Fan Advisory Board to hold public meetings to gauge fan opinion
The Everton Fan Advisory Board (FAB) will be holding four public meetings in the coming days where supporters will be able to air their views on the current state of the club.
The representative body that was set up last year to act as an interface between fans and the club’s Board of Directors over key issues concerning the running of the club, have arranged two in-person meetings and two virtual assemblies over Zoom.
The face-to-face meetings will be held at the Blue Base on Salop Street at 7pm on Wednesday, 11 January and at the Hot Wok across the road from Goodison Park at 1pm on Sunday 15 January.
The virtual meetings will be at 7pm on Thursday, 12 January and 7pm on Monday, 16 January.
For more details, and to register your desire to attend any of the meetings, email: Chair@EFC-FanAdvisoryBoard.com.
The meetings come at a time of rising discontent among fans at the club’s League and financial position, with the latest calls for communication and clarification from the top of the club having thus far gone unanswered.
A peaceful sit-in protest has been planned by supporters groups after Saturday’s home game against Southampton.
“We know how much our club means to all Evertonians and fully acknowledge the concerns and views being expressed about the club’s current predicament,” a FAB statement said.
“The FAB was established to ensure that the views of Evertonians are taken into account in the strategic decision-making process at EFC. We want to make sure that Evertonians have the opportunity to share their views or concerns about the strategic direction of the club.”
Reader Comments (88)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 09/01/2023 at 19:22:58
By the time the meetings with concerned fans have taken place and the FAB have reported the issues to the Board, the transfer window will be closed, and who knows we might be firmly ensconced in the Bottom 3.
FAB – Thunderbirds Are Go – a great 1960s made-for-TV puppet show.
3 Posted 09/01/2023 at 19:32:55
All that Jazz & Co need to do is look at the media coverage recently by the Echo, Sky, BBC and social media in general, to “gauge fan opinionâ€. They're nothing but pieces on the Everton chess board that are pushed around by Kenwright and the rest of them.
4 Posted 09/01/2023 at 19:37:22
5 Posted 09/01/2023 at 19:44:12
This is exactly what's required. Not another time-waster.
6 Posted 09/01/2023 at 20:03:37
That's my gut feeling. The power of the people (NSNOW) is something we don't want sidetracked or hoodwinked, like the FAB.
7 Posted 09/01/2023 at 20:04:37
Christ, even the bods in the Space Station know the fans opinion, for fuck's sake!!!
8 Posted 09/01/2023 at 20:34:59
I just hope the meetings don't end up showing the supporters in a bad light.
9 Posted 09/01/2023 at 20:35:43
100%
10 Posted 09/01/2023 at 20:43:51
Yes, yes, yes!!!
11 Posted 09/01/2023 at 20:49:30
Brian 8,
I will lighten the mood with a rendition of Abide with Me and a bit of juggling…
12 Posted 09/01/2023 at 21:05:13
I live in Canada but, from what I hear and read from various media outlets, there is a constant theme on the performance of the Owner and the Board that will not change with these meetings.
What the supporters would like is a copy of any discussions held between the FAB and any of the club's representatives and a copy of how many supporters attended the public meetings to show that it is just not supporters writing in on fan sites.
13 Posted 09/01/2023 at 21:08:12
I wouldn't ask them anything. Tell them what a shambolic mess they have made and that things and personnel must change. Do they realise that, if relegated, it could well be the end of EFC as a big club?
14 Posted 09/01/2023 at 21:10:30
What is the strategy for improving the performance of the board? Who measures and monitors this?
Are the board members subject to an individual performance-based review against annual objectives?
How will fans' views be aired? Will the points raised be publicised for comment prior to review with the board? Will the board review of said findings be publicised?
15 Posted 09/01/2023 at 21:16:26
16 Posted 09/01/2023 at 21:18:32
For the rest so far, with your petty little comments? Don't participate then.
For anyone who hasn't read the Echo article yet, there's this within:
… [Fans'] concerns surrounding the club. Against this backdrop the independent FAB has organised meetings through which fans can relay their thoughts, with an overview then to be provided to the club. Summaries of the meetings will be made public. The FAB said: “We know how much our club means to all Evertonians and fully acknowledge the concerns and views being expressed about the club's current predicament. The FAB was established to ensure that the views of Evertonians are taken into account in the strategic decision-making process at EFC. We want to make sure that Evertonians have the opportunity to share their views or concerns about the strategic direction of the club.â€
There will be a total of four meetings. The schedule below:
The face-to-face meetings will be at the Blue Base, on Salop Street, at 7pm on Wednesday, January 11 and at the Hot Wok at 1pm on Sunday, January 15. Two meetings will be held over Zoom. They will be at 7pm on Thursday, January 12 and 7pm on Monday, January 16. For more details, and to attend, email: Chair@EFC-FanAdvisoryBoard.com
17 Posted 09/01/2023 at 21:33:27
We have had first-hand experience of it already when we had that 27 Years Protest at Goodison in the pouring rain, when Sky interviewed (yes you've guessed right) Jazz, and there was no mention of Kenwright being the subject of the derision and anger, it was all centred around Moshiri being culpable as the Owner.
No reason to think why this will be any different, but the proof of the pudding is in the eating. I will keep my powder dry till then.
18 Posted 09/01/2023 at 21:34:57
The owner and board cannot fear the fanbase. They cannot ignore the clamour for an explanation and they can't just hope it goes away with a couple of wins. It won't! Ultimately, the buck stops with majority shareholder Moshiri and nobody really knows how the club has functioned or what pressures the hierarchy may have had to deal with under his leadership. But the board of directors, including chairman Bill Kenwright and CEO Denise Barrett-Baxendale also have a responsibility, too. With every position of office comes responsibility and accountability.
Alan Myers: Time has come for the club to put up, show up and speak up
Even the Morning Star have written about the club seemingly prior to the FA Cup meeting with Manchester United:
Everton's root and branch reform needs to start at the top
The Club and the board know exactly what the fans are thinking; will they do something radical to address those concerns? I very much doubt it.
19 Posted 09/01/2023 at 21:47:17
We need our own Bastille. It's the only way we'll ever get rid of you know who.
Barry, as an old Trotskyite, I can't believe I read the Stalinist rag but it was a good, accurate article.
20 Posted 09/01/2023 at 22:36:02
But I fear the owner and directors will not be moved by fan opposition.
As one of the oldies, yes, Harry Catterick was a controversial manager in his own " write" but I was proud to be an Evertonian during his term.
From the mists of time, selling Collins okay was wrong, but his signing Dennis Stevens, Ray Wilson and Tony Kay went a big way to us being Champions in 1963.
Watch the games on YouTube at home versus Inter Milan and Man Utd Charity Shield 1963 to see how good we were
Then other great signings: West, Fred Pickering, Howard Kendall, Alan Ball also magic etc. I was lucky to see all these players.
Sadly, I can't say the same about the present crop. We will need more than the Goodison roar this season to get us out of jail.
21 Posted 09/01/2023 at 22:42:58
You have to 'Apply' to be heard/speak your piece – that to me seems potentially 'Selective'. Picking and choosing who you want saying it and what you want said.
Obviously you don't want a rabble chanting 'Bill, Bill, Bill, - Out Out Out' (Do you??)
Nor the other extreme of a Father Ted protest plackard saying "Down with that sort of thing now".
Damned if they do and damned if they don't.
I did a Club survey a month or so ago... Bland questions with bland options – with a load of woke diversity shite tacked on the end.
I might(?) be an arl cynic, but I got the impression from the 'body langauge' of the wording, that my opinions would carry more weight the more 'right on' boxes I ticked.
*Interviewer thrusts microphone under woman's nose as she leaves one of Kenwright's productions... 'Apart from that Mrs Lincoln - what did you think of the show?'
I'd be quite happy (well, you know what I mean) if Moshiri sacked the Board – there must be plenty of candidates on LinkedIn – and kept Lampard.
What's Trevor Birch doing nowadays?
22 Posted 09/01/2023 at 23:02:30
23 Posted 09/01/2023 at 00:04:21
Why do you think that, in the face of a very organised NSNOW protest, the FAB are suddenly interested in fans' views?
I will tell you why: because it was organised to head off the Fan Led Review and then the original 27 Years protest. This latest effort is more of the same, trying to counter the recent NSNOW protest, arranged from Everton's offices in the Liver Building. That is its only object and outcome.
They are on a hiding to nothing, just like the Board they represent. It is so bare-faced, it is embarrassing.
24 Posted 09/01/2023 at 00:04:50
“Plans are at early stage and may include minority investmentâ€.
