The Mail Bag
Fellaini the new Cahill?
Comments (30)
Just wanted to throw this into the mix, but I think Moyes may see Fellaini as a long-term replacement (improvement) on our Tim.
The last three matches or so, he's been the one bombing forward from midfield ? I reckon he's told to get his head on anything inside or approaching the opposition box. He's a box-to-box player and he's clearly got a knack of scoring (3 in 3 is it now?).
But, and here's the rub, he seems to have more all-round footballing ability than Cahill. Don't get me wrong, I love Tim and what he has given us for a few years. But the general impression I get from most of you is that ? much as we love him ? he doesn't have the ability to hold a midfield together and drive a side on with his creativity when playing in a 4-4-2. (When was the last time you saw an eye-catching, defence-splitting pass from him?)
He's great in a 4-5-1 when he has licence to play as a goal-scorer, but I've heard a lot of people say our glorious 4-5-1 has been found out and we need (correctly in my view) to play two up front. Perhaps Moyes agrees and bought Fellaini as a Cahill who can pass and create?
If that's the case then a) What's the future for Tim (how long will Moyes go with playing them both together); and b) we still need a replacement for Carsley (as Moyes has obviously seen enough of Castillo already).
Chris Brown, Posted 30/10/2008 at 11:39:13
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
Cahill is 29 years old this year and will have a low resale value soon. As much as I think he is a great player for us I think it is time he was sold on and we brought in a young partner for Fellaini with the money.
How much would we get for Cahill? I’d go for 12million.
Cahill is more mobile and more intelligent in the box, he supports Yakubu much better and knows when and where to move.
They have similar qualities but they take up different positions. Fellaini is box to box whereas Cahill as an attacking midfielder/second striker.
Hopefully we’ll see them alongside each other on Saturday, I’d like to see us revert to a 4-4-1-1.
And it’s not negative either, I’m talking about a midfield containing Arteta, Osman, Fellaini, Pienaar and Cahill. That’s forward thinking and positive and it suits alot of our players.
4-5-1 or 4-4-1-1 is a good formation if it’s used correctly with the right personnel.
Tactical options and cover are important!
Also with Saha and Cahill fit and firing the Yak can’t afford to be lazy...I reckon AJ’s presence was one of the critical factors in spurring him on to eventually work hard last season.
The situation with Castillo has me flumoxed.
He reminds me of Jenas at spudz, who does f#ck all during games but amazingly pops up with a lot of goals.
It cant just be about scoring the odd goal. The guy is quite limited when it comes to tackling, passing and teamplay.
As for the big lad Fellaini, nobody should be making any sweeping statements just yet. The guy is still a kid with only a few games under his belt. Correct me if i’m wrong, but he barely speaks english (Castillo also), so lets just give him some room to grow (not in height obviously).
4-4-2 seems to be the way to go from here on. The old 4-5-1 is a tired machine that has been rumbled, and in truth produces a ugly brand of football.
For me, the most important midfielder for us this season could be Pienaar, a lad with genuine quality, who unlike Arteta, chooses to use his skills in every match.
My team v Fulham would be:
Howard
Yobo Jagielka
Neville Lescott
Rodwell
Osman Fellaini Pienaar
Cahill
Yakubu
He’s a centre midfielder, he’s said himself that’s where he sees his future, in midfield. It wasn’t even Moyes who moved him into midfield, it was the Youth/reserve team coaches.
Just thought I’d correct you there, it’s quite obvious that he also has all the tools required to be a very good midfielder.
And since when would a 17 year old suffer from being played out of position? Alot of acadamies do it. Use young players in different positions to develop there game and there understanding of the game.
Ajax do it and I’m pretty sure Sporting do aswell, two of the best teams for developing young players. I’m quite sure Dennis Bergkamp was used at right back when he was a youngster.
He’s also been playing defensive midfield for the England youth teams of late, speaks for itself really.
He should take out Osman now though after that Bolton performance and replace him with Castillo or Rodwell. Rodwell’s performance against Arsenal and Castillo’s against Stoke (the occasions when they have both played next to Fellaini) proved to me they are better suited than Osman in the long term in that role if we continue with 4-4-2.
Would you not agree, however, that Lescott is suffering at left back?
I for think Rodwell has looked better when he has played.
Not really to be honest. I think Lescott’s suffering because he’s lacking confidence, even at centre back he looked a little shaky.
I think he’s just going through one of those spells, he has been more or less immaculate for two years so maybe it’s his time.
But I do like Baines, I wouldn’t mind him getting games as he’s done well of late. I’d move Lescott centre back and Baines to left back.
I see what you mean about Rodwell, he could vert well be a ball playing centre half in the future. I think at the moment he is best of in midfield, there he can make more mistakes and no be punished.
It’ll also improve his distribution playing in midfield. Moyes and Andy Holden did say though that he’s been moved into midfield permanantly. We’ll see what happens.
My understanding is that Fellaini will be suspended against Fulham? I guess that would mean Timmy would come in for a straight swap.
As for Castillo, should definitely be given a go. Don’t think he looked that bad, and gotta have a decent look at him before deciding if he’s worth persisting with or not.....haven’t really done that yet.....
Oh wait we have one... Arteta! Arteta is someone who loves having lots of the ball and naturally likes sitting deep to retrieve it. Arteta in a centre midfield with Fellaini would have the perfect balance of battle and class.
For his size no one in the team holds his own better than Arteta. He also has the quick feet and ability to find space in tight spots, a lot like Osman but Arteta has more strength. Arteta can also tackle, unlike Cahill and Fellaini. I am not saying Arteta is the new Carsley but then again who is going to be?
We don't really need a new Carsley, we need someone who runs our game and Arteta is that man. Playing well or not he is our best footballer and on the wing he doesn't get enough of the ball. This doesn't make any sense as he is the player who makes us tick and should have the ball every attack.
For me I would play Ossie and Pienaar out on the wings (with a view to buying a winger in January so that Ossie is at most a squad player). With Arteta and Fellaini in the middle (Arteta our engine and Fellaini allowed to roam like he has done well recently) and Cahill and one of the lazy bastards up front (Cahill to battle and be clever and the Yak to do fuck all and hopefully poke one in).
Also I can't believe that when our strikers are playing so bad that Vaughan is not getting a look in. He looks hungry. Unlike the Yak and Saha that don't look bothered at all (last night's performance was piss-poor).
Arteta needs a new lease of life at Everton as his cameo on the wing has lost it's funny side. Sadly Moyes will not see any sense.
£17 million... my arse!
At the moment if Arteta gets moved into central positions we have to play Osman there. Ossie gives his all and he’s a decent central midfielder but he struggles outwide.
We just don’t have the players, the balance would be all wrong.
Arteta and Fellaini is a big no no, we’d get overrun in midfield against better teams. Neither are very hardworking and neither seem to like defending. The Osman/Fellaini combo works because Osman covers alot of ground and continually covers Fellaini. Arteta isn’t lazy by any means but you won’t see him defending when Fellaini bombs forward.
If we buy a winger then yes I’m all for it, Arteta would be a very good creative central midfielder in a 4-5-1. At the moment no chance, I’d like to see him drfting between left, right and centre during games.
He’s been doing well on the left of late to be honest. He was bright against both Man utd and Bolton I thought although his final ball needs to improve.
Listen to what Belgium fans have said, they say don’t expect Fellaini to be a goal machine. He lacks Cahill’s timing, its just that he has a physical advantage when in the box.
I have been happy with Fellaini’s recent matches but am still confused over his true roll. He isn’t an out an out goal scorer, defender or creative player. I see him as a mix, which is far from a bad thing. While we will need a Cahill replacement that won’t be a concern for years yet. If David Moyes claims Fellaini is a similar type of player to Cahill it must be asked why get two players so alike when we have no holding midfielder. That?s nothing personal against Fellaini, he is a good player I just can?t understand why he was the major priority. I think he is a good acquisition and had previously been looked at but I still think it was a last minute deal because the club couldn?t get a holding mid.


1 Posted 30/10/2008 at 13:55:52
Report abuse