First, the Echo covers LFC more because, in the grand scheme of things, they are bigger than Everton. People around the world know Liverpool, they generally don't know Everton. Of course they're going to get more media coverage. It's like the New York media covering the Mets as much as the Yankees. Not going to happen because one is much more famous and wins a hell of a lot more than the other.

What exactly would you like the Echo to cover regarding Everton right now? One team is signing many players, the other is not. One is creating news, the other is not. It's their job to cover the news, and appeal to the story that will get the most readers. If people weren't interested they wouldn't be filling their pages.

And then on to comparing Hicks/Gillette to Kenwright. Sorry, not a fair comparison. Kenwright has his faults, mostly not being rich enough to buy the players Everton's supporters want. But he did not leverage the club into hundreds of millions in debt over just a year or two, leading to the team failing to qualify for the Champions League. Kenwright has Everton in debt, just as every club is, but it just isn't the same situation at all.

"Selling virtually every player we have received a bid for" ? just stop it. Everton actually has quite a strong core and is hardly constantly selling. But don't let facts get in the way of your ridiculous rant.

No, he's not a saviour, he's a business owner who isn't as rich as we'd like. But go ahead and try to drag the Echo down with you because you want them to leave their pages blank until Everton makes some news. Which, as you write in the last sentence, hasn't fucking happened.

Good God, you even live in Florida. It's not even your local paper but you still want to boycott it. Why don't I start a boycott of your Florida paper because they don't have enough LA Lakers news?

Now we hear the families of young lads who have given their lives for this country are having their grief and privacy invaded. WTF?

Sure the Murdoch flagship sank yesterday, but rest assured another tatty little rag peddling the same tittle tattle and misery will be up and running before next Sunday comes around. Same shit newspaper, different name.

I know you didnt mean to draw comparisons, Thomas, but trust me, The Echo is the least of our problems. I`m not a reader, but I think when Everton do finally create a bit of news, we can all be confident they will print it.

If we really want to make a difference we should be talking about boycotting Sky TV and anything else associated with this empire.

Is it naive to dream of waking up tomorrow to find Sky TV no longer existed and the top flight in English football had once again become a level playing field?

Can we go back?

I stopped buying the Post/Echo when it moved production to Manchester; small minded perhaps but, if they can't invest in my city, I won't invest in them.

So that's alright then.

The fact is that the Echo is a Liverpool paper & Liverpool is split right down the middle (some say there's more Evertonians in Liverpool than Reds), so we should expect them to cover both equally because their readership is split equally. I can understand a certain bias in a national newspaper, but not a local one. Surely the Echo currently have all the news they need about Liverpool without having to pad things out with a bizzarely timed article about their European Cup successes.

I just read Prentice's piece of garbage about no need for revolution at Everton. I disagree as most of you do. Not because I view Kenwright as the same as Hicks and Gillette, but because Everton cannot and will not move forward under the current finances. It must change for us to have a chance to compete. Now if there is an organization this summer, with the stands filled with banners and waving scarfs a la Man U's current campaign, lets see how they cover it.

Oh, forget it; I can't be arsed!

Almost as bad as Merseyside, one morning when the odious red mare Linda McDermott was off ill, the news bit was read by a "Sha Reval" (sp) who,after banging on about the Shite, was about to do a piece on Everton when she stopped and said "Oh, I'm not allowed to mention those am I?" Whether she was making a point or was a bit dim and revealed what she'd been told I don't know, but it underlines all I've ever thought about the local "meeja". And that is all true. Sadly.

I boycotted the Echo in 1987 and never bought another one since. The day after Everton won the league, I, like many others, bought every paper, only to find The Echo's main footy page was filled with the headline Ian Rush going to Juventus, not the local team winning the league...

Oh no, not the Echo; this paper has had a blatant favourite for 30 years now, and we as Blues can put a stop to it by not buying it. If you don't agree, I appreciate that. I hope you enjoy the 24-page color pull-out next week.

Update today: we bought no one!!

And whoever runs the website ? what makes you think we want to see videos of the kitman telling us what jokers Leon Osman and Tony Hibbert are? ? So what? Why are we bothered if they're havin a great laugh out in Austria when they're both shit and have never won a thing.

Boy did Prentice jump in with both feet on his article, anyone who had doubts about my article won't now, following Prentice's piece. It displays all what we have come to expect from the Echo, patronising rubbish, smooth over this and smooth over that, there you go, have a nice pat on the head and run back to where you belong... it is shocking.

We don't ask for much ? unlike the inbreds across the park; that doesn't mean we have to accept being trodden down though. Keep up the fight, Everton are worth fighting for, it is all a big part of our lives.