Behind a paywall but you can listen to the article (it's terrible but ignore that)
https://assets.bwbx.io/s3/readings/RO7P1TT0AFB41673306435157.mp3
This sounds like the perfect buyout opportunity for EFC (or even investment) but no doubt Kenwright won't let go without a dirty tricks campaign. I'd be doing everything in my power to get in-front of this lot with pitch books and all sorts. If you don't ask, you don't get. Seems like we never ask, for reasons known.
25 Posted 10/01/2023 at 00:17:55
'Cynical' is the word that springs to mind. Like everything Kenwright does.
A cynical attempt to maintain the status quo and his position at the club. A cynical attempt to belittle a beleaguered fanbase who are desperate for stability never mind deserved of success we all crave (and should be aiming for).
Cynical = Kenwright. Shameful selfish man. I'm sure deep down even he doesn't believe it anymore but he's so desperate to maintain this smokescreen of lies and deceit, he'll do anything.
26 Posted 10/01/2023 at 01:10:44
I signed up to. Not that I expect much to come of it but I figured I'd at least give them a chance,
We want them to listen to fans. In theory, FAB are best positioned to share our concerns. If we boycott it then the only people involved will be sycophants fans so the idea of it being useless becomes a self-perpetuating prophecy.
If we participate, there's a possibility – albeit a small one – our voices will be heard. Worst case, it's a waste of my time and I lose an hour. Best case, maybe something comes of it.
27 Posted 10/01/2023 at 01:42:31
What part of this, "For the rest so far, with your petty little comments? Don't participate then.", don't you understand?
You haven't provided a single good reason for other Evertonians to not attend these meetings. So keep on with your meaningless arm-waving.
However, hope springs eternal. Here again:
There will be a total of four meetings. The schedule below: The face-to-face meetings will be at the Blue Base, on Salop Street, at 7pm on Wednesday, January 11 and at the Hot Wok at 1pm on Sunday, January 15. Two meetings will be held over Zoom. They will be at 7pm on Thursday, January 12 and 7pm on Monday, January 16. For more details, and to attend, email: Chair@EFC-FanAdvisoryBoard.com
28 Posted 10/01/2023 at 05:28:11
29 Posted 10/01/2023 at 07:55:08
I dislike Bill Kenwright, as much as any Evertonian, but I do believe it's churlish to suggest that he could still stop Moshiri from selling the club now.
Someone suggested this to me recently, and it never made any sense, unless what Jerome alludes to is true, and our chairman, is helping to prevent the club from receiving punishment for our horrendous mismanagement?
My thoughts could go deeper, but if Moshiri wants to sell, then although Bill Kenwright, might object, he'd be a very foolish man if he actually could prevent the sale of Everton going through, and he tried to do do this?
30 Posted 10/01/2023 at 08:11:00
What objectives in changing the Everton situation do you think will be achieved ?
Why is the Board completely silent ?
Why is the FAB being wheeled out at the this time to gauge Fan opinion?What have they achieved so far?
Have the Board and owner recognised and answered the NsNOW letter?
Does FAB recognise the NDNOW letter?
What is your opinion of the NSNOW letter and what should be done about it?
As a member of NSNOW and Fan since the 1960s I want those NSNOW questions answered and the proposed talks to begin, with a view to having the proposed actions taken.I have authorised NSNOW to add my name to any communications with Everton, having been involved in discussions with #27 years/NSNOW since the start.
31 Posted 10/01/2023 at 08:12:57
32 Posted 10/01/2023 at 08:17:16
Michael Corleone, got Hyman Roth in the end, nothings impossible, he said!!
33 Posted 10/01/2023 at 08:25:54
Newcastle have risen from the ashes after a change of ownership, it may be time for changes at Everton.
34 Posted 10/01/2023 at 08:29:49
I respect those who are part of it and I'm sure they have good intent. But it has been virtualy silent since it's conception and there has been no communication as to what they are achieving and their own communication with the club. Maybe I'm reading the wrong pages and have missed something?
I'm not naive enough to think that such a panel will make decisions on behalf of the board. They won't. But I would expect it to influence, inform or at the very least give the decision makers food for thought.
Use it or don't have it springs to mind.
I'll attend one of the Zooms at least. I can possibly make the 15th in person.
