that overall it will increase the quality of Everton relative the the UK Franchise Five, but possibly reduce the quality of English teams relative to European but maybe the opposite will happen.

Andy Crooks
130 Posted 25/06/2016 at 20:35:04
Michael K, I understand the balance you are striving for and, in my view the site should be free of politics. However, Martin Mason can talk about " the magnificent brexit result", and contrary comments are removed. Let us have all or none.
Colin Glassar
133 Posted 25/06/2016 at 20:48:55
If we get kicked out of Uefa, we should bring back the Home Championship (or whatever it was called), at least that way England would have a chance of winning something.

The only positive I can see with this Brexit mess is that we won't have to take part in the Eurovision song contest any more.

Brin Williams
134 Posted 25/06/2016 at 21:25:07
Colin 'at least that way England would have a chance of winning something'

Fat chance!.

Dan Davies
135 Posted 25/06/2016 at 21:32:12
Well if Brexit means more British youngsters get a chance not just at Everton but on the whole then that's a plus isn't it? At least on footballing terms like.
Andy Osborne
142 Posted 26/06/2016 at 02:59:42
We won't get kicked out of UEFA, Colin. Norway and Russia are in UEFA and are not in the EU. Probably other teams too. Are Iceland in the EU?? Brexit will have an effect on free movement of players and the money side but it shouldn't affect the fabric of the sport we currently have.
Derek Thomas
143 Posted 26/06/2016 at 03:23:16
Stop panicking, as Harold (Wilson not Matthews) said in 1967 'The pound in your pocket has not been devalued', nor the Euro in Johnny Foreigner's.

A quick check of the stats will show that in the last 5yrs the GBP/Euro has been all over the place and now at about 1.24 is not far off the average.

if PSG want Lukaku or we want whoever there will be an Internal price in the heads of both buyer and seller that will say I'm not paying/selling for more/less than 'X'.

Fees are paid (mostly) over a number of years anyway. Now I don't know if currency fluctuations are written in to theses things... and who knows how Mr M does his business and out of the back of whose sofa the money will be found or which Country this sofa is located.

Nothing's going to change for 2yrs MINIMUM, probably more. Plenty of time to learn how to live with this New Jerusalem.

The big thing for EFC is not the exchange rate or possible new rules on freedom of employment...the bits that everybody know that work will 95% stay. Everton's real concern should be/are.

a) Keeping the Players who may want to leave

b) Finding the right players to bring in to build the squad.

c) Getting the squad fitter, physically and mentally.

d) winning games and all that other footy stuff like Cups and stuff

Ian Bennett
144 Posted 26/06/2016 at 09:09:34
Brexit will mean:-

Option to end Bosman;
Fewer average European players coming in;
An end to 16-year-olds from teh EU going into academies. The age would move to 18;
More expensive transfer fees and wages from a devalued pound;
Presumably less EU technical staff;
Potentially less interest in the EPL resulting in lower TV broadcasting revenues.

Damian Wilde
145 Posted 26/06/2016 at 09:50:29
Articles keep mentioning how it's a disaster as 16-year-olds can't move from say Spain to England... hardly going to collapse the system, is it? To be honest, I think that 18 is fairer anyway; a kid of 16 shouldn't be shipped abroad – they should be with their family.
Colin Glassar
146 Posted 26/06/2016 at 11:05:52
As we will no longer be able to carry out immigration and customs control in France, does this mean we will be flooded with young, foreign players from Somalia, Afghanistan, Libya etc........?
Damian Wilde
147 Posted 26/06/2016 at 11:35:57
I see you're trying to be witty there Colin, but not appropriate.
Jim Jennings
149 Posted 26/06/2016 at 13:24:12
Colin Glassar #146

Absolutely pathetic comment

Denis Richardson
150 Posted 26/06/2016 at 13:40:18
Funny how long this thread is getting given the UK will remain part of the EU for at least anther 2 years, if not longer.

I'm pretty sure that laws regarding football transfers and players contracts will be pretty far down the list of things that the negotiators prioritise first.

Also Fifa/Uefa sets a lot of the rules the clubs have to follow so other than currency fluctuations, I think the Brexit decision will have fuck-all effect in the short term.

Dean Adams
152 Posted 26/06/2016 at 16:32:11
Lots of over-reaction regarding the currency. On June 14 2016 the £ to $ was 1.411, today it is 1.3681. Not such a massive drop when you realise that the £ had risen leading up to the referendum. Like all things, the losers make lots of claims of doom and gloom, when the reality is that they are tasting sour grapes!!
Brent Stephens
153 Posted 26/06/2016 at 16:51:10
Dean, from 14 June 2016 to 26 June 2016 - hardly a grand sweep of the history of sterling and the wider economic context! I doubt the person in charge of treasury / finance at Everton will approach decisions on what currency to hold based just on that.
Alan J Thompson
154 Posted 26/06/2016 at 17:40:04
Damian(#145); Don't know that it adds anything to the discussion but youngsters moving from Australia to European and UK clubs quite often get to take the family with them. Not sure if it's just the tyranny of distance or an incentive.
Brian Wilkinson
155 Posted 26/06/2016 at 17:47:03
Firmly tongue in cheek but it in 85 we were excluded by Europe, now in 2016 Leicester City find themselves out of Europe.
Brian Wilkinson
156 Posted 26/06/2016 at 17:50:15
Lets try again, tongue in cheek but in 85 we were excluded by Europe, now in 2016 Leicester City find themselves out of Europe.
Andy Crooks
157 Posted 26/06/2016 at 20:35:36
Glad you cleared that up, Brian.
Martin Mason
158 Posted 27/06/2016 at 12:32:57
Colin@151

The port security agreements are between France and the UK not between the UK and the EU.

Eric Myles
159 Posted 27/06/2016 at 16:42:28
Dean #152, not such a big difference if you're exchanging £1 to €, but if you're buying a player for £20 million it makes a bit of difference.
Jay Wood
160 Posted 27/06/2016 at 17:31:25
Eric @159.

Dunno where Dean @ 152 is getting his Forex numbers from, but if he can get that rate he should buy large and start selling at the true rate to make a Soros-like killing.

Since the first negative Brexit results announced Friday morning when the pound plummeted from a spike of 1.38 euros to the pound to 1.20, THAT is where it's stayed for 4 days now. As I write 1.1952 (and typically you won't get that commercial rate - 1.16 or 1.17 is a truer figure).

That kind of margin not only makes a considerable difference on the £20 million purchase of a player (€3.7 million less, by my calculations), but also to very every ex-pat living abroad and receiving, for example, a UK pension converted from sterling to practically every local currency as the devaluation of the pound is universal.

Dean Adams
161 Posted 27/06/2016 at 18:36:24
Jay, those figures can be found by goggling the pound to euro rates. Not hard for anyone to do and not anything like your 1.38 spike!! The rate on Wednesday 22nd was 1.27 and nowhere near your spike, but hey why let facts get in your way. Any spike in the market would have been triggered by greedy bastards who have once again profited at the expense of the nation and continue to do so.
Damian Wilde
164 Posted 28/06/2016 at 13:42:25
Jay, are you saying you know better than a Google Scholar?
Baz Daly
165 Posted 28/06/2016 at 23:48:06
Is it not the case that the UK can now have whatever rules it likes for anything?

Previously, under the EU, employment laws covered any kind of work, but the UK can now rewrite those rules to say, no more Spanish waiters, but wingers?...no probs...

Bob Parrington
166 Posted 28/06/2016 at 00:07:15
Christine #100. Excellent post. Looking at the brexit vote, from the demographics figures I have seen, it appear that the oldies (not so long to have to put up with the consequences) have shit on the younger people, who have perhaps 3 or 4 times the years to deal with the consequences.

IMO - Looking on from a distance, I note also that the referendum result is not binding on the government. So, I question whether or not the exit will take place. Is there a Poly in UK strong enough to create a "renegotiate a better Europe scenario"? Legally possible but politically dangerous (for those who dare!).

Effect of the EPL and British football in general? Will this affect the massive TV payments (maybe, maybe not)? Will the pound will recover? For the time-being, those with the "mega bucks" to invest are screwing every penny out of the 98-odd percent of other people by injecting panic in to the markets. When they see it is time to cash in, the markets will come back and so will the pound IMO.

Can't see much else major that will affect the EPL etc. Unless they go back to the old heavy ball with leather lace. Ouch!

