The Mail Bag

The whole hog

Comments (21)

Phil Gartside, chairman of Bolton, has come up with an idea that I believe has great merit and certainly worthy of consideration. Phil bemoans the way the Premier League has become too predictable. I think we could all agree on that point. Phil goes on to suggest having a Premier League One and Premier League Two each with 18 teams.

I would be all for that with the proviso that at the end of each season the bottom 9 teams of League 1 are relegated and replaced by the top 9 teams of League 2. Apart from greatly increased variety, it would allow for a mid-season break when international games could be played. I wonder what the rest of you think?
Dick Fearon, West Australia     Posted 24/10/2008 at 12:35:01

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Ste Kenny
1   Posted 24/10/2008 at 19:11:48

Report abuse

We already have that, it?s called the Championship.

I wouldn?t take any satisfaction from winning the lesser league either as you have only won it because the really good teams are above you.
Tony Williams
2   Posted 24/10/2008 at 19:24:42

Report abuse

Have you noticed it is always a manager/chairman of a team doing poorly that thinks of these things......hmm I wonder why
Lewis Austin
3   Posted 24/10/2008 at 19:04:56

Report abuse

Can't see how this will stop it being too predictable. Man Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal and the shite would still be in League 1 occupying the top 4 places.

Here's an idea to make things more interesting, why not make 3rd 4th 5th and 6th compete for the two remaining Champions League places, e.g. 3rd v 6th and 4th v 5th with the losers going into the Uefa Cup. This would give more teams a chance of gaining from the riches of the Champions League if they could beat one of the Sky 4 in a play off and it would bring extra revenue for the FA if they were played at Wembley. Of course this idea would never be passed by the powers that be, they wouldn't dare upset the Sky 4 but imagine the face on Rick Parry and every other kopite who thinks football revolves around them if it did.

Mac Smith
4   Posted 24/10/2008 at 19:40:14

Report abuse

You?ll have to explain this one a little more clearly to me please....how will taking two teams out of the Premier League make it less predictable?? At the top you will still have the Sky 4 and I for one think the bottom of the league is prooving ever more impossible to predict. I'm all for ways to improove the league, but this is not one of them.
Thomas Christensen
5   Posted 24/10/2008 at 20:03:16

Report abuse

It would change nothing, you’d still have the top four in the top four place...
Jeremy Benson
6   Posted 24/10/2008 at 20:16:22

Report abuse

Its easily solved.

Simply make the Champions League just that...for CHAMPIONS. Only the top team goes into it, so only 1 team rakes the majority cash in that season. That would more evenly distribute the champions league cash amongst the year-on-year winners which always varies, and it would give better value/income to a new-format cup knockout round Uefa Cup (for teams 2-6) even more. That would be an increased pot share of Uefa revenues, and reduce the ridiculous 19 games this season that the Uefa Cup winners would have to compete in.
Mark Hill
7   Posted 24/10/2008 at 20:23:04

Report abuse

The only way to make it fair, level playing field if you will is to distribute the money more......fairly.....i am not saying evenly distribute it, but the current set up is ridiculous....
Mark Hill
8   Posted 24/10/2008 at 20:24:55

Report abuse

I totally agree with Jeremy Benson, it should only be for the champions... the current format is only there because of the bigwigs up on high... ask the majority of fans and i am sure they would agree... make it for champions only... the Champions League that is!
Jay Harris
9   Posted 24/10/2008 at 22:03:56

Report abuse

Totally agree with Jeremy Benson and furthermore I would adopt something along American football lines that the top team(s) get last pick of new recruits.

In the prem it would work like Chelsea (eg) would have to wait until all the other clubs had finished bringing new players in before making any aquisitions or why not have a total ban on the top 2 being able to add to their squads for at least 12 months after winning something.
Dick Fearon
10   Posted 24/10/2008 at 22:28:33

Report abuse

O’ dear, another of my ideas shot down in flames.
Heres yet another for all of you to ponder. We start breaking up the Sky 4 cartel by smashing United tonight.
Paul Dean
11   Posted 24/10/2008 at 23:08:05

Report abuse

Jeremy Benson - this is a great idea - if the similiar system for promotion from the Championship was accepted by all teams then why not in the Premier league for CL spots?

Of course with the monopoly it will never happen.
Marco Bonfiglio
12   Posted 24/10/2008 at 23:25:37

Report abuse

Jeremy’s right, but heavyweight journalists like James Lawton in The Independent have for the last ten years been pointing out the illegitimacy of calling it The Champions League.

Jeez, look at some of the also-rans who’ve won it.

It’s a Eurocartel by stealth. Look at how Everton put the cat among the pigeons in 2005. UEFA were already sweating bullets even before the ’miracle of Istanbul’. The fact is, it doesnt matter who are the champions of Iceland, Norway, Slovakia, Austria, Hungary, Moldova, Ukraine et al, so long as we get the usual suspects on screen on Tuesday and Wednesday night.
Paul Daly
13   Posted 25/10/2008 at 00:38:00

Report abuse

How about these ideas instead?

Number the divisions one through four and link them as a single Football League. Revenue share from the television money between all the divisions. Ban all on shirt advertising. Ban player names on shirts. All shirts will be numbered one through eleven. Have all clubs revert to the kits they wore in the 1969-70 season. Revert back to the one-man-and-the-goalkeeper offside rule. Allow players to tackle. All games to kick-off 3pm Saturday. Stadium tannoy to be used only in cases of emergency, no rah-rah bullshit. Players must celebrate goals with a manly handshake or a pat on the back. All players to be paid union scale- that?s dockers union scale. Any player not sporting a mullet, short-back-n-sides, a permabubble ?fro or a Rod Stewart/Ron Wood pineapple hairdo is banned. Any player with a blog - banned. Any player with a hip-hop single- banned. Any player who has his house photographed for Hello magazine- banned. All players are contractually required to be excited about Third round FA Cup replays on a miserable Tuesday in January.
Eh.....?scuse me, gotta go, 1970 just called and it wants its memories back...

Derek Thomas
14   Posted 25/10/2008 at 06:16:05

Report abuse

We need a system that brings the shite 4 closer not one that distances them even further.
Rob Nunn
15   Posted 25/10/2008 at 07:15:52

Report abuse

I completely agree with the fact that the Prem has become boring and predictable.
Hull City always getting in the top 3 .... what a bore! Instead of trying to find some obscure pointing/league system I have an idea! Why not start playing football as if we believe we can win. You never know it may start soon against Manure!

COYB
Rob Nunn
16   Posted 25/10/2008 at 07:32:18

Report abuse

@ Paul Daly
Nice post mate, made me grin!
Tom Campbell
17   Posted 25/10/2008 at 09:32:26

Report abuse

I think that the best idea here is Luis Austins. I think they use the champions league play off in the Dutch league so it has been proven succesful. The Premier league is boring and im fed up with it, SkySports has destroyed other great leagues like the Dutch and German leagues who no longer produce good teams.


The Premier League is shite lads thanks to fucking money
Rob Nunn
18   Posted 25/10/2008 at 09:53:08

Report abuse

Oh dear, people are missing the point here arent they!

To beat the top 4, stop whinging about money, play better football. Thats the way to do it !

And at least if we try and do it instead of capitulate I will be a happy Evertonian!
Nick Entwistle
19   Posted 25/10/2008 at 10:26:46

Report abuse

Nope. You alter the 120-year-old format to improve competition? Probably not the format that is the problem.
Colin Potter
20   Posted 25/10/2008 at 10:44:07

Report abuse

I think Jeremy Benson's Cracked it!
The hard thing is to get these so-called experts to see sense!
Tom Edwards
21   Posted 25/10/2008 at 11:09:15

Report abuse

I agree with Jeremy Benson. The CL should be for CHAMPIONS ONLY. I remember the days when it was known as the European Champions Cup, because it was just that. And before anyone chips in, I know that the holders could enter it the following season without being champs of their own league! Similarly, there should be no play-offs for the lower divisions. Teams finish where they do on merit. To have promotion taken from you by a team that finished 4 places and 20 points below you following a mini knock-out competition, is ridiculous.

© ToffeeWeb