The Hot Wok? No disrespect to that establishment but a Chinese restaurant in the old Blue House as a venue?
Surely if the Club was taking the FAB seriously they would have opened the doors of Goodison and allowed them to host it in one of the executive suites?
Or don't they trust the supporters?
I'm getting more and more cynical and suspicious. This sudden setting up of meetings feels like a reaction to seeing the national media now turning their attention to the board and owner rather that the manager being the root cause.
Almost like a "erm, FAB, can you go and see what they think" moment in the closed corridors of Goodison power.
Gauge the supporters' feelings? Where have they been? When you have optimistic fools like me turning, the worm turned long ago.
Frank came over with the players on Friday to show respect to the supporters, who responded well to him and the team. It was almost defiance on both sides. Only as they headed towards the tunnel in the far corner did we turn our frustration at where the real issue lies. Sack the Board might be an easy thing to chant, but 9,400 Evertonians were calling for change and no doubt represented many more.
We will support the team every week with all of our heart and soul. That is not in question and unreserved.
But it doesn't stop us wanting change at the top of OUR club. Change the manager, wheel in the next unsuspecting victim and we'll be here again in 12 months time with the same people still in charge at the top.
Apologies for the outburst.
35 Posted 10/01/2023 at 08:40:05
If you think in terms of a new investor, imo this would be the truer objective of the takeover, that Everton want. Even Moshiri was proposed in the last takeover of only being prepared to sell some of his shares.It was never stated that Kenwright would sell his. It could be that it is a Markll takeover.Markl being the original Moshiri takeover.There is no evidence that Moshiri wants Kenwright out or himself out of Everton.There is no evidence that they both would be gone after a takeover. They both would have a say in any takeover negotiations as the main shareholders.
36 Posted 10/01/2023 at 09:02:00
Lampard obviously just isn't a good enough coach or strong enough mentally to demand what new players we require or how to get the best out of them and should be replaced immediately. That should be where our focus should lie but looks as though it's being completely and deliberately overlooked.
News that Pickford could be leaving would be the final straw, I wonder if any of these issues will be discussed at this meeting which will probably prove to be totally fruitless as the owner seems to have abdicated all responsibility for our predicament and has effectively gone missing.
37 Posted 10/01/2023 at 09:15:51
Well forgive me for being cynical but I suspect this FAB series of meetings IS the boards one and only response.
A specific set of questions need to be answered but they will never see the light of day with questions required to be submitted and therefore vetted prior to meetings. This is NOT a public Q&A session.
To what benefit Danny? The FAB cannot discuss or reveal any discussions they have with any member of EFC unless they are expressly permitted to do so. So this is distinctly one way traffic.
We have gone way beyond a FAB. Answers are required from the owner, chairman and CEO.
38 Posted 10/01/2023 at 09:41:17
39 Posted 10/01/2023 at 09:49:35
Your last sentence speaks volumes.
An owner who has seemingly lived in a dreamworld throwing his money at people I wouldn't trust to go and buy a pint with a five pound note and give me the correct change. And now facing the reality of his main benefactor not being available.
A Chairman and former owner who having ridden into Goodison on the back of a ticket of claiming to be a saviour now clinging on to power despite decades of failure.
A CEO who isn't really a CEO. Admirable work with Everton in the Community; I wish that would be expanded to other parts of the city and region as it does much good for a deprived community. But we are a football club first and foremost. If we don't sort out our core business, we won't be able to fund stuff like that.
One of my favourite players of all time seemingly acting like a lap dog. An elevated Duncan Ferguson, with just about as much non-influence.
I said I was getting emotional about this. Give me a pass. I'm having a moment!!!
40 Posted 10/01/2023 at 09:58:55
As many have said, this is about placating fans and delaying reaction. I can see it now, FAB 'So, loyal fans - what is the problem? Your not happy with what we serive up as football? Shall we drill down to see what can be done? Say another meeting at the end of Jan? Deliverd as if they have no awareness of the pressing, urgent issue at all. It's patronizing and shows utter contempt toward the fans.
Christine Foster, I really hope you are involved in some way, as you articulate the concerns superbly and have offered some sensible ideas of how to move forward.
41 Posted 10/01/2023 at 10:05:04
The only time I have come across FAB is on Twitter during #27 year discussion.Inevitability I get into a spat with them, in the Twitter medium.A medium I don't have a clue about.My communication on Twitter is pure luck most of the time.
I don't know if James has anything to do with FAB.I am communicating with him as purely a fellow ToffeeWeb poster on this thread.
42 Posted 10/01/2023 at 10:16:04
If I am wrong then someone please put me right, but I believe this will be the format of the meetings. They are not there to answer questions, in fact their code of conduct expressly forbids and disclosure of information unless given by the club.
43 Posted 10/01/2023 at 10:27:50
44 Posted 10/01/2023 at 10:35:07
Christine, I will (if allowed in!) do my best to report back on here my thoughts on the the meeting.
I won't say that I'm deeply suspicious that the reults of this meeting will be filed under "B" but the sod who won't hold Shareholder meetings is the same one we're campaigning to see him leave.
As Derek Knox has reported what happened, I went to that meeting in the pissing rain outside the Church at the corner of the ground. All that came out of the press meeting with a rep of this FAB was to do with Moshiri.
Well, that's not what I went there for, and I guess it was the same with many others. It was to protest at the 27 year slow strangulation of our great club and the man at the head of EFC for those 27 years.
That is now exacerbated by the rapidly increasing speed on the road to relegation.
These meetings are to find out our "concerns" and report to the Board.
well, they aren't concerns! I'll be saying that Kenwright should go, and his croneys with him. He has done enough damage to our club; and masde himself very rich in the process. If he had one ounce of dignity, he'd have gone years ago, the day that Sheik Mansour wanted to buy our club.
45 Posted 10/01/2023 at 10:38:15
46 Posted 10/01/2023 at 10:42:08
As many have said these “ meetings†seem to be very limited with questions being submitted in advance before being selected by the FAB.
We should try to restrict the questions to the most pertinent so that the FAB have to take them to the board. If not these meetings will turn into heated arguments between fans who all only have EFC best interests at heart, and will suit BK's agenda to dilute what is a growing recognition in the press that he is one of the main reasons we are in our current, and reoccurring, predicament.
A full on protest from the whole of Goodison AFTER the match finishes on Saturday, and every game going forward will have far more impact than a few “backstreet†meetings that the majority of the press will ignore.
30,000 people chanting “sack the board†will be shown on Match of the Day, the pundits will jump on it, then it will get onto News at Ten, and if we maintain our vociferous support of the manager and team, irrespective of our thoughts on both, throughout the games and then switch immediately to the protests it will gain traction.
None of this will help in the short term but we have to hope that it will eventually start the restructuring of the club's management.
47 Posted 10/01/2023 at 10:42:11
There is a probably a fine line between hot-headed activists and passionate supporters who care deeply for the plight of the club.
I get what you mean, but the majority are not pitch fork wielders and we shouldn't prevent the club hearing what supporters think and almost the entire football world can see.
Eric, try Spoons in most parts of the country. Even areas of London outside the centre!!
48 Posted 10/01/2023 at 10:50:27
While I applaud you for taking the trouble to go and let the FAB your thoughts, this is just a PR stunt, we have heard nothing from this group who are supposed to be representing us fans. I don't know whether its the FAB who have decided to call these meetings or someone from the club suggested these meetings. But it will achieve nothing they don't need to hold a meeting to know the vast majority of the fans are upset the way the owner and chairman have ran this club, anybody on a FAB group must know the anger amongst the fan base if they go to games. No doubt the meeting will end with the FAB group saying they will pass on the comments they have heard to the board. This is to make them feel as they have a purpose and the club thinking this is a way of engaging with fans.
What we need is to hear from our owner or if he cant be bothered our chairman to tell us what's the plan to get out of this mess. Although we will probably take whatever is said with a huge grain of salt.
49 Posted 10/01/2023 at 10:51:25
50 Posted 10/01/2023 at 10:52:12
51 Posted 10/01/2023 at 11:01:59
I'm not expecting this meeting to see the end of Kenwright ruining our club. I'm fairly certain it will turn out to be something on the likes that the FAB will report back some questions/views/concerns to the noble Knight. and it will be the end of our participation.
But we can only go and say our piece to the FAB. what they, or the noble Knight make of it I can guess!
53 Posted 10/01/2023 at 11:08:04
Keep telling everyone they need to be satisfied with their lot and everything is okay and they will think and rise against it.
I'll use an even simpler analogy from my childhood. Remember the "hot do not touch" signs on the glass in the Chippy?
