We just get told that Bill Kenwright says that some investors are bad, and we have to take his word, and then he won't tell us anything. Maybe it is Bill Kenwright's terms that are doing this. I would like to hear these investors' stories rather than no names, and a random apology on the website for no reason.

The only "model" that seems to work is the ego-driven billionaire who is not "investing" but prepared to plow huge amounts of their own money into a club. They are not expecting to make a profit but seem to do it for the sake of their ego or profile. Chelski & Man City fit into that category. Not sure what happens if the billionaire loses interest or gets into trouble (eg ex-Thai PM at City).

I can see why we do not fall into either category above and, to be honest, neither of the above really appeal to me. As far as I can see, there is no easy money available to EFC. It will take a lot of hard work and maybe some luck for us to keep dragging ourselves up by our bootstraps. For example, if we are to build a new stadium, it will only happen if we can manage to grab on to somebody else's coat tails (a la DK) as part of some larger development.

No one ever said it was going to be easy following Everton but, for me anyway, that's part of the appeal.

Please understand the simple FACT that he doesn?t own EFC ? he is by a very small margin just the major shareholder on around 27% of the company. That means there is another 73% with other people like Mr Woods, Grantchester and obviously private holders. BK has very little cash, most of his wealth is through shares and his Theatre activities. Some people say he is only worth £10 million so obviously he has creditors all over the place.

Other major shareholders, some Directors, some not, have a collective wealth of around £800 million yet I don?t see any of you personally abusing them, may I ask why not? Start with the Granchester?s (£500 million) then Woods or even Earl, all estimated pots over £100 million, yet you choose to attack the Chairman who takes no salary or expenses out of EFC.

Yes BK may be acting as a front for some of the others, namely Earl, but money talks and if an offer was real then the process would look after itself and frankly we haven?t even got past due diligence so that tells you we are not an attractive purchase. Just look how much G&H have taken out of LFC in the form of expenses ? it's an eye-opener.

Thereafter, be thankful we have BK; he is by no means perfect and has made mistakes. EFC debit was logged at £37 million last accounts, that figure can easily be reduced by player sales. Sheffield Wednesday went bust last Friday with debit of £30 million!! It?s not great at EFC but believe me it could be a lot worse. COYB

Over to you, clever lads.

I'm not laughing (too much) at the Liverpool situation as I don't know how solvent WE really are. However, I think it may be a case of "out of the frying pan, into the fire" for LFC. I've never really known any "altruistic" American investors, have you? This new set of owners, assuming they circumvent the injunction, don't appear to have enough serious money for LFC to compete at the top end ? Which is about as good as it gets for Everton at the moment.

Will this current management team take us to title glory? I dont think so, no. But have they restored the credibility of our club, and made us feel proud again? For the majority, yes.

I'd rather be on the footing when finally getting took over, as opposed to selling up as you are about to get put into administration..

But, at the end of the day, we aren't for sale, as the fat Spanish waiter would say... FACT! COYB