Maybe a new British Rules Football a bit like our Aussie Rules Football in which, if you miss the goal, you can still have a point (providing it's not too far off target). :) :)

Eric Myles
167 Posted 29/06/2016 at 08:30:04
Bob #166, the regulation weight of the ball per Law 2 has not changed since 1937.
Martin Nicholls
168 Posted 29/06/2016 at 08:52:44
As is to be expected, this started as a football related thread. Half of the above posts bear no reference to the effect Brexit will have on football as they are politically motivated and/or discuss economics in general. Let's just stick to the point eh guys?
PS - at the risk of contradicting myself, let's also stop this young v old debate. We live in a democracy in which virtually all adults get a vote. For the record I'm 66 and voted leave - I did so not because I think it best for me but because I think it's best for the future of the country (ie my children and grandchildren). No-one knows whether or not the country took the best course - it's all about expressing an opinion at the ballot box in a democracy. This is the wrong forum (is there a right one?) for personal insults and for people to be questioning the intelligence of those with differing political opinions. Let's stick to the footy and avoid the personal stuff!
Brin Williams
169 Posted 29/06/2016 at 08:59:16
MN 168 - This is what happens on virtually every thread. it starts with a theme and within half a dozen posts it is completely off subject and hi-jacked to some other non relevant topic.
Eddie Dunn
170 Posted 29/06/2016 at 09:18:29
A few years ago frustrated by the dominance of Sky and the big 4/5 clubs continuing to win everything, I imagined that things could only change if there was a big problem.
I was thinking of a pandemic or a war, which could impact on movement or a severe economic downturn.
Obviously I wasn't hoping for these things ,but I did think that the huge amounts of money in the game were obscene.
I don't think that Brexit will have a huge impact, but it does show that the house of cards that is this civilisation, is built on some rickety foundations.
Ray Roche
171 Posted 29/06/2016 at 09:28:45
Eric#167, But what HAS happened is the material that they're made of. OK, they may still be leather, but they're coated, waterproofed, without a lace and don't feel like a brick in a bag when you head them. They will weigh considerably less than a ball from the fifties and sixties when they're wet.
Bob Parrington
172 Posted 29/06/2016 at 09:55:11
Thanks Eric. Those bloody laces, though!!!!

So why do all the commentators make the excuse that the lighter ball is affecting the shot (mostly too high) and also that the new "lighter" ball tends to move about a lot, making it difficult for the goalies?

Also, thanks Ray. Absolutely right. They also had a bladder - a bit like an old fashioned car tyre (way back when!)

Martin Nicholls
173 Posted 29/06/2016 at 10:09:24
Brin#169 - couldn't agree more! Wouldn't mind so much if the tangent we went off on was at least footy related!
Dick Fearon
174 Posted 30/06/2016 at 10:38:41
Zen and the art of preparing a football.

Bob and Eric, they also had a rubber 'dicky' by which air was pumped into it. When the bladder is inflated to the required psi 'the dicky' is tightly tied then folded and tucked between the bladder and the outer leather skin. A leather lace is used to seal the gap. The completed procedure is called a casey.

Please note! above descriptive terms are as used on the playing fields of south Liverpool and may vary with different areas.

Amit Vithlani
175 Posted 02/07/2016 at 18:38:52
Judging by the money being thrown about, Sterling's devaluation appears to be having little effect on big transfers. Ibrahimovic, Nolito, Mandanda, Mkhitariyan have all arrived post Brexit, accepting the filthy lucre denominated in a weaker currency.

Perhaps higher prices and wages are being paid, but I am sceptical. I think the currency moves are irrelevant. The EPL has money to burn and transfers this summer will be greatly inflated, so judging the impact of currency moves versus general transfer inflation is hard.

Martin Mason
176 Posted 02/07/2016 at 18:57:20
For those who would try to dictate what subjects people can and can't post on, be fair, all of the political and economic aspects of Brexit will affect the operation of EFC. If we wanted to take the football related only theme to the limit then Brexit itself isn't football related.
Amit Vithlani
177 Posted 09/07/2016 at 09:56:20
So, 300m spent in a week this summer compared to 1bn for the whole window last summer. Devalued Sterling not dampening demand. Clearly the massive TV revenues are driving activity.

The other cost of devaluation, in terms of inflating transfers and wages given constant/growing demand from the EPL, is hard to assess from where I sit.

Are EPL clubs paying 10pc more in Sterling terms compared to last summer? Who can tell. There is a huge general inflation in the wage and transfer market this summer compared to last.

The Euro is also facing its issues. If Italian banks go kaput, Sterling may strengthen against the Euro, and London could retain its status as a financial centre post Brexit, as firms seek shelter from EU contagion.

Bob Parrington
178 Posted 12/07/2016 at 23:32:26
Dick Fearon (#174). You're right. I forgot about that.

I notice UK has a new female prime minister as an outcome of the Brexit vote. Is she another Maggie T, I wonder? I know nothing about her.

Interesting times around the world!!


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads



© ToffeeWeb