Season 2011-12
The Mail Bag
Phil Jagielka
Speculation seems to be growing everyday with regards to Phil Jagielka and Arsenal.
Personally, I really like Phil Jagielka, I like the way he hasn't rocked the boat in the style of Joleon Lescott whilst there is the whiff of a big money move in the air. He seems to be one of the very small band of current Premier League players who show a bit of loyalty.
Now although I do like him and his attitude, I have to say, anything upwards of £15M and he has to go.
I don't think he has been the same since his injury, to be quite frank, I feel like he's an accident waiting to happen every time he plays. This has been proved where he could perhaps be blamed for the two goals we have conceded this season. The cynic in me says his concentration is going as he has no real competition, Moyes is never going to drop him.
The big fear of course is what would happen to any money recouped. It's been stated that it would all go to the bank but, after reading all the fallout from the Blue Union Meeting, would this be such a bad thing?
In an ideal world, we would sell him for £18 million, and spend that on Daniel Sturridge and Adam Johnson or some other Football Manager style scenario. But what will probably happen is we sell him two minutes before the deadline passes and spend precisely nothing of the money!
So what do you think ? stay or go?
Franny Porter, Posted 25/08/2011 at 13:47:58
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
I agree with Nick that the Arsenal result last night means they will be a more attractive proposition for a player now.
I actually think we are being stubborn trying to hold on to our better players (who are starting to age and have the higher wages) perhaps the sale of Jagielka and a low cost replacement such at Ridgewell (experienced prem player at £4m) would provide a nice lump sum to the bank.
We are a more attractive proposition to potential buyers if our debt is gone and our outgoings are lower, therefore it makes financial sense and we still have backup in that position
Stay.
Whether this money is re-invested in players is irrelevant. If we really were up the creek in a year or two, something that is certainly possible, then he is worth significantly less due to his age.
One of the few things I can still credit Moyes with is his eye for a player. I'm sure that he could find a suitable replacement or develop one of our younger players to ensure we have the right amount of cover there.
I think the football would improve markedly should Heitinga go into the back four. People forget how well he played there in his 1st season.
Once again this week we have seen that Jag/Dizzer don't work as a pertnership.
Think we 'have to sell' rather than 'want to sell'.
If we can get in Ridgewell from Brum, pay some cash to bank and have enough left over for some loans then i think it is a no-brainer.
By the way, I am a big fan of Jags but Everton FC must come first.
If Moyes can do this in the next week then it will look good on his CV cos at present his player sales has been blotted by Gosling, Pinear, Yak, etc.
If all the money would go straight to the banks I say: keep him and sell Yobo to give the banks some money.
"In an ideal world, we would sell him for £18 million, and spend that on Daniel Sturridge and Adam Johnson".
Yep, luv that one.
Selling your best players only leads to one thing on the pitch and that is an inferior team and we all know where that can lead.
I'm a big Jags fan both as a player and, given his mature response to all the transfer speculation, a person. But needs must, and even if we had to, say, give two-thirds of any fee straight to the banks then we'd have a few million to play with before the transfer deadline. Not sure we'd need a direct replacement (maybe a loan, as suggested), but rather invest that money in a striker to address what's probably a bigger weakness.
Within obvious constraints, the bank does have some interest in Everton remaining a relatively successful Premier League club. Certainly they're better placed to get their money back if we can remain in the top 10 while at the same time living within our means. If that means clearing the debt while retaining, say, a third of transfer money earned for reinvestment in the team, I think that would be a reasonable argument that could be made.
A £2 million sale (e.g. Pienaar) - yes, I can see why the bank would want us to service our debts with the full amount of that revenue. An £18m sale, I think that's a slightly different matter.
So let him go. Who replaces him? Why not Duffy. Inexperienced yes, but isn't that how you gain experience. Whats the worst that can happen? One or two mistakes will see us drop a league position or two. But think of the positives - 15million to the banks will keep Bill in the hotseat for another year...
Take that 25mill and give it to the banks. This makes us a more attractive proposition for a prospective buyer, and in my opinion reduces the amount of tactical mistakes Moyes can make (i.e playing Cahill every game he's fit ad infinitum). Resulting in better football.
However, that stubborn git Moyes will not sell...He thinks selling players is a weakness - but he fails to realise it's sometimes a strength.
You bastard. I'm full of cold at the moment, with nostrils as red as Gok Wans ringer, and that comment has just made me snot all over the screen.
Personally if it does happen then I would like to see Duffy given a go, if we do bring anyone in to replace my choice would be Ohnuna.
But as he is gone.. maybe this Dann fellow..
But where I am going is if Eric Dier is as good as they say.. I would spend 10m (complete guess) to get him permanent...
then again.. I wouldn't replace Jags, so easy for me to say.
16 Posted 25/08/2011 at 16:09:41
"However, that stubborn git Moyes will not sell...He thinks selling players is a weakness - but he fails to realise it's sometimes a strength."
Moyes biggest fault, apart from substitutions and negativity.
Moyes is a good buyer on the whole but poor seller.
Selling Jagielka would be a strength just as selling lescott was.
Jagielka is an honest pro yes but very limited player and we play better football without him!!! SELL SELL SELL
I would sell everyone if a serious bid came in. The only exceptions being Baines and Barkley.
I do wonder about how much of that conservatism is down to the general club situation he finds himself in. That our financial situation is precarious enough that he actively avoids risk.
I mainly say that because I remember that when he first took over, and we were in a crisis situation, he took an often radical approach; which led to some crazy games.
Of course, it may also merely be that he's become more conservative with age.
Sell.
I think a lot of fans who watch the reserves will tell you he is not ready to be playing week in week out in the premier league.
Also, Peter Laing, well fuckin said.
The guy would have to be on the left to play with Bains. The strikers would have to be told to start scoring or else.
I also like the idea of Bains playing left mid, a bit like Harry Biggs has done with Bale. That way we could concentrate the money on a striker and sell all the other useless twats, in that role we currently employ.
But to lose Jags a certain quote from Michael Corleone comes to mind,
"It's business sonny, just business"
We have Heitinga, Yobo, and even Rodwell to take that role. Rodwell has still been linked to the CB role. I think Heitinga would fit perfectly and even give us more flowing football from the back.
The club needs the money and right now the long term stability and future of the club should be the main concern.
The only reason we got him was as part of the deal which sent Beattie to Sheff United.
Wenger is the one losing the plot by even offering £15 mil for him; in that respect, it's great to see one of the Sky darlings that desperate to sign someone.
Sell him if a decent bid comes in, regardless of how much of the money Moyes gets to spend.
Jags, to me, panics under any sort of pressure which I believe is not unrelated to the number of OGs he has scored. Very limited footballer, our biggest hoof merchant but doesn't rock the boat and makes some fine last ditch challenges, so doesn't come in for the same level of criticism as he might.
Let Heitinga play every game at centre back, give Rodwell a run in midfield (and see if he can justify the hype) and let Duffy cover at CB. Plus it looks like Yobo will still be there too. Even someone on a season long loan purely as cover - which Moyes has history of i.e. Senderos, Gardner, Ferrari - would do the job. I don't think this would weaken us on the pitch but I know it would strengthen us financially off the pitch.
And that attempted pass GJ refers to was embarrassing!
Sell him if a decent bid comes in, regardless of how much of the money Moyes gets to spend.
Jags, to me, panics under any sort of pressure which I believe is not unrelated to the number of OGs he has scored. Very limited footballer, our biggest hoof merchant but doesn't rock the boat and makes some fine last ditch challenges, so doesn't come in for the same level of criticism as he might.
Let Heitinga play every game at centre back, give Rodwell a run in midfield (and see if he can justify the hype) and let Duffy cover at CB. Plus it looks like Yobo will still be there too. Even someone on a season long loan purely as cover - which Moyes has history of i.e. Senderos, Gardner, Ferrari - would do the job. I don't think this would weaken us on the pitch but I know it would strengthen us financially off the pitch.
And that attempted pass GJ refers to was embarrassing!
Anything near £15m is phenomenal, cash in, pay done debt, free some wages up and let Heitinga pass the ball from the back
"Harry biggs" for Redknapp that's genius mate - just loved it.
Jags has always been a 'recovery' defender - prone to mistakes but with the speed and agility to recover and spare his own blushes. Since the knee injury he hasn't quite been the same.
Personally, i love the bloke & would feel horrible seeing him in another shirt, but realistically if we can move forward with a set of CB's of Distin, Heitinga, Duffy & Yobo (pending his own sale) i'll be happy to knock 15 million off the debt.
Previous seasons, we'd wait until the August Sky money to sign players (notwithstanding any players out).
Then we had a period of giving ridiculous contracts to players who weren't seriously being coveted by other clubs to "make a statement". Costs up.
Now we're taken to borrowing against 2012-13 Sky money (surely risky, unless we're capped at borrowing against the parachute payment level).
So the mid August dash for players won't happen (didn't happen last season). Hence any money brought in will go to the bank in its entirety, as we need to reduce our cost base, as we've now reduced our income stream.
Just a rumour but maybe we have missed the boat anyway?
With no obvious signs of investment into the club then come the January transfer window do we have to offload another saleable asset (Baines, Fellaini)?
I never thought i'd see things in this state at our club.
Just a rumour but maybe we have missed the boat anyway?
Apparantly they've offered £10m and we want £12m
Talk of a Korean loanee as part of the deal.
I'd be amazed if we don't sell at least one big player by september ? it's almost inevitable in my opinion.
Fellaini, Heitinga, Bily etc all come from these revenue sources.
INcoming transfer money has been used to pay off exppiring loans and we have had to secure against borrowing from new streams.
What we are experieincing is nothing new, it is just that we have nothing left to secure against
------------------
I can't agree...Arteta has been our most consistent creative player, and sometimes our only creative player. (last season he was recovering from a potentially career ending cruciate injury before anyone starts)..
Jagielka would not be missed in my opinion..in fact, I would suggest it would improve our play if Heitinga replaced him.
Justification is to see if we can find replacements closer in age profile to the core of the next Everton team.
Most would describe that core as being Baines, Felli, Coleman, Rodders, Barkley - that there is neither a centre half or a striker on that list is a concern....
2) People have to stop mentionning Rodders as a centre half...does no-one recall how he judged the flight of the ball for Ashavins goal against us last yr.......seriously Hibbert was preferred to him at centre half.......Hibbert!!
3) In the interim, I for one am happy to pay money to watch Jon Heigtinga hit 60 yr passes out of defence that consistently find a man.....
4) As back up Yobo is still far better than Ridgewell and probably only earns 10k less......strikes me as unnecessary horse-trading
It's a fine line. Jag's hoofs or Heitinga's unpredictability!!
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.


1 Posted 25/08/2011 at 14:22:36
Report abuse
However, Jag's decision will be based on balance sheets and if its stay or go it will just be for the best either way.
PS, how much does last night's Arsenal victory mean to our future?