03/07/2025 27comments  |  Jump to last

Evertonians have watched with immense pride as the magnificent new Hill Dickinson Stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock has risen from the banks of the Royal Blue Mersey. A truly transformative project for the club and the city, its completion marks the beginning of a new era. 

However, amidst the excitement, questions have lingered regarding the financing of this colossal undertaking, especially given Everton's well-documented financial struggles under Farhad Moshiri's tenure. This in-depth analysis of Everton's Annual Reports and Accounts aims to provide a definitive answer to the question: Where did the money really come from?

The Initial Vision and Moshiri's Pledge

When Farhad Moshiri took over as majority Everton shareholder, the vision for a new, state-of-the-art stadium was central to his ambitious plans. Initially, Moshiri had pledged to largely self-fund the project — a commitment that seemed to offer significant reassurance to supporters considering the accountant's widely reported wealth.

Indeed, his initial substantial injections of capital were crucial in kickstarting the development of the new stadium. In recent disclosures, Moshiri himself stated he invested £400M directly into the stadium project. This shareholder funding, often structured as interest-free loans, was a significant fiscal cornerstone for the early stages of construction.

The Shifting Sands of Funding: External Debt Becomes Crucial

The landscape of the stadium's financing shifted dramatically, particularly following Russia's horrific invasion of Ukraine in 2022. This geopolitical event led to sanctions against Alisher Usmanov, Moshiri's business partner and a key Everton sponsor of Finch Farm through his USM Holdings. The loss of this significant financial backing meant Moshiri could no longer solely finance the project as initially envisioned.

As a result, Everton had to increasingly turn to external debt to continue the rapid pace of construction. The club entered into various loan agreements to bridge the funding gap. Key lenders during this period included:

  • Rights & Media Funding: This was a significant source of borrowing, secured against the club's future media and broadcasting revenues. These loans often came with high-interest rates, a point of concern for the club's financial health.

  • MSP Sports Capital: Another investment firm that provided substantial funding, further adding to the club's debt pile.

  • 777 Partners: This firm, which later attempted a takeover of the club that ultimately failed, also provided important loans to Everton during the stadium's construction phase.

By 30 June 2024, the Everton Stadium Development Company Limited, the entity responsible for the project, owed over £800M. Of this, approximately £575.15M was owed to its parent company, Everton Football Club Company Limited (which included Moshiri's shareholder loans), and £200M was a "one-year facility" secured by charges in favour of various lenders.

The capital costs incurred on the new stadium project were substantial, with the accounts showing approximately £210.9M in 2022-23 and a significant £312.7M in 2023-24. By the end of June 2024, the value of the stadium development on the balance sheet had increased from £410.6M to £730.17M. The estimated total cost for the stadium is now around £750M to £800M.

The Friedkin Group's Intervention: Refinancing and Stability

The acquisition of Everton by The Friedkin Group in December 2024 marked a pivotal moment for the stadium's financing. The new ownership swiftly moved to address the high-interest debt burden.

In March 2025, Everton announced a long-term £350M financing deal for the new stadium. This crucial agreement, arranged by The Friedkin Group in partnership with investment bank JP Morgan, came from a consortium of "blue-chip institutional lenders."

The purpose of this deal was explicitly stated as refinancing the existing high-interest debt that had supported the completion of the stadium. This refinancing is expected to save the club tens of millions of pounds annually in debt repayments due to more favourable interest rates and longer repayment terms.

Furthermore, The Friedkin Group's takeover involved a comprehensive financial restructuring. This included the conversion of Farhad Moshiri's interest-free shareholder loans into equity, significantly strengthening the club's balance sheet and reducing its overall debt position. All existing debt facilities were repaid as part of this process.

Beyond Debt: Commercial Growth and Future Prospects

While debt and shareholder funding have been the primary drivers, other income streams will contribute to the stadium's long-term financial viability and indirectly to its ultimate cost recovery.

  • Commercial Partnerships: The recent agreement for Hill Dickinson to acquire the naming rights for the stadium, reportedly worth up to £10M a year (though some estimates suggest a lower figure closer to £6M plus add-ons), represents a significant new revenue stream.

  • Matchday and Other Revenue: Once operational in the 2025-26 season, the new stadium is expected to significantly boost matchday revenue due to increased capacity (recently adjusted down to 52,719) and enhanced hospitality offerings.

  • Non-Football Events: The stadium is designed as a multi-purpose venue and has already been selected as a host venue for a Rugby League Test Match against Australia in November, and Uefa's 2028 Euros, with plans for various other events, further diversifying revenue streams.

Conclusion: A Complex Tapestry of Funding

The journey to fund Everton's new stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock has been a complex one, reflecting the club's challenging financial situation under its previous ownership. While Farhad Moshiri's initial substantial investment provided the essential catalyst, the project's completion ultimately relied on a significant accumulation of high-interest external debt.

The recent intervention of The Friedkin Group has been critical in stabilising the financial picture, primarily through a substantial refinancing package and the conversion of shareholder loans to equity. This has shifted the burden of the stadium's cost from precarious short-term debt to a more sustainable long-term financing structure, underpinned by the new owners' commitment and the anticipated commercial revenues from a world-class venue.

In essence, the fantastic new stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock was built through a combination of:

  1. Farhad Moshiri's significant personal investment (estimated at £400M).

  2. Substantial high-interest loans from various lenders (Rights and Media Funding, MSP Sports Capital, 777 Partners), which covered the remaining majority of the construction costs as Moshiri's direct funding diminished.

  3. The Friedkin Group's recent refinancing of this debt into a more manageable, long-term package, along with their conversion of Moshiri's loans into equity in the form of a massive issue of new Everton shares, which has ultimately provided the long-term financial security for the stadium.

The Bramley-Moore Dock stadium stands as a testament to ambition and resilience, with its funding story serving as a stark reminder of the financial tightrope the club has walked, and the fresh start offered by the new ownership.

 

Reader Comments (27)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()


John Burns
1 Posted 03/07/2025 at 09:32:52
Thanks Michael, that's a good and clear summary of the stadium's financing.
Michael Kenrick
2 Posted 03/07/2025 at 09:33:04
Before I looked at this in some detail, I was still curious about the state of Everton's finances after the takeover by TFG and the effect of the claim that they had resolved all the horrible loans that Farhad Moshiri had committed us to.

On that score, checking the Companies House listing of charges confirms that the JP Morgan Chase instrument for £350M is the only significant financial one left, and that is new, dating from the TFG takeover in December 2024.

I can't find the exact cost of servicing this debt but seems it should be around £20M-£25M, which is around 10% of turnover, and I would expect to be manageable.

I was curious about how this may affect the various claims flying around about (a) how much debt TFG have committed us to; and (b) how much may really be available in terms of transfer kitty.

None the wiser really after all that effort! So I'll have to go with the £70M to £100M that has been bandied about. But some have said the debt we carry is massive; I'm not sure that it is really, considering the investment in the new stadium.


Laurie Hartley
3 Posted 03/07/2025 at 09:39:23
Thanks for the report, Michael. It seems we are now financially stable which is good news.

I only have one question – did Farhad Moshiri get any of his £400M back?

Ryan Holroyd
4 Posted 03/07/2025 at 09:54:25
I heard 25m up to 50m based on Everton achievements. So 25m!!

*figures from that talksport chap

Brian Wilkinson
5 Posted 03/07/2025 at 09:57:47
This is one of the best articles you have done, Michael, and believe me you have contributed some great stuff on ToffeeWeb — clear, precise and understanding of the stadium build and funding, and future costing and future income.

Really enjoyed that read.

ps: Most of us feared the worst when yourself and Lyndon where leaving the site, to see you back here is absolutely brilliant. I know you have been back for a while, and I know Evertonians will have difference of opinions, not just with you over players but also among ourselves, it's all about difference of opinions that makes this site the best.

I personally think if you walked away, Michael, this site would fold, so yes you will get some Blues who will disagree on some articles, some will say spot on, that's the problem, you put on different articles and no matter how well put or how true, there will always be divided opinions, whether it is about a player, or a match performance. But I just want you to know how valued you are on this site, along with every other single Evertonian on here that I can honestly call a family, people I have met on here, and people just simply I have spoken to on here.

Onwards and upwards

U.t.f.t

Ian Wilkins
6 Posted 03/07/2025 at 09:58:54
From your analysis Michael, we have a brand spanking new stadium, an asset worth £800M which will generate substantial new revenue.

To deliver that, Moshiri has taken a substantial personal haircut upon his exit sale.

We now have £350M of debt owed to blue chip lenders at sensible commercial interest rates. A toxic debt position has been refinanced. This is not significant debt in Premier League terms.

Our balance sheet is in such a healthier state now. We now need our annual Profit and Loss account to start showing better returns, in which the stadium will play its part.

Tony Cunningham
7 Posted 03/07/2025 at 10:29:14
Thanks for writing this and clarifying our position.

So the conclusion is we have an £800M stadium and owe £350M on it. That is quite amazing really.

Onwards and upwards.

Stu Darlington
8 Posted 03/07/2025 at 11:13:27
Yeah, but I bet the price of pies goes up!
Jake FitzGerald
9 Posted 03/07/2025 at 11:20:56
And barely 18 months ago, those utter cowboys 777 were the only name in the frame. We wouldn't exist now if they'd gotten their scabby mitts on the wheel.

I can't stand American capitalists but at least the Friedkins know what they're doing.

Hugh Jenkins
10 Posted 03/07/2025 at 11:34:20
Jake (9),

I doubt that American capitalists are different in any way to capitalists from any other country, and whilst many despise the democratic capitalist system, the alternatives (eg, Russia, China etc.) are dreadful.

Stewart Lowe
11 Posted 03/07/2025 at 11:49:57
As much as I despised Richard Masters and the Premier League, not allowing 777 Partners to take ownership because they couldn't prove assets were in place to fund what they wanted to do, probably helped us dodge one hell of a bullet!!

Similarly, but very different, not opting with John Textor has now proven to be yet another huge bullet dodged!!

With the above two in ownership, that could have set this new Everton back 5-10 years, so maybe the tide has turned for us, and I can't wait to be there on 9 September!! COYB!!

Martin Farrington
12 Posted 03/07/2025 at 11:56:58
JP Morgan… 😲

He owned the Titanic.

Lets hope the outcome is vastly different!!!

Nick Riddle
13 Posted 03/07/2025 at 11:57:18
Thanks for doing the legwork on that Michael, and congratulations on putting together a very readable article on a very dry subject.

It's going in my digital library to keep for future reference.

Jake FitzGerald
14 Posted 03/07/2025 at 12:06:15
Hugh @ 10,

The only alternative to Anglo-Saxon western capitalism doesn't have to be Russia and China. Dunno if you've noticed, but they're both about as capitalist as it's possible to get - and Trump's America is actively seeking to go down their route.

Pete Neilson
15 Posted 03/07/2025 at 12:11:54
Thanks for the article, Michael.

As I understand it, Spurs has around £70M depreciation per season against their stadium, it's the main reason they satisfy PSR.

Presumably from this coming season we'll also be able to assign tens of millions of depreciation, hugely boosting our PSR position. More headroom for TFG to invest in the squad?

James Marshall
16 Posted 03/07/2025 at 12:14:45
And there I was thinking they funded it when they found the Arteta money down the back of Bill's sofa.

[Someone had to say it.]

Andrew Merrick
17 Posted 03/07/2025 at 12:15:33
Martin 12, most people rate that hotel...haha
Laurie Hartley
18 Posted 03/07/2025 at 12:28:38
Brian # 5 - I agree with your view that Michael is crucial to the viability of ToffeeWeb.

Don't worry about us arguing with him on occasion though. I think he likes bit of biffo now and again.

Martin Farrington
19 Posted 03/07/2025 at 12:30:30
Andrew, lol. Indeed. Let's face it, the only crisis we have had so far is the reduction in capacity because some idiot forgot to factor in the separation required between home and away fans.

So the stupid capacity number that was dreamt up, is now a really stupid number. Thankfully it's not a massive drop.

Michael Kenrick
20 Posted 03/07/2025 at 13:34:38
Wow, Brian, that's really generous of you and much appreciated.

There's others who wouldn't quite agree, of course, but they include some who seem to take pleasure from using the site to wind up and then attack other Evertonians, and I'm simply done with that.

We have different opinions and that's all part and parcel, but I will no longer tolerate belittling personal attacks on here.

Sean Kelly
21 Posted 03/07/2025 at 13:49:41
Thanks Michael for putting out an article that simplifies our finances to the great unwashed, I don't come on here praising anybody and am normally a moaning auld sod but this cleared things up for me.

This is the tonic I need having twisted my whole left side in a recent accident. The legal drugs help also. Maybe going forward I won't be on here giving out. Onwards and upwards. Thanks again, Michael, for the clarity.

Eric Myles
23 Posted 03/07/2025 at 14:08:29
The estimated total cost for the stadium is now around £750M to £800M

By any chance do you have a breakdown of that cost Michael?

What exactly does it include?

Michael Kenrick
24 Posted 03/07/2025 at 14:27:39
Sorry, Eric, I have no idea and would have to use my 'Phone a Friend' card. This is what she reckons:

Given the range of £750M to £800M, a highly illustrative breakdown might look something like this:

Direct Construction (Materials, Labour, Major Systems): £550M - £600M

Enabling Works (Dock infill, Ground prep, Utilities): £70M - £100M

Professional Fees (Architects, Engineers, Project Management, Legal): £70M - £100M

Financing Costs (Accrued Interest, Fees): £60M - £80M (total over construction period)

Contingency / Ancillary Costs / Overruns: £0 - £50M (depending on how much was absorbed into other categories)

It's important to reiterate that these are estimates. The actual figures are closely guarded by the club and the contractors. However, this breakdown gives a likely indication of where the significant investment has gone.

Brendan McLaughlin
25 Posted 03/07/2025 at 14:41:20
Pete #15

That doesn't ring true.

Stadium costs are excluded from PSR so we've already "benefited" somewhere to the tune of £700 million.

Surely we can't benefit a second time as we depreciate our new home over whatever number of years?

Or am I misinterpreting what you're saying?

Tony Abrahams
26 Posted 03/07/2025 at 15:17:40
A good article Michael, and judging by your last paragraph@20, it sounds like you have been looking in the mirror and doing a little bit of soul searching lately!

I’m glad you stayed on Michael, because I think this website needs you mate, but the standard has definitely been lowered since Lyndon departed, so articles like this are very welcome.

Not that it really matters but if it’s true that Moshiri lost £400 million, I’m wondering if he received any money when TFG, purchased the club?

Jay Harris
27 Posted 03/07/2025 at 15:34:47
Tony he took a bath on around 400 million(his interest free loans) and just asked for 50m when the deal was finalized.

So he was taken to the cleaners by Black Bill and TFG.

We should be grateful to him for what he did for us despite his bumbling management.

Great post by the way Michael and so glad you're still on board.

Pete Neilson
28 Posted 03/07/2025 at 15:42:13
Brendan (25) the joys of PSR!
I got it from The Athletic which is pretty reliable. They reported that Tottenham's stadium depreciation costs were essential to their PSR compliance. According to them Spurs depreciation and non-player amortisation have run at around £70 million since 2019-20. Primarily as a result of the stadium.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


How to get rid of these ads and support TW

© ToffeeWeb