-sm.jpg)
Hull City have made a ‘formal offer’ for Everton midfielder Tim Iroegbunam.
The newly-promoted side have been linked with Iroegbunam since sealing their return to the Premier League, with Hull in search of a defensive midfielder to boost their squad.
Hull had pursued Burnley midfielder Florentino Luís last month, but the deal fell through when the player opted for a move to Ipswich Town instead.
Iroegbunam is now in their sights with The Bobble reporting that a formal bid has been submitted by The Tigers.
The 23-year-old made 17 league starts for Everton last season, but has seen midfield competition increased by the arrivals of Hayden Hackney and Christian Norgaard. With Harrison Armstrong also impressing in pre-season, Everton could sanction Iroegbunam’s sale should a suitable offer arrive.
Hull’s opening bid is unspecified, though it’s understood that Everton value the player at between £15m and £20m. Iroegbunam signed for Everton from Aston Villa for a fee of around £9m in 2024.
Earlier this week, Hull boss Sergej Jakirovic told BBC Radio Humberside that the club were making progress in a deal for Iroegbunam.
"I think there is progress in this player," he said.
"I like how he is playing and he is very experienced. I think we need this profile for a midfielder and I hope we will sign him.
"But, we will see. It could be a loan or permanent transfer. There is a lot of exchanging. He is in the last year of his contract which is an advantage for us."
Reader Comments (88)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 13/08/2026 at 12:05:15
3 Posted 13/08/2026 at 12:08:44
4 Posted 13/08/2026 at 12:12:28
Tim has not necessarily set the world alight and he's had a few bad games, but he's had some good games too, and he's a decent defensive body in the midfield where we have also lost Gueye, where Garner is currently coming back from injury AND having to deputise at right back.
The flipside is we signed Hackney and Norgaard, so perhaps there is sufficient cover in DM, and perhaps Tim going means more minutes for more attacking mids like Armstrong, Alcaraz, etc"
Obviously the same cannot be said at full back. We need a decent right back STILL and even with the cash constraints I do find it mystefying it's taken us so long to fill that one gaping hole when other teams are signing players in that position without issue.
5 Posted 13/08/2026 at 12:15:43
6 Posted 13/08/2026 at 12:25:23
7 Posted 13/08/2026 at 12:26:22
A £20m fee would be decent business however for an area we are well stocked allowing us to invest elsewhere, who knows maybe even in a full back… god forbid.
8 Posted 13/08/2026 at 12:38:45
I think we should definitely add a sell on clause into the deal as he will improve with more games at Hull.
9 Posted 13/08/2026 at 12:40:38
Good luck to him at Hull. I will be backing him every game: close your eyes every tackle. Tim Iroegbunam... not what Everton need.
10 Posted 13/08/2026 at 12:41:18
Of the ones we have, Norgaard, Rohl, Hackney, Garner, Armstrong, KDH would all be ahead of him in the pecking order. If he can curb his tendency to go into tackles like a headless chicken I believe he will have a good career in the Premier League. But he won't be getting that unless he plays every week.
11 Posted 13/08/2026 at 12:44:14
All he needs is a good run of games.
12 Posted 13/08/2026 at 12:53:49
If he is sold I hope Everton put some decent sell-on clauses in.
13 Posted 13/08/2026 at 13:11:31
14 Posted 13/08/2026 at 13:21:20
15 Posted 13/08/2026 at 13:35:57
16 Posted 13/08/2026 at 13:47:07
17 Posted 13/08/2026 at 13:47:45
18 Posted 13/08/2026 at 14:16:51
19 Posted 13/08/2026 at 14:23:26
There's something about this lad that I like, despite his obvious inconsistencies.
20 Posted 13/08/2026 at 14:28:54
21 Posted 13/08/2026 at 14:52:43
Like others, I'm not sure he'll make it or not but a properly constructed sell on clause would effectively give us a form of a buyback clause, if he succeeds and we find Norgard is past his best in a couple of years.
22 Posted 13/08/2026 at 15:03:16
23 Posted 13/08/2026 at 15:08:39
24 Posted 13/08/2026 at 15:15:09
25 Posted 13/08/2026 at 15:32:38
If we can get our money back that would be a result, fantasy to think well get £20m for a poor player in his last year IMO.
26 Posted 13/08/2026 at 15:38:14
As central midfield is our strongest area of the squad I'd sell and invest money in full back area's as that's a major concern for the new season which is only 9 days away.
Could we not put a buy back clause into contract incase he excells at hull it seems to be something that happens when clubs sell promising youngsters so why not us? That way we have an option if he does become an excellent player we have first refusal
27 Posted 13/08/2026 at 15:40:26
Would definitely put in a sell on clause though, maybe even a buyback clause.
I wish him well if he does move. Prefer to see someone like Keane and Travers moved on before Tim.
28 Posted 13/08/2026 at 15:45:11
The plan has probably been in place for a while to sell, you don't bring Hackney, Rohl etc into the team if you want to keep Tim.
29 Posted 13/08/2026 at 15:50:54
30 Posted 13/08/2026 at 15:52:20
31 Posted 13/08/2026 at 15:56:14
And his confidence carrying the ball often backfires, as he drives into blind alleys and turns it over in bad positions.
He was once Gana's most likely successor, but now he's behind Garner, Norgaard, Hackney, and probably Armstrong and Rohl at the position. There's no path for him anymore at Everton.
Wishing him the best. The Hull fans will love his fire and commitment.
32 Posted 13/08/2026 at 16:19:59
33 Posted 13/08/2026 at 16:20:02
34 Posted 13/08/2026 at 16:22:21
With a decent run of games I believe he will become a very good player but in the last 12 months of his contract with an additional 12 month option the time is right to sell him.
Go get Jackson and Munoz and start the hunt for a LB.
35 Posted 13/08/2026 at 16:22:32
With our midfield stocked, we shouldn't wait for Tim to develop. Armstrong has shown enough, and shone in my eyes, that we need to do this to improve our trading reputation. No more hanging on too long, moving players while it is still a good proposition for them and their new club.
I liked Tim going forward and feel with stable partnerships, he could become a solid PL player. He isn't there positionally or reading the match.
36 Posted 13/08/2026 at 16:24:16
37 Posted 13/08/2026 at 17:08:56
The position he plays, the gana/norgard role is one that requires composure, which is something he lacks, experience & maturity will give him that, if we had others surplus to the squad I'd keep him, but if you got 20m for him that's decent money!
38 Posted 13/08/2026 at 17:12:05
39 Posted 13/08/2026 at 17:23:22
40 Posted 13/08/2026 at 17:37:57
It doesnt help to stockpile players who wont play, which leads to them stagnating and not able to show their value to other clubs. Were already facing this potential problem with young players in Dibling, George, Rohl, Alcaraz, Hackney, and Armstrong. They all have great potential, but they all need to play to improve.
It also seems like this was always part of the plan, especially once we brought in Norgaard. Let Tim go, and lets all hope he succeeds elsewhere. Then take the same amount for Alcaraz if someone comes calling, Then spend it all on the best right back we can find.
41 Posted 13/08/2026 at 17:49:24
42 Posted 13/08/2026 at 18:02:22
Develop into a top midfielder given a good run of consecutive games imo.
43 Posted 13/08/2026 at 18:08:21
44 Posted 13/08/2026 at 18:14:11
Beto, Akcaraz, Patterson to sort.
Mcneil done.
45 Posted 13/08/2026 at 18:17:52
46 Posted 13/08/2026 at 18:56:41
I agree, just don't think we have that time to give him, last season showed he needs to improve, definitely on the ball.
We need the player he could be now !
47 Posted 13/08/2026 at 18:59:20
Think a relegation battling Prem team like Hull will be a good move for him.
