
Everton's sister club in the TFG franchise, AS Roma are planning to build a new stadium with estimated construction costs of at least €1B.
AS Roma is building a new stadium, called the Stadio della Roma, in the Pietralata area of the capital, which is designed by Populous and aims to open around 2028.
The €1 billion project will feature a circular design inspired by classical Roman architecture and modern technology, and include a large community and green space area around it.
As reported in today’s edition of La Gazzetta dello Sport, the overall cost of the new stadium is estimated at €1B, a jewel that by 2027, on the club’s centenary, will become a living masterpiece of Giallorossi support.
The facility was designed in particular to offer Giallorossi fans a Curva Sud with 21,000 seats, one of the largest in Europe, with a total capacity of 55,000 seats, extendable to 62,000.
Meanwhile, AS Roma have said it will cost half of the stated €1B. Construction has not yet started.
Reader Comments (28)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 19/11/2025 at 18:10:04
Although... feretting around, it may well be old news:
Roma unveils designs for €1B new stadium
That was from 25 July 2024. I'll see what La Gazzetta dello Sport said that was new...
3 Posted 19/11/2025 at 18:19:58
Everton or Roma? Dan Friedkin — make a choice... as, long-term, it can't work... can it?
4 Posted 19/11/2025 at 19:18:09
I'm not that clever!
Editorial Team
5 Posted 19/11/2025 at 19:45:43
I think it was Paul Kossoff. Yes, let's blame him instead.
6 Posted 20/11/2025 at 00:18:36
7 Posted 20/11/2025 at 00:42:36
8 Posted 20/11/2025 at 01:54:21
9 Posted 20/11/2025 at 03:40:44
For all occasions and weather.
10 Posted 20/11/2025 at 07:31:31
When Dan Friedkin acquired the club, he pulled the plug on Meis's project permanently, subsequently choosing a new location in Rome and hiring a local firm to design it. The project has still not officially broken ground, mostly because local residents are still fighting it.
Incidentally, Friedkin himself is reported to have designed a featured section of the new stadium.
11 Posted 20/11/2025 at 07:40:19
12 Posted 20/11/2025 at 08:19:47
Link fixed now... but it's to Inside Football. I couldn't find the other story.
Thanks for adding that background, Mike. I was trying to figure out what had happened from the Wikipedia article.
13 Posted 20/11/2025 at 13:02:40
The West Stand is restricted by the river. The South Stand by Nelson Dock, and even if TFG acquire it I'm not sure of the engineering complexity to extend such a big structure.
The East Stand would have to significantly encroach on the plaza, and would also make access to any part of the stadium difficult. The North Stand backs directly onto the UU wastewater treatment plant so there is no space.
I also seem to remember there was a planning restriction on the height of the stadium, although as the waterfront has now lost Unesco World Heritage status that may not be an issue anymore.
The capacity can be increased if the safe standing ratio of 1:1 standing to seats is increased to 1.8:1 as in Germany, although that is not a club decision but the licensing authority or Premier League.
14 Posted 20/11/2025 at 13:24:23
As well as many layout bugs.
Better to switch back to the old forum format until this has been properly beta tested and is in a better condition.
15 Posted 20/11/2025 at 13:27:18
16 Posted 20/11/2025 at 16:10:53
We have a false canal on the water side, so space there, we have a fan plaza that can fit 17,000 in it, space to expand.
Also I'm sure where the stands stop short either goal ends, a few thousand seats would fit in those spaces. If the Red Shite can keep finding space for expansion, then we can.
17 Posted 20/11/2025 at 17:19:40
In terms of the North and South Stands stopping short, I think both pretty much come up against the boundaries of Nelson Dock and UU. Again, if TFG acquire the dock, that may give some scope.
I agree the plaza could be an option but given the nature of access to the stadium is all from the plaza I suspect that would be a real logistical challenge.
18 Posted 20/11/2025 at 20:31:10
I meant the Goal end stands can put another few hundred seats in either end. The stupid cut-out design that seems popular means less fans get in. The canal waste of space, there to let water in and out, really?
Have you not noticed the Mersey? We should have been the biggest ground in Liverpool, no excuses.
19 Posted 21/11/2025 at 00:03:22
As John says, that may change if TFG buy Nelson Dock and want to fill it in.
20 Posted 21/11/2025 at 00:05:44
I was very angry when they made that space a large bath.😁
21 Posted 21/11/2025 at 00:13:48
I expect the capacity of our ground was determined by affordability based on projected income. Again, why assume it was capped unnecessarily lower than it should have been?
22 Posted 21/11/2025 at 06:59:01
The money to pay for it is the key.
The key to 'money' in the Premier League is On Field Success, sustained On Field Success.
*fades in Zager & Evans 'In the year 2525'
23 Posted 21/11/2025 at 08:44:41

Does that not look rather ridiculous? The Football Crematorium.
24 Posted 21/11/2025 at 09:50:59
Sorry but the new owners have turned it into a circus. So I will still look in occasionally but that's it.
Congratulations on fucking up a great fan site!
25 Posted 21/11/2025 at 13:24:11
26 Posted 21/11/2025 at 14:57:40
27 Posted 21/11/2025 at 15:09:10
29 Posted 22/11/2025 at 10:37:41
Did our location ultimately restrict us too much.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 19/11/2025 at 15:45:34
Nice if we could, at just over what the other lot's capacity is.