The Mail Bag
Tale of two penalties
Comments (19)
If Gerrard or Young had been 'handed off' in the way Pienaar was in the first half it would have been talked about as a 'stone-walled' pen. As it was, we didn't even get a look at it again at half-time. Instantly pronounced as a good piece of defending. Dismissed.
I wonder, were there any other incidents to note regarding tackles in the box?
A tale of two penalties. The two saved by Howard!
Tony Horne, Posted 19/04/2009 at 16:38:05
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
But that?s all spilt milk. We?ve finally won a penalty shoot-out, I?ve finally seen Tim Howard save a penalty (two!!) and we?re going to Wembley to win the cup, having knocked out four of the top five in the process. Toffees forever! And to all of you who were there (I?m in South Africa!) the support was outstanding!
However who cares??? We’re in the final.
Woop woop
EFC are quite similar to the England national team, in terms of their shockingly predictable failure at penalty shoot-out competitions, so what a wonderful surprise, sprinkled with a life-affirming dose of pride, that we actually won one for once!!!
Absolutely on cloud nine.....
The Jags incident - if you view the replay from behind he clearly plays the ball before contact.
Still - they won! Get in!
They must have forgotten that Ferdinand, Vidic, Park and Foster, according to the information they provide, go way beyond this parameter. Tevez gets in at 25, although he seems a little older as does, come to think of it, Macheda for his 17 years. The Da Silva twins must be 17 I suppose, but it doesn?t stop one of them rugby-tackling just outside the area.
Kids, eh?
Come on Everton, Wembley here we come... Again!!
Has the media mentioned that Arteta and Yakubu were missing and Jo was cup tied?... Just wondering.
He couldn?t see past the red spot on the end of his boozer's nose!!!
On the flip side, Cahill did Vidic all ends up when he turned him and that should never have been a foul.
I think the ref was pretty poor in patches today, but evened it out over the 120.....
"Riley refused what appeared to be a clear-cut penalty when defender Phil Jagielka brought down Danny Welbeck"
and again
"United were then denied what looked the clearest of penalties when a breakdown in communications between Howard and Jagielka forced the defender to haul down Welbeck. "
It might have been given as a penalty; it might not - it could have gone either way. It was not "the clearest of penalties" and The Jags did not "haul down" Mr Welbeck.
Why can’t the media just get off their Rich 4 High Horse for once; a marginal decision went against Man Utd for the first time this season - so for once give us credit where it is due. Some chance!
I thought Riley had a good game actually and in my opinion, it would of been easier for him to award that penalty but he held his nerve. Kudos to him, and well done to the boys as there is no doubting that they deserve to be in the final.
Fat stupid bloke on Setanta (no clue who he is) referred to Moyes's comments about the appointment of Mike Riley as the referee as "Grimey", suggesting this could have contributed to what he felt was a definate penalty not being given.
The fact is though, that Moyes?s comments may just have been a stroke of pure genius. I think he may have out-mindgamed Mr "Mind Games" Ferguson. If this did influence the 'no penalty' decision then I bloody love it! Makes Moyes rule even more in my book.
Every other bugger is at it (Allardyce re Cahill / BBC re Felliani) so why shouldn?t we?
I make that Moyes 1, BBC / FA / Mike Riley / Setanta knobhead / SAF 0
The Wellbeck incident was marginal too, but maybe if he hadn’t have looked so keen to throw his arms back and hit the deck he might have got something.
Still, it’s all conjecture - We’re in the Final!

