-sm.jpg)
While there has understandably been plenty of focus on incomings at Everton this summer, it’s vitally important that the club manage to change up their squad and cycle out those players deemed to either be on the fringes, or surplus to requirement.
However, that had proved easier said than done, and until last week, there had been very little interest of real substance in Dwight McNeil, Carlos Alcaraz, Nathan Patterson — bar an enquiry from Eintracht Frankfurt — and Tim Iroegbunam.
While other players could of course leave, it is those four that were widely expected to be, essentially, up for sale if the price was right.
However, in the space of a week, McNeil has left, in a lesser-seen swap deal with Crystal Palace for Brennan Johnson, and it looks like Iroegbunam could well follow.
There has been some tentative interest in Iroegbunam from the newly promoted Premier League clubs all summer, but it is Hull City who have pushed the button on making a move and formalising their interest.
Hull and Everton are, at the time of writing, in talks over a deal worth an approximate £16M, with that figure coming from The Bobble on the A View From The Bullens podcast. However, negotiations are under way as to the structure of the deal.
The Tigers’ boss, Sergej Jakirovic told BBC Radio Humberside earlier this week that Hull were interested in Iroegbunam, and it does seem all parties are working actively towards striking an agreement.
The news has somewhat split opinion, with some Evertonians coming down on the side of it being an excellent sale to make, and others reluctant to see Iroegbunam go.
But in this writer’s view, it’s absolutely the right time to move him on.
That is not because Iroegbunam is not a decent player. He has just turned 23, and he had a solid enough campaign last season. He made 29 Premier League appearances, with 17 of those being starts, while he tallied up an impressive number of successful tackles (45 won from 68 attempts).
Yet with Hayden Hackney and Christian Nørgaard coming in, and Harrison Armstrong’s continued development, Everton are simply too stocked in midfield, and someone has to make way.
Throw in that Iroegbunam only has a year left to run on the deal he signed in 2024, albeit Everton do have an option to extend it, then it makes sense to cash in, especially for an offer of £15M or over.
It is that kind of smart trading that Everton haven’t been able to do enough of in recent years, either because their fringe players were on high money and were not wanted elsewhere, or because they simply couldn’t afford to trim the squad any further. Indeed, it was more often than not key first teamers, such as Alex Iwobi and Amadou Onana, who were making way as the Toffees tussled with their financial nightmare.
Iroegbunam came in as part of Everton’s attempts to tackle their PSR issues, with Lewis Dobbin heading the other way to Aston Villa in what was essentially a swap deal, albeit one that went down as separate transactions for accounting purposes.
He has certainly performed well at times, and there should never have been any pressure on him to become a key player.
But, should this deal go ahead, then Everton will be booking a tidy profit for a young player who has helped the team, helped himself in developing and was brought in, essentially, for that very purpose.
Should it all go ahead as planned, then Everton will have recouped some cash for the first time this summer, given, reportedly, no money changed hands for McNeil and Johnson.
There are others in the squad that will almost certainly be circulated, too, as the window draws to a close, and expect more wheeling and dealing in the coming weeks.
Reader Comments (21)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
3 Posted 14/08/2026 at 10:53:59
We're well stocked in midfield and need to reinforce elsewhere.
4 Posted 14/08/2026 at 10:59:17
Also, Hull are buying Lucas Gourna-Douath who is a defensive midfielder so I don't see why they'd want Iroegbunam as well.
5 Posted 14/08/2026 at 11:04:54
He is well down the pecking order, I never rated him, he gives too many fouls away, loses the ball a lot, and can't pass 2 yards to a teammate,
I don't get what people see in him
6 Posted 14/08/2026 at 11:05:34
I don't think his ball distribution is good enough, either and, I know it's not his main attribute but he offers nothing in a creative or attacking sense.
I think a central midfielder should be chipping in with 2 or 3 goals a season if they play enough matches.
The right-back situation is getting beyond a joke now. A week from the campaign starting and we're still looking at Jake O'Brien starting the season. It was a joke 4 or 5 years ago but, now Coleman has gone, it is a colossal failure.
Get the Munoz deal done today and stop dithering, Dave. Spence has gone to Inter Milan. Options are running out.
7 Posted 14/08/2026 at 11:13:59
Last season petered out due to a paper-thin squad, with main players injured or run into the ground.
We don't have money to buy a squad the size of Man City or Chelsea or the amount of quality they can buy. Therefore we must hold on to decent and young players.
8 Posted 14/08/2026 at 11:24:17
If I could replace all four, I would... but will that happen any time soon, I'd say it's unlikely. Is £20 million a good price for Tim in the market today? Yes.
9 Posted 14/08/2026 at 11:26:29
10 Posted 14/08/2026 at 11:31:14
Give him a contract extension if he is going to stay. Otherwise, he walks for free next season.
11 Posted 14/08/2026 at 11:39:46
12 Posted 14/08/2026 at 12:04:34
We are looking for a right-back and apparently have interest in Van den Berg from Cologne.
But he is a centre-back. I don't get it.
13 Posted 14/08/2026 at 13:16:56
I hope hits the ground running back from injury. I'm one of the few who wants to keep him.
14 Posted 14/08/2026 at 14:49:01
You say "Our squad is tiny" -- I assume you mean numbers and not stature -- but this puzzles me. And you are not alone, with others saying we have a threadbare squad, etc. My understanding is that you are allowed to name up 25 senior players (although you can go ion to use any number of U21s).
The club has just published it's definitive squad list and it adds up to 24 in number (including Dibling, George and Armstrong, who are young but beyond U21s).
I just can't see how we fit in many more. Of course the other issue now is apparently we have too many players for the same positions, with between two and three fro each position being optimal.
So it all points to some of our poorer players needing to gotten rid of. Sadly that has to include Iroegbunam, but it looks like he will be heading only toi the treatment room.
15 Posted 14/08/2026 at 15:01:58
His contract is up at the end of this season. It's this window or never if we want any kind of reasonable fee.
16 Posted 14/08/2026 at 15:26:17
My fear is that the sale falling through is going to limit the right-back search. I think we've already spent this window's budget.
17 Posted 14/08/2026 at 16:05:19
As I understand it, the only criteron is age and all fall below 21. If that's true, we have an effective squad of 21 with 4 slots still available to reach maximum. That's the upside of Davey trusting youth -- okay, time for my pills!
18 Posted 14/08/2026 at 16:26:34
This would be an awful case of putting a guy in the shop window whom we should've been protecting and not playing now costing us £15M.
Or maybe we have to take £5M with a huge number of add-ons just to make sure we don't walk away with nothing.
19 Posted 14/08/2026 at 17:19:34
If not, then I'd keep him for squad depth to cover for the inevitable injuries that will happen throughout the season.
20 Posted 14/08/2026 at 17:57:14
While technically correct -- that the named 25-man squad should be only players over the age of 21 by a certain date, there's a certain practicality involved when it comes to developing youngsters, and especially kids like Dibling who have been purchased for the first team.
These days, and I believe for a number of years now, such players have it expressly written in their contracts that they will not play for the U21s. My understanding is that those players are named as part of the 25-man first-team squad...
But I have no idea how enforceable this is if the scenario developed where they needed to be classed as U21s to allow the club to bring in more senior players to fill out the 25-man over-21 squad.
21 Posted 14/08/2026 at 18:27:28
I have heard of those clauses, Mike, but I do not believe you can use a contract clause as a derogation of Premier League rules.
Armstrong would also be a different case to the other two, coming through the academy, so I think we have sufficient space to strengthen.
Whether we have the SCR headroom and cash seems to be a different matter altogether!
22 Posted 14/08/2026 at 20:42:29
I heard Bale speak on a podcast yesterday and he said the most important thing is to get games, play, get experience, make mistakes, at whatever level -- that's the only way to improve.
If his injury stops a move, the 1-year option kicks in, he may move on in January or the Sumner if he can't break through.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 14/08/2026 at 10:43:32
This mentality of having a first 11 has been killing us for years. We always end up down to the bare bones, with a bench, and sometimes even starting with academy players.
We need to keep him.