The Mail Bag
Nothing To Do With Us
Comments (11)
If I was manager or owner of Portsmouth or West Ham I would be giving short shrift to David Moyes and Everton FC for daring to comment on how they do business.
Similarly, I wouldn't want Tony Adams or Zola commenting on how Everton FC carry out their affairs. Moyes' point may well have validation but it is not his remit to justify how Everton operate in an open market place at the expense of those who do things differently.
Players — and for that matter managers — are professional people who get the best deal available to them. If their employers pay them above market value then that is the employers fault and eventually the employers will pay the price for over-stretching themselves.
David Moyes is hardly going to attract new faces to the club now or in the summer by cryiing poverty and moaning about market forces.
Also, I don't remember David saying to Bill, "Oh, it's alright Bill, I'm happy with the salary I'm on now; wouldn't like to be cast as a mercenary or take money that the club can ill afford!"
Anthony Dyer, Posted 18/01/2009 at 16:29:24
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
Moyes is spot on. Even though he may be a hypocrite. It may not be any of his business but if we are to be competing with anything other than rich men?s dildoes like Man City, or global megabrands like Man Utd, then something has to happen. Football at the moment is an obscene money wasting TV soap. If it wasn?t for the weekly 90-minute fix it gives us junkies each week, I?m sure many like me would walk away from it.
Rather than criticizing the real big spenders (Chelsea, Man City etc.), he pointed out that a major source of destabilisation was coming from clubs like West Ham and Portsmouth who had owners who pumped silly money into their clubs for a very short period ? paying ridiculous fees and wages in the process ? and then went bankrupt and / or vanished.
In the ongoing debate about how to deal with the current economic insanity in the game, it seems very reasonable for one of the most senior managers in the Premier League to make this kind of point. It?s not just West Ham and Portsmouth?s business ? it?s their effect on the whole game.
The implications of Moyes?s points are pretty clear: that there ought to be a lot more vetting of club owners before they are allowed to run amok for a season or so and then disappear. Kind of thing Platini is looking at as far as I can tell.
Doesn’t do politics
Doesn’t do football
We get a player costing £15m, a 4-year contract on £30k a week, total cost = £6.2 + £15 = £21.2m. Another team, same player £15m on £60k a week = £27.2m ie + £6.2m extra... times that by say 15 players = £93m divide by 4 years = £23m per year.
If I was Moyes trying to bring players in and someone gazumped me every time, I?d be fucked off, but it does stop you getting mercanaries like Scot Parker who we wanted but who went with the money and really improved his career! Or M'bia, who desperately wanted to join us in the summer but now wants to go to a bigger [paying] club. So being cheapskates can be a good thing sometimes.


1 Posted 18/01/2009 at 21:13:13
Report abuse