The Mail Bag

With every Sith Lord there is always an apprentice...

Comments (18)

Most of the dust has settled now from Sunday. One thing has remained prevalent though, be it in the newspapers, tv or radio, the fact that Mike Riley didn't give Man Utd a penalty. I didn't have the greatest view of it from my seat, when I got home and saw the highlights in all honesty it was touch and go. However, Riley didn't give it and I think it was the negative publicity that he received all week about his alleged 'team' that brought about his decision not to award it.

The fact that he never gave us a decision afterwards adds credence to this, but two wrongs don't make a right and booking Timmy for turning Vidic was laughable.

David as we know has the ear of Sir Alex and has his confidence, the studious and diligent way he prepares and micro manages the club from top to bottom is by and large modeled on what he has learned over the past 10 or so years.

It appears now that he has learned how to use the media as a tool to put doubt and perhaps fear not only into apponents but also officials.

We've seen the diplomatic and stand offish side of him over the past few seasons in front of the camera's but now there is a new string to his preverbial bow. Another classic trait of Ferguson.

Sunday was a truly wonderfull day, I hate to use the word occasion because I hope days like this once again become a regular sight for us all... again.

As for our Manager, I think he is starting to put all that he his learning in to play. Thanks Sir Alex!
Matthew Barry, Cardiff     Posted 20/04/2009 at 17:55:39

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Lyndon Lloyd
Editorial Team
1   Posted 20/04/2009 at 22:44:33

Report abuse

It seems as though working the media has become another tool in modern football and Sir Alex is the master, as you say. Sam Allardyce did a number on Cahill before the Blackburn game and the glee was written all over his fat face when Tim was booked when he was the one fouled during that match. So I say go for it, Moyesey!

Plus, someone in the media should point out that they?d only have missed the penalty had they been given it!

David Moore
2   Posted 20/04/2009 at 23:14:14

Report abuse

Tim got booked for abuse not the challenge. THere however is one angle which shows clearly that Jags didn’t clip the player. So it was Riley’s only good call in the whole game
Mark Pendleton
3   Posted 20/04/2009 at 23:45:31

Report abuse

Tim did get booked for his reaction but it wasn’t a foul, the otherwise exemplary Vidic committed himself and dived in allowing Tim to just turn away. Very poor decision. And we were denied two clear corners which would have allowed us the set pieces we were relying upon. I’m not saying they equal the penalty decision but it’s not like we didn’t have some blatant decisions go against us, a couple which could have been decisive.

As for the penalty incident the guys in the ITV studio were split over it and my opinion is that from one view it looked like a definite penalty and another it looked like there was no contact. Now i don’t recall which view Riley had but if he’s not certain he can’t give it. That’s what we’d be told if the shoe was on the other foot anyway. We’d also be told you make your own luck and i’m damn sure had it been us that were denied a penalty like that and went out nothing much would be made of it in the media.

On the whole we won so in all honesty i don’t really care, it’s just nice not to be bemoaning how some debatable decisions may have cost us the chance to get through. If it was deserved or meant to be then they would have scored more penalties than we did. Simples.
Andy Crooks
4   Posted 21/04/2009 at 00:24:21

Report abuse

Lyndon,I have to say I am disappointed in your comment.There are many ways in which I’d like to see us match the sky four.Manipulating referees and using the media is not the Everton way.We are better than that.
Richard Lum
5   Posted 21/04/2009 at 01:00:37

Report abuse

If Moyes did not "remind" the referee to be fair, he would have given the controversy penalty. Hence it is not manipulation.
Steve Pendleton
6   Posted 21/04/2009 at 02:03:22

Report abuse

Andy, get off your high horse and come down and join us who live in the year 2009.

You say that there are many ways in which you’d like to see us match the Sky Four. Name these ways please and the realistic way in which we are to attain them.

Our approach over Moyes’ reign of leaving the referees to do their job hasn’t been advantageous to us at all.

The Andy Johnson penalty shouts is a classic example of how Wenger used the media and refs to affect results.

Disappointed in Lyndon?? What a laugh!!
Jason Lam
7   Posted 21/04/2009 at 02:48:13

Report abuse

Referees are only human and therefore need to be ’managed’
Dan Brierley
8   Posted 21/04/2009 at 02:36:15

Report abuse

My personal feeling, is that Moyes prevented the penalty with his comments about Riley before the match.

But you have to accept if Moyes hadnt made those comments, then we would have watched a completely different match in which maybe the Jageilka challenge wouldnt have happened.

Personally, I think it was a stonewall penalty when you look at it from Riley’s viewpoint. Moyes’s comments are the only logical mitigating factor as to why he didnt give it. He can argue now, that he got it right. But could he see that when Jags was on the opposite side of Wellbeck? Could he bollocks.

SAF and Wenger have been at it for years, regarding manipulating the officials. It would be interesting to see some statistics on how many points can be attributed to mind games each season.

But then again, maybe thats what SAF wants me to think, that it is a big conspriacy. Maybe in fact, he is trying to take over the world
!! Arggghh, get out of my brain!!!!!
Dave Wilson
9   Posted 21/04/2009 at 05:38:58

Report abuse

Andy Crooks

I nodded in agreement as I read your post . . .but then I got to thinking, Big Sam did do a number on Cahill, SAF and Benitez have both accused referees of being influenced by the Goodison crowd - before the game.
Remember the special one’s histrionics at GP accusing AJ of diving ? He later admitted he was wrong but the damage was done, between them, he and Wenger had pushed AJ’s career over a cliff by making remarks to the press

I agree with you, its a sad indictment of where the game is going, but could it be that Moyes (and Lyndon) have just had enough of being the victim ?
Steve Linden
10   Posted 21/04/2009 at 08:26:38

Report abuse

I’ve not seen the challenge again, only saw it once live from the opposite end of the ground. From my viewpoint the United player seemed to throw himself a bit dramatically and it looked like a dive. When there was no pen we were surprised he wasn’t booked for diving especially when they tried a dive a few minutes later.

The referee got one look through a number of players so unless he’s 100% certain he can’t give it. We were lucky, perhaps, that the linesman (assistant) was on the wrong side but they say you need luck to win a cup.
Steve Carter
11   Posted 21/04/2009 at 08:58:07

Report abuse

What I’m loving in all this is old red nose’s bellyaching about it. Keep reading those papers all week Sir Alex, they won’t change from saying we won on penalties.
Andrew Laird
12   Posted 21/04/2009 at 09:06:33

Report abuse

Andy, I commend your moralistic viewpoint on how you think that Everton should be above this but in all honesty if we want to challenge for trophies and get in amongst the clubs with Sky shares we have to level the playing field to some degree. All successful clubs are at it every week and Moyes has chosen the perfect game for the spotlight to be thrown on the referee with millions watching his performance.

Nobody can know for sure that Moyes affected the penalty decision other than the referee himself, but unless he is 100% sure in the microsecond he got to see the incident (if he did see it), then the rules are that he cannot give it. The amount of dodgy decisions given to Everton?s opponents in the last 5 years is shocking and I for one would love to rectify that by hook or by crook (pardon the pun Andy).

Paul Walsh
13   Posted 21/04/2009 at 09:49:31

Report abuse

You have to remember that Moyes was asked the question directly about Riley’s suspect impartiality. I think he could have swerved it in the cause of diplomacy but chose not to. I’m not going to hold it against him at all. I thought it was a very shrewd move on his part. Riley needing reining in. He’s a terrible referee and a weak one who could have done for all our hopes and dreams.
Keith Richmond
14   Posted 21/04/2009 at 10:10:03

Report abuse

With a penalty not being given for the foul on Steven Pienaar, and the denial to Tim Cahill of a clear run on goal for an alleged foul, not to mention some of the other incidents referred to above, overall the key decisions went in favour of Manchester United, which is more or less what we have come to expect with this referee in charge. I can?t understand what the fuss is about.
Ian Tunny
15   Posted 21/04/2009 at 10:00:52

Report abuse

Ferguson can't have it both ways. When Man U played Blackburn a couple of months back at Old Trafford, Pedersen was practically clean through on goal and Fabio or Rafael de Silva made the slightest contact with his hand on Pedersen's shoulder and he went to ground very easily, some people said why would he go to ground, he was clean through? Ferguson was adamant that he dived.

A few weeks later at Arsenal, a similar thing happend with Pedersen diving in the box but nobody was near him. Ferguson was proved to be right.

There was hardly any difference in the challenge of Jags on Wellbeck, negligible contact; not enough to make him go to ground, it was a dive or a slip on the dodgy pitch. Some you get; some you don't... it went for Ferguson last time, but not this time, people always say it evens itself out over a season.
Chris Fisher
16   Posted 21/04/2009 at 10:10:15

Report abuse

I dont think what Moyes said made any difference to his decision. I just think he thought it weren't a pen and even after looking at it over and over, I'm still not sure! He got to look at it once and wasn't 100% sure so he couldn't give it. Like people have been saying, some angles make it look a nailed-on pen but other angles show that Jags dosen't actually touch the kid's leg, he kicks himself.
Ste Booth
17   Posted 21/04/2009 at 10:46:22

Report abuse

One Major penalty decision goes in our favour.... Does that mean we are still owed another 9 to even up the stonewallers that AJ never got?

Let the press talk about the penalty decision, we will just keep marching on quietly and with dignity, all the way up the steps to lift the cup. Then will the press notice ? who cares!
Phil Bellis
18   Posted 21/04/2009 at 11:41:38

Report abuse

I’m with Andy to a lesser degree in that I don’t see anything undominican in pointing out some home truths to the media - about time Moyes gave a bit back
What I’m immensely proud of is the professionalism (in the proper sense) and morality of our team - no abusing the officials and snarling around the ref to get a decision, get a player booked/sent off etc
Why the hell Gordon Taylor, the highest paid prefect in Britain doesn’t sort his membership out over this is beyond me..ffs, they’re supposed to be in the same union
By the way, wasn’t that the best ever rendition of ’Forever Everton’ ever performed (wipes tears from eyes)

© ToffeeWeb