Season 2011-12
The Mail Bag

Former Goalkeepers' Fortunes

 35 Comments: First  |  Last

I've found it mildly interesting to follow the differing fortunes of our relatively recent second and third choice goalkeepers, Iain Turner and John Ruddy.

Iain Turner, who, remember, was sent off after 9 minutes into his no-so-glorious Premier League debut with us, but who nonetheless went on to have some success with Sheffield Wednesday (on loan from us) and then Preston North End, has now fallen back upon hard times: he was loaned earlier this year to Dunfirmline (having lost his first team place at Preston as a result of injury), but sent back upon being injured again, and is now club-less having now been released by Preston.

John Ruddy, on the other hand, is Norwich's first choice keeper, was their Player of the Year this season, and now is in the England squad for the 2012 European Championships. One of the relatively few gems that David Moyes has let slip through the net. Not having seen much of his performances with Norwich this year, how do ToffeeWebbers presently rate him against Tim Howard?
Steve Carter, Sydney, Australia     Posted 24/05/2012 at 04:48:12

back Return to the Mail Bag  :  Add your Comments back

Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Dave Southon
390   Posted 24/05/2012 at 07:10:20

Report abuse

I really rate John Ruddy, unfortunately his development under Moyes would have been handicapped due to the lack of first team opportunities.

He would never have been the 'keeper he is today without getting the move to pastures new. Unfortunately, it does beg the question: Was this one simply "one that got away" or are many of our youngsters generally not good enough?

Judging by various other youngsters who have moved on, I would hazard a guess that DM actually has a good grasp of his youth/reserve players and can see who will/won't progress.

Eric Myles
396   Posted 24/05/2012 at 08:06:30

Report abuse

Remember it may also have been a case of Ruddy seeing that he was not going to be a first team regular and preferring to move away to get some first team action.
Matt Traynor
397   Posted 24/05/2012 at 08:06:43

Report abuse

You can't say he let him slip through the net. Ultimately the player was ready for 1st team football, and wanted stability instead of being loaned out 1-2 times a year. Norwich is geographically ideal for him.

Ultimately Moyes probably decided he was ready, and Howard remained the number 1, so adios John. Just waiting now for some to base his 81 minute league performance against Blackburn as proof-positive he was better than Howard...

David Chait
399   Posted 24/05/2012 at 08:12:53

Report abuse

Yeah he was good and is getting better.. but wouldn't have replaced Howard who still has many years ahead of him.

So best for player and club to move on.

Ciaran Duff
403   Posted 24/05/2012 at 08:24:32

Report abuse

I've always thought that it must be tough being a No. 2 (or 3) keeper. Look at Mucha - played in the World Cup, came to Everton and has hardly had a Prem Lge game in goal since. If the No. 1 keeper is playing well and doesn't get injured, you just never get a sniff.
Derek Turnbull
408   Posted 24/05/2012 at 08:53:01

Report abuse

It makes you wonder if it's worth buying youth goalkeepers for the future. A few years of being an understudy because they're counted as being yound and inexperienced, then they understandably move on for the sake of their career.
Tony J Williams
409   Posted 24/05/2012 at 09:50:03

Report abuse

Ruddy was just unlucky to be behind a fella who has just finished his fourth season without missing a league game.

Good keeper but had to move to get playing time, hope he does well.

Jeremy Benson
410   Posted 24/05/2012 at 09:57:03

Report abuse

Howard is now 33; toffeeweb stats say he has a contract until 2016 (!), thus I am going to presume that he is going to be first-choice until he is 36+. Which is a little longer than I would like, and you can see why ruddy probably moved on. I'm surprised mucha has stayed.
Kevin Sparke
411   Posted 24/05/2012 at 10:11:55

Report abuse

That's the problem with goalkeepers - if you have an established professional who's doing a good job and a young tyro who looks like he's going to be something useful - you can still only play one at a time. You cannot make room for them by swapping your team around like you can for a midfielder, defender or striker.

Which is why an ambitious kid will be off to a lower division or lesser team rather than sit behind a stalwart waiting for an injury or really bad run of fom. Goalkeepers are also notorious late developers and often the best years a goalkeeper gives to a club are the years 25 -35.
This isn't always the case - but it happens more often than not.

Chris Fisher
413   Posted 24/05/2012 at 10:29:14

Report abuse

Ruddy is good but Howard was and is better, he would of been an excellent replacement for Tim when he retires but considering goalkeepers go on into their 40s these days I doubt he wanted to hang around for that long!!
Jim Harrison
421   Posted 24/05/2012 at 11:03:54

Report abuse

I dont think that Ruddy was even first choice for Norwich at the beginning of the season! They had a keeper called Rudd who got injured and Ruddy replaced him, and kept his place due to form. He might have got that chance at Everton had Howards fitness record not been so good. It seems he made the right choice to leave, which is a shame for us.
Dick Fearon
438   Posted 24/05/2012 at 13:09:59

Report abuse

Derek T # 408, I am beginning to question the worth of having an academy. Since Moyes arrived Anichebe is the only graduate we have seen and then only fleetingly. Victor is not blessed with any particular skill and he spends more time either on the bench or on his arse.
Barkley and Rodwell our supposedly budding super stars have had even less first team playing time than Victor.
Moyes claims he is protecting them yet both are strong robust young men at an age when many of their peers at other clubs are nailing down first team places and in some cases international caps. The question is, what is it they are being protected from?
Sadly it seems that in Moyes who sees them on a daily basis thinks they do not cut the mustard. Are we to add their names to a long and growing list of academy failures.
If Victor is the only academy graduate then I rest my case on the worth of having it.
Jimmy Kelly
440   Posted 24/05/2012 at 13:19:24

Report abuse

Rodwell is 20 years old and has played over 100 games, he has had injury problems over a long period of time otherwise he would probably have 150+, what more do you want?

Similarly Vaughan was given a chance, had injury problems, was given 3-4 more chances to get over them, and was then sold on for a reasonable fee.

Have you ever actually seen Barkley? He has bags of talent but he quite simply isn't better than the players in the team at this moment in time. He needs to improve and work hard and he will get more than enough chances in the coming years - he's only 18. How many 18 year olds were playing regularly in the premier league last year?

Back to the original point, Ruddy is decent and he's done well for Norwich but he's not better than Howard which means there was nothing wrong with the decision to let him go.

Ryan Holroyd
441   Posted 24/05/2012 at 13:28:23

Report abuse

Jack Wilshere, played too many games at a young age. Now crocked. A warning to all I think.

As for not having an academy, Dick, Everton would have been out of business had we not had one. You really say some stupid things.

Paul David
471   Posted 24/05/2012 at 16:07:40

Report abuse

I dont think we're the type of club that should be prepared to let a young keeper mature in the 1st team (its different for outfield players) with the inevitable mistakes they will make.If a young talented keeper wants to leave because he is good enough to play for a lesser club then its hard to deny them but because their unproven it usually means the fee is low so I hope Everton put a sell on or buy back clause in the contract so we can at least benefit in the future.

A few seasons a go I would have put Howard in the top 3 keepers in the league,now though I think he's slipped down the pecking order and would think about getting a long term replacement.Its not a prioity though.

Mike Allison
478   Posted 24/05/2012 at 16:48:35

Report abuse

Ruddy is a bit flappy and insecure. He's still young for a goalkeeper though, by the time he's 30 he might be brilliant. He shouldn't be in the England squad though, we're just ridiculously short of goalkeepers with Foster and Robinson unwilling to play.
Sean Patton
500   Posted 24/05/2012 at 19:18:28

Report abuse

It always baffled me why Turner was ahead of Ruddy because based on their appearances for Everton, one was calamitous and the other was decent.

Turner famously cost Everton a game against Man United 2-0 up less than 30 minutes to go and he chucks one in and Ruddy came of the bench to keep a clean sheet with 10 men.

Anyway memories and all that good luck to both of them.

John McLoughlin
550   Posted 24/05/2012 at 22:19:04

Report abuse

I always liked the look of Ruddy over Turner. Turner's legs look like they'll snap on heavy impact. But Ruddy is not as good as Howard and was never going to get into our team so it was best for him to try elsewhere. And in reply to an earlier point he's Norwich's number 1 since he joined them. Rudd only played this season in a game when Ruddy was suspended after being sent off.
Dick Fearon
588   Posted 25/05/2012 at 02:12:13

Report abuse

Ryan # 441, I meant to say this dismal failure of an academy has been a waste of time and money. Moyes must at least share part of the blame. Anichebe is the only one of its graduates that has gone anywhere near repaying what he has cost and even that is debatable.

Next season Barkley will be 20 and Rodwell 22, not exactly youngsters, eh? For every Wilshere (who next season will be 21) there are a lot more learning their craft in first teams. I will be pleasantly surprised if Jack or Ross nail down a first-team spot with Everton.
Dennis Stevens
646   Posted 25/05/2012 at 10:04:02

Report abuse

This thread's obviously the kiss of death as poor Ruddy has broken a finger & is now out of Euro2012!
Paul David
648   Posted 25/05/2012 at 10:14:15

Report abuse

Dennis

Time to start a thread on Gerrard and Suarez then.

Stephen Kenny
660   Posted 25/05/2012 at 11:12:01

Report abuse

I'd take Ruddy over Howard all day long. Ruddy is a much bigger presence and more vocal.

Howard is nowhere near the top 10 keepers in this league and is now singled out by the opposition as they know he's a liability. The gladwys usually shout keeper's ball about two seconds before he gets off his line.

Paul Joy
662   Posted 25/05/2012 at 11:32:07

Report abuse

Stephen #660
it is all about opinions but to say Howard is nowhere near the top 10 keepers is a sweeping statement. My view is that for last season as a whole I would place 5 others ahead of him - Krul, Vorm, Hart, Cech & Reina (just). The others no thanks they did not perform as well as Tim Howard. John Ruddy performed very well for his 1st full season in the premiership and he will develop I think.

But really all keepers have their strengths and weaknesses and Tim Howard is no different. You must also remember that he was the top goalscorer amongst keepers too!!!

Ray Robinson
663   Posted 25/05/2012 at 11:52:22

Report abuse

Stephen, yes, Howard has his weaknesses but how you can rate Ruddy over him on the basis of one good season is beyond me. Moreover, I rate Howard amongst the top ten PL goalies - despite his faults.
Stephen Kenny
742   Posted 25/05/2012 at 18:34:18

Report abuse

Paul these are the PL keepers I'd take over Howard.

Given
Hart
Cech
Sczeceny
Friedel
Reina
Lindergaard
Foster
Robinson
Begovic
Ruddy

All for when I've seen them at GP or watched them live they all seem to communicate with their defences and command the area better than Howard.

The keeper I was most i8mpressed with was Foster who looks a top keeper in every aspect.

Stephen Kenny
743   Posted 25/05/2012 at 18:39:38

Report abuse

Ray,

How many seasons do they need before I rate them?

I thought Rooney was a better player than Madar after about 10 minutes.

Paul David
747   Posted 25/05/2012 at 18:44:52

Report abuse

Stephen

I can see a volley of abuse coming your way now.

I dont agree with a couple on your list but i'm surprised not to see Hennessey there.He is who I would like to see between the sticks.

Stephen Kenny
763   Posted 25/05/2012 at 19:31:52

Report abuse

Paul,

It's fair to say I see Howard a lot more than others but I have seen a fair bit of those I've mentioned.

I haven't seen much of Vorm, Hennessey or Bogdan and I don't think Paddy Kenny is a bad keeper neither but not that good with crosses.

Howard seems to be rated on here (Maybe the number of Americans who use TW?) but get's a lot of stick at the game.

Matt Traynor
955   Posted 26/05/2012 at 21:46:15

Report abuse

Spare a thought for former keeper Steve Simonsen. The only player to miss a penalty at Wembley that sent Huddersfield to the Championship.

All 22 players had to take a kick.

Chris Owens
956   Posted 26/05/2012 at 22:02:19

Report abuse

He wasn't the only one to miss. I think only one of the first 6 was scored.
Matt Traynor
957   Posted 26/05/2012 at 22:12:43

Report abuse

Chris , you're probably right. I'm like a half deaf half blind fly on the radio that caught half of it.

Still. I am pretty sure I was there at Southampton when Simo made his debut, off the bench, replacing ??? And it was 0-0 at HT but we lost 0-2???

??? are please fill in the gaps.

Chris Owens
962   Posted 26/05/2012 at 22:30:10

Report abuse

Matt, he replaced Paul Gerrard, and we did lose 2-0.
See the Toffeeweb report at:
http://www.toffeeweb.com/season/99-00/reports/southampton_a.htm
Matt Traynor
965   Posted 26/05/2012 at 23:03:49

Report abuse

Chris, thought it was Gerrard he replaced.
The Den was not a happy hunting ground for me as a fan. My highlight being meeting Paul and Ov Collyer. St Mary's didn't bring better fortunes. Although at least I can say I saw Li Wei Fang's game for us. We lost 1-0. That Latvian player they had.
Mike Gaynes
098   Posted 28/05/2012 at 04:16:17

Report abuse

Stephen, you're completely out of your tree. Anybody who would take blunder factories like Robinson, Foster, Begovic and Lindergaard over Howard, or ancient mariners like Friedel and Given, has to be smoking something really potent.

Hart is the best keeper on the list, and the best in the league. Howard is superior to all the rest in terms of shot-stopping, particularly at close range. He has improved in both distribution and command. And, he's the least prone besides Hart and Friedel to howlers... he's only had two or three in his Everton career.

As to Ruddy, he's an average Prem keeper who had a good season and has established no record of consistency. His place in the England side speaks to the chronically dismal state of English goalkeeping depth, not some brilliant talent that David Moyes didn't see. The idea that he's even close to Howard, let alone better, is utterly ridiculous.

Karl Masters
253   Posted 29/05/2012 at 10:26:40

Report abuse

We were strongly linked with Joe Hart the summer he went to Man City, 2007. In the end, we took on that German, whose name escapes me, who blundered against Oldham in the FA Cup. Is Hart now better than Howard? Could be that was a bigger mistake than letting Ruddy leave....

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to the MailBag, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb