30/08/2026 8comments  |  Jump to last

(Photo by Naomi Baker/Getty Images)

A day is a long time in football. A day is certainly a long time when it comes to Everton.

In the space of 24 hours, the club’s leadership managed to lose any credit or trust it had from the fanbase... and it was all for nothing.

Saturday’s 1-1 draw with Bournemouth was overshadowed by news that Everton were in talks with Nottingham Forest over selling Harrison Armstrong, the jewel of the next generation.

Armstrong, to his immense credit, played at the Vitality Stadium, and he played well.

It has been reported that the teenager had not pushed for a transfer. It was not David Moyes’s doing, and it is understood to not have even been a decision made by Angus Kinnear.

Instead, TFG had pulled rank and decided to cash in on the youngster as they aimed to make a quick sale that, it seems, Everton actually badly needed.

TFG has now learned the hard way that you do not rile up this fanbase. By Sunday morning, after an outpouring of outrage among Evertonians — with the 1878s fan group going as far as to threaten a boycott of their activities if Armstrong was sold — TFG had pulled the plug on a deal that, as of Saturday night, had reached the stage where medicals were being scheduled.

That good news was short-lived; Sunday turned out to be one of the most hectic days of transfer-related business in recent memory.

Armstrong is staying, but Iliman Ndiaye is set to join Tottenham, with Richarlison heading the other way. Talks over another loan move for Jack Grealish are at an advanced stage and Kenny Tete is close to joining from Fulham.

But we’ll have more pieces to discuss those various potential ins and outs.
We must circle back to Armstrong, and ask why in the world did TFG think that selling him would be a good idea?

This reeked of a detached ownership stepping in and, frankly, making a huge miscalculation. Whether it’s because TFG has told Everton’s transfer “committee” that there is no more money to be spent, and a sale is needed, or it’s because they simply want to recoup some of the money they
have already put in, or because the Toffees are somehow close to the line on SCR... who knows? 

But what’s clear to this writer is that this was a decision taken at the highest
level without any consideration for the wider context.

TFG, thankfully, saw the error of their ways. But now, they must try and rebuild a bridge they have torched down. It is now time for some open and honest communication from Dan Friedkin, the owner of this football club. We should not only ever be hearing from Kinnear. 

TFG are detached to the extreme. Whereas we heard too much from Farhad Moshiri, we don’t hear anything from TFG, and that needs to change.

Kinnear is their man on the ground, and Evertonians can be grateful for his public communication, but too often it is sounding like spin, rather than honesty. 

But let’s take Kinnear’s words from a few weeks ago at face value. Let’s say he wasn’t lying (as why would he?) — that suggests, then, that the rug was pulled out from under him and his “local team”.

So the next question is, why are Everton so desperate to sell? Why are they in such need to generate, it seems, a profit for the books of around £40M?

Is it just a coincidence that such a profit would cover the amount put into the club by TFG earlier this summer to cover the payment to Burnley?

If it is, then it’s understandable — but tell us! Do not take the fanbase for fools.
Were TFG eager to release funds to attack the last few days of the market, but did they miscalculate who in the squad was for sale, despite reportedly receiving pushback from Kinnear and Co?

Are TFG unimpressed by the transfer committee’s lack of decisive decision-making? Are they unimpressed that fringe players have still not been sold? Perhaps that is why they stepped in.

But if that is the case, then heads need to roll. Ultimately if something isn’t working, it’s best to change it quickly, rather than drag it out. Because, if Kinnear is not being listened to, or if he is being circumnavigated, his position is untenable. If Moyes is being too stubborn, then he must be shown the door if he does not want to fit into the plan — whatever “the plan” is.

And the worst thing of all is, this situation with regard to Armstrong was totally unavoidable. Evertonians might not like it, but they can understand that Ndiaye — who is not going to sign a new contract and can attract a sizeable fee — wants to leave and that sometimes you have to cash in to reinvest when the opportunity is there to do so.

But Armstrong has shown no such desire to leave. He has started every game this season and he has been superb. He is the future of this club, or at least, he should be.

All that this fiasco achieved was not only annoying the fanbase and exposing a flawed structure behind the scenes — it also will have no doubt planted serious questions in Armstrong’s mind.

Over the summer, Armstrong joined the Unique Sports Group agency. These are serious players, they do not mess around. And you can bet, that now, they will be pushing their client out and circling his name, because it’s clear, Everton were willing to sell.

TFG might have seen sense, but is it already too late? Armstrong only has 2 years left to run on his contract. Everton should be doing all they can to renew it, but will that be enough?

He was reportedly in line to earn a six-figure weekly salary at Forest — are the Toffees now going to have to shatter their wage structure to try and keep a teenager who, as good as he is, isn’t 100% guaranteed to be a first-team starter in every single game?

And don’t be surprised, regardless of Armstrong’s contract situation, if his agency generates more significant interest in January, or next summer, from bigger players than Forest.

Armstrong is rightly seen as one of the brightest prospects in English football. He has the composure, the craft and the fight to make it. He is not Wayne Rooney level, sure... but this is a kid that’s going places.

Now, Everton — or, namely, TFG — have opened a can of worms. It’s a huge misstep, and those who already had their concerns over TFG’s true aims and ambitions for this club will now almost certainly be done with them and calling for another ownership change.

Those who were on the fence may now be leaning that way, too. And this is the issue: TFG don’t really have any defenders because they never speak. They never communicate with this fanbase and show that they really care or understand what Everton is about.

Have Dan or Ryan Friedkin even attended a game at Hill Dickinson Stadium yet? It’s going to be a long way back, and there’s almost certainly going to be some casualties of this.

Let’s just hope, on the pitch, Everton still come out of this summer stronger than they started it, and that Armstrong realises that he is, at least in the eyes of the fanbase, the shining light.

 

Reader Comments (8)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()


Mike Allison
1 Posted 30/08/2026 at 22:51:09
A nice summation Patric, I feel so completely without hope for the future of the club under these owners now.

What on Earth is going on? We’ve been skint and desperate before - if we are, tell us. We can handle it.

Did someone think it was good business sense to sell off a prized asset for a low value?

Who at the club thinks Kenny Tete is the answer to the right back problem?

So much damage has been done, and as fans we’re essentially angry and bewildered about the whole thing. We need some serious, clear communication as a first step because we’ve been massively disrespected.

The journalists like Alan Myers, Joe Thomas and Giulia Bould need to do some actual journalism and ask some real questions, getting some real answers.
Ian Wilkins
2 Posted 30/08/2026 at 22:58:11
On the face of it, despite CEO saying the opposite, we do appear to have had an urgent need to generate funds.
And the sale of Armstrong, unlike anticipated sale of others, came from left field.
Add to the mix our senior management, including manager, looking divided and side swiped.
Yes it’s been a strange period, in which, in the absence of any meaningful explanation we are left to draw our own conclusions.
Not a way to run a football club.
Leaves a lot of questions. Perhaps Guilia Bould, not one to shirk the awkward question, should publicly ask to discuss with Mr Kinnear. See how that goes…
Mike Gaynes
3 Posted 30/08/2026 at 23:05:41
Patric, you couldn't have crammed any more hyperbole into this rant if you'd tried.

Yes, this definitely "reeked of a detached ownership... making a huge miscalculation." But "a bridge they have torched down" and a "fiasco"?

It would have been that and worse had they closed the sale. But in the end all they did was field an offer presented by Armstrong's powerhouse agents and then foolishly decline to instantly turn it down because, one assumes, they didn't understand Armstrong's meaning to a fan base that had tracked his growth since he was five years old. To them this was a chance to cash in on what they saw as our fourth-or fifth-choice defensive mid (Garner, Norgaard, Rohl and Hackney could all be ahead of him still) without seriously damaging the squad.

Well, they found out the hard way that they needed to listen to the fan base, and they reversed course. Lots of "detached" owners wouldn't have. And it's not like the consequences seemed immense. I mean, the 1878's threatened to halt their activities? Not quite comparable to the Roma Ultras threatening to kill the Roma CEO and her children. The Friedkins have dealt with a way worse fan uprising than this one, without bending. So I give them a certain amount of credit for recognizing their error and backing off. Yank billionaires aren't exactly noted for their willingness to do that.

No, the Friedkins don't care about building bridges to the fans, or coming to the games. They're devoted to building a business entity. They will assuredly make more mistakes in the process, but I predict they're not going anywhere.

In the meantime, Armstrong will feel really good about himself. And that may help him through a long season of watching others named to the 11 ahead of him.
John Collins
4 Posted 30/08/2026 at 23:08:34
Kidded again by the looks of it.

The massive wave of enthusiasm as we entered the new stadium, with billionaire owners, has slowed to a drip.
People hoping what they are seeing in front of them isn't true.
Personally, I'm gutted.
I realised a while back what the owners were about, but have to admit I was taken in by the whole thing initially.
Only Everton eh.
John Collins
5 Posted 30/08/2026 at 23:11:31
Mike,

"But in the end all they did was field an offer presented by Armstrong's powerhouse agents and then foolishly decline to instantly turn it down because, one assumes, they didn't understand Armstrong's meaning to a fan base that had tracked his growth since he was five years old."

That would have took them the length of a phone call to" understand".
Not two days
Mark Taylor
6 Posted 30/08/2026 at 23:15:50
You feel that the manager, CEO and owners are not exactly a united front here. I had hoped we had moved on from dysfunctional.

I've posted before how important our SCR ration is while ruminating over transfers. There's no point calling for big money to be spent if the rules don't allow it. My very rough back of a fag packet calculation put us around 70% or so based on this coming year's revenue, taking our CEO at his word that we (somehow) are now in the top third for revenue generation.

85% is the number(though some clubs will happily stretch that further and pick up the penalties) but it's important to note that level will almost certainly see us making a loss, especially when you factor in the reality that roughly 10% of our revenue is needed to service our debt. And that made me wonder if the real limit is actually 70%, and no more. That of course is also the level you need for Europe and keeping it there avoids us making Villa style cuts on the off chance we actually got into Europe.

That leave us in a kind of limbo. Personally I'd take the Beto/Balogon swap, keep Ndiaye, see if we really can't manage to do something with the Ironman deal, and maybe Patterson to rustle up the money for some kind of RB. If it has to be Tete, who did used to be a decent player, they better do a thorough medical because he has become a biscuit.

That would do. I don't want Grealish or Richi back, wages prohibitive and potential to wreck our SCR. Then maybe with a bit of wage headroom, see what we can pick up in January.
Derek Thomas
7 Posted 30/08/2026 at 23:17:36
It's not a 'Cover up' as such, but we all know it's the cover up that causes the most trouble.
If we needed £40million because of Burnley and compliance - then say so!
Turn the anger outwards to Masters and Burnley, not inwards.

I'm starting to even feel sorry for Moyes...it'll soon pass I'm sure...possibly having to manage this hotch-potch patch of Richarlison, Grealish & Tete, aka, the old, the halt and the lame.

Dysfunctional? We can only dream of being that efficient.

What a fucking shambles
Jeff Armstrong
8 Posted 30/08/2026 at 23:22:34
I don’t think Harrison will be feeling good about his £1200 per week contract, which was due to go to £80,000 at Forest, and if he’s lucky, will rise to £10,000 pw at EFC.
Be interesting to get the full story about this non move, what were Harrison’s views on the whole story.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


How to get rid of these ads and support TW

© ToffeeWeb