Season 2011-12
The Mail Bag
Everton's defensive football a product of David Moyes?
Since David Moyes took over the management of Everton FC in 2002, we have been subjected to absurd and tedius defensive football. Yes, granted, at certain moments of his reign he has been so adventurous and daring to even play a fundamental 4-4-2. However, in recent years, a stale 4-5-1 formation has been enforced, with the motive of packing the midfield with players full of workrate and effort, generating the lack of finesse players and a creative edge to our brand of football.
Many Everton fans have admitted being bored and sometimes even embarrassed by the brand of football we have displayed this season. This was most certaintly the case in the game broadcasted on Sky Sports 1 for all to see, away to West Brom. Yes, we came away with the 3 points that were so desperately needed; however, surely there can only be a certain degree of satisfaction with a result which saw one of, if not, the most dismal football game I've ever witnessed.
Recent weeks have seen the occasional appearance of two strikers deployed upfront in Anichebe and Stracqualursi, but this has only been a result of the recent pressure put on Moyes concerning the poor football being played, and this has reflected on attendances, especially for games at Goodison Park with the lowest turnout since Moyes took over, seen at home to Norwich nearly one month ago. Moyes's excuse or evidence of playing two upfront seems to be with Cahill and Saha, yet we all know that Cahill isn't a natural striker.
It makes me ashamed to say this but, in some cases this season, I would go as far as to say that Everton are the most boring football team to watch in the Premier League. The brand of football Everton fans have had to endure this season is just quite honestly not good enough for a football club to the stature of ours. Keeping the ball doesn't seem to be the issue; it's the cutting edge, the ball through the eye of a needle, and that clinical finish. These are vital aspects of our game that we are severely lacking.
This brand of football is a result of the ethos embarked upon with the squad by David Moyes, of effort and working for each other, which is all very well... However, without flair and natural skill and ability amongst the squad, this does not score the goals which ultimately win football matches ? not keeping the ball and pressing the opposition.
Chris Walford, Posted 20/01/2012 at 00:02:54
Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
This mentality of Moyes's is the reason why he has never won anything and why he will never get a bigger job than Everton.
if everyone followed your lead wed all be posting without ever having a good word to say about our club.
and if we followed your advice, you wouldnt have a club to moan about.
http://www.talksport.co.uk/magazine/features/2012-01-17/leagues-best-passing-team-revealed-arsenal-chelsea-swansea-man-united-man-city-spurs-or-liverpool?p=9
That means 1 in 4 passes goes astray. From this you can work out our pattern of play:
1st pass Howard -> Fullback
2nd pass Fullback -> Fellaini
3rd pass Fellaini -> Centre-half
4th pass Centre-half HOOOOOOOOOOOF!
It's very easy to have good passing accuracy if all you're doing is tapping it around your defence and defensive midfielder when you're under no pressure from the opposition.
We are absolutely woeful at the moment as a spectacle. There hasn't been one rousing performance all season even in games we've won. It will be a happy day when the Kenwright-Moyes double act leave town.
And I think most football fans will agree we have played good football under Moyes. Unsuprisingly this happened at a time when we had enough money to compete and were able to invest in and keep good attacking and creative players. Many, as on this thread, dismiss the monetary effect, yet seemingly ignore the clear correlation between successful good football and money, and the decline of Goodison football (which was pretty shite when Moyes took over no?) with the decline of funds.
Don't get me wrong, when we came 4th, none of us were complaining, it's just the past couple of years we have completely stagnated and right now I do not see where this team is heading...
Oh we have, yes.
For 20 minutes at home v Villa we looked good....
End.
We have consistently finished higher in the league than teams with similar resources. Granted its not always been pretty but beggars can't be choosers.
surely Fellaini, Bilya, Rodwell, Baines, Saha, Cahill, Jagielka, Distin, Heitinga, Osman, even Neville, etc, are more than capable of passing and moving much better than they have been doing this season?
They may not be Lionel Messi but they are NOT crap players, are they?
they don't watch the other games because you hardly have two boring teams on, there is always a better side on a Sky match so the game seems more interesting.
I huarrantee you, if you watched a Wigan v Stoke game, you would swear that you have discovered the cure from insomnia.
Moyes has played good football, even Merse was creaming himself over Pienaar and calling us Arsenal light....the problem, as always, was that we were playing lovely tippy tapp football but having absolutely no outcome at the end.
It's gotten worse now because Pienaar and Arteta have gone and we have no flair left in the side,
Yes it's down to Moyes, but it's also down to the players and it is deffinitely down to the board for not getting replacements for our more skilfull players
On paper you wouldn't swap any of the first team players of Swansea for Everton! Yes, Moyes and Everton will finish higher than Swansea but in the token he will kill my passion to watch a team that I dearly love.
For me, our problem is that no-one breaks forward from midfield, they are all on a tight leash. It's no surprise we play better football when we go a goal down because you see the players think, "Oh, fuck it ? let's try and score."
Moyes is no better than Big Sam.
Swansea are probably best example of playing football and they also have a striker who I enjoy watching, makes great runs and seems like a good finisher.
I think the article is about our brand of football as opposed to whether or not we are crap as a team. Unfortuantely, we're both at the moment. Spurs at home and Chelsea at home were last times I saw us play how I would like - icing on cake was winning those games too. We are extremely boring now and a terrible terrible team
Whatever cosmetic gripe you have about Moyes's tactics, he has out-thought over 50% of his peers in the Premier League... for a decade.
Therefore, when you describe his tactics as "absurd,"" I find that line illogical.
Moyes has to cut his cloth accordingly; When circumstances have allowed, we have played plenty of decent stuff, but I concede, the recent deployment of Neville & Heitinga in midfield isn't designed with aesthetics in mind, more a case of needs must.
However, Moyes will not break out from the blinkered obstinate strategy he uses by being more adventurous and playing the younger players. The mediocre football we are serving up every week is a direct result of Moyes's doctrine.
We have seen Cahill and Saha decline along with the the same old sideways passers like Osman, Fellaini and Neville.
We got rid of the pace that Beckford had and the craft of Arteta and that's why we are what we are now-a slow predictable team that anyone can get results against and very often do. I would like to see more of Barkley, Rodwell and Donovan together with Vellios up front.
What has Moyes got to lose except paying customers... and be sure ? this will reflect in season ticket sales for next season.
Just a point about Swansea, the do look confident going forward but as soon as they get put under any pressure they crumble like no team I've ever seen in the premier league, before. Not they key to success, I'm afraid. If we did have a team who were both superb going forward and solid at the back I'd be made up (and our chairman would be from Russia or Abu Dhabi).
Dave Wilson ? Don't be like that, you know I'm exaggerating. You go a lot of the games right? Surely you think the players we have are capable of better football? And don't you think Moyes really emphasises and instructs all his players to think about defence first, attack second? How many teams in history have had success with this style of play?
The same questions go to Sam Hoare, are you entertained watching us? Do you think Moyes will get a bigger job than Everton?
You know, I'd love Moyes to think "Fuck this, I won't be here much longer, I'm going to go for it and believe we can win every game". Maybe then we'd beat one of "the big 4" away from home. But, it's been 10 years, and I just can't see him changing.
School of Science and all, Football is an entertainment game. Think of how many great goals we've scored over the years or been in fantastic edge of the seat games, it's only a handful and I think Everton FC fans deserve better.
Credit where credit is due, his football has been effective to a point in the league. I have been proud of our recent finishes. However doesn't negate the fact that it is awful to watch. I
Although Moyes tactics and style of play have been far from effective in Europe. Infact it's been quite embarrising at times & he has looked like a rabbit in the headlights. But suppose that's a different kettle of fish???
Yes Swansea play great football but they've only been in the prem for 2 minutes. Teams like blackpool and reading have done similarly and then faded. Moyes keeps it basic and keeps us higher in the points table than we are in the money table.
I'm sure if Moyes had Everton play like Wigan, you'd well defend it.
Not entirely sure who the 'big four' are any more. But didn't we beat Liverpool, Man City, Spurs and Chelsea away from home just last season?
No
Firstly... Wigan? Sean and supporters, have you gone bonkers? You want us to play like Wigan? They are even more impotent than us.
Until a recent improvement (strangely against the big teams), they've been extremely boring to watch. It seems on here that someone has watched them play the ball around against Chelski, and got all excited, struggling under the misconception that they play good football. (They try to play good football, with sporadic success, but look like a poor man's Arsenal's youth team, who mainly frustrate and occasionally entertain.)
Swansea keep getting thrown around in these discussions. Incredible job that Rogers has done, quite amazing in fact. But It's January. Hull and Reading looked good in January once. Now where are they? Do you think it is fair to assess a team's successful football based on half a season?
Who wins the Premier League? The teams with money. Who wins the Euros, World Cups and Champions Leagues? The best teams. Apart from when Greece won in the Euros playing some of the most defensive and ugly football the world had seen. Would they have won playing attacking? Of course not. When Porto won the Champions League, was it through attacking brilliance or tactical and efficient defence? It was with defensive ability and good counter-attacking (see Mourinho's Milan too).
Good football is the domain of the best teams. The Premier League has proved that often the entertainers of those outside the top 6 (the likes of Blackpool, West Brom, Reading) suffer. Look at Bolton: surviving for so long with ugly football which was much maligned. A new manager comes in, buys attacking players, makes them look pretty... and now they look like they will be relegated. Wigan too may well head that way.
We DID play good football a few seasons back. To suggest otherwise is to spew idiocy. Now we can't, because we have had to sell attacking players. Now we get success from the back. Our defence is bettered only by the top teams. Moyes's foundation is in defence; if he had money, he would buy attacking players and we would all be treated to a better spectacle. For evidence of this see our recent signings: Drenthe (Extremely attacking), Denis (Striker), Donovan (Attacking), Gibson (A footballer).
A dichotomy exists with regard to the perception of Everton. The pundits, the writers, praise Moyes as a genius, who performs miracles in keeping us in the league. The Everton fans see him as someone who holds us down, who we could improve on.
The pundits do not watch us every week. They do not suffer the often horrible spectacle. But they do watch other teams. They do realise that every window, we are the bottom or very close to the bottom, in terms of spending. They do watch our creative and very best players go out a door, and no one come back through.
Moyes could set us out to play attacking; that cannot be in doubt. But what is very much in doubt, is whether we would have as many points. Our weakness is clearly up front; our strength at the back. We have no strikers relative in quality to Howard, Baines, Jags or Distin. Saha at present would struggle in the Championship. Vellios maybe can be decent but he is very young. Denis is? well, the Championship may be too good for him. We are shit up front. To attack therefore, would be pointless. It would be to play to our weaknesses. We don?t even have the strikers of Blackburn and Bolton.
One last thing: watch Swansea for the next five games. They will frustrate you in a similar way to us. They keep the ball superbly, but have suffered from the very thing the original post highlighted: a failure with the final ball. They were majestic against Arsenal, but Arsenal suit them perfectly. They don?t play like they did against Arsenal every game. They too frustrate, and have looked the most impotent of the sides that have played at Goodison this season. Their test hasn?t come yet. When they lose 4/5 games on the bounce, let?s see how often they are brought into the threads of ToffeeWeb as the footballing archetypes of the Premier League.
This has also been very reactionary from you lot. Look at the last 10 seasons of the Premier League ? not the first six months of this. Boring football is often the best way for mediocre teams to survive. Guess what? we are very mediocre. Not because of Moyes, but because of money. Because we have had to sell, had to watch the good players grow older and sour (Cahill/Saha) and can?t bring in replacements or suitable competition.
Several people on this thread have dismissed money as a factor. Stupidly dismissed money as a factor at that. Someone please give me evidence that we weren?t playing the best football of Moyes tenure when we had some money and a good squad. When we went and outplayed City and Pienaar looked like he should have been playing for Arsenal. Now he sits on the bench at Spurs and he was our most impressive attacking player. That is the reality. Our best attacking player (maybe second best) at our former rivals.
And even when we had money, it was far less than Spurs, Liverpool etc etc. Than the teams we would finish next to, or above. We never had much, but the shithole of a manager, who can?t buy and has no tactical awareness, turned us from relegation to a steady European team on a shoestring, who DID entertain for a period. But then the bank knocked on the door.
Moyes isn?t an attacking manager, I won?t claim that. I won?t claim that I am pleased with many of our performances this season. But I will claim that he is a victim of circumstance. And I will claim that we would not be higher up that league table, if he decided to play 4-4-2 or Martinez was in charge.
Also the Cup defeat of Chelsea doesn't count because it wasn't in normal time
I struggle to get through long winded stuff, particularly the pro Moyes guff but hats off mate, pissed myself at this in your post:
"For evidence of this, see our recent signings: Drenthe (Extremely attacking), Denis (Striker), Donovan (Attacking), Gibson (A footballer)."
Poor Gibson ? talk about damned by faint praise! There's been some crackers stoutly defending Moyes but this is a fucking gem.
Regarding Moyes, perhaps he should take a lesson from that Damn-the-Torpedos, attack-minded genius Mourinho and his "entertaining" style.
No?
Then perhaps Wenger and his continental flair, flowing "entertaining" style. Second thought, perhaps not. After all, since Bergkamp got old and Henry was dumped in his prime for cash exactly how much more silverware has Arsenal garnered than Everton?
We're in a down period right now. That fact one of the few agreed on in here. It's because we have an ownership problem, not a Moyes one. There's no such thing as lousy ownership yet great sides on the pitch. It doesn't happen.
Let's hope Moyes can keep us up this season (as fucked-up as it is to have to put it that way) and next starts with a new ownership group in place. Then let's talk about Moyes.
COYB
The teams that play the best football more often wins simple as, The most annoying thing is seeing teams like Swansea Wigan is that everyone is so comfortable on the ball- from goal keeper till striker, now look at Everton, hibbo shites himself jags hoof distin bamby on ice Cahill etc etc, it's all about coaching giving the players belief to play that way, and the thing is every evertonian knows we have the players to do it... Frustrated blue :-(
As far as I can see it no one here has said they would prefer us to play like Wigan.
like it when people stand up to the playground bully...
post of the year thus far that lad...
well in Jim...
Like most evertonians I am a born optimist but I don't think I could stand too much more of Davy's negative battles for survival.
Fingers crossed this window closes with us retaining everyone (except Bily).
http://peoplesgroup.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/the_blue_union_update_01.pdf
Is that so genius? Just play better than the other team. So, no connection between playing the best and having money to sign the best talent? Who knew?
You don't know what you're talking about, Sean's not a genius, he just understands football, sorry soccer!
They are widely viewed as playing great football.....why aren't they top of the league with a 100% win ratio?
Come on Einstein, why is that?
TBH No I dont,
I accept your point that we could be more adventurous, of course I do, but will it improve us ?
Hibbert, Jagielka, Coleman, Cahill, Neville etc, all know how to grind and claw their way to the top of the 2nd tier of the Premiership, they've made a living out of doing precisely that. The best of the rest . . but anybody who thinks that by telling them to play further up the park, they will develop silky skills, or suddenly start to see the pass they've been blind to thus far in their careers is fooling himself.
The ball players and footballers have gone Tommy lad, the mixture is destroyed. Moyes came close but the cigar looks like eluding him.
I believe the board are responsible for this, I also believe every time somebody blames the manager they exonerate the chairman.
They may please the MOTD pundits passing around their own half against a couldnt be arsed Arsenal, but those of us who have actually seen them know better dont we ? its garbage. defensive garbage, football without purpose. in fact if you take Jagielka out of our team they are identical to us. . . except we score more concede less and err finish higher.
Has anybody ever seen a team defend with eleven in their own box as much as Swansea at GP ? . .IN OPEN OPLAY ?
Those of you who are hooked will have no trouble at all getting tickets to see them. Those of us who have seen them know why.
So Arsenal got beat because they could't be arsed! I'm sure you'd be saying that if we beat them.
And we finish higher than them do we, coul do sworn they've just got promoted.
Moyes didn't come close, we've payed shite for years, and when we played any team that could actually play football, like in Europe, they battered and humiliated us, you're as much a fantasist as Kenwright, how you're not laughed out of the pub I'll never know.
Plus we haven't played badly for years, that is pure fantasy, a few years back we had a team largely reagrded on here as the best since the mid 80s with a midfield that was only criticised for over-passing.
We broke AZ Alkmaar's prestigious record, wupdeedoo, AZ fuckin Alkmaar.
I remember the Fiorentina home game too, watching my son cry because yet again Moyes had let us down and we were out, thanks to his shite dour defensive tactics in the first leg........ I can talk about it now.
I watch football first lad(sky). Last time I saw Match of the Day, Jimmy Hill was presenting it. You have never heard me referring to their pundits about Moyes ? that's just another deperate attempt from you to make things up ? I don't even know who they are.
People are quite tolerant where I drink, to get laughed out of the place you`d have to come up with stuff like ? "kenwright sold everything to back his manager" OR "getting promoted from the championship = a higher finish than top half of Prem... but then who on earth would be that dumb?
Just off there now as it happens...
Yes Nuremburg wasn't pretty, but this was one of our first runs in Europe for ages and that was a classic away perfromace the likes of which you see Man U and Chelsea pull off all the time. Do people on here really expect us to go away to these grounds with no European experience and wipe the floor with people? It doesn't happen that way, Man U messed up in Basle, Liverpool toiled against debrecen, Arsenal have been beaten by just about everyone at some point.
As for Alkmaar they're probably as patronising about us as you are about them, what makes us (to the neutral observer) any better than them?
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.


093 Posted 20/01/2012 at 06:50:02
Report abuse
It's not Davy's fault that Neville is picked at all, nevermind in midfield.
It's not Davy's fault that we have 11 in our own box for corners.
It's not Davy's fault that at home we treat QPR, Wigan, Stoke, Bolton, Uncle Tom Cobbley and all like Barca.
No of course it isn't
It's because everyone has more money than us and if you kick off at 3.00pm or whenever, it's nil-nil and you get one point for that. Which gives you 38Pts...THEN...All you have to do is keep it tight and pinch one and before you know it, you've got the magic 40Pts and everythings Cushti. A few other keep it tight and pinch one's and you moves up a place ( or two ). @ 600K per place you know it makes sense Rodders...He who dares Rodders, He who dares??? er er ?? might lose.