The Mail Bag

The New Order

Comments (32)

My jaw hit the deck when Man City were reported to have offered £100M for Kaka today. We are now a genuine top 6 side and this obscene amount is more than our first 11 are worth at today's prices. I believed the media were doing all they could to hype up the ambition of the new owners at City, but it seems they are deadly serious after all.

We can safely assume City are guaranteed a top four place by the 2010-11 season. So were does this leave us, and the rest of the Premier League? You would say Man U and Chelsea are not going to be knocked off their perch, unless Roman calls in his loans. Arsenal are maximising their potential income with a new 60,000 seat stadium and gate receipts in the region of £3M per match. That leaves Liverpool who, like the rest of the "Big Four", budget for Champions League football and the riches it brings.

The Yanks are having problems servicing their current debt, and their new ground now looks dead in the water. Ourselves and Villa are the closest challengers, but we still won't consistently break the monopoly, that is until now. I can see Liverpool having to sell their best players to keep afloat when CL football is no longer guaranteed. The Man City billions will actually give the rest of us a chance of breaking the Sky generated top four. Interesting times ahead.
Kevin Tully, Liverpool     Posted 14/01/2009 at 17:43:46

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Lyndon Lloyd
Editorial Team
1   Posted 15/01/2009 at 00:53:45

Report abuse

It is going to be interesting but I?m not sure we can safely assume City are guaranteed a top four place by the 2010-11 season. Chelsea bought their recent success but Abramovich was at least starting from a position of relative strength, the team having already established itself as a top-six, trophy-winning side prior to his takeover.

If not starting from square one, City are at least a long way from a position of similar strength and they could well prove to be one large, laughable experiment in Fantasy Football played out in the real world; a collection of very expensive luxury players on more money than we mere mortals can comprehend.

Sure, a player like Kaka ? assuming, of course, he can be turned by pound signs and would swap the glamourous environs of Milan for more wet weekends in Manchester than he thought possible ? can win matches but is it enough to guide a team that still has Richard Dunne as its first-choice centre back and the still untested Mark Hughes as manager to the Champions League?

What it drives home to me is what we could achieve if we had even a fraction of City?s new buying power. Two or three top-quality additions (and they don?t have to be in Kaka?s league) would be enough to propel us into the top four and still be able to compete with the monied teams who will still be 11 human beings kicking a ball around, not superheroes with unconquerable powers.

Jimmy Crack
2   Posted 15/01/2009 at 01:44:08

Report abuse

As much as it frustrates me seeing the shite finish above us (almost) every season, I?m happy where we are. We?re relatively stable. With a trillionaire owner (billionaires are sooo last year), you never know what?s going to happen when they lose their interest. I can?t wait for Abramovich to let Chelsea loose, and I?m sure Man City won?t be in great shape after their owners leave.

Meanwhile, we?re slowly progressing and consolidating our strength. Imagine where we would be if we were playing the way we are now at the beginning of the season... above Arsenal that?s for sure. I?m proud of the way we?re going about things, particularly with David Moyes at the helm. Not including the Kirkby bullshit and all the lies involved but let?s not go there...

Jimmy Crack
3   Posted 15/01/2009 at 01:51:15

Report abuse

A little more consistency on the field will pay massive dividends.
Peter Pridgeon
4   Posted 15/01/2009 at 02:09:32

Report abuse

Man City are guaranteed absolutely nothing by spending money. Good teams are built, season after season; Mark Hughes will have to be patient to build a side that can be a genuine and regular top four candidate. He has then got to get past Everton, Villa and one of the existing top four cartel. This is before he tries to break his nearest neighbours near monopoly on the title. No 100 million pound Kaka?s will do this without a period of team building.

Money isn?t everything it just helps good managers become great managers. Now maybe if the chosen one was to become Man City manager things would change.
Sean Condon
5   Posted 15/01/2009 at 02:46:03

Report abuse

I wonder if Kaka and Robinho will be eager to ply their trade in the Championship next season. How many more losses before Robinho starts giving catty interviews mentioning the "ugly women in Manchester.... and the cold, cold rain."

City bedded down with the Devil when they courted Thaksin Shinawatra, a scumbag if one ever walked the earth. They have yet to pay fully, but they will.

Jason Lam
6   Posted 15/01/2009 at 03:45:57

Report abuse

I really don’t know what the Arabs are in it for. Man City have become a sheik’s dildo.
Russell Buckley
7   Posted 15/01/2009 at 04:00:15

Report abuse

What gets me is why people support clubs like Man City and Chelsea. Unless you are from Manchester or London or you have been brought up as a fan I don?t see what new fans would be attracted by.

It can only be that they don?t care how they win. They are the type of fans that piss me off the most. There the type of fan who knows jack all about football and will run out to buy an LA Galaxy jersey just because it has Beckham?s name on it.
Jeremy Benson
8   Posted 15/01/2009 at 05:28:37

Report abuse

If they have billions, why buy Craig Bellamy?

I don?t think anyone has anything to worry about. As for media speculation... well this post is about simply further media speculation. No-one has any proof of a £100 million bid for Kaka ? just what has been reported in the press. It's reported in the press every season that Kaka will go for a world record bid. Last year it was Chelsea, before that Real Madrid. Never happened though.

I would imagine they?ll need to buy another 6 world class players, buy 6 reasonable English players who then languish in the reserves, and go through another 2 managers before they win anything. And that will be the FA or Carling Cup. Probably in 2012.

And then the Mayan calendar ends ? so they?ll never win the Premier League. Nor will Liverpool. There?s always a bright side...
Scott Milne
9   Posted 15/01/2009 at 05:33:55

Report abuse

Not particularly worried ? they could spend all the money in the world on these big name players, but Hughes will still screw it all up.

A lot of clubs have spent a lot of money and gone nowhere ? Spurs, Newcastle, Leeds, Sunderland etc...

We?ll be playing Champions League football before they are.
Tony Anetts
10   Posted 15/01/2009 at 08:41:12

Report abuse

I have empathy with City fans, as they genuinely follow their team through the good and bad ? remember when City were getting 30,000+ in the Third Division? So the supporters really do deserve some success.

City are much like us, in that they are a big club that has a big, more successful, red wearing, neighbor that attracts all the attention and glory. I see many similarities between us and therefore wish them well.

I believe that the Kaka thing is a stunt only. The City Owners are demonstrating their power in the way that Arab culture understands. What they possibly have not realised is that while this demonstrates their wealth/power to their Arab peers, it does nothing to build a successful football team, which is all that matters in Europe. They could much more readily strengthen and further build a team using the £125M (including a year?s wages) to buy 5-8 players to give City a real spine. Luckily for us they have not and their folly is our gain.

I would like to think that if we found £125M under the mattress we would do it smarter and seek to build with foundation stones rather than ornaments ? pretty as they may be.

It will all end in tears...

Luke Dunn
11   Posted 15/01/2009 at 09:07:50

Report abuse

Who gives a fuck about Man City? Let them buy kaka, the back 5 (including keeper) are rubbish, hence their league position. I would be more concerned if they cloned that Steven Ireland, he is a decent player, they need more types like him if they want to be in ?our? position.
Jason Williams
12   Posted 15/01/2009 at 09:34:26

Report abuse

As someone said ? all that money and they want Bellamy, Upson and Parker!!!

First thing they will need to do is get rid of Hughes, he is totally out of his depth. If they sign Kaka for £100mil, who cares? ? they will be worse off in many ways. We are in good shape at the mo... and without selling our soul.
Willie Norman
13   Posted 15/01/2009 at 09:50:35

Report abuse

Luke Dunn isn?t perhaps far off the mark, saying City need to find a goalie and a defence first. The rumour I heard was that the fuss about Kaka was just a screen, while City actually inquired at AC Milan about once-very-good goalie Dida (who is coming to the end of his career, no longer first choice at AC Milan, and probably cheap).

Supposedly City are also interested in midfield-defender Gattuso, also not the youngest, and in danger of losing his first team place after badly injuring his knee. Now he?s a player who would give City some sparkle!

Harry Thomas
14   Posted 15/01/2009 at 11:09:35

Report abuse

Whether City actually make it or not is not what matters to me (and they probably won?t until Mourinho arrives in a couple of seasons time.)

What scares me is that they are demonstrating here that they can buy anybody, that?s.... yes, absolutely anybody.
Damian Kelly
15   Posted 15/01/2009 at 11:35:35

Report abuse

Have to pick you up, Harry ? City are merely demonstrating that they can offer money for anyone; it still hasn't been proved that they can buy anyone they want as that requires a Yes from the selling club and a Yes from the player.
David Whitwell
16   Posted 15/01/2009 at 12:17:01

Report abuse

Just thinking myself, if we had £125m to invest in players over and above our existing squad, where do you think we would finish?
Allan Williamson
17   Posted 15/01/2009 at 13:02:42

Report abuse

Man City are shite, Mark Hughes should have stayed with Blackburn. Now all he?s getting is a bunch of mercenaries who won?t be able to play together. If Everton had a £100m, I?d be extremely upset to see them waste it on a guy who wants to leave if another player leaves. I mean Kaka is a baby ? he?s only going for the dosh and to go to the club with his mate Robinho. Man City are like the tin man of football.... no heart; they?ll win nothing!!
Jay Woods
18   Posted 15/01/2009 at 10:55:27

Report abuse

After 50 years in which City have managed one title and 2-3 cups, I don’t begrudge them stab at better times. It’s the only chance their fans alive today will ever have of seeing them compete with their hated rivals. Why should we moan about that?

As for Manchester being wet, etc, Kaka plays for Milan, a team from a city with continental winters that see many more days of snow, freezing fog, etc than Manchester does. Madrid, where Robinho arrived from, is also much colder in winter than Manchester, so let’s just dispel a few myths about these fellas not liking the weather in the northwest. Besides, it was never an issue for Ronaldo, Tevez, Torres, and many others.
James Marshall
19   Posted 15/01/2009 at 14:08:21

Report abuse

Give me one good reason Kaka would go to City if it was his own choice? Milan will probably sell because £100m is too high to turn down but as a player if you had the choice what would you do? The high life in Milan, playing for a great club with great players etc, or Man City??? I know where I?d rather be shopping!

It all stinks ? too much money, it's fucked football up and the world has had it.... We?re doomed Mr Mainwaring.... doomed!
Simon Skinner
20   Posted 15/01/2009 at 15:42:36

Report abuse

"So let?s just dispel a few myths about these fellas not liking the weather in the northwest."

Yep, Northern Italy can?t claim all year round glorious weather, as anybody who went to Fiorentina will attest. I?m still drying myself off.
Richard Murray
21   Posted 15/01/2009 at 15:49:03

Report abuse

M'bia to Newcastle for £5mil? Something about this doesn?t add up to me.
Steve Hogan
22   Posted 15/01/2009 at 16:50:55

Report abuse

Here?s a forecast, in the next three years, having disposed of Mark Hughes, the Arabs bring in a high profile European manager and City qualify for the Champions League, by virtue of buying ALL the world's best players.

The RS finish fifth and then get together with their (ex-G14) playmates, and lo and behold, the Uefa organising committee allow five English clubs to qualify for the CL!

The Sky 4 become the Sky 5, and the ?old order? is maintained. They have already set a precedent by allowing the RS to qualify for the CL despite not finishing in the top4 a few years ago. Watch it happen.
Will Bruce
23   Posted 15/01/2009 at 20:00:26

Report abuse

The footie goldmine is going to burst, just watch the empty stands, £500,000 per week for one player?, it is coming to an end.
Steve Edwards
24   Posted 15/01/2009 at 20:04:18

Report abuse

Richard ? I?ll be surprised if they get him for £5M. They wanted a lot more off us a few months back. Then again maybe his game has turned to rat shit and they want to unload.

With regard to Man City, it may surprise one or two people to know that they were the main team in Manchester until the Munich air disaster came along... that's right, United had a good side for once and most of them were wiped out in the disaster. Everyone in the country felt sorry for them and many started supporting them. That was the birth of the Manchester United you know today.

I?ve never had a problem with City and I find it amusing that they have suddenly come into all this money. I do feel that the Sky four feel threatened by their new status and until the shite get new owners they are definitely vulnerable to them. If they can prize Kaka away from Milan and don?t forget they took the other Brazillian away from Chelsea, they can prize anyone away from anyone and that includes Torres and Gerard. I?ll bet the gobshites are bricking it at the thought.

There is an old saying: My enemy?s enemy is my friend. One or two of you could do with remembering this... Let the fun begin.

Dan Parker
25   Posted 15/01/2009 at 22:40:46

Report abuse

Interestingly and I haven?t verified the BBC facts but Arsenal?s club record transfer under Wenger is less than we paid for Screech.

"Arsenal?s current transfer record fee is £13m paid to Bordeaux for Sylvain Wiltord in 2000"

Money doesn?t buy class... just look at Shrek.
Paul Kish
26   Posted 15/01/2009 at 22:49:50

Report abuse

I?ve got to say I fine the whole situation obscene. The fee and the wages are not being offered because it?s the going rate, but because City have no concept of building a team and they?re desperate. How is Kaka going to help a team that is defensively pourous?

The move if it happens will send costs spiralling, again and in a time of tough economic times I think it?s a disgraceful waste of money. It?s a sick joke.

The other issue is, if Kaka doesn?t want to move to City, he doesn?t have to. He?s contracted to Milan. If I were him, I?d stay put and then agitate for a move in the Summer to a club I wanted to play for. Real, Barca, Inter, United would fall overt themselves if he put in a request for a move and they wouldn?t be paying anywhere near £100 million.
Lewis Austin
27   Posted 15/01/2009 at 23:04:10

Report abuse

Dan, I'm sure Arsenal paid about £17m to Seville for Reyes.
Dan Parker
28   Posted 15/01/2009 at 23:27:00

Report abuse

I guess it could have been but wasn?t?

"Reyes signed with English club Arsenal FC during the January transfer window of the 2003-04 season. The £10.5m fee was negotiated with top ups, depending on the success of Arsenal, which could have risen to £17m."
Dan Parker
29   Posted 15/01/2009 at 23:29:06

Report abuse

That said, we probably paid 50p for screech with 17million payable based on our success!
Peter Roberts
30   Posted 16/01/2009 at 10:38:56

Report abuse

Dan, haven?t Arsenal just spent £15m on Nasri?
Craig Taylor
31   Posted 16/01/2009 at 07:04:33

Report abuse

I think its time some people change their attitude on Moyes/BK/Everton and transfers. We know we need a striker and perhaps a winger, but we should all know we haven't got a lot of money if any. I think that, though there will not be a lot of activity, someone will be pulled out of the bag by Moyes. However, what I also think is that he and Bill have learnt their lessons.

We do not want to be showing panic to others and steaming in for a player, just for them to smile and say "you are desperate so pay over the odds". Bide our time, let the Man City's of this world throw their cash away on shit such as Bellamy (I realise Kaka isn't shit), and get in players for what they are worth and we can afford. A little respect for Moyes and Bill for this please!

Peter Howard
32   Posted 16/01/2009 at 14:09:32

Report abuse

Screech cost £1.50 plus £15m depending on appearance ? which means they owe us £10.

© ToffeeWeb