The Mail Bag

Pienaar??

Comments (25)

So Steven Pienaar was again absent from the squad yesterday, just wondered if anyone had heard news of his likely return.

The injury he sustained against Fulham seemed pretty minor and there was even talk that he would only miss 1 match, (this was about 2 months ago) and yet there is still no sign of a return and very little has been said at Everton about him or his condition. He is someone that we miss greatly and we need him back asap with Billy suspended and Arteta still out.

Maybe someone can shed some light as I may have missed something!
Steven Smith, Ipswich     Posted 09/11/2009 at 07:58:44

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Matthew Lovekin
1   Posted 09/11/2009 at 14:25:04

Report abuse

I have also been thinking the same, we’ve really missed him.

Can’t wait until we have a midfield of Pienaar, Arteta, Rodwell and Bily, with Cahill behind Saha.
John Holmes
2   Posted 09/11/2009 at 14:32:20

Report abuse

It was apparently more serious than first thought, but Moyes said last week that he hopes Pienaar, Osman and Neville will be fit for the United game which suggests all three are very close.
Ciarán McGlone
3   Posted 09/11/2009 at 15:46:30

Report abuse

He is helping evacuate the Titanic as we speak....

Be careful what you wish for.
Gavin Ramejkis
4   Posted 09/11/2009 at 16:20:16

Report abuse

I mentioned this in a thread the other day before the Benfica game over the use of the fabled "last minute fitness test" the game after he was injured and that this test seems to have lasted ages now and just what it entails.

If he is out, just bloody say he is out, and when you expect him back... but then that wouldn’t be the "Everton way" would it?

We desperately need some creativity in midfield, surely an emergency loan could be agreed by the FA, pity it would no doubt not be agreed by BK.

Paul Lally
5   Posted 09/11/2009 at 16:06:55

Report abuse

My theory: Steven Pienaar is the face of South African football and therefore the 2010 World Cup. The best player they have ever produced, he has the hopes of a nation resting squarely on his shoulders. So I would very much imagine he will be wrapped in cotton wool all season.

It is unthinkable for the South African FA or Fifa for that matter, that Steven is not on the pitch for the opening World Cup game.

What does that mean to EFC? Good news — Elstone should have the marketing dept riding the back of Pienaar into the 2010 World Cup and pushing EFC all over South Africa.

Bad News — as said above, he will be wrapped in cotton wool for large parts of the season. The biggest sporting event in South African history and Steven Pienaar is out injured — unthinkable.

Not good for EFC games, I know... and club should come before country but, in this historic case, I have a feeling we will only see Steven used when really fully fit. Any scares at all from then to the end of the season and he will not play.

World Cup year is only good for a club if their players are on the fringe and/or not certain of a place in the squad and have to play well to be included. The players who are certain to be picked will miss a lot more games as they prepare for the tournament.
COYB

Dan McKie
6   Posted 09/11/2009 at 16:35:18

Report abuse

Paul Lally, not sure why you would think that. I'm pretty sure that David Moyes, like most Evertonians, won't give a flying one about South Africa or the World Cup, and why should we?
Eugene Ruane
7   Posted 09/11/2009 at 16:17:32

Report abuse

A couple of weeks back, I read an article in (I think) When Saturday Comes, about that whole Mutu/Chelsea/Coke/Juve/Fiorentina thing.

(maybe it was yesterday’s Observer - my memory has turned to shite recently)

Anyway, there was a bit about players doing rehab and..um..stuff and one bit I remember (coz it confused me) said...

"...and there are a least two players presently serving secret bans for substance abuse".

SECRET bans?

How curious I thought.

Now I’m not for a SECOND pointing the finger at ANY of our players.

However I AM suggesting that if it is ’out there’ that secret bans are being served, surely EVERY club has a duty to ALL it’s players who are out of the side, to say..

"Joe Shmo has a broken eye and will be out for at least three weeks"

Just a suggestion


Sniff (that’s a cold by the way!)
Paul Lally
8   Posted 09/11/2009 at 17:01:13

Report abuse

Dan, I am not saying I like it or that David Moyes or EFC do either. Over the years I have seen it before with other players in a World Cup year.

South Africa was chosen for political reasons as well as spreading the football gospel and I am afraid that what we want will not come into it. If you were in Steven’s shoes what would you do?
He knows himself the importance of this competition to his nation and the hopes he carries. Add into the mix the political, economic and commercial implications and the pressure he is under must be immense.

For Steven Pienaar, the World Cup is not just about games of football. So yes, he will look after himself... And you never know, Moyes may understand this as well.

Steve Pugh
9   Posted 09/11/2009 at 18:06:00

Report abuse

This is very similar to a post at the latter half of last week and I will repeat here what I said then. If you look on the OS it will tell you that he has a knee injury and is expected to return late November. There is, and has been, no secrecy about his injury, yet people are constantly complaining that the club aren’t telling us anything.

They are, you just have to look for it.
Guy Hastings
10   Posted 09/11/2009 at 18:16:50

Report abuse

Eugene - hope you’ve got a good lawyer with posts like that.
Pat Finegan
11   Posted 09/11/2009 at 19:54:49

Report abuse

According to Mick Rathbone’s blog earlier today, Neville, Pienaar, and Osman are all "making rapid progress".
Alan Kirwin
12   Posted 09/11/2009 at 20:15:30

Report abuse

Slightly different tack, but if you observe the tackle that took Neville out then it’s a surprise he wasn’t badly damaged.

It was one of those incidents where, despite an apparent aim of getting the ball (to be generous) there was an unquestionable intent to follow right through whatever the consequences for the other player. When this is done, as it was, with studs up and a rigid leg, the consequences can be shocking for the player who was tackled. This sort of disguised assault needs to be jumped on big time.

It is precisely this sort of tackle that Jimmy Shithouse Case perpetrated to end Geoff Nulty’s career. Pienaar fell foul to an apparently lesser assault, but nonetheless reckless behaviour. As for what Nolan did to Anichebe, it disgusts me that such a shithouse can play on with impunity whilst a young player’s career hangs in the balance after the worst assault in recent memory.

If an Everton player did what Nolan or Etuhu did then I’d want him out. We sometimes lose sight of the spirit of this game. I’m sick of having to swallow the consequences of reckless assaults on my team.
Michael Kenrick
Editorial Team
13   Posted 09/11/2009 at 22:11:07

Report abuse

I know you do not look kindly on anyone being so bold as to disagree with you or, dare I say, question your esteemed wisdom, but was it not the case that the Neville incident resulted from both players lunging in feet first, with equally reckless abandon, chasing a 50/50 ball?

It makes me wince when I see highly priced footballing assets conduct themselves in this way, but the alternative, apparently, would the old timers accusing said players of being "shithouses" for not diving in.

Interesting watching Fellaini on Sunday, he definitely is not one for diving in, and seemed to even back off from the challenge on a few occasions.

And that clumsy gangling clatter-barge he has perfected doesn’t even qualify as a proper tackle. I couldn’t help wondering if he’d actually improved all that much from the first game he played for us last season... but I’m digressing.

Guy Hastings
14   Posted 09/11/2009 at 22:48:46

Report abuse

Michael - last season Fellaini only had to look at someone in the tunnel before Z-Cars started to warrant a booking. No wonder he’s less than enthusiastic about sticking his size 19 boot in.
Alex Kociuba
15   Posted 09/11/2009 at 23:10:01

Report abuse

Haha Eugene funniest post I have read for a while. Quite interesting that there could be secret bans.

Paul Lally could be right I hadn’t thought of that. Apart from just the South African FA, Pienaar himself wouldn’t want to miss that either — it would be something most professional players wont get a chance to do.
Thomas Surgenor
16   Posted 10/11/2009 at 01:06:58

Report abuse

This ban thing might have a bit of mileage in it (not saying that's why Peanuts is out)... bAND ut, a mate from work who is a and Gooner told me 6 months ago that's why Rosicky was out.
Eugene Ruane
17   Posted 10/11/2009 at 09:24:19

Report abuse

Guy Hastings - I think I would only need a good lawyer if I accused somone of something and that something wasn’t true.

I didn’t.

I simply pointed out that, given what some players ARE up to (coz it’s in the papers and stuff) clarity from clubs is the best way to stop rumours developing.

The original post says...

"The injury he sustained against Fulham seemed pretty minor and there was even talk that he would only miss 1 match, (this was about 2 months ago) and yet there is still no sign of a return and very little has been said at Everton about him or his condition"

The fact that original post exists is (kind of) proof of what I’m saying.

Ciarán McGlone
18   Posted 10/11/2009 at 09:48:40

Report abuse

Alan,

I assume you sent a letter to David Moyes last season requesting him to sell Mr Fellaini because of his repeated, intentional and highly dangerous use of his elbows on fellow professionals...or for Mr Cahill, who is an invariably dirty git...
Steve Callaghan
19   Posted 10/11/2009 at 12:12:33

Report abuse

Paul Lally - personally - as far fetched this may seem at first pass - I think you are on to something there....

My thoughts were (just thoughts, no substance whatsoever) was that perhaps Pienaar needs a minor op...and this has been discussed with him and the SA authorities - the response back was no way from both player and SA. Any operation being riskier than a period of prolonged rest...

From our perspective - such an op to ’clear up one or two things’ would be quicker than no intervention and long rest..so we wanted him to have it he did not - queue impass and possible fall out.

All this seems a little far fetched, granted, but the silence surrounding Pienaar’s fitness and contractual discussions is deafening. Although - granted - Baz mentioned today that Pienaar is on the road to recovery - when this means he will play again is anyones’ guess.
Steve Pugh
20   Posted 10/11/2009 at 12:55:12

Report abuse

Okay here are my "guesses" as to when people will be back. As read from the Official Everton Website, which gives you all of the information that they have.

Piennar - late November
Jags late December early 2010
Arteta Late 09 early 2010
Neville late November,
Osman Late November
Big Vic Late 09 early 2010. Only Jo and Vaughn are as yet unknown.

Why are people insisting on a conspiracy of silence, the info is there and is updated on a regular basis. Maybe some of you won’t be happy unless the club rings you every evening to keep you informed and make sure that you are happy.
Alan Kirwin
21   Posted 10/11/2009 at 13:11:56

Report abuse

Ciaran, re Fellaini, are you referring to his struggle with the Hull defender who was repeatedly fouling him & wouldn’t let go of him? Last time I checked holding on to a player in the area (in fact anywhere) was a foul. And re Cahill, remind me of last time he put a player out for months on end through a violent or reckless challenge.

In fact let’s make it much easier Ciaran, rather than post ridiculously contrary & pious posts just for the sake of it, kindly remind us all of the last Everton player who committed a bad/deliberate foul resulting in horrendous injury & lengthy absence for an opponent.

Ciarán McGlone
22   Posted 10/11/2009 at 14:36:22

Report abuse

No I’m not Alan...

I’m talking about his highly publicised, and clearly intentional use of his elbows several times last season....

Now, are you going to answer the question???

Letter or no letter?
Ciarán McGlone
23   Posted 10/11/2009 at 14:40:52

Report abuse

Oh and by the way...I also remember you celebrating Neville’s tackle on Ronaldo last season, which was far more deliberate than Etuhu’s 50/50 challenge....and could have been just as damaging..

You’ve been pontificiating and moaning about the bad men hurting evertonians for some time...I merely think it’s time you were taken to task on it...


In a friendly way, of course....


Football is a contact sport....and we are as guilty of overstepping the mark as anyone else...
Steve Pugh
24   Posted 10/11/2009 at 18:49:35

Report abuse

Ciaran, you sound just like me!
Ciarán McGlone
25   Posted 10/11/2009 at 21:47:48

Report abuse

LOL...What, a teacher...


my god where did it all go wrong!

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb