The Mail Bag
Cahill again
Comments (32)
Looks like Timmy has just has just played a blinder for the aussies against Qatar today, scoring one, winning a penalty and setting up another and all this from a midfield role in a 4-1-3-2 formation. Who say's he can't play in midfield?
Of course "it's only against Quatar", I can hear the doubters on this site saying, but when fit, I don't believe there is a better player currently wearing the blue shirt.
Liam Reilly, Posted 15/10/2008 at 13:12:25
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
The aussies though, play the ball through the middle and down the flanks and don’t just lump it up field, which is sadly the biggest difference.
The fact that your summary is based on his ATTACKING assistance in the team, should prove something to you!
And yes, it is only Qatar! I think they were once beaten 9-0 by Kuwait!
On his positioning, he just isn’t an orthodox midfielder. He can do a job there but we have better options and he doesn’t offer anything excellent in that position.
When your looking at an attacking midfielder in a 4-4-2 your looking for a creator and someone who can dictate the tempo and give you passing ability in the middle. The likes of Fabregas, Gerrard, Scholes, Deco etc all do this, Cahill doesn’t.
He’s a second striker, a very good one actually. We don’t want to waste him in midfield, we’ve done it before and it didn’t work. Play him to his strengths and he’ll produce the goods.
Midfield needs to be made up of both types of players. Do you see Deco ruuning back and helping out his defence, or perhaps Scholes. There’s a reason they can’t tackle, but it doesn’t make them any less important to the team.
More important IMO, but hey, I just want to see attacking football.
How exactly do you come to the strange conclusion that I would be happy with 11 defenders on the pitch? Some people are simply unwilling to accept their poster boys are not as good as they think!
All I want is midfielders who can pass the ball effectively. Is that too much to ask?
Can I suggest laser removal for the Cahill tattoo Liam.
TC may lend more to the team when he operates as a loose attacking midfielder, but hey, the guy has one of the best attitudes of any player ever to don the royal blue jersey. And to describe his midfield creativity as zero is not just desperate bollocks, but says so much more about your take on life, judging by your posts on here which seem to constantly plunge deeper depths of misery and despair.
Aside from his ability to score goals and influence games and teammates, Cahill is also the last Everton player to score in the league at Stamford Bridge, the Emirates, Old Trafford and Anfield. Tell you anything? He may have been a little quiet by his own standards since returning from injury (rather prematurely) but Cahill is a tiny god in our recent history.
And what has his tattoo got to do with you? Can I just suggest that you either change your outlook & expectations of life, or get some Prozac urgently. It?s hard enough dealing with the fallout from Moyes?s behaviour since May and the ruination that it seems to have brought to our season. But then I have the misfortune to read your postings and find myself wanting to punch my computer.
How can anyone be that miserable?
Grella was one I thought who would fit in perfectly, the other is Jason Culina at PSV. Culina is just about the key to the Australian midfield and never plays a poor game.
How is it that the majority see his value to the team as a whole and you can?t get you?re head around one aspect of his game? Mind boggling.
I guarantee Pim Verbeek (Aussie coach) will play any formation to accommodate him as he scores goals!!
Under (mainly) two Dutch coaches (Hiddink & Verbeek) the whole style of the team has changed. Every player understanding their role and possession football is a large part of it. Physical strength and aerial balls are still in the mix but are only a part of the plan now.
On paper the Aussie team has some reasonable players (including Tim) but is nothing special by international standards. Still, as a team with a good system, they seem to do well (recent friendly victory over Netherlands being a good example). I guess we?ll wait & see how they go in the WCQ and hopefully the WC.
Anyway, my point here is that I was really hoping that DM would get a Dutch assistant in last summer. Tactically & technically the Dutch system seems to produce some great coaches. I think EFC needs to look outside the EPL box to broaden our ideas.
I’ve got nothing against Steve Round but it would have made sense to me to match Moyes up with an offsider who can fill the areas that he isn’t strong in (eg passing attacking football.) I fear at the moment we have two managers who can only offer the one type of football.
Catch a bloody grip will you.
Do you seriously expect me to express happiness about something I quite CLEARLY find a negative in the team?
What a strange little world you live in.
Doing you pathetic little pseudo-psychologist routine on the basis of my proferring an opinion on the negatives of Everton ? really is a shortcut past thinking.
If you find the expression of my opinions on Everton so distasteful - then don?t reply. Simple.
Because quite frankly this site could do without the prozac laced musings of some arrogant twát, who would rather engage in ad-hominen, than address the point in question ? and who evidently thinks that anyone who disagrees with his opinion, and has the audacity to criticise his ?love-in? is obviously in the ?depths of despair?.
Give it a fuckin rest you two-bit clown.
What exactly is effective about passing the ball backwards?
Let’s agree to differ on this one eh? I see a exciting passionate player who gives everything for the shirt, who’s goal contribution alone warrants a place in the team and you see someone who can’t pass the ball.
Nough said!
I’m all for playing Cahill as as second striker in a 451...were his strengths are obvious...but its also obvious to anyone with eyes that he’s not effective in a 4 man midfield...
Do you disagree?
p.s I am not out to upset anyone...however it seems that certain people are easily upset at contrary opinions to their own. The editors seem to agree with me.
Qatar stuck to their game plan and because of the heavy rain before the game, (oh I had a great unobstructured view and got soaked to my undies! Great stadium but god help you if it rains..) they payed dearly for not being able to adapt. The Socceroos changed their game plan and the game was effectively over after 30 mins. Dwight Yorke played over here last season and honestly look crap. ( no suprise there) the reason? generally the players are FAR fitter here than in the UK but they don’t have the skill set. There are some good Aussie players around Europe and some good ones here, but are they better technically than what we have, I don’t think so.
Tim was sharper and his skillset better than most on display. But then the way EFC play these days DM could find a few Aussies who will work until they drop, but may only complete 5 out of 10 passes.. still sounds like a better average than we have at the moment..
You ask the question: "What exactly is effective about passing the ball backwards?" You need to state clearly what you mean by an effective pass as the recognition of an effective pass in the stats is one which finds another team mate, irrespective of its direction.
"All I want is midfielders who can pass the ball effectively." Neville fulfills this criteria but sends the ball the wrong bloody direction.
You made a latent point in reference to Neville..and it was clearly my optin to refute the veracity of your point with the question I posed.
You choose not to answer it. Speaks volumes.
p.s You undermine your assertion that you don’t know what an ’effective’ pass is - and any further point you have based upon this, when you clearly imply that backwards is the ’wrong bloody direction’.
Perhaps you should stick to the point in hand, rather than confusing yourself with tangental nonsense.
Cahill is not good in a 442. Discuss.
I’ve forgotten what I was going to write.....
...I’ m holding that thought of Christine :0)
Mind you Aussie girls don’t seem to mind the wet tee shirt contests.. ah well..oh to be 21 again lol
Oh, I prefer experience to youth. How about the wet Everton pink shirt, Christine :0) Who needs the infighting on the forum when I can ponder on rainy days and Christine without the protection of her brolly ? Ah, contented sigh...........
Well we don’t get much excitement on the pitch these days !!
Your point about my comments well made and accepted 100%. Apologies to all. This is all about opinions, it?s just surprising to discover that someone can have the same opinion about everything and never be able to resist sharing it. Nevertheless, bad form on my part.
Ciarán McGlone:
"Give it a fuckin rest you two-bit clown."
My sentiments precisely. Please take your own advise, literally. Everything you say on this forum is negative drivel. Hence my enquiry about what makes you happy (in the EFC sense). Clumsily put, and therefore withdrawn, but the sentiment remains.
You responded to an article of mine quite recently (as you do all others) with exactly the same mindset. Unadulterated negativity, opinion dressed up as fact, baseless accusations and arrogant intolerance of views (even those based on real facts) that differed from your own speculative crap. Negativity dressed in hypocrisy. You add nothing.
You ask for me to discuss 4-4-2 and Cahill yet choose to disregard the request of explaining the relevance of your Qatar-Kuwait reference?
There?s not much point in providing a reasoned response to someone who readily admits their postings are intolerant of other?s opinions... yet unamshamedly repeats that exact same fault. As it is, your response represents nothing but self-dellusional and self-righteous bollocks.
Your previous article was shite. And so was your accusation of my ?consistent abuse of Kenwright?..... which you spectacularly failed to evidence!
Get over it
Steve Pendleton, Maybe you should lay off ? triping up your own arguments.

