The Mail Bag

Versatility

Comments (23)

I think this is a very weird point.. but entertaining nonetheless. But has anyone noticed how obsessed Moyes is with versatile players? We probably have more versatile players than anyone else in the league i.e Heitinga, Neville, Jagielka, Arteta, Osman, Pienaar etc etc.

I'm not saying it's completely the worst thing, because obviously versatile players are useful, but this links to our small squad, where Moyes clearly buys versatile players to cope, almost as a substitute instead of simply buying more players. I mean Moyes's comments about Heitinga acting like two signings in one because of his versatility worries me.

I may seem naive, because of the current financial market bla bla bla we can't buy much more players, but there are plenty of cheap players for cover that would a job. A player like Zenden would do alrite, still a decent enough players on the left. Michael Ball even for left back. Basically, Moyes is stubborn in his philosophy for players as in they always have to be young and upcoming. I'm not criticising any players Moyes has bought, because most of them have been fantastic, but we do need more players, if we wanna acheive in 4 competitions, and cheap alternatives or loan signings would be good as cover, instead of focusing on players who are versatile all the time. Do people think I have a point or am I a loon?
Ben Jones, Anglesey     Posted 10/09/2009 at 20:11:03

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Matt Bone
1   Posted 11/09/2009 at 08:09:29

Report abuse

Ben, you are not a loon but the players you mention bringing in on afree as cover would not be players to take us to the next level.

Versatile players and young and upcoming players are a necessity for Moyes as we are skint. The young players have potential re-sale values and versitile players allow a certain flexibility.

I would love Moyes to buy a £20m specialist but it ain't going to happen.
Andrew Conroy
2   Posted 11/09/2009 at 08:11:35

Report abuse

I take your point Ben, but I can’t see the worth in going for Ball. If numbers was purely the name of the game, it would have made more sense to keep Nuno on: for all that he didn’t see much of the Goodison turf last year he’s much more the sort of pro that Moyes likes.

As a side point, and without wanting to doom the guy from the start, I’m wondering whether Heitinga will even act like one signing. Some Atletico Madrid friends I was pumping for information said that he was an absolute liability at centre back, giving away vital penalties on a worryingly regular basis. When he moved to right back he did marginally better, but overall they’re glad to be rid of him, hugely disappointed with his time there, and well pleased for the dough they got from us. It didn’t sound to promising, but I’ve got enough faith in Moyes and Round to get the best out of him.

It did make me wonder, though, how excited we’d all have been about signing him if our transfer policy wasn’t so bloody awful, and we got players in early and in sufficient numbers. For the last couple of years us Evertonians have been like the kids who thought Father Christmas had forgotten them, but at the last minute when we were at our lowest ebb were given a consolation present.
Andy Morden
3   Posted 11/09/2009 at 08:27:39

Report abuse

I think you have an absolutley valid point Ben. Moyes loves players who he percieves to be ’versatile’. Often this translates as ’good lads’ who will do whatever job asked of them. Neville and Osman are two such players. Neville is ideally not a central midfieilder and Osman is ideally not a wide player. Jagielka is also awful when put into midfield or played at right back. If you look at the top teams’ players they can do this - indeed, their play is marked by fluidity and an interchange of position and role. Think Rooney (sorry, some of you may spit when you see his name!), Ronaldo and Tevez at Man U last season.

However, I do not think Moyes aims to acheive this. He goes for players with the ’right attitude’. Of course this is important, I’m not denying that. We don’t want a team of disinterested idiots. But because of the limited budgets we operate to we often don’t go for out and out specialists for specific positions. We can’t afford the top players who can play in a numbr of roles well either. Thus we end up with square pegs in round holes quite frequently.

I understand the pragmatism involved, but I don’t necessarily feel great about it.
Stefan Tosev
4   Posted 11/09/2009 at 08:32:54

Report abuse

"this links to our small squad, where Moyes clearly buys versatile players to cope, almost as a substitute instead of simply buying more players."

Moyes has to be very careful with the money he alone is generating, the key statement in his transfer policy is to bring people who will improve the squad and not adding players for the sake of it.

"I may seem naive, because of the current financial market bla bla bla we can’t buy much more players" if you cant realise the financial constraints Moyes is facing it answers your next question "am I a loon? "
Al Reddish
5   Posted 11/09/2009 at 09:04:27

Report abuse

Matt, a £20m specialist would be nice but there are those that should be avoided at that price.........Glen Johnson ha ha ha!!!
Liam Reilly
6   Posted 11/09/2009 at 09:54:39

Report abuse

Surely Moyes cannot be criticised for bringing in young up and coming players. The players your talk about (cheap alternatives), or loan signings as back up to the first team, would still command a considerable salary for warming the bench.

Looking at our financial position, Moyes has this one spot on. Have one strong core unit of players and several versatile players that can interchange in the event of injury. It's not ideal, but until we can have 22 first class footballers, we’ll have to make do.
Brian Noble
7   Posted 11/09/2009 at 10:09:52

Report abuse

A journalist mate reckons Heitinga could well be Moyes’s Krøldrup Mark 2! Apparently, he’s a liability at centre-half and became the the first player in history to be marked 0/10 in his last game for Atletico Madrid by the national football paper! Rumours abounded that he was ’playing for a move’ so whist this may explain his lack of effort it also says something about his character.

My bet is he will get the right-back slot allowing the skipper to flourish in his preferred role as the holding midfielder.

Matt Traynor
8   Posted 11/09/2009 at 10:18:19

Report abuse

You’ve got it about right. I can understand why Moyes goes for those types of players, but even after we signed Jags (and would you still refer to him as "versatile" after his performances in central midfield?), a friend pointed out to me that "a team of Neville’s and Jagielka’s will never win anything".

That said, I also think in the modern day there is more of a tendency for specialist players. I can recall Trevor Steven, ostensibly a right winger for us, playing up front when needed. Our "Mr Versatile" back then was Alan Harper - and boy did he suffer for it to a degree - the sub of choice, back when it wasn’t a 2nd team on the bench.
Ben Jones
9   Posted 11/09/2009 at 10:18:04

Report abuse

Saying that Liam, you do have a point with wages... but I’m still agreeing with my point, is there a problem just buying players primarily to back the team up? It’s just once we have an injury crisis, which will probably be this season, knowing our luck, and we don’t have numbers to cope. This almost happens every season, and yeah with Matt’s point, players like Zenden and Ball will not take us to the next level, but they would be cover for players who could take players to the next level.

Question, am I still a loon?
Dennis Stevens
10   Posted 11/09/2009 at 10:14:07

Report abuse

I think that Moyes’s apparent strategy is fine but where there is a weakness it’s perhaps in allowing him to believe the squad can continue to cope without certain issues being adequately addressed. The two obvious examples being the defensive & wide midfield slots.

Moyes seems to have been endeavouring to address these positions almost since he took over from Smith. No matter what variations he tried he always came back to Carsley as the best man we had for the defensive midfield role; unless Heitinga proves capable, we are no nearer resolving that position.

Similarly out wide, although at least here Moyes has bought first Davies and then VDM and is no doubt disappointed that neither really worked out, hopefully Bilyaletdinov will be the answer to that one.

It’s alright have versatile players who can do a job in a variety of positions but it’s not desirable to play them out of position for a sustained period, as has happened with Neville & Osman, for example.

Dan Brierley
11   Posted 11/09/2009 at 10:14:48

Report abuse

I think you are right Ben, it is certainly done on purpose that we have versatile players. But I think this is actually a very positive thing, and an excellent way of compensating for having a small squad. But of course, versatile players tend not to be as effective as specialists. It still remains to be seen just how good our new recruits are, but in general I think we are in a better position than last year. Let's hope that our problematic right side can get some much needed improvement.
Liam Reilly
12   Posted 11/09/2009 at 10:43:30

Report abuse

I’m all for buying players to back up the squad Ben. My concern would be that they would be inferior players, which wouldn’t neccessarily improve the squad.

In addition, their appearance would halt the progress of some of the younger players coming through and I’d rather see some one of the kids given a chance than some fancy Dan who would rather take the cash and the bench that play regular football elsewhere.
Andy Crooks
13   Posted 11/09/2009 at 11:15:15

Report abuse

Every team needs a selection of versatile players. To really move forward we need what I would describe as some luxury players. At the minute Yakubu is the nearest to that at Everton.

By a luxury player, I mean someone who might not cover every blade of grass but who can win a game in a second. Not, I think, the type of player favoured by David Moyes.

Tim Lloyd
14   Posted 11/09/2009 at 12:37:00

Report abuse

Versatile and luxury players.

I rather think that most players at the top levels of Football today could be considered pretty versatile. Most full backs are required to ba attacking as well as defensive, hence the reason Hibbo took such a lot of stick. A good defender, he lost some of his best qualities as a defender desperately trying to be an attacking full back as well. Bainsey attacks well but is a bit suspect in my opinion when defending.

Lescott, who could pop up with useful goals, act as an emergency full back or occupy his favoured positon of centre back.

John Terry is another who scores goals not infrequently. Most midfielders appear to be proficient in playing back or forward though of course, tend to be better at one rather than the other.

Out and out forwards, e.g. Yakubu, appear to me to be a dying breed. I well recall Big Dunc tracking back to assist in defending corners.

It all stems from the success enjoyed by Holland, quite a tiny country, who espoused the concept of total football,

I don’t think versatility is such a wonderful thing. Was Christiano a winger or a central striker? What about Rooney?

I personally prefer my players to feel comfortable in more than one position. My criuteria would be, are they comfortable with the ball at their feet, Arteta is fantastic in my opinion. He always looks so relaxed and rarely loses the ball.

No, give me versatility. Moyes is not that unusual.
Tim Brashar
15   Posted 11/09/2009 at 13:26:07

Report abuse

To pick up on the points raised by Andrew Conroy & Brian Noble re: Heitinga, does it concern anyone else that both he and Bily were unused subs in their recent internationals?

Are they really the 2 class internationals they have been marketed to be?

I hope so!
Joel Webb
16   Posted 11/09/2009 at 14:16:02

Report abuse

I reckon that Moysey would have been on the phone to Hiddink and van Marwijk to politely suggest they use his new boys sparingly!
Cahill didn’t travel to Seoul either despite the fact he’s the soceroos most important player.
I’m just happy they’re all fresh, fit and ready to rock Fulham! =D
Stephen Kenny
17   Posted 11/09/2009 at 15:27:14

Report abuse

You can get lots of crap players cheaply who specialise in a specific position or you can sign a really good player who can play in a number of them. For me the second option is the one that will most likely bring success.

For me we now need to start getting good players who specialise in one position as this is usually better again. Obviously our sell to buy policy means we wont be seeing this anytime soon but hypothetically this is what’s needed to break the so called glass ceiling and possibly just to stand still considering what some teams are spending.
Tony Williams
18   Posted 11/09/2009 at 15:51:59

Report abuse

Tim, I certainly noticed Heitinga not playing, as I purposely watched the Scotland v Holland game to get a glimpse of him; however, as Holland had already qualified, in my optimistic view I was thinking that they gave the better players the day off and rest; hence why the fella from the Goonies was playing and got booked for diving... no two-match ban for him though!
Andrew Conroy
19   Posted 11/09/2009 at 17:04:29

Report abuse

There’s such enormous pressure on the new signings to hit the ground running that I think it goes way beyond their ability with the ball and is much more about their strength of character. As likely as Moyes is to take time bedding Heitinga and- especially- Bily in, the expectation amongst the fans that these are the guys to take us to the mythical ’next level’ puts them at a disadvantage from the start. I know this is the lot of the modern pro, and metal toughness is a prerequisite, but if we had a board that could have got the signings in earlier, thus giving them time to adapt to the culture and the club we’d be likely to see the best of them far quicker, making it that bit easier for them to justify the price tags they came with. But ’if my auntie had balls....’ and all that.

The obvious comparison is with Fellaini last season who, in spite of his obvious- albeit frustrating- ability was thrust into such a difficult situation that it took him ages to get into any sort of stride. Something tells me that Bily is likely to be a rather delicate soul that needs to be treated gently, so if things don’t go his way from the start and he makes Osman look like Cruyff it puts even more pressure on our threadbare squad.

To bring it back to your original point, Ben, surely Moyes’s obsession with versatility is in no small part because of Kenwright’s uselessness as a chairman and businessman?
Brian Waring
20   Posted 11/09/2009 at 20:58:39

Report abuse

Spot on Ben. I was thinking the same thing. When you see a player Moyes is linked with, or has signed, it almost always has ’versatile’ before his name.
Brendan McLaughlin
21   Posted 12/09/2009 at 00:49:42

Report abuse

Jesus! We’ve just signed a couple of new players & we are damming them before they have even kicked a ball in earnest.
Matthew Lovekin
22   Posted 12/09/2009 at 09:31:21

Report abuse

Versatility is key to Everton because we can’t afford the wage bill that a big squad would cost.

Therefore, smaller squad, less money, players playing in several positions.

End of.
Wilson Tan
23   Posted 12/09/2009 at 19:49:49

Report abuse

Tim Brashar, Andrew Conroy & Brian Noble:
For Heitinga & Atletico Madrid - see Pienaar & Borussia Dortmund, see Arteta & Real Sociedad and to a lesser extent, see Howard & Manchester United.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb