The Mail Bag
BK Bull
Comments (35)
Has anyone else noticed, every time we approach the transfer window, Mr Kenwright gives his little sound bites on how good DM is, how marvelous he is, and how we can't do without him. Call me cynical but is it for David's benefit or ours? Or is it a way of saying we haven't got any funds available but with DM at the helm we should be ok anyway?
I would prefer the truth, get a couple of loan players but only if it improves the squad, and give Moyes a budget for the end of the season, which would allow him to strengthen Everton before pre-season training. If we do sign someone, is it too much to ask for the player/s to be 100% free from injury, more than 5ft 6in and quick?
God, this is starting to sound like a letter to Santa... apologies!
Eddy Grundy, Posted 01/01/2009 at 15:42:22
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 02/01/2009 at 09:01:07
Cue the barrage of usual suspects singing his praises with old chestnuts from any of the following:
"He is one of us" ? doesn?t make him any better.
"We have broken our transfer record for several seasons on the run" ? this was Sky money; not a penny invested by a single director.
"He?s not a foreign mercenary" ? who is to say which is worse without trying, look at Man Utd and Villa for clues to positive experiences
I won't even go there with his lies and unfogiveables as they have all been posted on this and many other websites before today.
3 Posted 02/01/2009 at 07:56:13
Some of your new found mates are budding clairvoyants with the power to read Bill's mind. Without offering a skerrick of evidence, they have accused Bill of every kind of skullduggery. I have unsucessfully challenged those exaggeraters and in some cases, downright liars for proof of their statements and now I toss the same gauntlet for you to make and prove your case.
What really gets in the craw of the critics is that they or anyone who has supported Everton for more than six years would have to concede that Everton have come a long way since Kenwright took over. That man has overseen our transformation from a hopeless basket case that was a certainty for 2nd division oblivion into a very competitive outfit under a brilliant young manager.
4 Posted 02/01/2009 at 09:24:39
I feel that Everton are being run like a good business. We don?t over-spend. We focus on good management. We have a Chairman and Manager who work well together and who have a clear vision of the future. I?d go so far as to say that Everton is a model that other clubs (including Chelsea and Liverpool) should follow.
Sure, things can always be better. I?m sure if BK can find a buyer for Everton with more resources, he will sell out. But he?s not irresponsible and I trust he will not just sell out to anyone. Also remember that he has invested in Everton as a business (his love for the Blues aside). So he will want to make sure that when he sells, the deal is right for him.
Let?s leave the business end of Everton to Bill and the Board. Unless we have all the details and know the full facts (which we never will as Everton are not a publicly listed company), let?s just focus on supporting the team and David Moyes !
5 Posted 02/01/2009 at 09:28:28
6 Posted 02/01/2009 at 09:54:52
7 Posted 02/01/2009 at 09:46:25
Perhaps we should be more like West Ham (as some of you whinged for last year). Now having a fire sale. Or is it only an Abramovic that you dreamers will accept, ie. Someone who will inject billions of HIS OWN money?
Dream on boys. Get used to the credit crunch & get off Kenwright’s back for a bit. People like me are not apologists for him, just more realist than dreamer & bored to tears with the ignorant attempts to slag him off for everything under the sun.
8 Posted 02/01/2009 at 10:15:31
As for Olivier Dacourt, please, he is just the sort of foreign mercenary we do not need.
9 Posted 02/01/2009 at 12:29:15
10 Posted 02/01/2009 at 12:41:00
11 Posted 02/01/2009 at 12:46:49
12 Posted 02/01/2009 at 12:42:46
It?s no secret the Directors don?t contribute their own funds towards the club, check out other Premier League clubs, Gavin, and you will find the same scenario as well. You fail to mention (selective memory perhaps) that none of our current Directors or Chairman take a penny in salary out of the club either?
If you look at our cousins across the park, a certain chairman renegaded on his original decision to sell his majority shareholding to DIC, instead went for a ?better? offer from a certain American consortium, now that?s what I call greedy.
13 Posted 02/01/2009 at 12:49:33
But then the transfer window re-opens and we suddenly have the BK bashers back in all their soapbox glory. Lighten up Eddy and Gavin. Yes, there are thousands of us who agree with you that the ride has been rough and littered with debris for the last 9 years; however, we?re still on the ride ? Leeds, Forest and Derby can?t say that! And you could well have added Chelsea to that list until their knight in shining gold armour arrived late!
And yes, BK can be a tart at times, but he?s still a fellow Evertonian ? that is never going to change.
14 Posted 02/01/2009 at 13:07:43
I think Moyes could get a lot out of this player, a lot more than Spurs anyway!
15 Posted 02/01/2009 at 13:21:54
As for Bill, take it with a pinch of salt. I for one have learnt my lesson and won?t get dragged back into an emotional wilderness.
Steve Ryan... Comment of the day mate!
16 Posted 02/01/2009 at 14:56:05
17 Posted 02/01/2009 at 15:28:44
An injection of pace into the side would add an extra dimension to our play. So come on guys any ideas? I?m thinking Obinna, Odemwingie, Dos Santos, N?Zogbia, Lennon, Valencia, Pennant? Take your pick!
18 Posted 02/01/2009 at 17:37:57
19 Posted 02/01/2009 at 17:47:38
20 Posted 02/01/2009 at 20:04:07
Every time he says anything we have the usual suspects on here telling us it?s all bullshit ("Black Bill" Gavin? That?s a new one
How many epithets does he have now? Billy Liar, Bullshit Billy, Billy Liar....)
It?s clear that some people dislike the man and never will, and that?s perfectly fine. Everyone is entitled to an opinion. But why do we have to have this discussion EVERY time he says anything? Why does anyone who doesn?t spend their lives looking for reasons to hate Kenwright a "sycophant" or an "apologist"?
He?s not the devil incarnate. Nor is he Roman Abramovich.
Get over it.
21 Posted 02/01/2009 at 21:32:16
And he tries to spin the panic buys and makeshift loan deals as something wonderful, with injury-prone Saha now out for at least two months in total. This is the predicament people predicted exactly on the basis of the pathetic showing by EFC in the transfer merry-go-round.
It?s not a question of disliking the man, it?s about totally distrusting the bullshit. No-one has to look for a reasons to hate ? all we have to do is wait quietly and sure enough, up he pops with this utter mindless drivel. It doesn?t make him the devil incarnate, but it does make him look a right tart.
22 Posted 03/01/2009 at 00:52:58
23 Posted 03/01/2009 at 05:15:26
24 Posted 03/01/2009 at 09:44:20
25 Posted 03/01/2009 at 08:59:39
Who was to blame, if there is any blame, for not raising those funds will eventually come to light. I personally believe that working in the background were powerful forces that had a different agenda for the Kings Dock site. I admit that is mere conjecture on my part and not based on known facts. Unlike most anti-Bill K critics I would not dare cast aspersions or denigrate anyone without actual proof.
In Bill we have a leader who recognises that if Everton is to have any kind of future it must lie somewhere beyond crumbling outdated Goodison. Kings Dock failed, perhaps so too might Kirkby... yet it can no longer be denied that somehow, somewhere we have to build a future and with each passing year the need is more urgent.
26 Posted 03/01/2009 at 12:40:36
Let's get on with supporting the club and looking for someone with a big back garden where we can play. If DK goes to the wall there is plenty of waste ground around some of it made in Adolf's time and still not cleared up.
27 Posted 03/01/2009 at 13:41:55
28 Posted 03/01/2009 at 15:58:03
Even when Gregg came forward, BK wasn?t intrested, because it would have meant him giving up some of his train set. Now, isn?t that being selfish? If he (as we?re always being told) always wants the best for the club, why didn?t he take Gregg up on his offer? Because of BK, we missed out on one of the biggest opportunities we will ever see in our lifetime.
29 Posted 03/01/2009 at 21:14:34
From the depths of gloom and despite our awful financial situation Evertonian spirits were lifted if only temporarily. Kings Dock was a wonderous vision that tantalised us for a while.
Must we go through life perpetually downcast and without hope? That way of thinking would have seen us under the jackboot. Is it not a good thing that sometimes we set our spirits free and if only momentarily, soar with eagles. All great things have their beginnings in someone's dream.
If the alternative is what many on this site seem to prefer, I would rather hold tightly to Bill's coat-tails.
30 Posted 03/01/2009 at 19:00:57
31 Posted 04/01/2009 at 01:49:56
And then when Paul Gregg made a proposal to save the deal, BK vetoed it as it would have meant more kudos to Gregg and then actively sought to discredig Gregg and remove him from the board.
And then when Gregg mounts a challenge to BK to take control of the Club, BK invents the Fortress Sports Fund who?s ?cheque is in the post? ... So what happened to that money?
None of this is a ?matter of perception? but a well documented history of BK being ?economical with the truth?.
32 Posted 04/01/2009 at 07:20:16
33 Posted 04/01/2009 at 10:39:49
34 Posted 04/01/2009 at 12:19:21
35 Posted 04/01/2009 at 12:27:25


1 Posted 02/01/2009 at 08:59:52