The Mail Bag
Champions League Play-Off!
Comments (47)
Just read an article stating that a Champions League play-off is being considered for the Premier League.
The plan is that only the top three teams automatically enter the competition and then teams finishing in positions fourth to seventh play a mini-knockout competition.
I for one see this as a very exciting proposition. Not only does it increase the potential of someone breaking the "Sky 4" domination of CL qualification, but I can just picture us playing Liverpool in the play-off final. It would be more valuable than any FA Cup final in history, and they would have so much more to lose than we would. How sweet would it be to win that one?
I'm backing this idea 100%!
Jamie Sweet, Posted 15/02/2010 at 20:30:59
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
While I think it's probably a good idea, what's the bet the first team to qualify by such means finishing outside the top 4 are the RS!
However, we would be in a great position to win any May play-offs against Liverpool, Spurs or Aston Villa. It would be the sweetest victory of all to rob the CL spot from the lot across the park, after the snide way they got into the competition a few years back.
Somehow I don’t think this will ever see the light of day though.
And can we not see them winning the final thanks to a dubious penalty as a bambi style dive from their captain gives the excellent opportunity for the referee to ensure they get into Europe.
No way — the chiefs at the Premier League know what I know and this is just to make sure they make it,
For me collusion is not acceptable. The sooner this cartel that is the CL is smashed, or at least the competition reduced, the better. Champions, and maybe 2nd place teams, only. Scrap the league and return it to a cup format. It has ruined football.
It could also give them a swift kick in the goolies if they come forth then lose the play-offs. I just think they realise for the first time they are under a very serious threat from the also ran’s in the EPL, and are willing to cover their backs.
If the better teams finish in 3rd & 4th then they need to be good enough to get past those teams around them to get a CL spot, I don’t see what’s wrong with that. ... So for instance lets say Birmingham finish 7th, they would have to play an away play-off tie at say, Villa (5th), the winner of that would go on to play Arsenal at Wembley. If Birmingham won those 2 games after a long season then they deserve to take Arsenal’s place in the CL.
I mean c’mon, apart from the odd game here & there Arsenal haven’t exactly set Europe alight and they’ve had any number of opportunities. Sure other teams would struggle at first but give it a few years and I think we might have an all-together different and more changeable top 4 & some teams that can hold their own in Europe.
If they still fail then there’s always the Europa League, which if they win could also qualify this way.
I actually think it is a disgusting idea, why should a team that finishes 7/8th potentially beat out a team possibly 30 points above them on the strength of one game. It may be good for us if we get into those positions but still a horrible idea.
What next, play-offs for relegation so a team with potentially 10 points gap from the next team getting relegated.
Money-making bullshit.
Suppose the team in fourth was vastly superior all season and finished well ahead of the others, but had some bad injuries for the two games of the play-off. Just makes a mockery of the league system.
And not just from the Sky 4 point of view.
It would be an extra fixture at Wembely for the FA to cream some money from - oh they do love a game at Wembley do the boys at Lancaster Gate!!
should be that. In point of fact IF there have to be play-offs, then automatic qualification should be restricted to the champions and play-off between the next four clubs might be a possibility but frankly I think a Champions League should be just that.
The proposal can’t be implemented for 3 seasons, and who knows what the finances of the Premier League clubs will be by then.
At present ,4 teams object to this apparently, Liverpool, Arsenal, Man Utd and Chelsea. If it disrupts the established top 4, then I am in favour, although I think they might be better to do something like
5th v 6th
4th v the winner of 5th v 6th
Winner gets CL, RU gets Europa League
So as to give the 4th team a benefit of some sort.
As much as I’d love to see the extra football (and it’s certainly a high stakes prize on show) — I really think the Champions League should be for Champions only.
However, if it does come off (3 years away) — it’ll no doubt be a very exciting competition...
Well, guess where these games will be played????
First legs in Dubai and Malaysia, second legs in LA and Jo’Berg and the two legged final in Sydney and... whoever promises the most cash..
As much as I dislike the cartel, qualification should be on merit.
Maybe a better idea is to have the FA Cup or Europa winners going into the CL, at least they will be "Champions" of their competition. I know this has been discussed on here previously.
Im not convinced about this argument its all a plot to get the RS into the CL. They still have to win it remember. Although the time they qualified by coming 5th still annoys me. I agree if you win a trophy you should defend it but they were not the rules at the time (another argument for another day).