What was the first thing you did? Burn your finger.
Tell people they can't have or want something and you poke the fire.
54 Posted 10/01/2023 at 11:16:02
I can just imagine how the meeting will go. The answer to every question will be we don't have the answer but we will put these questions to the board. As far as I am aware they have never called a meeting or given any reports of how meetings with the board have gone, and what questions did they ask.
Oh of course they all had to sign a non disclosure form before being accepted onto the FAB.
55 Posted 10/01/2023 at 11:32:58
If this meeting was taking lace in my back garden I'd draw the curtains.
Not telling others how they should express their concerns, but for me, attendance to this carefully managed charade gives it a credence it doesnt deserve.
56 Posted 10/01/2023 at 11:58:18
He got a lot of sympathy because people believed the interview shouldn't have been taped. Proving My, my - hey hey, Bill Kenwright, was here to stay
I also agree with Christine, Darren, and everyone else who can't take the FAB however many, seriously. But I'd go the meeting and tell everyone to be quiet and listen to what these fans who have been selected by the club, have got to say about our current predicament first. Then I'd speak
57 Posted 10/01/2023 at 12:41:10
58 Posted 10/01/2023 at 13:06:53
They know what's coming so are prepared and stick to the script regardless of the questions that they have already been told they are going to be asked. The party line as they call it.
A deliberate tactic. In my line of work, I've had media training. They call it bridging. You always turn the response back to the point you want or have been told to make regardless of the question.
Personally I'm more honest and transparent, but that's what they teach you.
59 Posted 10/01/2023 at 13:32:57
100 percent right.
60 Posted 10/01/2023 at 13:35:28
A lot of money has been wasted, but the club have spent on average around £33 million per year, over the last five years, so this isn't even extortionate?
We have given massive wages, to a lot of average players, which equates to gross negligence once again
61 Posted 10/01/2023 at 13:45:33
I have no objection to anyone signing up or attending the meeting.The more the merrier and some like yourself, with good articulation, may be able to put across his view. It can only help, because it can be contrasted with the actual response of FAB.You may find that it will be one of a series of meetings.Good Luck being selected.
62 Posted 10/01/2023 at 14:02:48
To me, this has numerous advantages, including:
a) One meeting, one record of it widely distributed and available as a matter of record. If the feedback path has to be: supporters - fans' groups - FAB - board and back again then OK, not as streamlined as supporters would want, but at least open and accountable;
b) Promotes the fans' groups as being responsible representations of the fanbase;
c) Enables fans groups to prevent a more united front and avoid repetition in the questioning. It will mean the fans groups co-ordinating beforehand, but surely that's a good thing?
d) The co-ordinated supporters groups (see above) have the opportunity to ask general and strategic questions as well as more specific ones, bearing in mind sensitive commercial and business matters will (understandably) not be on the agenda.
63 Posted 10/01/2023 at 14:09:28
Is it really, really a matter of economics? Do we have to wait till the new revenue streams open up to us via Bramley Dock so we can compete again?
64 Posted 10/01/2023 at 14:42:43
We have recovered about 350m by selling our most desirable players. Thats why the net spend doesnt look quite so bad. But it does'nt, as you well know, even begin to tell the true story.
Ironically; The want away players will go a long way to saving Moshiri from the mother of all financial losses. When he emerges from this intact...ish. It will be more through luck than judgement...He isn't as slippery as Uncle bill.
Kenwright on the other hand, has always been highly adept at portraying the departing player as the villain and himself as the victim.
"They've taken our boy, Mum".
In other words "All I did was alert Man U to the fact that they could get Rooney on the cheap... And the bastards took him"
65 Posted 10/01/2023 at 14:44:20
If waiting for new revenue streams from BMD to transform us it'll be a long wait.
The list of clubs who built new and still await mythical salvation is endless. Arsenal are only now showing signs of reaching Highbury levels.
Without a bail out future generations will point at BMD as the final nail in the financial coffin.
66 Posted 10/01/2023 at 14:55:59
I'm thinking of claiming it for us Evertonians, who have been the real victims, because nearly every single day now, I'm reading something else about Bill Kenwright, and can't believe how gullible so many genuine Evertonians, have been.
My heads banging with it, and I can't imagine it is good for any Evertonian, right now. Bang - bang - bang - bang fuckin - bang
67 Posted 10/01/2023 at 15:08:59
68 Posted 10/01/2023 at 15:10:40
Aside from all the criticism, have any of these fan groups, etc come up with a plan for the club? Some new ideas, a vision of what to do to take the club forward? Like, what would they do if they were in charge? Who would be suitable candidates to replace 'the board.'
Am not sure what Saturdays event will achieve - media attention?
I have often been surprised that no group has ever decided to pitch up outside Kenwrite's offices in London.
69 Posted 10/01/2023 at 15:11:16
BTW: In my previous post (62) under point c) it should read as present, not prevent. Apologies for any confusion.
70 Posted 10/01/2023 at 15:21:34
71 Posted 10/01/2023 at 15:29:42
72 Posted 10/01/2023 at 15:31:28
Going to be quite expensive for a league one side.
73 Posted 10/01/2023 at 15:39:02
74 Posted 10/01/2023 at 15:48:13
I would call the cops on them trespassing.
75 Posted 10/01/2023 at 15:51:11
76 Posted 10/01/2023 at 15:58:11
77 Posted 10/01/2023 at 15:58:42
Besides, even with an American takeover, such a minimum price would be financial suicide.
78 Posted 10/01/2023 at 16:03:35
I haven't had further details yet specifying if the questions have to be submitted beforehand. But with that being said, for the Zoom calls at least that would make sense or if not questions, at least making a schedule of who gets to ask one otherwise it could get chaotic if everyone can chime in and talk over each other over the phone. For the in-person meetings I don't see any reason to have such a system. It should be just like any town hall meeting where people can show up, get in line and ask or say whatever they want.
79 Posted 10/01/2023 at 16:31:03
There is no way fans will pay that if we take the drop. In theory we may go down and bounce straight back up for the opening of BMD season but I wouldn't put money on it.
If they are the cheap seats, how many will be available? What will be the price of moderate and premium seats?
Either way... cannot see it selling out if we don't improve as a team.
80 Posted 10/01/2023 at 17:07:24
He has the power to make any changes he desires, he's not made the changes yet even though the club's been a disaster for years now.
There's next to nothing ever comes out of the club that has any substance to it, that's not good enough. It's just very bad customer relations.
The bottom line is though, that the only power us supporters have is to stop buying tickets to attend the games, but that's just cutting your nose off to spite your face. They know that we are daft enough to attend games whatever happens now and in the future.
The least we can do is make life uncomfortable for him and the rest of the hierarchy.
81 Posted 10/01/2023 at 17:08:07
82 Posted 10/01/2023 at 17:26:31
Gosh, it's been a quiet day! No whiff of any transfer gossip for us?
83 Posted 10/01/2023 at 17:29:17
84 Posted 10/01/2023 at 18:07:59
The protest is an emotional vent for supporters nothing more which is understandable but utterly futile. To change matters of substance, which I presume is the aim, only big money can do that.
"big money" = Mansoor not Moshiri/Randy Lerner.
85 Posted 10/01/2023 at 19:22:40
Had he been sacked by now, we would have had a new manager bounce instead of being led by Frank Spencer.
86 Posted 10/01/2023 at 19:26:31
Was Frank in charge for over two decades? Lampard is a symptom, not the cause, but you're right, it's all too much for him and the momentum is too far the wrong way.
Very dangerous (for Everton) to do nothing for six weeks including the recruiting team if we have one. Reap what we sow, unfortunately.
87 Posted 10/01/2023 at 19:34:00
Is this what you're trying to say, Barry?
88 Posted 10/01/2023 at 21:56:19
But we remain 3rd bottom in terms of how much we charge.
I know it's contentious and plays with the souls of purists as well as us having to be realistic as having to be realistic to our traditional support base but most expensive season tickets:
Tottenham £2025
Arsenal £1839
City £980
United £950
Chelsea £940
Liverpool £869
Everton £625. Only Brentford and Forest are cheaper than us. And those clubs listed above have bigger capacity stadia than us.
What surprised me was Southampton at £1149, the 3rd most expensive.
I like how Everton try to keep them available and affordable to the fanbase but it tells a story.
90 Posted 12/01/2023 at 18:57:29
I've not seen it mentioned...
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 09/01/2023 at 19:14:39
If Neville and Rats can attend too, with a hint of Reid, and even Digne (as a player who had had enough of what was happening to the club), that would be grand!