The Mail Bag
Some Hard Decisions
Comments (38)
Well, he gets paid enough but Moyes has 2 big decisions to make which will demonstrate his true "1st eleven".
To me it's only:- Lescott vs Baines; Cahill vs Osman.
I would personally go for Lescott over Baines even though I think Baines is a far better attacking fullback. Lescott will as we know give us goals; Baines won't. It's a major decision as I think both will not take the bench lightly or for long.
I would also go for Cahill rather than Osman. Whilst both will give you goals, Cahill is the livewire, the aggressor, the 'gets under your skin' type player. Everton's record is far better with him in. The only worry I've got ? are Fellaini and Cahill too similar? Who will hang back?
So my team for Wednesday is: Howard; Neville, Yobo, Jagielka, Lescott; Arteta, Cahill, Fellaini, Pinnear; Yakubu, Saha.
Subs - Nash, Hibbert, Rodwell, Osman, Vaughan, Anichebe, Castillo.
Mike Oates, Posted 27/10/2008 at 23:19:52
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
Hopefully, once Cahill is back, Fellaini will drop back a little. That way he can wander forwards and give us that target as an option, not as a preferred way of playing.
Cahill is clearly the preferred player over Osman. Ossie does OK, I think he’s certainly a good enough player for our bench, but he’s not first XI material. Cahill, for all his limitations, just seems to give us that extra drive and gets so many invaluable goals.
As for the CB quandry, can you leave one of Jags, Lescott or Yobo on the bench? Especially when there’s only the Prem and FA Cup to play for. It’s not like we’re gonna play a lot of games this season....... I think Baines is a good footballer and he hasn’t really had a fair crack at the first team. But I’d pick Lescott over him, especially at the moment. If we were playing good football and we’re relatively solid at the back, Baines would be a good asset going forwards. But right now, I’ll settle for Lescott and maybe the odd goal off a set piece.
From what I?ve observed over the last few years, it?s quite apparent that Cahill is useless in a 4-man midfield, yet you advocate putting him in just that role... Personally I?d rather have Saha there.
As for Lescott... HE IS NOT A FULL BACK!!!!!!!!!!!
Potentially one of the best centre halves we have ever had, he is being ruined by being played out of position... absolutely ridiculous state of affairs...
And Baines has more than deserved his starting line-up. Moyes is a numpty... and Baines should just go now, as he will never get a fair crack of the whip.
As for Cahill and Osman, yes, I prefer Cahill, but as I mentioned on a previous thread, it will be interesting to see how Cahill and Fellaini fit together in a midfield 4. They would have to be disciplined and know exactly what each other's roles were, and not both just bomb into the box!
Maybe you’ve seen him play in a 4-4-2 role for Millwall and have come to a conclusion that he is crap in that role??
I would drop Lescott at the moment, as he is off form.
My bench would be Nash, Hibbo, Lescott, Rodwell, Osman, VdM, Saha.
Castillo’s presence would give Cahill and Fellaini the opportunity to push on in support of Yak. I would like to see Shandy get 15 minutes to see if he is serious this time. Fingers crossed because he has the ability and if we can finally get the attitude right we have a top player there.
Maybe you?ve not watched as many games as me Steve, but Moyes has used Cahill in a 4-4-2 (not often, but he has) on occasion... the last outing for him in that particular formation being against Liege...
Perhaps you missed that game too.
The same 11 had a real go at Utd second half so have proved that they can do it. I’d say, same again boys - go and get the win!
After the feelgood factor of coming back against Utd, I can’t believe that we are taking about surrendering the initiative and playing 4-5-1 against the mightly Bolton!
If that doesn’t work and they slip back to mediocrity, then picking from a bench including Cahill, Vaughan and Anichebe sounds good to me.
You make the assumption that Cahill must automatically start...
He must be played to his strengths and if that means sitting on the bench when we play a 4-4-2, then so be it.
------------- Howard -------------
Neville---Jagielka-----Lescott---Baines
Arteta---------Fellaini---------Pienaar
---------------Cahill----------------
-------Saha------------Yakubu-------
Subs : Yobo, Castillo, Hibbert, Nash, Osman, Vaughan, Baxter
We have a lot of permitations available but have not yet seen what might be our best back four. Midfield - Pienaar, Rodwell or Castillo, Fellaini, Arteta. Saha & Yak up front. Subs - Ruddy, Osman, Cahill ,Vaughan, Neville, Anichebe
maybe it is an assumption, but I would describe it more as an opinion, Cahill is our best player, to leave him on the bench is nonsensical. Now whether we will have a situation like in the England team whereby Fat Frank and a certain other non entity can’t play together only time will tell. But there is only one way to find out.
As said above, give the team that started against United another go tomorrow, with Cahill on the bench. If it isn’t working then at least there’s options to go more attacking......
After all the enforced changes, really Moyes needs to be settling a side, especially with the lack of cup games coming up.
I certainly don?t agree with your opinion that Cahill is our best player.
Cahill is a good player when used effectively, in my opinion using him in a 4-4-2 is not using him effectively.... and renders him pretty useless... and our midfield pretty impotent.
We?ll have to agree to differ!
I think the midfield line up on Saturday was close to our optimum with the current squad, although I?d like to see Castillo on in place of Osman.
I think that?s the way for us to go and have the 4-5-1 with Cahill to fall back on when we need it.
Howard
Pip, Jags, Lescott, Baines
Rodwell
Arteta, Fellaini, Pienaar
Timmy
Yak/Vaughan
Fellaini and Osman have been in good form, neither deserve to be dropped. Osman whilst he has his defiencies is simply a better out and out centre midfielder than Cahill. He has more technique and creativity, he covers more ground and in that positiop he offers a similar amount of goals.
People may disagree but Osman has proven he can do a job consistently in that role, Cahill hasn’t. I’ve seen him have some good games but I’ve also seen him have alot of stinkers.
As someone said it should be Saha v Cahill, I really don’t mind who plays in that position alongside or just behind Yakubu. Both are good effective players.
Baines v Lescott, I really don’t mind to be honest. I think there both good fullbacks albeit a little different. If we are going with Osman, Fellaini, Pienaar and Arteta in midfield then I’d rather have Lescott back there as we do need some presence. If we go with Cahill I’d give Baines a go, he’d give us some creativity down the left.
Howard, Jagielka, Yobo, Lescott, Baines, Arteta, Fellaini, Neville, Cahill, Pienaar, Yakubu.
I?ve put Jagielka RB so that I can put Neville in the holding role o accomodate Fellaini and Cahill. Also, this team includes both Baines and Lescott.
Neville has proved he is the best attacking right back we have, I don't believe Jagielka's distribution will be good enough, particularly the key art of whipping a cross in ? Neville can.
Jag's strength is his short distance speed to stop the nippy centre forwards ? let's not loose that.
Michael ? I don?t want to be rude, but the thought of Neville in midfield (especially when we have all our midfielders fit again) makes me cringe. He had a great game against the Mancs at right back, and now people are talking about Jags or Yobo playing there... unbelievable!!!
I?m pretty sure the same team that played on Saturday will line up tonight, but the likely swap of Cahill for Saha... and I expect Cahill to play as far forward as possible. This isn?t a negative line up at all, and with the likes of Vaughan, Saha, Anichebe, Baines, Castillo etc on the bench, we have good options as and when the match needs changing.
Come on you Blue Boys, let's get at them from the start and bag all the points!
Best pick for me would have to be:
--------------Howard---------------
Yobo--Jags--Lescott--Baines
--------------Castillo---------------
Pienaar----Fellaini-------Arteta
----------------Cahill----------------
-----------------Yak------------------
And I?d give the captains armband to Fellaini (does he speak English??), if not then to Jags.
He’s a terrible right back, he just doesn’t understand the position. He played there a few times in the 06/07 season and was terrible.
It has to be a joke. Surely.
Connor is right... Yobo played right back about 5 years ago for Nigeria. Hasn?t played there since then, and captains the team from right side of central defense. Lots of good centre halfs started as full backs... if I remember right, David Weir played right-back before he came to us, and even had a few games for Everton in that position. Undoubtedly though, like Yobo, he was best in the middle.
What about Joleon though... I?m starting to doubt he?s got the sharpness, and positioning to be pushing Jags or Yobo out of that central position yet.
We need a better right back
Yobo played right back for Nigeria
Excellent lets all play Yobo at right back
Was he any good at RB
Noooo! He was Crap!
What !
Duncan - your right, well sort of, I wasn’t joking about Fellony be capt, but it was a momentary mental aberation. I think I just saw his name at the centre of the team pick. I guess a Fellony captain would be a crime of some sort.
Perhaps worthy of a separate thread but I am not an advocate of a permanent captain anyway. Moyes needs a captain ON the pitch for 90mins, and should pick someone appropriate before each game. Off the pitch what’s the captain do. Moyes can ’talk’, ’consult’ with who the hell he likes regardless of who his club captain is. Having a permanent captain only ever restricts the manager when it comes to changing formations, or dropping out of form players, as the captain always expects to start.
We have to be aware of their danger from set pieces so I would leave Lescott in for now and see how he does with Baines on the bench.
I also thought Neville had a much better game with Pienaar in front of him on the right and would start them that way.
Arteta gets much more involved on the left handside where he can cut inside and influence the game from central positions. The balance was alot better in midfield on Saturday.
I totally agree with your thouhts on the Captain situation though (apart from the brain spasm you had about Fellony - nice one). It was the same when Stubbs was club captain, but not in our strongest 11. Neville has the leadership skills and is a good pro, he is in our best 11 at the moment, but how many of us would like to see him replaced?
I think Tim Howard, Jags, Cahill, and even Arteta have shown enough leadership to get the armband in my opinion. Not sure which one I’d pick... always used to think Cahill, but ideally a centre-half suits the job. Yobo anyone?
How about reversing that idea? Go out using 4-4-2 from the start with Cahill on the bench and try to get ahead. If winning we can shut up shop and bring Cahill on with the 4-5-1 formation. If losing we can bring on a fresh striker AND Cahill in order to attempt getting back into the game.
I would normally be slightly apprehensive about this especially going out 442 against the likes of the top 4 but Man U at the weekend made me think otherwise! Also against lesser opposition like Bolton tonight we could even try setting out with Cahill in the 4 man midfield from the start. Or is this too risky for Mr Moyes?


1 Posted 28/10/2008 at 06:52:38
Report abuse
I?m still unsure about Baines vs Lescott. Baines provides the width and crossing ability that we lack on the left side (given we play with a right-footed left midfielder). Lescott, when crossing the ball, floats it in which is easier for the defensive side, whereas Baines really whips it in with venom which gives us a better chance. Lescott scored 10 goals last season though so it?s a real tricky one.
I?ll make a decision and say I?d go with Baines, based on the fact that Lescott scores most of his goals from set pieces, which he will used for irrespective of whether he is LB or CB. We lack width in our team, particularly on the left, so I?d go with Baines and let Jags, Yobo and Lescott fight it out for the 2 CB positions.