Whats wrong with another day at Wembley, I quite enjoyed going to the Cup Final (result aside), and the Semi was somthing else.
Finally it can’t happen for another 4 years anyway I think including this one. Somthing to do with the TV rights having already been sold and the format of the competition being set.
The EPL is becoming one of the most popular leagues in the world, of any sport, and the smaller clubs want a piece of the action, rather than all the money going to the Sky 4.
Between now and the end of the current TV contracts, there will be lots of ideas floating around. You can bet your house that Game 39 will be mentioned again in some new format. Whether any of them will change anything (or even happen) is another matter.
-----------------
It’s pathetic isn’t it...I’ve had posts mysteriously disappear for commenting on this unhealthy infatuation with Liverpool shaped conspiracy theories..
If he had, he’d essentially be saying we don't have legitimate claims to be a Top 4 club — which may or may not be true... but he’s never going to admit that to them or himself.
In an ideal world, I’d want us to fight for 4th genuinely but to be honest I’m sick to death of the same four clubs creaming it in year-in, year-out so personally think it’d be great to be honest — anything to spread the joy.
The Champions League ceased being a competition for Champions at its inception and this way a play off a) puts the frighteners on the Sky 4 not in the top 2 positions and b) keeps the season well and truly alive for anyone in the top half.
Play off for 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th. Winner of final goes into Chs League, runner up goes into Europa then the two losing semi finalists play off for final Europa place.
The more chance we have to play in big games the better as far as I’m concerned —- and it would be a fucking big game.
Last 5 seasons, teams who have finished 5th or 6th:
Everton 3 times
Aston Villa 2
Tottenham 2
Bolton, Blackburn, Liverpool 1
We’re the obvious beneficiaries of this idea so I really don’t see how in the world people think it’s anti-us and pro-Liverpool? - In the last 4 seasons they’ve only been 4th once, either 3rd or better other years.
Let’s get behind this idea instead of constantly panicking about how the Shite might benefit.
I do not see how this works with the Europa positions. Would the runner up of the final get this? And what if one of the teams wins the FA Cup, who would get the free Europa place?
Let's say that the play offs are 4th vs 7th and 5th Vs 6th.
4th loses to 7th and then 7th beats 6th in the final.
7th goes into CL, 6th into EL.
Does 4th get free EL spot, if one becomes available, becuase they are the highest original league position?
Or what about another playoff match between 4th and 5th to decide.
It doesn’t work for me.
I thought most people were in favour of reducing the number of matches played these days. I can’t see the England manager being happy in a summer tournament year.
I can’t see a manger being happy about it if they are in the FA cup or CL final but have only managed a play-off place in the league.
And finally for the Liverpool bias brigaders — If Liverpool were to finish in a relegation position, how about a new play-off style so that they play the runners up of the Championship and whever wins that game goes into the Champions League!!!!!!!
If Everton were to finish 4th and Liverpool finish anywhere below 4th, Liverpool will automatically qualify at Everton’s expense. This way the refs don’t even need to get involved.
The rules are clear.
I’ll get shot down for this but isn't the bottom line that the only team that suffers in this is those that come 4th? Unless they win the play-offs, in which case it makes no real difference (more games, yes, but also more revenue and, to be honest, so what — isn't playing football matches what this 9 month excercise every year is all about...?).
Places 1-3 are essentially unaffected, 5-7 get a shot at the big time and 4th has to lump it — after all, they knew they’d have to play off at the end of the season if they didnt get Top 3 any way. So, three teams are better off, one isn't. Job done.
If they do introduce it, I can put my house on it we get 4th in the inaugral year and then there will be a mighty wringing of hands, weeping and a gnashing of teeth! Especially if we then go on to lose to the RS in the final! TW will experience meltdown!
Bring it on. Get it done.
If they want to make it a more even playing field, the final CL place should go to the winners of the FA Cup. At least they could justify being champions of something. The team that finishes 7th should have no claim on a CL place.
No, if you finish fourth you are in, if you don’t you are out.
Ciaran — I’ve had posts disappear for no reason other than someone doesn’t like the cut of my jib — It’s probably a Kopite Konspiracy :)
So for Everton I think this would be great. The only change I would make would be that the Winners (only) of the FA Cup get a spot and the play-offs are then from 3rd to 6th.
This would grant a real prize back to the FA Cup and most of the teams from 6th upwards would be involved in Europe in any case, so it would just be a question of which cup.
This proposal isn’t about breaking up the cartel, it’s about maintaining the status quo. And far from thinking it’s a conspiracy against us for Liverpool, it’s quite clearly for Liverpool and Arsenal to the detriment of probably city. We should be very wary of this, just do a quick mental list of the clubs in the premier who have the most experience of 2-legged ties.
As for the TV contract, I’m certain that they would jump at the chance to show these play offs. If they were offered the extra games free or for a nominal amount they would bite the FA’s grubby hand off. Think of all the adverts they could show during the "richest game in the world".
I’m against it for the simple reason that the RS NEED IT BADLY. Fuck ’em, lets watch and laugh as city qualify season in season out while the RS get buried under the mountain of debt that they used to climb above us and the other big clubs who didn’t have FA/UEFA/SKY to help them out.
The rule won’t appear for at least three years....wrap some tinfoil around your head.
A pencil up each nostril as well!
Its Richard Scuadmore with his latest ploy to get ENGLISH Premier League games played abroad.
Its the pre-cusor to the 39th Game all over again.
The man has never given up.
What they should do is decrease difference 4th/5th place can expect to earn in prize money. The difference can be anything around £30 million a season.
Its ridiculous. Suits certain clubs and reduces competition. This play off scheme is just a ploy to get games played "on tour".
To the detriment of supporters in the UK.
The G14 was officially disbanded but are you saying these clubs have no influence on Uefa?
No, I will not be at the game tonight, Andy.
It is not fair to change the rules to spin a bit more money out of the game.
If we truly want to maintain football as a "live" specatator sport and the intention is to break up the sky 4 monopoly there are much better ways to achieve this.
For a start the one that grinds me is the astronomical wages paid to average players who dont know what to do with it, followed by agents who deal in lottery style fees.
It is all obscene and is already bringing the game down........ Portsmouth, Southampton , Cardiff, Crystal Palace.
We need to introduce regulation of players wages and agents fees ASAP.Then watch the change in the landscape.
This competition is the reason for all our domestic cups being devalued, you can shove it up your arse if you ask me.
a) Fairness
b)Financial
c)A pro-Liverpoolfc conspiracy
And the winner is?
I’d rather not shove it up my arse..
It’s arguable that allowing more than one domestic team into the CL is where the problem you are referring to originates from...
So, in answer to your question - YOU care about the devaluing of the CL...Because it’s effectively responsible for what people erroneously term "the sky monopoly" ( it has very little to do with sky - all premiership teams get a reasonably fair amount of the sky TV money - which is seperate from the CL).
1) There is no capacity in the calander for any more games. Certainly not in an international championship year.
2) UEFA won’t have it.
On a wider note, i feel there is a lot of Urban myth again being banded about. I do think the FA have the interests of the big four at heart generally, but i feel we take this Liverpool/FA conspiracy too far as mentioned above. If, and its a biggish If, Liverpool finish 4th this year next year and the year after they deserve to play in the CL. It is up to everyone else to pick up their games. If nobody can beat liverpool this year they will only have themselves to blame.
In my opinion the only automatic place should be the champions. Why not have 2nd to 7th all play off for the available CL and EL places.
Could not be any fairer than that although we may have a few objections.
I’ve suggested that it should all be done on goal difference instead of points. This makes every minute of every game just as important. How different would the league look today based on goal difference, instead of trying to re-create mini cup finals.
Argument for the idea:
It gives clubs other than SKY 4 a chance to play in that lucrative competition.
Argument against the idea:
The FA Cup Final plus international games and finals of European games would not allow sufficient time for extra games.
Results of those PL games already played between 4th to 7th could be used to determine the CL place. That would produce an answer and solve the problem of extra games.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.


1 Posted 15/02/2010 at 23:24:28
Report abuse
David Moyes was quoted in the media giving his opinions. He says " I am for it in some ways, and against it in others", but I get the feeling that he's more inclined towards this proposal.
After reading his views, I can see his logic. The proposed revamp might offer teams like ours a slightly better opportunity to qualify for the better European competition compared to our chances now (or even in the next decade methinks!). But honestly, my first reaction to the headline and opening paragraph was "Dirty cheats! They're just trying to offer Liverpool another lifeline to get into the competition", seeing that this season they're facing another real possibility of not qualifying via the automatic top four places...