The Mail Bag

Selling the Crown Jewels

Comments (47)

In today's Sunday Express, an article states we are possibly going to sell Jack Rodwell to Man Utd. Does anyone think this is a good move to fund our transfer spending in the summer or another example of selling off of one of our prize assets?

The article goes on to say : MANCHESTER United have been quoted a staggering £30million if they want to lure Everton starlet Jack Rodwell to Old Trafford.

Sir Alex Ferguson is a long-term admirer of the versatile Everton star and is putting plans in place to establish an English core to his United defence for years to come. He has already completed part one of his plan – signing Fulham’s Chris Smalling – and now the United manager wants to finish his rebuilding by signing Rodwell, 18. Everton are reluctant to sell but the club have a good relationship with United, despite the acrimonious departure of Wayne Rooney to Old Trafford in 2004.

A Goodison Park insider said: “Jack is one of the brightest talents here and although we want to keep him, everyone has a price.”

Moyes hopes bumping up the price will force United into increasing their bid.
James Elworthy, Liverpool     Posted 14/02/2010 at 06:59:52

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Steve Guy
1   Posted 14/02/2010 at 08:34:06

Report abuse

The Sunday Mirror is also reporting that Everton have placed a £30M price tag on Rodwell. Given the rumours circulating for some time that Utd plan to raid Everton for Jack in the Summer, this is all starting to look vaguely familiar. Deja vu, Rooney style.

If he's genuinely not for sale, then just say so. The fact that Everton have put a price tag on him (albeit allegedly) says that actually he is for sale — you'll just have to pay well to get him.

I'd like to see Everton come out in the next 24 hours and make an unequivocable statement on the situation telling Man Utd and anyone else to shove it where the sun don't shine, but I won't hold my breath!

Nick Entwistle
2   Posted 14/02/2010 at 15:08:45

Report abuse

Everton can possibly do many things, so balls to another page filling peice of nonsence from Mirror Group.

Surely it would be better to keep Rodwell and let someone get carried away with a lesser player like a Lescott to top up the coffers.

If we want real class to come to Goodison, those players need to look at who is already there and see others like themselves.
Anthony O'Sullivan
3   Posted 14/02/2010 at 15:25:52

Report abuse

It's a fact of life for Everton, if they want to buy players, they need to sell first; only problem is, if we keep selling genuine quality players to teams above us, then we have no hope of ever catching them.

Rooney and Rodwell are top 4 team players. If we don't have top 4 players, we won't break into the top 4; if we don't break into the top 4, we can't keep a hold of these players.
Kunal Desai
4   Posted 14/02/2010 at 15:35:11

Report abuse

The reality is that this story is more likely to come true in the summer or the other would be to sell Pienaar. We have no money and will look to acquire a few more players to add to the squad along with the usual few loanees. I certainly can see this happening. No other way forward.
David Hallwood
5   Posted 14/02/2010 at 15:33:14

Report abuse

I thought the statement that every player has his price is a statement of the obvious, just as we’ve seen with the ’big’ clubs. Ronaldo, possibly Fabregas and even Rooney himself hes been touted for a move abroad with big bucks quoted...
Stewart Littler
6   Posted 14/02/2010 at 15:37:55

Report abuse

Sorry, but, as much as I like Rodwell, he is nowhere near the quality of player we need to win things now. He may be in 5 or 6 years (as Rooney is) but could also go the other way. In an ideal world, we keep him, even if it means less incoming transfer activity. If £30m is on the table, and that gets us Donovan, plus another midfielder and striker, it may well be worth it.
Andy Codling
7   Posted 14/02/2010 at 15:42:40

Report abuse

Many fans will remember a famous quote from Bill Kenwright in which he claimed he wouldn’t even entertain talk of selling Wayne Rooney for £50m... shortly before selling him to Manchester United for £27m.

It will happen.
Kevin Spencer
8   Posted 14/02/2010 at 16:04:43

Report abuse

What makes United capable of buying Rodwell? I thought United were as broke as we are. After all, being broke means that you don’t have any money. So were are United going to get the £30m we are talking about? Are they going to sell both Old Trafford AND Wayne Rooney?

http://www.goal.com/en/news/9/england/2010/01/14/1744399/manchester-united-could-sell-old-trafford-and-wayne-rooney

If United are broke, but still being able to buy Rodwell for £30m. I don’t really understand why we (also broke) can’t buy Donovan for a fifth of that price!
Dom Eaton
9   Posted 14/02/2010 at 16:51:06

Report abuse

Not sure he would go for £30M, but we don't have a pot to piss in and for one, I think we spent the Rooney money very well.

However, I do think the we would have been in much trouble if we had not sold Shrek, we were playing around one man etc... the same can't be said these days. I'm on the fence on this one and wish EFC would be a little more honest about their finances.

Anyway, Once a Blue, Always a Blue, Mr Rooney.
Dan Brierley
10   Posted 14/02/2010 at 16:45:16

Report abuse

If Rodwell is worth £30 milliion, how much does that make Fellaini worth?

I think I am still in the minority of people that hasn’t seen what the big fuss is over Rodwell. I would rip someone's arm off if they offered us £30 million for him.
Andy Mack
11   Posted 14/02/2010 at 17:11:35

Report abuse

A structured £20m and he’d be off. The board couldn’t refuse, to be honest I thought Moyes would walk when the board sold Lescott last summer. I don’t agree with it, but it does seem the way we are running. I suppose thank heavens that we have a parade of talent to sell as god knows where we’d be without the Rooney, Lescott, AJ cash over recent seasons.
Ciarán McGlone
12   Posted 14/02/2010 at 18:49:02

Report abuse

Seling assets and loading us with debt... step forward the Bill Kenwright model for success...

He’s been doing this since he came here..will anybody be really surprised when it happens again?

I won’t. It’ll probably be accompanied with some bullshit about how football is for billionaires and that he’s been searching 24/7 for investment.

Groundhog Day at Everton....
Philip Jones
13   Posted 14/02/2010 at 19:48:30

Report abuse

I was as disappointed as the next blue when we sold Lescott, but, with his money, we acquired Distin, Heitinga and Bily — money well earned and spent in my opinion. Plus, Lescott’s head had been turned... what’s not to say the same could be said of Rodwell? 'Once a blue' and badge kissing, my arse! Also, in my opinion, Heitinga is a better defender than Lescott, only my opinion though.
Alan Clarke
14   Posted 14/02/2010 at 20:12:34

Report abuse

Man Utd are absolutely skint. Do you think for one minute Ziralex would not have spent a penny of the Ronaldo money if it was made available to him?

Glazer: "There you go Sir Ferguson, £80 million quid for you to turn us into the ultimate title winning team."

Ziralex: "No Thanks, I’ll just take Owen on a free thanks. He’s the missing piece for us."

Rodwell may leave us but there is no way Man U can afford him.
John Keating
15   Posted 14/02/2010 at 20:30:58

Report abuse

I’ve been supporting the Blues since the early 60’s and seen the best come and go
If I was Moyes and offered 30 million for Rodwell I’d take him myself to Old Trafford. MAKE him sign on the dotted and run with the money .
MAYBE he’ll be great and maybe he won’t get all possibilities in the contract and sign him, off
Rupert Sullivan
16   Posted 14/02/2010 at 20:35:55

Report abuse

I don’t for one moment think that Man U would be in for Rodwell, they already have Hargreaves and Carrick in that same position and they paid expensively for both.

However, if someone did offer £30m for the lad I too would like to see the club tell the bidder that he’s not for sale - I fear that the club would sell however.
Dermot Ryan
17   Posted 14/02/2010 at 21:33:35

Report abuse

Sorry. I’m with all those who think we should sell Rodwell for £30 million (or even a few million less). He might be a great prospect, but he is not a player that I associate with our strongest team. At the moment, he is not Rooney and he is not Fellaini. (And we have Arteta for cover for Fellaini.)

I would be a lot more concerned about selling Peanuts and Fellaini. I imagine we are going to be stuck with all these realities either this summer OR certainly the following season unless we show a serious intent and ability to crack the top 4.

Jay Harris
18   Posted 14/02/2010 at 21:40:04

Report abuse

Oh how fickle we are.

A few months ago he was the Everton "Kaiser" now it’s doubtful he’ll be top grade so lets sell him for 30 pieces of silver.

No wonder some people lick Kenwright’s arse if that’s your view.

Football is changing and players who are big,strong and skilful are becoming even harder to come by.

Rodwell is certainly destined for the top and could be a future England captain.

Wouldnt you love that to happen while he’s still at EFC.

The only reason we have to sell players is because of Kenwright and his cronies inabaility to generate a plan for the club to operate profitably and not massively in debt with consequent interest payments.
John Keating
19   Posted 14/02/2010 at 21:51:16

Report abuse

Jay we are fickle but also we are realistic. Let's suppose we kept Rooney. Can you honestly say we would have been any better than we are now?? I think not.

Same as Rodwell. Yes he's a great potential player. How many have we seen. Cadamarteri, Jeffers etc etc. The step up is immense.

Rooney made it and good on him. Rodwell.... maybe. Sorry, take the cash.

Eddy Grundy
20   Posted 14/02/2010 at 22:17:27

Report abuse

Everton to a fan is a way of life, Everton to our Directors is a business. We need to survive and to do that we will sell our marketable players.
David Hallwood
21   Posted 14/02/2010 at 22:30:58

Report abuse

I’d like to remind everyone that our Wayne, like our Joleon, asked for a transfer, so you can either put them in the reserves or get the best deal you can. I thought the Rooney sale was a win-win- — good for him, better for us, and if someone offers £30mil for Rodwell, bite their arm off.
Mark Reid
22   Posted 14/02/2010 at 22:37:11

Report abuse

I think it's a Red Shite story. Utd are skint and even following the bond issue have a £60 million interest payment to meet this season.

Budgets are tight, and we probably only have two clubs to think about in terms of trying to entice Rodwell. Won’t happen unless they meet a pre-determined asking price.

It's how Moyes (good guy) / Kenwright (bad guy) enticed £24 million out of Manchester City for the second best defender at the club, then went out and bought Heitinga for a quarter of that... who looks far better and committed to the club.
Mark Rankin
23   Posted 14/02/2010 at 22:33:42

Report abuse

"Rodwell is certainly destined for the top and could be a future England captain"

From what I have seen this should read "possibly destined for the top". It’s not that I think he’s a bad player, I don’t.

It’s not that I’d flog him to Man U, I wouldn’t. It’s just that he’s a young lad with potential who has come through the ranks at Everton and needs plenty of time, dedication and luck in order to become a quality Premier League player, "England captain" ... whoa, Nelly.

Keith Glazzard
24   Posted 14/02/2010 at 22:30:06

Report abuse

Would £30m pay for a redeveloped stand at Goodison? "The Rodwell Stand".

As a lad, I grew up to notice that the only truth in the Sunday Express was the general knowledge crossword. Some journalists have reliable information, but it is gold dust in the trade. They don’t fill up their column inches with it. You have to speculate to accumulate.

Rodwell, like you and me, has his price. I suspect that my £30k days are behind me, but his have hardly started. Pub talk.

It's been said many times on this site, the problem isn’t transfer fees — it's wages. For heavens sake, keep out of the transfer market — cut out the agents, and pay the players we have more, just to keep them.

Coming back to fitness, we have a squad to match any. We don’t need to sell, and for a while, we don’t need to buy. This club is close to a ’tipping point’. Two or three months ago, that could have been downward. Now its going upward, and can rise very rapidly. It could be that Moyes’s legendary faith in his players comes up a full house this May.
Mark Reid
25   Posted 14/02/2010 at 22:46:28

Report abuse

Oh and in relation to the above... and anyone coming back with "well they sold Ronaldo for £80million"....

Yes, but they bought Valencia for £16million, they have that £60million interest/bond dividend fee, along with the Glazers taking out their annual "pay" of £20million.



So the Ronaldo money is gone, along with continued instability over the ownership money. I don’t think their total summer budget will be over £20million, without not paying down their debts or actually incurring more debt.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/jan/20/manchester-united-glazers-debt-ronaldo


So, end of this season they still face the £60million (after bonds issue) "interest payment"/bond dividend (at 8% BEFORE any paying down of debt).

But this time without this time having sold an asset.

So, compared to last season they would possibly have a net shortfall of — get this — £30 million....
Keith Glazzard
26   Posted 14/02/2010 at 22:56:30

Report abuse

ps - my £30k days may yet come again, and I do get offers of teaching, but I am content enough.

Of course I meant the £30msquid the Sunday Express have offered for Jack.
Pat Finegan
27   Posted 15/02/2010 at 01:10:42

Report abuse

I’ll believe it when I see it on the OS. Toffeeweb is a reliable source, the OS is a reliable source, that’s about it. There will be speculation all summer about Pienaar, Fellaini and Rodwell leaving but we won’t actually know anything until there is an actual fee agreed.
Jay Harris
28   Posted 15/02/2010 at 05:47:03

Report abuse

John you may be right and without the Rooney money we’d certainly be doing a "Portsmouth" but we don't need to sell Rodwell and if we have any ambition to break into the top 4 in years to come then keeping Rodwell is essential not just for his ability but also for the signals it sends out to the players and other teams.

Hands off we’re not a feeder club we are a leading challenger to the "EX moneybags" elite.
Mark Stone
29   Posted 15/02/2010 at 09:23:28

Report abuse

There are two points worth making here:

The first is that this story probably doesn’t hold much water. Talk of "Goodison Insider’s" and "a source close to ...", is journo speak for "my imagination".

Secondly, though, if offered £30m Rodwell would without doubt be sold. Every player’s head is turned by the lure of money/trophies ... and if the player wants out there is very little the manager can do to stop him leaving.
Mike Allison
30   Posted 15/02/2010 at 09:53:20

Report abuse

Mark’s got a good point, phrases like

-"Goodison Insider’s" and "a source close to ..." 1 are well known for being unreliable, they’re ways for people to gets stories out without any accountability. Apparently American journalists consider it ridiculous that British journalists get away with doing that sort of thing.

On Rodwell himself, I think he’s quality, and I think over the next five years we could build a team around him, and he could become an important England player, so obviously I want to keep him. If we do have to sell him though, we should be realistic about it, get the maximum amount and use the money wisely. This would mean selling him sometime before August 28th in whatever window it was.

From Man United’s view though, I don’t see that he’s shown himself to be worth £30M yet though, so I can’t see that transfer happening. Rooney had already proven himself on the international stage when that transfer happened, Rodwell plays in a position which will take him a long time to mature into.
Richard Dodd
31   Posted 15/02/2010 at 10:21:35

Report abuse

All Rodwell possesses is potential. If Davey feels that by selling him AT THE RIGHT PRICE, it will provide the funds necessary to strengthen the side further so be it. We shouldn’t get too sentimental about ’selling the crown jewels’ and such other bollox — they all leave in the end, don’t they?

And, by the way, our resurgence has come whilst this latest Boy Wonder has been out of the side!

Gary Mortimer
32   Posted 15/02/2010 at 11:02:54

Report abuse

Correct me if I’m wrong, but last summer DM stated that Lescott was not for sale and it was only after the transfer request AND the abject performance against the Arse, did he decide it was best for all to cash in and take City for about £15m more than JL was worth.

Blame BK for the ground move debacle and the non-release of funds (which may actually be a happy accident in the "Credit Crunch Days") — but to blame him for JL leaving is not too realistic. Only Chelsea could afford to pay him what he’s getting at Citteh. Once his head had been turned, only a visit from the local "businessmen" to dissuade him from a move would work — Stevie GBH anybody (allegedly).

My views on Rodwell are that he’ll stay as long as he doesn’t ask for a move. I’m not sure that Man Yoo would risk that type of money in these times. If he does end up going — £30m would compensate I guess.

Liam Reilly
33   Posted 15/02/2010 at 11:40:55

Report abuse

Potential not Proven. The only team that would pay £30M would be City if a bidding war started, but as the boy is under contract, he would have to want to go there.

We’d be lucky to get £10-15Million for him from United and that would include staggered payments depending upon appearances, trophies and international caps.
Ciarán McGlone
34   Posted 15/02/2010 at 12:04:58

Report abuse

...and Gary Neville...
Kieran Fitzgerald
35   Posted 15/02/2010 at 12:08:25

Report abuse

I find the idea of building a team around the one potential world class player we have a strange one. Yes, in a couple of years time we may be able to say to quality players that we are trying to buy that we have Jack Rodwell, England superstar, in our team. But quality players cost money. We can afford to pick one up every eighteen months at present, once we sell a quality player, or the training ground, or next season’s sky money to the banks for the overdraft.

The pace will just be two slow and as Rodwell’s value grows, so will his wage demands and lust for trophies. We can’t afford to break our wage ceiling as it is. A world class player will look for world class wages.

Yes, we have highly talented players in our squad right now, and this may keep Rodwell for a couple of seasons. But by the time he starts to come into his stride they will be starting to age, and if we having startd to win things by then, who’s to say we will keep them. Who’s to say we’ll keep Pienaar after this season.

I would love to have kept a player of Rooney’s ability. I would like to be able to see us keep a player of Rodwell’s potential ability.

If we sole Rodwell, plus one or two fringe players like Anichabe, I think that we would have the cash to really improve the overall talent of the squad in one summer transfer window or over the space of two in a season.

Duncan McDine
36   Posted 15/02/2010 at 12:19:20

Report abuse

If we could raise £30m from the sale of Rodwell, I’d be very impressed. I think its more likely that we’ll be offered £15 - 20m tops, and I’m sitting on the fence with the idea of selling him for that figure.

At £30m its a no brainer... he’s no Wayne Rooney. A big talent, sure, but its unlikely that he’ll progress to being better than a Carrick / Barry / Huddlestone type player.

If you look at the progress Everton have made in the last 6 or 7 years, its through selling our prized assets for big money. Taking into account the fact that Rodwell still has a lot to learn defensively, I would suggest that anything over £20m would be good business.
Mike Allison
37   Posted 15/02/2010 at 12:37:33

Report abuse

"A big talent, sure, but its unlikely that he’ll progress to being better than a Carrick / Barry / Huddlestone type player."

I’d disagree with that, you’re setting the bar particularly high there. I think at times he’s already as good as them, but lacks their experience. Huddlestone’s a very odd name to throw in, I like him as a player, but he’s not exactly got a track record of achievement that Rodwell will struggle to match has he?
Tony Williams
38   Posted 15/02/2010 at 13:21:11

Report abuse

I can see him fitting in perfectly at Le Arse... unfortunately.
Sean McCarthy
39   Posted 15/02/2010 at 13:28:15

Report abuse

Sell Rodwell??? Who is gonna tell me daughter?????

Seriously I'd have him as captain within the next 2 years and build a team around him. Wake up and for once see what we've got. He's class and mature way beyond his years. He even binned his WAG after she went to the papers about their relationship.
Duncan McDine
40   Posted 15/02/2010 at 13:57:36

Report abuse

Mike, I agree with you that Huddlestone was an odd one to put in there. But what I meant was, he seems to be the kind of player that’s very comfortable on the ball, but can be accused of not getting involved enough. I can’t ever see Jack Rodwell developing that winning hunger and bollock-busting desire to put him in the elite bracket of Permier League midfielders.

Just my opinion. For what its worth, if he did manage to develop a really agressive winning mentality, along with learning to track runners etc, he could be a great. To be fair, though, this could be said of many English midfielders.
Jack Henderson
41   Posted 15/02/2010 at 13:56:43

Report abuse

Personally, I’ve always been a fan of his, he plays with a maturity way beyond his years. It's easy to forget how young he is, and if there’s a better prospect in the league then I have yet to see him.

How many 18 year olds are there in world football playing as regularly and showing such promise? Off the top of my head I can only name Canales at Santander (just joined Real Madrid), Santon at Inter and Sakho of PSG.

If he asks to leave then there’s nothing we can do, otherwise I think we should do all we can to keep him. Wouldn’t be surprised to see Yobo and Yakubu leave this summer, and to me Pienaar seems to be agitating for a move.

If we were to let any more players leave the disruption would be too great and I feel that that those three leaving will create enough space on the wage bill and bring in enough cash to fund our summer dealings.

Philip Bunting
42   Posted 15/02/2010 at 13:24:08

Report abuse

Sad state of affairs when all we as fans can do is talk about selling our best. Everton was always better than that!!!
Robert Johnson
43   Posted 15/02/2010 at 15:40:15

Report abuse

Firstly, if Man Utd or anyone else for that matter were to offer anything close to £30m for Rodwell now, we’d be mad not to take it. He’s shown potential but there’s absolutely no guarantee he will become the world class player that many, if not most seem to think he is destined to be.

You don’t build a team around one player - you build a team. The idea that by selling Rodwell we would be selling off an opportunity to ’build a great team around him’ is no more true than it was of Rooney.

We’ve got a great set of midfield players at the moment, and can play a number of different combinations of them effectively, as the performance against Chelsea showed — despite the absence of Fellaini, our performer of the season so far, we put in one of our best team performances yet.

I’m not saying I’d be pleased to see the lad go, but if we were to get a good price, as we did with Lescott, and strengthen the team as a whole as a result, then I’d be all for it.

Secondly, as a couple of people have mentioned, this is largely academic at this stage because there is no way that Man Utd have £30m to spend on an unproven youngster this year.

Matthew Tait
44   Posted 15/02/2010 at 15:51:35

Report abuse

I think that if we could get £30m, the right thing would be to sell Rodwell, although it would be a shame.

But let’s face it, his best position is probably defensive mid - i.e. Fellaini’s best position. So, we have two young players that are likely to be top, top class in the same position.

We can’t play them both in centre mid (or, we could, but I don’t think it would be a good idea - I would rather have Arteta and Fellaini), which leaves Rodwell pushed back to CB long term.

That may be fine, and CB may be Rodwell’s future at United too. But if Rodwell is really worth £30m then I think we could better spend that £30m somewhere else than have it sitting at CB - either in more attacking players, or in a new stadium. A £30m CB is a luxury Everton can’t afford, especially when Moyes has repeatedly shown the ability buy cheap CBs and develop them into excellent players.
Alan McGuffog
45   Posted 15/02/2010 at 16:21:55

Report abuse

Two points:

If Rodwell "makes it", ie: he developes in the way that we think he should, then he will be off. Man U or Arsenal. If his career starts to stagnate then he will stay.

Secondly, forget about £30 million... if Ferguson wants him, he will get him at the price he wants to pay. Moyes will make all the right noises but then Blue Bill will assume the position and will get royally shafted... maybe £15 million with all sorts of Mickey Mouse add-ons... eg: we can have first dibbs on Scholes.

Dermot Ryan
46   Posted 16/02/2010 at 08:13:04

Report abuse

Build a team around him? Really? I don’t think I can think of one player in the world, let alone Everton where I’d do that. Messi? Kaka? Rodwell? Get real.
Peter McHugh
47   Posted 16/02/2010 at 13:00:53

Report abuse

Rooney wanted to go, he hated Moyes and said so himself. I think EFC also wanted rid.

Rodwell is a different kettle of fish. Seems settled, only potentially world class. For £30 million I would definately sell him, but doubt he’s worth that much...

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb