The Mail Bag
Cracks? £19m v £30m
Comments (9)
Are the comments from Robert Elstone about spending £30m, and David Moyes's £19m figure, the first signs of cracks appearing in the Goodison dam? Why would DM raise this point after the video blog on the Daily Post's website? Has he just planted a seed on his routemap to Man Utd? I hope not.
Tony I'Anson, Posted 13/09/2009 at 04:47:50
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
Either way, I think the reality is somewhere down the middle. £19m for the three first teamers, but then additional tribunal fees for Garbutt and Mustafi, small transfer fees for the two American lads (?) and a loan fee for Jo. This maybe doesn’t reach the £27m (+ £3m wages) that Elstone suggested but it’s certainly millions rather than hundreds of thousands.
More importantly, COYB at Fulham today!
I tend towards the first explanation, but then I do not have a blind faith which allows me to believe without question what the club tells me... maybe I’m just too cynical.
Love the timing though, a ToffeeWeb furore is kicked up about Elstone’s comments and then a day or two later, Moyes makes an innocuous comment which puts a completely different light on things...
I think the only crack appearing was swiftly smoked up before this thread was created :d Geeez..!
Really looking forward to seein the boys run out at the Cottage tonight — should be a cracker!
It’s a PR case gone pear shaped after Moyes’s comments, as it brings to light the bullshit that is spread by the inner sanctum at our club.
Other than the obvious Rooney mention, one player that really sticks in my mind for that is Steve McMahon. I remember us playing Ipswich in 1981 at Goodison when they were UEFA Cup holders and as a teenager myself loving it that Mick Lyons, team captain, was tackled by McMahon whilst fannying around at the back unable to decide who to pass to! Stevie Mac just took the ball off him and started the move whilst Lyons stood there open mouthed.
I know McMahon is far from poular at Goodison these days, but what a player and had we had him in the late 80’s rather than an ageing Reidy and a crocked Bracewell we’d have done a whole lot better after Kendall MK1 left.
Rodwell should play until his performances dip and then give him a rest.
COYB
Then on http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/everton-fc/everton-fc-news/2009/09/11/everton-fc-rocked-by-mikel-arteta-injury-setback-92534-24669295/2/ David Moyes said “You can work it out yourself,” said the Goodison manager. “Bilyaletdinov, Heitinga and Distin came to roughly £19m give or take a bit, and money we got back for Lescott after we paid Wolves is about £19m.
“We’ve only spent what we have brought in, we haven’t spent any other cash on top of that. That’s what it looks like to me. Times are hard, so I will work to what I can do.”
THE point of my posting was why would a united "media savvy" Everton ship even hightlight the difference in the numbers at all? That’s all I’m saying. I’m not discussing what the actual numbers of figures were, but just why they were even said in the first place.
Is it like the first hints of a divorce from a couple who have been happy for 7 or so years but can’t find a way ahead together for the next 7 unless they win the flaming Euro Millions???
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.


1 Posted 13/09/2009 at 08:31:06
Report abuse
I would guess that Elstone's figure, as a financial type, includes signing on fees for all the players signed, not just the transfer fees of the 3, whereas Moyes only looks at the top line numbers.