The Mail Bag
Lescott To City?
Comments (36)
I have just been reading the Echo article about how Everton are going to block City's move for our much loved Joleon. Made me seriously question whether or not I would keep him, if I was Moyes and City waved a massive cheque under my nose. Let's face it, while the lad is a superb defender and scores you goals, we are covered in the department and we could cope without him.
Jagielka is our best defender by a mile, and I mean at actually defending, and Yobo has better physical attributes than Lescott but is prone to the odd mistake. Lescott's distribution is not as good as it should be but he is solid enough and tries to get forward, and as I have already mentioned, he will get you at least 6 goals a season.
They have just paid £12M for a left back that never gets a game and is 29 years old. Lescott plays week-in, week-out, is 26 and not yet in his prime and scores you goals. I'm sorry but if City offered £25M for him, I'd sell him in a heartbeat. As much as I love the lad and think he is class, can you imagine what Moyes would do with £25M?
It would secure Moutinho, and a replacement defender, maybe even Upson. I would even chance my arm and ask for £20M and the young lad Sturridge. The stupid twats would probably do it as well, they have no grasp of the value of money as they may as well print it.
Another thing, separate to the above, Palacios is about to go for £14m. If he does, then Arteta is clearly worth £30m, having said that though, I wouldn't sell him full stop!
Now back to the original subject, only one thing would make me turn down such an offer for Lescott and that is the effect it may have on the spirit of the squad and all the money in the word cannot buy you a team spirit and a togetherness like ours. Time will tell as to what is gonna happen but In Moyes I Trust!
Benn Chambers, Posted 16/01/2009 at 10:59:28
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 16/01/2009 at 14:42:08
3 Posted 16/01/2009 at 14:48:03
4 Posted 16/01/2009 at 14:46:34
5 Posted 16/01/2009 at 14:50:27
6 Posted 16/01/2009 at 14:50:06
Thing is, if we did get that, I bet only half or less would be available to spend, which is why for Moyes, from a football point of view, he won?t go for it.
Oh well, who cares, it?s 2 derbies next week. COYB
7 Posted 16/01/2009 at 15:12:41
8 Posted 16/01/2009 at 15:13:11
Do you want a good football team or a nicely balanced ledger. It?s bad enough not having the money to improve the team but sell Lescott?
9 Posted 16/01/2009 at 15:48:38
Would you pay £15-20m for Lescott ? No ! Why ? Because he isn?t worth it.
If City are prepared to pay that then we should have their hand off provided the money goes straight into the team.
We have to accept that we don?t have any other way of coming up with that kind of cash, which we need badly to progress.
Lescott is not irreplaceable and another two quality players could also be added to our wafer thin squad. It?s a no brainer for me.
Wait 'til after the derbies though!
10 Posted 16/01/2009 at 15:53:30
11 Posted 16/01/2009 at 16:06:32
The whole City thing is interesting but I find the money banded around as offensive in the current climate... that's modern day football, I suppose but I hope we do everything possible to keep our players and spirit.
12 Posted 16/01/2009 at 16:06:27
If we were offered £15-20m and Lescott offered £100k a week (assume on £40 to 50k at minute) then the deal is on for both parties.
The problem City are creating is that they are completely destroying the market foundations ? but they are being destroyed every season even by the likes of AV, Spurs, Sunderland etc and now a player we would want to replace Lescott would also now attract a huge increase in fee ? hey Everton have got £20m, why wouldn?t they pay £10m for Joe Bloggs even though they only offered £3m back in August.
The game is on a self-destroying path, there will be a prerequisite that every Premier League club has to have a billionaire chairman to enter the league ? not based on league placings or relegation/promotion BUT by MONIES.
13 Posted 16/01/2009 at 16:32:28
14 Posted 16/01/2009 at 16:48:12
15 Posted 16/01/2009 at 16:49:52
16 Posted 16/01/2009 at 17:43:36
17 Posted 16/01/2009 at 18:24:09
18 Posted 17/01/2009 at 02:30:08
19 Posted 17/01/2009 at 04:45:44
Well, I wouldn?t mind it if Victor was sold.
20 Posted 17/01/2009 at 04:54:51
However, to claim he?d make off with the proceeds of player sales is laughable in light of all the positive things BK has done, which should not need spelling out. The total costs of players, particularly their astronomical salaries, is likely where most of the money goes and so, while some issues are very emotive (particularly potentially leaving GP and the City of Liverpool), surely it is a bit much to accuse BK of some of the things that are ranted about in some of the comments.
I doubt if DM or BK would sanction the sale of Lescott, unless he wanted away, which I doubt he would, given the team spirit he is a part of, his recognition and form within the team, the fact that we are an upwardly mobile team that has become a European qualifier on a regular basis. I can only imagine any key player being sold for mega bucks AND with DM being content he can IMPROVE the team with use of the proceeds.
Other than Rooney (an exceptional, one-off case of a flawed personality wanting away) I can?t think of any departure under Moyes that he was not happy to let go (Faddy was probably the closest, but DM was content to let him go for a good profit as he was not deemed good/consistent enough to command a regular starting place).
21 Posted 17/01/2009 at 09:36:56
22 Posted 17/01/2009 at 09:54:14
23 Posted 17/01/2009 at 10:24:03
The real worry would be exactly how much of that money he would actually see? I feel some previous posts would be bang on, those Kirkby consultants won't pay for themselves you know!
Now Joleon ? go show us what we might miss and stick one in the red shite's net Monday, good lad!
24 Posted 17/01/2009 at 10:32:44
25 Posted 17/01/2009 at 11:14:55
26 Posted 17/01/2009 at 11:43:08
27 Posted 17/01/2009 at 12:09:27
28 Posted 17/01/2009 at 12:50:33
29 Posted 17/01/2009 at 15:00:48
For a start, Lescott?s form until about a month ago was dreadful. If I were him, I would think very carefully about moving to City because he is very much a confidence player. He proved to me that when he went off on England duty, he was not confident playing with the big boys and was awful. You wouldn?t believe it was the same player who played for Everton last year. Like it or not, City are going to have some very big boys playing for them so Joleon beware... you might bottle it!
Hands up how many of you would not have accepted £15m for Lescott 5 or 6 weeks ago? He was absolutely dreadful, not for a game or two but for half a season! Yeh, I know he is playing well now at center back but Moyes started him off this season playing in the center... Do you remember the Blackburn game?
I think we could make £15m plus go a long way as long as Moyes gets the lot. Who?s to say Joleon?s form won?t dip again... as I said it wasn?t for a game or two, it was half a piggin season.
30 Posted 17/01/2009 at 20:06:48
31 Posted 17/01/2009 at 20:48:11
If we want to progress, we keep our best players and carry on building slowly each year to break into the so-called big four. We have proved over the last 5 years that Everton are the only team with a limited budget to challenge for Europe.
I was at the Hull game and it was a great atmosphere; we need to do it more and more and bring back the good times. Let's all get behind the boys for the rest of the season and beat the shite over the next 2 games.
We will win the cup!
32 Posted 17/01/2009 at 21:28:05
33 Posted 17/01/2009 at 21:39:16
1. You need to realise what a player?s value is in the current market. If City are preparing to bid £40m for Terry and just signed Bridge for £12m, then Lescott should command a fee of about £30m. If Everton don?t demand the fee in relation to other players being transferred, then we don?t deserve anything.
2. If the deal is in the best interest of the Club, then we would definitely have to consider it. For example, Milan have a very high average age in their squad. With £100m they can bring in a lot of new young quality players.
For argument's sake (I know it won?t happen in Lescott?s case), say that we were offered £78m for a player (or two) and we needed the money to build the new stadium to secure the financial future of the club, then we would have to consider it. Also, for argument's sake, if City offered £30m for Lescott and another £30m for Arteta, we would wipe out all our debts in one go. Should we take it then?
However, before we even consider selling one of our better players, we would need to have the money from the sale available to get in a replacement(s) and have those replacements lined up.
34 Posted 18/01/2009 at 01:13:25
35 Posted 18/01/2009 at 10:09:15
We risk unsettling the best squad we have had for years if we let him go. What message would it send out to Arteta, Cahill, Yak or others if we started selling our best players while we are 6th in the League? All in all a very big risk in my opinion and therefore should only be considered for crazy money. And even then, only if replacements / additions are already in place to come in immediately to keep the players and fans happy.
36 Posted 18/01/2009 at 11:25:52
Let's take a middle quoted figure of £20M for him [£12-£15M if not City] if Moyes has got someone lined up to replace him and someone else lined up to further enhance the team within that amount of money so be it. If not then no it?s not worth it. Simple really.


1 Posted 16/01/2009 at 10:51:11