48 Posted 13/08/2026 at 19:38:55
Like the sound of Ians proposal at (33) but I cant imagine Hull would be such mugs as to agree to giving us all the control over the move unless the agreed fee was peanuts.
49 Posted 13/08/2026 at 20:56:45
I know you're a big fan, and at 23, he has loads of time to develop.
He got a lot more playing time last season than Armstrong, and was very inconsistent. I think Harrison is a lot more skilful and way better on the ball.
50 Posted 13/08/2026 at 21:09:14
We haven't off-loaded many (any) players whose subsequent careers made us seriously regret the decision to let them go.
51 Posted 13/08/2026 at 21:15:24
We are moaning that players are held and held in the U21s for too long. How many games is he going to play with the midfield we have? He is not going to be first choice and only as a sub or if someone is injured. Best for him and us to move him on.
52 Posted 13/08/2026 at 21:27:35
53 Posted 13/08/2026 at 22:11:47
You must have seen some god awful players in your time if you consider Tim to be terrible.
54 Posted 13/08/2026 at 22:47:52
However, he hasn't made the progress we all expected mostly because his tackling is suspect.
He is also a victim of Moyes tactics which probably kept him from getting forward more often and grabbing a goal or two which always helps your resume.
Everton need to sell some other "fringe" players in order to bring in fresh blood to the areas we all agree they are weak in.
55 Posted 13/08/2026 at 22:53:28
Moyes does this all type of thing all the time.
Step 1 one remove players that the previous manager signed never his signings until they are 100% his signings. Cash in on your best players along as they are not signed by him.
Why would any manager from the top 4 teams last season want to buy Ndiaye... (remember not signed by Moyes)
Step 2 indicate to his heirarcy that he has signed 'great players' who are not ready yet for the premiership, Hence the fact that nearly 75% of his signing value was not utilised properly last year, Rohl, Aznou and Dibling were hardly used but they are ready this season.
Step 3 mess around in pre season friendlies change your team putting players together who he has seen play badly together in games and expect them to play great.
Then select the team you finished the season with.
I think most people could name the team to kick off the first game of the season. I expect
Pickford,
Mykolenko, Tarks, Keane, O'Brien (even if a new right back is signed) Norgaard (in place of Idrissa), Armstrong (In place of Garner),
Rohl or (Ndiaye if any sanity prevails), Dewsbury-Hall, George (if Grealish is not resigned)
Barry
Finally we sold a player who can shoot from a distance for a player who taps them in and will cost us a higher salary.
Look at Moyes's record in choosing strikers he has never signed a striker with better than just under 1 goal every 4 games.
We could have had Vlahovic for free with a salary of 120K p/w
Link
Also why are we not looking at Azeez from Millwall Link
This player is totally aware of where his team mates are look at his passes.
56 Posted 13/08/2026 at 23:01:02
Hull fans will cry when the red cards come out regularly. Sorry but he's not for me. Oh, Southampton just bought Dobbin for £10M... probably turned out equal.
57 Posted 13/08/2026 at 23:03:49
58 Posted 13/08/2026 at 23:10:58
No matter how much you wash them and get them clean, they still fucking stink of arse.
59 Posted 13/08/2026 at 23:25:31
You could of course just buy a new pair?
Unless you've signed a contract... in which case I'd recommend turning them inside out?
60 Posted 13/08/2026 at 23:35:06
Apart from Rooney, when did Moyes cash in on a player not signed by him?
61 Posted 13/08/2026 at 23:40:56
We've signed players we didn't need in a position where we're developing good young Englishmen and completely failed to sign players in the position where we actually need them.
Loan Tim out, don't sell him. He's already good and if he plays regularly he'll be a very good Premier League ball winner.
62 Posted 13/08/2026 at 00:04:32
He's a typical player Everton fans love, a tackling machine with woeful passing, never scores any goals, and gets booked a lot, but he runs around a lot.
As Mike Gaynes points out, he constantly gets caught the wrong side of his man. Snap Hull's hand off and get shut as far as I'm concerned.
63 Posted 14/08/2026 at 02:20:36
Noorgard (32) played not even one game last season and Hackney comes from the Championship and isn't fast. We already have an extremely slow backline. Terrible choice letting him go.
64 Posted 14/08/2026 at 04:21:12
"We could have had Vlahovic for free "
You are absolutely dreaming. Never a prayer he would consider a mid-table club. He spoke with Champions League clubs only, and was always leaning towards Besiktas because his favourite manager is there.
Re Azeez, good player but I'm happier with Brennan Johnson.
65 Posted 14/08/2026 at 06:52:55
We have Dewsbury-Hall and Hackney, who is getting up to speed, plus Garner to come back -- unless Moyes wastes him at right back, Rohl and Norgaard. That's six in competition for the midfield spots. Is there much room for Iroegbunam and Alcaraz?
We have Ndiaye, Dibling, George and Johnson battling for the two wide places. Is it worth financially looking at getting Grealish back?
Looks like this season we're going to stick with Barry and Beto -- unfortunately.
To me, it's defence we have to sort out. Long term, Moyes should be looking at Branthwaite and O'Brien in the middle. Full backs... now there's a problem\!
If we can get £15-20M for Tim Iroegbunam, we will take it. Charly Alcaraz... well, not sure what we'd get there.
66 Posted 14/08/2026 at 06:55:12
Do not sell... end of!
67 Posted 14/08/2026 at 07:25:47
68 Posted 14/08/2026 at 07:40:38
Two different type of players mate. I've posted many times: Armstrong will develop to be the best out of the current squad.
69 Posted 14/08/2026 at 08:07:14
Moyes tried to slow Rooney down by benching him but Armstrong will be the first name on team sheet forever unless someone takes him. Hes pure class.
70 Posted 14/08/2026 at 08:16:08
Fullbacks could transform us from a nearly good to really good competitive level.
Improve turnover, transition, passing and chances created.
The focus then of course is finishing, but one step at a time.
71 Posted 14/08/2026 at 08:34:07
Financially that would be the best deal for us; same with Chermiti last season. But given that he will want to just play, he needs to be sold with a sell-on fee on top.
Decisions need to be made on assets like Beto, Patterson and Alcaraz. We can't afford for £40-50M of talent to walk for nothing.
72 Posted 14/08/2026 at 08:51:11
James Beatttie - 68 in 204 for Southamption = 1 in 3
Andy Johnson - 82 in 223 = 1 in 2.7
Yakubu - 104 in 226 = 1 in 2.2
Jermaine Beckford - 80 in 148 = 1 in 1.85
Stephen Naismith - 57 in 200 = 1 in 3.5 (but still better than 1 in 4)
But why let the facts spoil a lie because you do not like someone.
73 Posted 14/08/2026 at 11:48:53
74 Posted 14/08/2026 at 12:14:24
But if we sell him, we'll have money for Hector Fort. We need him more urgently.
75 Posted 14/08/2026 at 12:28:45
Tim won't get much game time with us.
77 Posted 14/08/2026 at 12:48:56
You maybe right, he could turn into being a great player... but, then again, maybe not. He's a player that has to go to make room for more pressing concerns.
I quite like him but needs must, in my opinion, and, if it helps us get Munoz, then so be it. This deal should have clauses all over it though, sell-ons, buy-backs (if that's even a thing) etc.
78 Posted 14/08/2026 at 13:22:43
Either a straight sale at a decent price, or a loan with an option to buy! Use the money to prioritise a right-back and a striker, because we can't rely on Bluto and Barry to act as our only option!
Apparently, Hull have pulled out as he has an injury, and not available for season start!
79 Posted 14/08/2026 at 14:16:11
80 Posted 14/08/2026 at 16:47:11
81 Posted 14/08/2026 at 17:35:13
I also think we sold Chermiti too soon.
Phil (72) I don't lie. I have made mistakes on ToffeeWeb but I now try and find the facts to back up my feelings and thoughts.
If you are looking at goals throughout their careers then we should have kept Maupay on that basis. Who throughout his career has scored 1 goal every 4 games. We could also count every goals scored at under 17, 16 etc if that will help your point to prove me wrong. I am only interested on the goals players scored for Everton.
Once again my point is the goals they have actually score for us;
Maupay Link
Let's look at the goals the players you mentioned in your post have actually scored for us.
James Beattie Link
Andrew Johnson Link
Yakubu Link
Beckford Link
Naismith Link
Beto Link
There is still a chance that Barry might get better Link
Strikers not signed by Moyes.
Lukaku Link
82 Posted 15/08/2026 at 08:16:00
My understanding is that he was sold for £8M plus a selL-on fee of 20%. That would get us £8M plus £3.4M sell-on fee once sold before the injury occurred.
The lesson was Everton should have loaned him for a season, and then made a decision to sell themselves for £25M or keep as the 2nd or 3rd striker. That assumes he wasn't at end of his contract and the club didn't need the £8M last summer for other things.
Chelsea seem to do this thing all the time. Buy young up-and-coming stars, do little with them themselves, but make good profit when moving them on. Everton aren't set up to do that. That needs to change in time.
83 Posted 15/08/2026 at 09:00:47
Beattie 13 goals in 76 games (1 goal in 6)
Johnson 17 goals in 61 games (1 goal in 3.5)
Yakubu 25 goals in 82 games (1 goal in 3.3)
Beckford 8 goals in 34 games (1 goal in 4)
Naismith 18 goals in 103 goals.(1 goal in 5)
Why is that do you think?
84 Posted 15/08/2026 at 09:07:05
85 Posted 15/08/2026 at 09:20:09
All managers who are at a club for any length of time sell players and bring in new ones. It 's part and parcel of management.
I just find it strange that you seem to be suggesting that Moyes is replacing players to basically boost his own ego.
Moyes is also on record admitting some of his buys were largely down to his recruitment team. Seamus Coleman and John Stones for example.
There are plenty of sticks with which to beat Moyes... no need to be grasping at straws.
87 Posted 15/08/2026 at 09:52:10
And Frank, that is not what you said: "He has never signed a striker with better than just under 1 goal every 4 games".
So it was all about their record before they got here, unless you didn't express yourself correctly.
88 Posted 16/08/2026 at 20:11:16
We got chatting for 10 minutes and he brought up he was aware he was passing through the great county of Irish football captain -- recently retired "as he put it" from Everton.
He asked me, did I know him? To which I replied "All Donegal people know Seamus, as do all of Ireland and a fair few outside! Especially us Everton supporters!!"
"So you are an Everton supporter?" he asked, and I said "Indeed I am."
The conversation continued about sports and he was fairly knowledgeable all-rounder, but more interesting was he claimed he was friends with an associate of our owner. His guy was a major supplier to the Friedkin group in some way or another.
He reckoned Richarlison is going to be signed, and Lampard will be a target! Make of that what you will... imagine!
89 Posted 16/08/2026 at 20:29:15
Where in Donegal? Are you a local or are you visiting?
I was in Donegal myself this weekend but the weather was awful today so I came home early.
90 Posted 17/08/2026 at 06:43:52
Maybe these players went backwards with regards their goals scored because they couldn't quite make the step-up? But when you consider that three of them were already playing and scoring in the Premier League, then the only step-up that they have genuinely made is that they all went to a bigger and better club.
If this is the case, then surely it's got to be about the system that had already been developed at the club they were joining, a system that means a lot of fans just unfortunately don't really enjoy watching Everton playing under our current manager?
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 13/08/2026 at 11:57:52
Unfortunately, as it appears, we may need to make a sale before we bring anyone else in.