The Mail Bag

Wealthy Evertonians

Comments (17)

An article recently appeared in the Liverpool Echo regarding the Times rich list and highlighted the some of the most notable names connected with Liverpool including Sir Paul McCartney, Lord Grosvenor, Steve Morgan etc.

The name that really surprised me was Lord Grantchester who was quoted as having a fortune of £1.2 billion inherited from the Moores dynasty and his late Grandfather Sir John. Over the years, I have been intrigued by Lord Grantchester and his tenuous links with Everton FC... is he really a fan or does he take a mere passive interest in our fortunes?

On delving a little deeper he is involved with the Everton Collection as a trustee. Grantchester obviously has his reasons for keeping his distance from the running / ownership of Everton; however, given the Moores connection with Everton and his obvious wealth, it begs the question: Why hasn't he been more actively involved?
Peter Laing, Liverpool     Posted 27/04/2010 at 09:52:32

back Return to the Mail Bag

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Martin Clark
1   Posted 27/04/2010 at 12:40:47

Report abuse

He's obviously got other priorities!

It would be wonderful to have a billionaire who was a true fan. Even if he just gave Everton financial security and maybe Moyes a little spending money!

I really don't think we're far off from being right up their with the best of them.

Three or four decent signings: right mid, right back, striker and cover at left back.

Can hope!
Mark Hill
2   Posted 27/04/2010 at 13:07:07

Report abuse

Maybe it's because he realises that today there really isn't any money to be made in football? Or that's what BK would have you believe it would seem (though I am not BK bashing, just the feeling I get). Although I do think BK (and the 'team') to some extent has steadied the ship for us....

We can dream...!
Phil Martin
3   Posted 27/04/2010 at 14:07:15

Report abuse

Obviously Grantchester feels nothing for the club. Aside from maybe some historic family obligation to have some involvement. Because otherwise he could've take over long ago -surely?

The club finanically is almost on its knees. This will be the third summer in a row we can't afford to buy a single player (without substanstial sales first).

What happens when/if we ever finish in the bottom half and recieve even less TV/Prize money we recieve now? Surely we'd be forced to sell players just to pay back outstanding loans.

Moyes has presented us with a potentially great squad of players but our current board are serving shit pie.
Nick Entwistle
4   Posted 27/04/2010 at 15:44:07

Report abuse

Maybe some supporters would like it kept just like that.

Lets say he works 80 hours a week doing whatever he does, why would he want to then get involved and be responsible for something that gives him time out and pleasure away from his day-to-day dealings?

Then again, he may spend all his time on a yacht in St Tropez supporting the LA Lakers...
Matthew Lovekin
5   Posted 27/04/2010 at 17:02:57

Report abuse

Sir Philip Green????

Terry Leahy???
Dan Brierley
6   Posted 27/04/2010 at 17:15:38

Report abuse

"Obviously Grantchester feels nothing for the club."

Bit harsh considering it was Grantchester that donated 100 grand which basically saved the David France collection from being sold off.

Here we go again with the "Moyes has created a squad of players" crap. David Moyes is an employee, who takes home the best part of 50 grand a week from the club. He doesn't buy players out of his own pocket, nor does he negotiate contracts.
James Flynn
7   Posted 27/04/2010 at 19:36:58

Report abuse

Finance follows winning. The first sign of new construction won't be the point of a spade being driven into the ground. It will be EPL Silverware being lifted overhead. Watch and see all the rich fans we have after that.

Put another way, switch the RS and our history. Which team would, "the most notable names connected with Liverpool including Sir Paul McCartney, Lord Grosvenor, Steve Morgan etc." be connected with in that case?

Everybody loves a winner, rich folks just like the rest of us. We're right there to challenge next season after all these years of building. When we see the cup being lifted, we can anticipate Goodison re-furbish/new stadium/whatever occurring. Because winning is THE money magnet.
Iain Love
8   Posted 27/04/2010 at 20:11:36

Report abuse

Funny, I thought Liverpool where skint as well? Macca obviously doesn't care.

Really, most people I know with money are as tight as a duck's arse... and that's why they have money. I can't think of a worse investment than a football club and when you look at Citeh, £200mill down the pan and maybe, maybe 4th; R Madrid — shit loads and 2nd in a two- horse race...

I can understand teams with a global image making money for the owners but we don't have that. Donovan would help but Beckham's the man.

Eugene Ruane
9   Posted 27/04/2010 at 20:40:44

Report abuse

I was at school in the 60's and 70's.

At 'playtime' (in the juniors and seniors), we kicked a ball.

Full matches, 3-an'-in, 'SPOT' (no full stops, exclamation marks or underlines!) Knock-out Paddies etc.

Actually, when I say 'we' I'm talking about (I'm guessing) 90-95% of all the boys.

But as you were legging it about (after a Frido that was more balloon than ball), you would from time-to-time notice those kids who were playing ...um.. 'other things'.

We thought of them as 'oddies' and 'soft-arses'

They often seemed to be 'playing' sci-fi type stuff.

Doing 'robot walks' (arms out in front and walking like Kenneth Moore in Reach For The Sky).

Anyway, the reason for 'jermember' ("The lowest form of conversation" - T. Soprano) is that I've always thought of the Beatles as 'playground oddies'.

Yes of course they were four lads who shook the world...etc blah and two of them (sort of) ended up cool.

But something tells me that they'd have been nowhere near a ball at school and so the idea of Macca ploughing grillions into us has, to me, always seemed a non-starter.

Anyway got to go, it's my pick.....aww shite - come on Doddy you're the last one left, I suppose I've GOT to have you (you're in goal!)
Fran Mitchell
10   Posted 27/04/2010 at 21:16:37

Report abuse

Why would he?

There is no profit to be made. He may support the club, but why waste your money for a game of football.

I enjoy football, I support Everton, but if I was rich, I wouldn't invest in Everton, or any football club. I would go and watch the games, maybe, if I could be bothered with the flight from South America, but otherwise I wouldn't invest.

Ambramovich has spent a fortune to win a few league titles, it really ain't worth it.
David Freel
11   Posted 27/04/2010 at 21:19:33

Report abuse

The legends of lore have it, firstly, that the vast majority of Lord Grantchester's estimated fortune is controlled by his mother, Lady Grantchester, and therefore not his to do with what he please.

And, secondly, that he still harbours bitter resentment over being excluded in Bill Kenwright's takeover in 2000... to the point where he wouldn't be party to any takeover that put so much as a penny in Bill's pocket.

Steve Foster
12   Posted 27/04/2010 at 21:23:20

Report abuse

Sounds like a gloat, but one of the fab four is actually a family member. Recently at the Echo Arena opening, we were all invited backstage, and being an Evertonian, I wanted to know which side of the city his footballing love was.

His reply, Everton, something I sort of already knew. So I just spat it out and asked about investing. There was no reply, and just a blank, vacant look in his eyes.

Now maybe he did not hear me, or it was all that drumming had affected his understanding of the english language.

So, there is one rich Blue you can scratch off your list, thats for sure!

I think we have a strong enough squad, and good youth's coming through to really do something next year. Without the distraction of the Europa, and a good pre-season, I think the top 4 is now just the top 2, and 6 teams that can fill the vacant CL positions, so why not us?
John Vanderwerff
13   Posted 27/04/2010 at 23:05:18

Report abuse

I don't think his mum will let him spend his money!
Alan Williams
14   Posted 28/04/2010 at 08:12:10

Report abuse

I always find it amusing how everybody slag’s off BK yet nobody has ever mentioned the Grantchester’s wealth that has been on the board for tens of years. I mentioned this over 18 months ago when the attacks on BK were just petty and small minded. They have the wealth to take control of the club with petty cash, they could have cross guaranteed Kings Dock and many other investment opportunities but they have chosen not too. If we are going to be honest they have the right to say no as it’s their money, “old money” is littered with individuals who are a little more prudent and comfortable with ones own wealth so its not out of character. The rich list is not an exact record of wealth it’s a mere guess at the value of the Estate, if we all add up values of houses, pensions, saving etc etc then on paper we all look more wealthy than we really are but to purchase EFC you need cash, and sacks of it. Ask yourself this simple question, if BK had their wealthy I would be pretty sure we would be in a far better stadium and fiscal position than we are today. His (BK) biggest failing is purely down to lack of wealth, he admits that personally all the other mistakes is him and others trying to punch above their weight financially and on some occasions failing miserably. COYB
Eugene Ruane
15   Posted 28/04/2010 at 10:27:17

Report abuse

Alan Williams; my guess (and that's all it is) as to why 'everybody slags off BK' and why "nobody has ever mentioned the Grantchester’s wealth that has been on the board for tens of years" is (partly) one of profile.

In other words, Lord and Lady Poshington-Toff keep a very low profile and are therefore more difficult targets.

BK (the man known to many now as 'Luvvie Darling) has other ideas – like pushing his fat grinning grid into any camera within a ten mile radius and practically 'ripping his stomach out' at the mention of Moyes.

(NB: and being the biggest Tom Pepper this side of the old Bar-K doesn't help).
Phil Bellis
16   Posted 28/04/2010 at 14:53:21

Report abuse

Sort of a crossover with the Ground Move Low Priority posts but... shame Sir Macca wouldn't be interested in funding the Jim or Linda McCartney stands — and him Walton-born.
Dennis Stevens
17   Posted 28/04/2010 at 22:14:02

Report abuse

Alan Williams : "...all the other mistakes is him and others trying to punch above their weight financially and on some occasions failing miserably." That's a very generous assessment of all the Board's mistakes during the Kenwright era. I'd like to think that, good or bad, the Board are a more than just victims of circumstance.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb