Season › 2012-13 › News
Pienaar completes Everton return
Puts pen to paper on 4-year deal; will wear no. 22
Steven Pienaar is a full-time Everton player again after the 30-year-old put pen to paper on what is believed to be a new four-year deal at Goodison Park. The South African underwent a medical earlier ahead of a £4.5m transfer from Tottenham Hotspur.His agent, Rob Moore, released a photograph of him inking his new contract, sealing a return to Goodison for the midfielder two and a half months after his emotional farewell after the Newcastle game.
"There was no doubt in my mind that I would be back," Pienaar said after completing the deal. "I told the manager how I felt and I am happy now it is all done".
Originally signed from Borussia Dortmund in July 2007, Pienaar became a crowd favourite at Everton in his first spell with the club, making 147 appearances and scoring 16 goals as part of what was the most exciting midfield at Goodison since the 1980s golden era.
The elusive breakthrough to Champions League football never came, though, and with his career reaching its peak in terms of his physical abilities, the Bafana Bafana captain was tempted south to White Hart Lane to realise his dream of playing in the Continent's elite competition.
The move to Spurs soured quickly, though, when Pienaar found first-team opportunities severely limited under Harry Redknapp. After just a handful of starts, the former Ajax Cape Town player jumped at the chance of making a deadline-beating return to Everton on loan at the end of January.
It was to be a triumphant return, one that yielded four goals and arguably the best club form of Pienaar's career that helped propel the Blues to a seventh-place finish, heights that seemed unthinkable back in the autumn when a relegation battle was not out of the question.
Realising he had re-found his home, Pienaar was distraught at the thought of having to leave again earlier this summer but a deal to bring him back to Everton was one of David Moyes's stated priorities. Though it took longer than many expected, the conclusion of the transfer will come as a relief to all parties.
Rumours suggest that Pienaar signs a new contract worth £10.5m over the life of the deal, one that potentially ties him to Goodison until the summer of 2016. He will wear the No 22 jersey.
Quotes or other material sourced from Evertonfc.com
Reader Comments (113)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 31/07/2012 at 15:55:23
Johnson on loan and Lukuku on loan and I think we would all be very happy.
3 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:05:57
4 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:04:48
I'm new on here. I've supported EFC over 30 years!
I agree Mark what you say, but maybe later tonight better news!
Ian, great shout Johnson from Shitty and Lukaku both on loan, complete the jigsaw excellent! Sell Johhny for £8M and get a good replacement, the Blackburn kid is suppose to be good, use the rest of the money for loans!
5 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:23:42
Had our financial state not been made so precarious by said Chairman and Board then I feel we'd not only have kept Pienaar in the 1st place but maybe even better quality of players around him. Please think about the much bigger picture! Thanks...
6 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:29:53
Secondly, should we not be aiming higher than loan signings?
7 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:32:01
8 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:35:15
9 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:41:07
10 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:54:18
11 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:45:28
I was disappointed when he went but understood the reasons at the time. We didn't have money to pay more and he fancied his chances at Spurs.
Now, after it didn't work at Spurs and we have a little more for wages, he has come back and I'm happy about it.
The price we sold at and the price we bought him back on are based on contract length and value. Doesn't feel good but that's how it works.
I won't be holding my breath for many more players. I think the winger and the forward are probably just one man: Naismith.
12 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:54:42
13 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:49:54
Anyone who seen the change in form after January must be glad he is back.
Lets just look forward to the new season, welcome home Stevie P....
14 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:03:02
15 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:00:03
16 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:53:18
17 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:51:27
Ian 001 i'm sure Lukuku has already gone somewhere on loan, i'd like Johnson though, if he played for us he would certainly have gone to the euro's.
Can't understand why players lose themselves at big spending clubs ie Parker at Chelsea, at least Pienaar had the sense to get out quick.
Can't see us buying anyone else, I just hope some of the young lads push on this season , like the look of Barkley but he needs more discipline, saw Hallam Hope for the reserves I think he was playing as a striker but if he was converted wide right he'd piss all over Bale and Walcott for pace.
18 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:05:59
Seriously, is the picture link working for anyone else? This is all that's on the agents' website.
19 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:02:49
And we've found the money without selling anyone else. Amazing!
20 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:16:55
Mark, be thankful. It was Evertonian time that gave the Yak his age-defying properties.
Anyway, glad that Pienaar's back.
21 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:22:04
Was him in an Everton sweatshirt with pen in hand and piece of paper in front of him.
22 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:34:36
23 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:14:59
Lukaku is still there Fulham showing intrest in a loan deal.
Agree with you about these players who move knowing they will be lucky to get a game, Moses will go the same way if he moves to Chelsea..
24 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:30:12
Now Arteta, Cahill, Yakubu, Bily etc etc etc have all departed.Don't you feel that it is ironic that it has needed all those players to leave before he is brought back ?All the above players are/were amongst our highest earners.
Our squad is now far smaller than it was for the past few seasons and our wage bill is considerable decreased.
I just hope that the youngsters come through and replace the players that have left. Opportunity knocks for Barkley, Junior and Rodwell to show their worth and make the fans forget the players who left.
I just believe that the Pienaar departure and buy back represents poor management and is a further example of how poorly the club is run.
It's not too long ago that Gosling left for nothing when he would surely have brought at least two million pounds to the club. Now Pienaar after being allowed to depart is costing us more than we received for him and he is over a year older.
25 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:42:03
26 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:49:15
Is that just over 50 grand a week?
What was he on before he left us?
27 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:50:50
28 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:01:35
£50k p/w?
July?
Disclosed Fee?
What's going on?
29 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:03:36
Moving on, welcome back Steven!
30 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:07:20
31 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:30:12
32 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:31:20
33 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:32:06
34 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:34:44
35 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:31:42
I must be dreaming..
36 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:57:10
37 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:54:48
We have done okay under the circumstances. Kenwright is responsible for these appalling circumstances and the criticism of those such as the Blue Union for daring to look for change is beyond belief. I like Naismith ; Pienaar is a good player but if this is time to rejoice then we are contentedly heading towards disaster.
Five or six years ago this close season would have been considered unacceptable , the fact that many think that two average signings in July is cause to rejoice suggests, to me, that Kenwright has won and is here to stay.
38 Posted 31/07/2012 at 19:12:35
In Jan we had Landon, Straq, Drenthe & Pienaar. Is it limited at 2 per window?
...If so wud love to see Landon + Cahill in Jan and two others now....
39 Posted 31/07/2012 at 19:13:05
Next thing you know, I will be able to watch a full friendly match I paid £18.99 for on Everton TV.
Anyway, welcome back Pienaar, the team need you, I will just have to get over the money grabbing feelings I had about you when you left..
40 Posted 31/07/2012 at 19:34:26
and this does not include the world wide deal, which has not been done yet, there has never been so much cash in football so we were bound to muster something one day.
Andy chill out mate enjoy it whilst you can, I have my anger towards him too, but I don't remember a better first eleven over the past five or six pre seasons than we have now, Darren Bent etc, even Lescott and Baines at the time were gambles and Pienaar is not an average signing, but saying that it`s not 11.00pm on deadline day yet.
41 Posted 31/07/2012 at 19:44:18
42 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:09:53
43 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:07:53
Johnson on loan is unrealistic I think, but Lukaku looks likely and is a good shout. I envisage another random loan signing from somewhere too, but probably wait another 3, 4 weeks for that one.
Right winger is more important for anything though.
44 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:11:41
45 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:14:25
46 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:19:37
47 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:15:36
48 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:20:11
49 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:43:41
Cahill gone and none of our big names gone.
A bit bloody harsh would not do that justice. He was blinding for us, and I reckon coulda gone to a CL club at least as a squad player. Part of the best midfield we had in decades (I'd say 2008 and 09 with Pienaar, and Arteta, and but for bloody injuries woulda been the same but with Felli). That for the Cup Final and a fit Yak or Jags woulda been the icing on the cake of a brilliant Goodison career.
He deserves nothing less than utmost respect. And I would love to see him back for a swansong in Jan. Tickets would be as rare as salami at a bar mitzvah.
50 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:53:22
I do respect what the guy said about his reasons for not going to another Premier league club but I don't see as how a CL club would have come in for him.
Right now we need to manage our limited resources very very well. If selling an older player like Cahill means we get to use his wages to pay Pienaar or some other palyer who will bring more to the squad then I am all for it.
51 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:59:59
52 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:09:53
53 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:28:30
2 or 3 more signings and I'll be quite happy.
54 Posted 31/07/2012 at 21:23:19
55 Posted 31/07/2012 at 21:31:13
56 Posted 31/07/2012 at 21:21:13
I've not really seen Naismith but a Celtic friend (who knows his stuff) rates him very highly, as does Jelly, so I tend to think a fuck-all outlay (wages excepted) on potential is a great deal, and a reason to rejoice.
We're skint and we know it; Kenwright has NO money and we know it — move on, lad.
57 Posted 31/07/2012 at 21:37:10
I have been an Everton supporter for 20 odd years but have never been to Goodison yet. I hope to make my first trip this season Liverpool for the Merseyside derby at Goodison. Can anyone advise as to the best way to get tickets for me and my family as well as the best seats at Goodison?
Thanks
58 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:03:31
1) Can we desist from calling him Peanuts?
2) Can we buy someone in an attacking role (preferably right wing) with some pace?
59 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:13:25
I just realised though, that we still haven't sold Yobo yet. I really thought selling Yobo would fund the Pienaar deal. I know Cahill has left, but the official site said he left on a nominal fee, although I think Cahill was on £50k a week, and of course that will go straight to Pienaar.
I just wondered what people thought of this. I think us selling Yobo afterwards might mean we might have some cash to spend, albeit probably on loan fees, but still cash to spend!! It wouldnt make sense if we had every intention to use the Yobo money to fund the Pienaar deal.
Who knows?! But it makes me a bit more optimistic
60 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:14:10
62 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:14:08
THat's got to be over 100,000 a week saved since they left.
Pienaar was here for the second half of the season so wages would be a small adjustment either side of that so NAismoth for Tiny must equal a wage saving.
If Yobo goes that should theoretically fund someone else especiaaly with this TV money that everyone is going on about.
Zaid
I assume by family you will be bringing kids so I would suggest writing to the club and enquiring about the " Family enclosure".
63 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:27:03
64 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:44:35
Yes I will hopefully be coming with my 2 little ones....
65 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:51:01
66 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:48:46
COYB!
67 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:56:37
Might be a good idea to get Zapata on a free and maybe some maverick loan in. Think Lukaku is still looking for a loan.
69 Posted 01/08/2012 at 01:06:03
All-in-all, he's back now we can set out with our great midfield and start adding some of the new crew who are coming through!!!
70 Posted 01/08/2012 at 02:15:50
71 Posted 01/08/2012 at 03:36:18
72 Posted 01/08/2012 at 06:29:07
No amount of "It's good to get him back" will ever reconcile the fact that he should NEVER have gone in the first place and the stupidity of letting him go has now been exposed in all its glory.
73 Posted 01/08/2012 at 06:53:47
74 Posted 01/08/2012 at 06:46:35
And with the new YOUNG possibly mega/good starlets from the Academy expected to shine from this season onwards, things look rosy, yessiree! Just one thing though: How will we pay for their expectantly good contracts?
75 Posted 01/08/2012 at 07:18:12
I really can't understand the down on the clubs dealing. We had no choice but to sell as his contract was coming to an end and he wanted to go. Spurs were the highest bidder so he went there, we wanted him back and to get him we had to pay what Spurs asked. It's the market in action.
76 Posted 01/08/2012 at 07:30:28
77 Posted 01/08/2012 at 07:38:28
78 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:09:23
79 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:12:19
80 Posted 01/08/2012 at 07:35:25
81 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:18:25
82 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:18:51
However in denying Pienaar the pay rise - reportedly £70k - and removing Arteta and now Cahill, our biggest earners, the club is in better shape in terms of the wage bill, and did not allow an individual to break the club's pay structure and ceiling.
83 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:30:31
Pienaar was quoted as saying he wanted to play Champions League football. However, that doesn't suit your case. I mean, you can't use that as a stick to twat Moyes with, can you?
In addition to that, he could have gone for nothing six months after we sold him, so getting a reported £3m for him was a better deal than keeping him and letting his contract run out, and Spurs sign him for free.
Everton could be criticised IF they were playing some sort of brinksmanship, hoping Pienaar would sign an improved offer, but he wanted to go. His choice.
84 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:32:23
85 Posted 01/08/2012 at 07:39:55
I felt it at the time but cant really say Pienaar conned us either as he never fully committed to us in the build up to his contract renewal. The big mistake we made was not selling him 12 months earlier when it was clear he was going to go to the highest bidder and wanted Champions League football.
Maybe Pienaar was the one that was “conned” into thinking the grass was greener on the other side, but then I think he knew the score to be honest didnt he.
So, all in all, it's not a "con" it's just how football works nowadays.
Forgive me if Ive got the maths wrong here, and this is no doubt simplistic, but this is how I think it works out:
Scenario A – Pienaar asks for 4 year deal 18 months ago @ £70k p.a. = £14.5m deal ending in Jan 2015. At that point hell be 32 so we might get a nominal sell on fee of £1m or we get another two years or so out of him at lower wages. So 4 years costs us £13.5m.
Scenario B – we let Pienaar go for £3m but buy him back for £4.5m - £1.5m down on the deal. We agree a 4 year deal worth £10.5m which expires when the player is 34, no sell on fee. 4 year deal has cost us £12m.
So, all in all were £1.5m better off than we would be had we done what youre recommending and conceded to his wages demands – not taking into account the £3m weve saved in wages whilst hes been gone.
So – in essence, weve saved £1.5m - £4.5m, strengthened the wage structure and made it clear we wont be held to ransom by players? Or am I just being gullible?
Other obvious factors are that weve missed out on 18 months of what are going to be Pienaars best years – which in your defence have probably cost us a higher place in the league and maybe even a Cup Final, who knows. But then he's missed out on those years too getting no first team football which has probably taught him a lesson to be honest.
Maybe the Pienaar we got back was a better player in part due to getting some great experience training with, if not playing with, the best Spurs team in decades. Maybe hes picked up a few tricks from Hawwy as you like to call him, who knows.
The Pienaar we got back was the best weve seen, whats yet to be seen is whether he was just playing to facilitate a move back and his form will drop but I think hes going to push on and try and get us somewhere now. Lets face it, this is going to be his last major move so it boils down to how he wants to look back on his career and I think hell want it to end on a high, who knows.
One thing we do know is weve got a great player back, a senior pro and an international club captain. If my maths is right were better off financially and you never know, he might even be telling the likes of Barkley, Baines et al that maybe the grass isnt greener on the other side after all.
So – all in all, I'm glad he's back, and well done to David Moyes for getting him back.
86 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:25:34
I would hav e Gibson + Feli beside eachother. Not much would get past there.
Pienaar is more than welcome. I would play him on the left with license to roam. Barklay/Osman/Naismith rotating behind Jelavic.
My dream sighning would be Johnson who I would play on the left and move Pienaar inside. One is still allowed to dream isn´t one?
Should we sell anyone it would have to be a CH. Here the axe would unfortunatly fall on Jags. Sorry but he would raise more. Football is a business. Look how we got screwed by árry over Pienaar. He bought Pienaar not to strenghten them but to weaken us who where better at the time and it worked. Duffy should get a lot more playing time otherwise he will not develop. JH + SD with Duffy rotating. Rodwell would be forth choice unless we could sell him for £20m.
87 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:51:27
£50k over Pienaar's 4-year contract = £10.4M!!!
Let's just hope he's quicker than Neville in his last year(s) before retirement.
88 Posted 01/08/2012 at 09:01:30
Nice analysis thatnks, kinda covers what I wanted to say.
I only have one issue..............Peter Barry wouldn't be caught dead applauding Everton or calling them shrewd whilst his two favorite people are in charge!!
89 Posted 01/08/2012 at 09:31:38
Well said, people trying to put spin on us losing money here is laughable - should have been brave enough to flog him at decent money before it got to the "spurs" stage.
The only thing I would agree with the spin doctors about is he's a much better performer for his coaching at Spurs.
90 Posted 01/08/2012 at 10:59:07
Your point on him being a better player since returning will be seized on by the sheep no doubt as further proof of just how smart Daft Davey, is just wait and see.
Oh wait I see Mike Green # 156 has done exactly that. QED.
91 Posted 01/08/2012 at 10:25:14
Howard
Neville Heitinga Distin Baines
Rodwell Gibson Pienaar
Naismith
Fela
Jelavić
Subs: Mucha, Jagielka, Hibbert, Barkley, Coleman, Junior, Anichebe.
92 Posted 01/08/2012 at 11:18:50
93 Posted 01/08/2012 at 11:15:34
Your posts do tend toward early 80's Derek Hatton in their style too.
The irony is that you appear more rigid in your own version of all things blue than the so-called "sheep" that you like to refer to...
95 Posted 01/08/2012 at 11:49:38
I don't think it's a bad price, even taking his age into account, for a player who has been and will continue to be (hopefully) the heartbeat of the team.
Massive confidence boost to the rest of the squad no doubt as well; fingers crossed for a good start!!
96 Posted 01/08/2012 at 12:55:06
Sorry Peter you are right.....I hate the world and everything is shit......and its all Daft Davey and BK's fault
98 Posted 01/08/2012 at 13:06:17
'The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt'. — Bertrand Russell.
99 Posted 01/08/2012 at 13:35:36
I don't know and I don't really care BUT I could look at the pics all day long and try and work out their meaning.
If there are any dirty old men out there perhaps you would care to ' ave a gander!!
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/photos/beach-volley-what-do-those-hand-signals-mean-slideshow/#crsl=%252Fphotos%252Fbeach-volley-what-do-those-hand-signals-mean-slideshow%252Fbeach-volleyball-what-do-those-hand-signals-mean-photo-1343817170.html
100 Posted 01/08/2012 at 14:26:10
"I am have a real laugh"
No you're not, Peter, you don't know how to laugh.
But, hey, let's not let the facts get in the way of a good story.
101 Posted 01/08/2012 at 18:11:22
"Your point on him being a better player since returning will be seized on by the sheep no doubt as further proof of just how smart Daft Davey, is just wait and see.
Oh wait I see Mike Green # 156 has done exactly that. QED."
Interesting stuff, if a bit crazy. I think you'll find it was my point that Barry was agreeing with, not the other way around. He gives this away with the word " agree" in "The only thing I would agree with the spin doctors about is he's a much better performer for his coaching at Spurs."
There's also little clue in that my post was #155 @ 7.39am and Barry's was #162 @ 9.31am. 155 comes before 162 but we should probably leave maths at the door, eh.
Now, I'm relatively clever, but not clever enough to "seize" on something thats not going to said for another two hours.... even when it's based a point I made in the first place.
My point now I guess is - have you got something constructive to say, or is this just one big wind up......?
But then you knew I was going to say that, didn't you?
102 Posted 01/08/2012 at 21:30:46
103 Posted 01/08/2012 at 21:56:25
Is Shane Duffy's inevitable rise to stardom another one of those things that are beyond criticism and cannot be questioned?
104 Posted 01/08/2012 at 22:01:16
105 Posted 02/08/2012 at 02:32:31
Well, I hope now we do not want to sign Donovan, one old guy is enough.
What we are in desperate need for, are younger talented English players if we are aiming for Euro football next year.
106 Posted 02/08/2012 at 03:59:17
Andrew Ellams # 184 Please look at all my posts on the subject and point out where I have said Pienaar would not be an asset to Everton. You won't be able to find one of course. My point is and has always been the insanity, incompetence and inefficiency of Daft Davey and BK in this matter and the laughing stock that they and Spurs have made of Everton in the process.
107 Posted 02/08/2012 at 06:02:51
Such as his 'big game bottling' his 'Derby Day Disasters' his negative safety first football and last and by no means least his hand in the Pienaar debacle and humiliating by Spurs which has made Everton a laughing stock.
No matter which way the Moyesophiles try to spin it.
108 Posted 02/08/2012 at 06:22:16
109 Posted 02/08/2012 at 06:11:40
The bit where they took advantage of Everton's refusal to give in to a greedy agent by agreeing to said greedy agent's demands... only to find that their gormless manager was unable to get any sort of performance out of the player?
The bit where they were forced to cut their ever growing losses by selling him back?
Or the bit where they took Saha from our wage bill and put him on theirs.
I predict our humiliation will be complete when the team Moyes cobbled together on the cheap (without bowing to greedy agents) finishes above them this season.
Perhaps we should have capitulated and met the demands of £70k a week in the first place; it may have cost us £4m more... but think of all that humiliation we could have saved ourselves.
110 Posted 02/08/2012 at 08:00:50
112 Posted 02/08/2012 at 14:10:37
True. Don't know how I'll be able to show my face.
113 Posted 02/08/2012 at 14:11:46
"last and by no means least his hand in the Pienaar debacle and humiliating by Spurs which has made Everton a laughing stock".
Still blaming a manager for a club's financial dealings, I see. Daft. And how has Spurs humiliated us? You speak for exactly one Evertonian. Poorly. You're humiliated? Too bad for you. I'm not.
Spurs did well in depriving us of a key player the 1st half last season. This can't be denied. Since then, they've screwed up badly in the Pienaar "debacle" and we get him back.
No matter which way you and the other Levyites try to spin it.
114 Posted 02/08/2012 at 14:40:41
Ouch! Fantastic put down :-)
115 Posted 02/08/2012 at 14:41:55
They can say that because of people like you who seem to see those as the only two games of any real significance in a season.
You must be in absolute heaven being able to now bleat about a recent loss to the shite that actually took place at Wembley too! Probably gives you a semi of your own...
116 Posted 02/08/2012 at 15:07:00
117 Posted 02/08/2012 at 15:49:45
Don't thing we were humiliated just made to look what we are - clueless.
Rumour has it the London School of Economics are having tee shirts with "sell low and buy high" printed - why they aren't advertising here is beyond me.
So we'll finish above Spurs eh Dave?
Of course having Pienaar with his spurs "added value" coaching and no european games could be the difference .......... couldn't it?
Levyites??? How very odd, almost Old Testament.
With Moyes and his miracles it's getting more Biblical by the minute here.
"Thou shalt not worship false idols" comes to mind.
118 Posted 02/08/2012 at 18:38:33
It's ironic you want to talk about the London School of economics yet base your entire argument on a rather naive and oversimplified primary school sum.
You may believe that by taking one figure and simply subtracting another, you have come up with the answer, but ask any economist and they will list out a whole load of factors you seem to be either unable or unwilling to factor into your equation.
Moyes has not just pulled Pienaar's carreer out of the Karzi once, he's done it twice. The South African stagnated under the gormless coaching he recieved at Spurs ( where they repeatedly failed get any sort of performance out of him). Yet the minute he was back under Moyes's guidence he was delighting the Goodison faithful in pretty much in the same way he did when he was voted our player of the season last time he was here.
Your claim that Pienaar was better coached and therefore became a better player during his few weeks of hell at Spurs will come as a very great surprise to the thousands of Evertonians who proclaimed him player of the season before he'd been anywhere near WHL.
You carry on looking for negatives, but if you think this is becoming biblical now, wait till you get a load of the fatted calf being prepared by the GP faithful.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


1 Posted 31/07/2012 at 15:46:32