Pienaar completes Everton return

, 31 July, 113comments  |  Jump to most recent
Puts pen to paper on 4-year deal; will wear no. 22
Steven Pienaar is a full-time Everton player again after the 30-year-old put pen to paper on what is believed to be a new four-year deal at Goodison Park. The South African underwent a medical earlier ahead of a £4.5m transfer from Tottenham Hotspur.

His agent, Rob Moore, released a photograph of him inking his new contract, sealing a return to Goodison for the midfielder two and a half months after his emotional farewell after the Newcastle game.

"There was no doubt in my mind that I would be back," Pienaar said after completing the deal. "I told the manager how I felt and I am happy now it is all done".

Originally signed from Borussia Dortmund in July 2007, Pienaar became a crowd favourite at Everton in his first spell with the club, making 147 appearances and scoring 16 goals as part of what was the most exciting midfield at Goodison since the 1980s golden era.

The elusive breakthrough to Champions League football never came, though, and with his career reaching its peak in terms of his physical abilities, the Bafana Bafana captain was tempted south to White Hart Lane to realise his dream of playing in the Continent's elite competition.

The move to Spurs soured quickly, though, when Pienaar found first-team opportunities severely limited under Harry Redknapp. After just a handful of starts, the former Ajax Cape Town player jumped at the chance of making a deadline-beating return to Everton on loan at the end of January.

It was to be a triumphant return, one that yielded four goals and arguably the best club form of Pienaar's career that helped propel the Blues to a seventh-place finish, heights that seemed unthinkable back in the autumn when a relegation battle was not out of the question.

Realising he had re-found his home, Pienaar was distraught at the thought of having to leave again earlier this summer but a deal to bring him back to Everton was one of David Moyes's stated priorities. Though it took longer than many expected, the conclusion of the transfer will come as a relief to all parties.

Rumours suggest that Pienaar signs a new contract worth £10.5m over the life of the deal, one that potentially ties him to Goodison until the summer of 2016. He will wear the No 22 jersey.

Quotes or other material sourced from Evertonfc.com



Reader Comments (113)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Mark Tanton
1 Posted 31/07/2012 at 15:46:32
This could still rumble on 'till next week, going on Evertonian time, which is a law unto itself. Fair play though, credit to Kenwright if he gets Pienaar back in - still three short after this though, in my ever so humble opinion.
Ian Glassey
2 Posted 31/07/2012 at 15:55:23
In an ideal world a right winger and striker,
Johnson on loan and Lukuku on loan and I think we would all be very happy.
Clarence Yurcan
3 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:05:57
Took long enough but glad he's back!
Malc Kitchen
4 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:04:48
Hi everyone,

I'm new on here. I've supported EFC over 30 years!

I agree Mark what you say, but maybe later tonight better news!

Ian, great shout Johnson from Shitty and Lukaku both on loan, complete the jigsaw excellent! Sell Johhny for £8M and get a good replacement, the Blackburn kid is suppose to be good, use the rest of the money for loans!
Paul Jamieson
5 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:23:42
Mark Tanton I agree with your comments about Evertonian time but to be fair your statement about Mr Kenwright is laudable. Pienaar should never have been allowed to leave in the 1st place and if rumours are true he's being offered similar amounts as he wanted not to leave in the 1st place. This is not good management from our chairman.

Had our financial state not been made so precarious by said Chairman and Board then I feel we'd not only have kept Pienaar in the 1st place but maybe even better quality of players around him. Please think about the much bigger picture! Thanks...

Paul Jamieson
6 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:29:53
Malc, welcome 1st and foremost

Secondly, should we not be aiming higher than loan signings?

Graham Holliday
7 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:32:01
He's signed. Pictures of him putting pen to paper on Twitter. Welcome home Stevie...
Malc Kitchen
8 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:35:15
Cheers Paul, I agree but money is tight as we all know! We simply can't afford Johnson so loan it is. Which is the case with a lot of other clubs in the Premier! I would sell Heitinga for the right money (£8M) if we don't get that then fine! A good chance to get Donovan back, especially if Galaxy don't make the play-offs!
Henry Enzio
9 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:41:07
Gald hes back but havent we had our pants pulled down over the price??
Shane Corcoran
10 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:54:18
Did you see the photo Graham? It's just that the link above isn't working now.
Danny Jones
11 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:45:28
Welcome back Steven.

I was disappointed when he went but understood the reasons at the time. We didn't have money to pay more and he fancied his chances at Spurs.
Now, after it didn't work at Spurs and we have a little more for wages, he has come back and I'm happy about it.
The price we sold at and the price we bought him back on are based on contract length and value. Doesn't feel good but that's how it works.

I won't be holding my breath for many more players. I think the winger and the forward are probably just one man: Naismith.

Paul Brookes
12 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:54:42
Glad to see Pienaar deal is done. Time for two more: Johnson on loan a great shout there. He will fill the left or right wing spot with Osman playing in the Cahill role now he's gone. Get the Yobo deal done so he's gone then get a CB in to help Jags out.
Ian Glassey
13 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:49:54
Its over at last do we know the exact fee, in my mind at £4.5mill a bargain.
Anyone who seen the change in form after January must be glad he is back.
Lets just look forward to the new season, welcome home Stevie P....
Mark Tanton
14 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:03:02
Embarrassingly but not surprisingly the Echo is not in the know, it seems.
James Morgan
15 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:00:03
Malc, sell Johnny? Why???
Ian Black
16 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:53:18
Save your pessimism for another day chaps, we've signed two players in the summer. In JULY! Although I'll be sleeping with one eye open, cast upon the family silver, today is a day to rejoice! I really thought we were going to fuck this one up.
Iain Love
17 Posted 31/07/2012 at 16:51:27
Happy he's back, we're a better team with him in it. Hopefully he's realised this is the place for him.
Ian 001 i'm sure Lukuku has already gone somewhere on loan, i'd like Johnson though, if he played for us he would certainly have gone to the euro's.
Can't understand why players lose themselves at big spending clubs ie Parker at Chelsea, at least Pienaar had the sense to get out quick.
Can't see us buying anyone else, I just hope some of the young lads push on this season , like the look of Barkley but he needs more discipline, saw Hallam Hope for the reserves I think he was playing as a striker but if he was converted wide right he'd piss all over Bale and Walcott for pace.
Shane Corcoran
18 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:05:59
http://www.strictlygentlemen.com/#!Pienaar Transfer Update/c2p6

Seriously, is the picture link working for anyone else? This is all that's on the agents' website.

Keith Glazzard
19 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:02:49
This is good news. As things stand, we can start the new season with at least the same starting 11 that stuck 3 in against Newcastle at the end of the season. It has to be good for confidence all-round. Players leaving can have a domino effect - this is the opposite.

And we've found the money without selling anyone else. Amazing!

Leslie Wee
20 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:16:55
@999

Mark, be thankful. It was Evertonian time that gave the Yak his age-defying properties.

Anyway, glad that Pienaar's back.

Graham Holliday
21 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:22:04
Yes, I saw the picture. Maybe it was withdrawn at Everton's request?

Was him in an Everton sweatshirt with pen in hand and piece of paper in front of him.

Mark Riding
22 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:34:36
Nothing on the official site yet ?
Ian Glassey
23 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:14:59
Iain 025
Lukaku is still there Fulham showing intrest in a loan deal.
Agree with you about these players who move knowing they will be lucky to get a game, Moses will go the same way if he moves to Chelsea..
Trevor Lynes
24 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:30:12
Danny #017 The fact is ; the reason Pienaar left according to rumour is his wanting parity with Arteta regarding wages.

Now Arteta, Cahill, Yakubu, Bily etc etc etc have all departed.Don't you feel that it is ironic that it has needed all those players to leave before he is brought back ?All the above players are/were amongst our highest earners.

Our squad is now far smaller than it was for the past few seasons and our wage bill is considerable decreased.

I just hope that the youngsters come through and replace the players that have left. Opportunity knocks for Barkley, Junior and Rodwell to show their worth and make the fans forget the players who left.

I just believe that the Pienaar departure and buy back represents poor management and is a further example of how poorly the club is run.

It's not too long ago that Gosling left for nothing when he would surely have brought at least two million pounds to the club. Now Pienaar after being allowed to depart is costing us more than we received for him and he is over a year older.

Shane Corcoran
25 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:42:03
It's back up now Graham.
Jamie Barlow
26 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:49:15
10.5 million over 4 years.
Is that just over 50 grand a week?
What was he on before he left us?
Danny Burke
27 Posted 31/07/2012 at 17:50:50
It's on official site now. Done and dusted. Welcome home peanuts.
Victor Chang
28 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:01:35
under £5m?
£50k p/w?
July?
Disclosed Fee?
What's going on?
Kevin Day
29 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:03:36
Welcome Malc, good to see new blues in the ranks, be careful what you say though mate as we do like a good “debate”, and selling JH has been thouroughly expressed on another post on here, the author, quite rightly, got torn apart!.
Moving on, welcome back Steven!
Kieran Fitzgerald
30 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:07:20
Where did we get 4.5m from? The wages I can understand as Cahill is gone. But 4.5m is strange. At this rate loan players will be paying us a loan fee.
Peter Webster
31 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:30:12
Welcome home son.
Chris James
32 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:31:20
Unlikely to be £4.5M upfront I'd guess and the way football payments are structured there's probably still £1-2M outstanding from our sale to Spurs.
Sam Hoare
33 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:32:06
Would have been happier with 3-4m but splitting hairs really. A really fantastic player who knows us inside out, will fit in immediately and has at least 4 years of playing at the very top level. Whilst I would not make a habit of signing players over 30 I think this is great news for the club and now gives us a starting 11 that could potentially achieve things if injuries are kind....
Jeff Beaumont
34 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:34:44
Just hope he's found not guilty at his SA trial in Sept.
Ian Glassey
35 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:31:42
Dont tell me a member of the board put a few bob?...
I must be dreaming..
Brent Stephens
36 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:57:10
I've read comments (about peanuts and a possibel transfer) on this site for god knows how long and I can't believe how many pessimist know-alls (know-nothings!) there are. They come right in with their valuable(!) judgements about "this is never going to happen" or "not until the eleventh hour". Why didn't you just wait, as advised by others?!
Andy Crooks
37 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:54:48
I'm glad he has signed but to call it "a day to rejoice " only goes to show the state we are in. Kenwright has gradually lowered the expectations of Evertonians to such an extent that the Pienaar debacle is being viewed as some sort of triumph.

We have done okay under the circumstances. Kenwright is responsible for these appalling circumstances and the criticism of those such as the Blue Union for daring to look for change is beyond belief. I like Naismith ; Pienaar is a good player but if this is time to rejoice then we are contentedly heading towards disaster.


Five or six years ago this close season would have been considered unacceptable , the fact that many think that two average signings in July is cause to rejoice suggests, to me, that Kenwright has won and is here to stay.

John Feeley
38 Posted 31/07/2012 at 19:12:35
How many loans are we allowed?

In Jan we had Landon, Straq, Drenthe & Pienaar. Is it limited at 2 per window?

...If so wud love to see Landon + Cahill in Jan and two others now....

Mark Riding
39 Posted 31/07/2012 at 19:13:05
Its all going too well for me.. got to be a spanner in the works somewhere ! ( sorry Brent #058 - Im always a pessimist when it comes to Everton )
Next thing you know, I will be able to watch a full friendly match I paid £18.99 for on Everton TV.

Anyway, welcome back Pienaar, the team need you, I will just have to get over the money grabbing feelings I had about you when you left..

Paul Gladwell
40 Posted 31/07/2012 at 19:34:26
This latest TV deal must be the reason for the cash, don't the bottom team now get something like £14M extra than what was handed out to the bottom team last year?
and this does not include the world wide deal, which has not been done yet, there has never been so much cash in football so we were bound to muster something one day.
Andy chill out mate enjoy it whilst you can, I have my anger towards him too, but I don't remember a better first eleven over the past five or six pre seasons than we have now, Darren Bent etc, even Lescott and Baines at the time were gambles and Pienaar is not an average signing, but saying that it`s not 11.00pm on deadline day yet.
Ean Palese
41 Posted 31/07/2012 at 19:44:18
I like Peanuts and I think it's a fair signing but do you really think this will 'make' us? And am I off by saying that we sold him for 3 mil and bought him back for 4.5?
Peter Warren
42 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:09:53
Great signing 50k a week is cheap. He wanted £70k previously. Made up. Andy I get it but we have Jelavic who is amazing. We have an enjoyable team one capable of winning a cup and getting into Europe , an amazing talent in Barkley and I believe in Rodwell and to call Naismith average is unfair when you know fa about him
Ben Jones
43 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:07:53
We still need a little more, but its an important signing. As a previous poster has stated, we have kept the same team against Newcastle, as well as adding Naismith, who can make a difference.

Johnson on loan is unrealistic I think, but Lukaku looks likely and is a good shout. I envisage another random loan signing from somewhere too, but probably wait another 3, 4 weeks for that one.

Right winger is more important for anything though.

Andy Crooks
44 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:11:41
Paul, Darren Bent? if only,mate.
Michael Williams
45 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:14:25
Welcome home lad!
Chad Schofield
46 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:19:37
Brilliant! Oh, and welcome Malc.
Peter Cummings
47 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:15:36
The question is: Will he once again renew his highly succesful partnership with the best left back in the game or will it be ruined by the Man Utd, 'interest'? Think it's time Kenwright clarifies the situation once and for all.
Kieran Fitzgerald
48 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:20:11
Andy, Darren Bent would be a cracking signing. Ben Jones, random is the word to use. Nothing would surprise me at this stage with this transfer window. Two signings in before the end of July, Cahill gone and none of our big nsmes gone.
Roberto Birquet
49 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:43:41
Kieran
Cahill gone and none of our big names gone.
A bit bloody harsh would not do that justice. He was blinding for us, and I reckon coulda gone to a CL club at least as a squad player. Part of the best midfield we had in decades (I'd say 2008 and 09 with Pienaar, and Arteta, and but for bloody injuries woulda been the same but with Felli). That for the Cup Final and a fit Yak or Jags woulda been the icing on the cake of a brilliant Goodison career.

He deserves nothing less than utmost respect. And I would love to see him back for a swansong in Jan. Tickets would be as rare as salami at a bar mitzvah.

Kieran Fitzgerald
50 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:53:22
Roberto, for the last season and a half, Cahill was poor. I genuinely don't mean to put the guy down in terms of eight seasons of great service and loyalty to the club as well as model professionalism but he was past his peak. I think that keeping Cahill would have been a mistake purely on what he could have offered on the pitch next season.

I do respect what the guy said about his reasons for not going to another Premier league club but I don't see as how a CL club would have come in for him.

Right now we need to manage our limited resources very very well. If selling an older player like Cahill means we get to use his wages to pay Pienaar or some other palyer who will bring more to the squad then I am all for it.

Kieran Fitzgerald
51 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:59:59
Also Roberto, if it came down to a choice between selling say Baines and Jelavic or say Cahill and Pip I would pick the latter two every time.
Peter Warren
52 Posted 31/07/2012 at 20:09:53
Great signing 50k a week is cheap. He wanted £70k previously. Made up. Andy I get it but we have Jelavic who is amazing. We have an enjoyable team one capable of winning a cup and getting into Europe , an amazing talent in Barkley and I believe in Rodwell and to call Naismith average is unfair when you know fa about him
James Morgan
53 Posted 31/07/2012 at 18:28:30
Much needed signing for the club. But the club not saying 'undisclosed' fee? Strange! It's a big contract for a 30 year old but I suppose he's not going to be a victim of losing pace as he's not exactly a speed merchant now.
2 or 3 more signings and I'll be quite happy.
Kieran Fitzgerald
54 Posted 31/07/2012 at 21:23:19
I think that Pienaar understands the current ethos of the club and what Moyes is trying to achieve at the club with this squad. This for me is just as important as knowing the squad as a group of players or the tactics. He knows what he needs to bring into training and into the dressing room. People have mentioned the fact that he can hit the ground running. Well in a lot of ways it will be like he never left.
Paul Gladwell
55 Posted 31/07/2012 at 21:31:13
Sorry Andy you know the Bent I meant.
Iain Love
56 Posted 31/07/2012 at 21:21:13
Andy 060 We were piss poor before we got Pienaar (and Jelly, granted) in, and they BOTH transformed us into a cracking side. I'm sure had Pienaar played against the RS in the FA Cup, we would have been in the final. Of course it's a day to rejoice signing a player who we KNOW will make us much better for under £5mill — "it's a bargian".

I've not really seen Naismith but a Celtic friend (who knows his stuff) rates him very highly, as does Jelly, so I tend to think a fuck-all outlay (wages excepted) on potential is a great deal, and a reason to rejoice.

We're skint and we know it; Kenwright has NO money and we know it — move on, lad.
Zaid Omar
57 Posted 31/07/2012 at 21:37:10
Really thrilled that Pienaar has joined!! I'm South African and nearly all the SA football pundits were really upset when he left Everton cos they felt that Everton was a perfect match for him. Wish him and Everton all the best for upcoming season

I have been an Everton supporter for 20 odd years but have never been to Goodison yet. I hope to make my first trip this season Liverpool for the Merseyside derby at Goodison. Can anyone advise as to the best way to get tickets for me and my family as well as the best seats at Goodison?

Thanks

Tony McNulty
58 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:03:31
Two priorities now:

1) Can we desist from calling him Peanuts?

2) Can we buy someone in an attacking role (preferably right wing) with some pace?

Ben Jones
59 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:13:25
After finally seeing Pienaar arrive, I think its a good signing. A quality, creative player who will fit right in. Maybe a bit steep for a 30-year-old, but with his quality and his fitness level, it's not bad at all I think.

I just realised though, that we still haven't sold Yobo yet. I really thought selling Yobo would fund the Pienaar deal. I know Cahill has left, but the official site said he left on a nominal fee, although I think Cahill was on £50k a week, and of course that will go straight to Pienaar.

I just wondered what people thought of this. I think us selling Yobo afterwards might mean we might have some cash to spend, albeit probably on loan fees, but still cash to spend!! It wouldnt make sense if we had every intention to use the Yobo money to fund the Pienaar deal.

Who knows?! But it makes me a bit more optimistic

Michael Boyle
60 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:14:10
Welcome back. Class player, great to watch. Following Everton since 1970, when Sandy Brown lived on our road, drove a Hiillman Hunter and took me to school on way to training!
Jay Harris
62 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:14:08
Dont forget we let Drenthe, Donovan and Strac go not to mention McFadden and others.

THat's got to be over 100,000 a week saved since they left.

Pienaar was here for the second half of the season so wages would be a small adjustment either side of that so NAismoth for Tiny must equal a wage saving.

If Yobo goes that should theoretically fund someone else especiaaly with this TV money that everyone is going on about.

Zaid
I assume by family you will be bringing kids so I would suggest writing to the club and enquiring about the " Family enclosure".

Tony Twist
63 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:27:03
Quality signing as we all know but just a tad expensive. We really need a right winger to supply jelly and I would presume naismith up front. We also require the likes of Barkley, Vellios, Junior and Duffy (and Rodwell for that matter) to go to the next level. And of course us not losing the first team players we already have! Not much to ask for really! We would have quite a handy team then!
Zaid Omar
64 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:44:35
Thanks Jay

Yes I will hopefully be coming with my 2 little ones....

Kevin Elliott
65 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:51:01
Absolutely chuffed.Never wanted him to go in the first place.Welcome back Stevie.
Jack Okell
66 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:48:46
Made up about this! We wasted £9 million on a Russian export. We have permanently re-assembled one of the best partnerships in world football. Of course it isn't ideal to pay more than we sold him for, but the time wasn't right. Things have a way of sorting themselves out.

COYB!

Sam Hoare
67 Posted 31/07/2012 at 22:56:37
I suspect that Naismith (or Ossie) will be playing on the right wing with felli behind Jelly and either Rodwell or maybe Junior or Barkley in the middle which means I think we now have our starting 11 for the season.

Might be a good idea to get Zapata on a free and maybe some maverick loan in. Think Lukaku is still looking for a loan.

Jem Traynor
69 Posted 01/08/2012 at 01:06:03
Glad he's back and ours with no worries about him fucking off again! Not a great price but this is what happens when you're skint with your back to the wall.

All-in-all, he's back now we can set out with our great midfield and start adding some of the new crew who are coming through!!!
Steven Twine
70 Posted 01/08/2012 at 02:15:50
Great news, feel really confident about playing anyone when he plays. He is always looking for the ball and trying to make things happen. Bet anyone that the squad, and jelly the most will be made up hes back!
Eric Myles
71 Posted 01/08/2012 at 03:36:18
Paul #054, no chance of that mate, we must have recieved the Sky cheque or got a bridging loan until it clears. Good that BK didn't try to save another month's wages and only sign him on D-Day though.
Peter Barry
72 Posted 01/08/2012 at 06:29:07
Iain Love # 086 says "I'm sure had Pienaar played against the RS in the FA Cup, we would have been in the final." So why wasn't he, Iain? Because crafty cockney Hawwwy CUP TIED before sending him out on loan, that's why. Hawwwwy knew exactly what he was doing and it is all part and parcel of the conempt Spurs have for Everton and the great con game Spurs have played over Pienaar with Oh so gullible Daft Davey and BK falling for it hook, line and sinker.

No amount of "It's good to get him back" will ever reconcile the fact that he should NEVER have gone in the first place and the stupidity of letting him go has now been exposed in all its glory.
Paul Gladwell
73 Posted 01/08/2012 at 06:53:47
Well said Tom in the peanuts shout, leave that to Blue kipper and kopites.
Tom Dodds
74 Posted 01/08/2012 at 06:46:35
Great, hoorah! We've found the money to buy 'our' player back. We've cleared the decks and offloaded other players to pay the wages of 'our' own player back...well and good??

And with the new YOUNG possibly mega/good starlets from the Academy expected to shine from this season onwards, things look rosy, yessiree! Just one thing though: How will we pay for their expectantly good contracts?
Martin Mason
75 Posted 01/08/2012 at 07:18:12
I think that this is great news, we are far better with Piienaar than without. Too high a price but if he plays next season like last season then he'll be worth it.

I really can't understand the down on the clubs dealing. We had no choice but to sell as his contract was coming to an end and he wanted to go. Spurs were the highest bidder so he went there, we wanted him back and to get him we had to pay what Spurs asked. It's the market in action.

Iain Love
76 Posted 01/08/2012 at 07:30:28
Peter 137, read Martin 140.
Peter Barry
77 Posted 01/08/2012 at 07:38:28
Martin Mason # 140 You are mistaken Pienaar only wanted to go because Everton refused him a pay rise. We have now succeeded in paying Spurs MORE to get him back than giving him the pay rise would have cost us in the first AND losing him for half a season in the process. Incompetent insanity is what I call it.
Peter Barry
78 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:09:23
Iain Love # 141 Read my reply # 142
Peter Barry
79 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:12:19
Oh and we had him on loan and have now signed him on contract on the wages we refused to pay that made him want to move in the first place. Absolute mind numbing incompetence on behalf of Daft Davey and BK.
Rory Slingo
80 Posted 01/08/2012 at 07:35:25
Agreed, Martin. So we paid a bit more than what we sold him for but he is a known quantity. We know how he plays, we know he fits into the team, we know the rest of the squad react positively when he's in the side and at the end of last season he showed better form than when he left us despite being stuck on Spurs' bench. Given a choice of pairing him up with Bainesey on the left again or taking a gamble with some unknown quantity, I'd go with Pienaar. £50k/week is a snip for a player worth what he is to us. We've struggled to create many goal-scoring chances since he left and Jelavic is going to need plenty of supply to convert on his way to the Golden Boot. So it's good business for me and glad it's concluded early. Credit to BK where it's due.
Rory Slingo
81 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:18:25
Forget your happy pills this morning, Peter?
Nick Waters
82 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:18:51
You make some good points Peter, and I tend to agree with you in terms of the wider picture. Incidentally we actually lost him for a whole year (Jan to Jan) not half a season. What we could have achieved with him in that 12 month period would be interesting to know.
However in denying Pienaar the pay rise - reportedly £70k - and removing Arteta and now Cahill, our biggest earners, the club is in better shape in terms of the wage bill, and did not allow an individual to break the club's pay structure and ceiling.
Ray Roche
83 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:30:31
Peter Barry

Pienaar was quoted as saying he wanted to play Champions League football. However, that doesn't suit your case. I mean, you can't use that as a stick to twat Moyes with, can you?

In addition to that, he could have gone for nothing six months after we sold him, so getting a reported £3m for him was a better deal than keeping him and letting his contract run out, and Spurs sign him for free.

Everton could be criticised IF they were playing some sort of brinksmanship, hoping Pienaar would sign an improved offer, but he wanted to go. His choice.

Sam Hoare
84 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:32:23
Actually Peter he wanted 75k a week before he left and is now on 50k a week I believe. So we have actually made a saving on his long term outlay even when you include the 1.5m price rise in his transfer fee (which I believe was far more due to his desire to have a crack at champions league than the wages as he was being paid less at Spurs than offered at us)
Mike Green
85 Posted 01/08/2012 at 07:39:55
Peter Barry #137 – Spurs didn’t “con” us, they saw the opportunity to get a good player on the cheap, who they knew they’d get their return on investment if it didn’t work out and weaken a competitor in the process. If we did it you’d be calling it “shrewd” and applauding us for a great bit of business. I was sick at the time because it was so obvious what was going on.

I felt it at the time but cant really say Pienaar conned us either as he never fully committed to us in the build up to his contract renewal. The big mistake we made was not selling him 12 months earlier when it was clear he was going to go to the highest bidder and wanted Champions League football.

Maybe Pienaar was the one that was “conned” into thinking the grass was greener on the other side, but then I think he knew the score to be honest didn’t he.

So, all in all, it's not a "con" it's just how football works nowadays.

Forgive me if I’ve got the maths wrong here, and this is no doubt simplistic, but this is how I think it works out:

Scenario A – Pienaar asks for 4 year deal 18 months ago @ £70k p.a. = £14.5m deal ending in Jan 2015. At that point he’ll be 32 so we might get a nominal sell on fee of £1m or we get another two years or so out of him at lower wages. So 4 years costs us £13.5m.

Scenario B – we let Pienaar go for £3m but buy him back for £4.5m - £1.5m down on the deal. We agree a 4 year deal worth £10.5m which expires when the player is 34, no sell on fee. 4 year deal has cost us £12m.

So, all in all we’re £1.5m better off than we would be had we done what you’re recommending and conceded to his wages demands – not taking into account the £3m we’ve saved in wages whilst he’s been gone.

So – in essence, we’ve saved £1.5m - £4.5m, strengthened the wage structure and made it clear we won’t be held to ransom by players? Or am I just being gullible?

Other obvious factors are that we’ve missed out on 18 months of what are going to be Pienaar’s best years – which in your defence have probably cost us a higher place in the league and maybe even a Cup Final, who knows. But then he's missed out on those years too getting no first team football which has probably taught him a lesson to be honest.

Maybe the Pienaar we got back was a better player in part due to getting some great experience training with, if not playing with, the best Spurs team in decades. Maybe he’s picked up a few tricks from Hawwy as you like to call him, who knows.

The Pienaar we got back was the best we’ve seen, what’s yet to be seen is whether he was just playing to facilitate a move back and his form will drop but I think he’s going to push on and try and get us somewhere now. Lets face it, this is going to be his last major move so it boils down to how he wants to look back on his career and I think he’ll want it to end on a high, who knows.

One thing we do know is we’ve got a great player back, a senior pro and an international club captain. If my maths is right we’re better off financially and you never know, he might even be telling the likes of Barkley, Baines et al that maybe the grass isn’t greener on the other side after all.

So – all in all, I'm glad he's back, and well done to David Moyes for getting him back.

Brian Garside
86 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:25:34
Sam. Where does Gibson fit in?
I would hav e Gibson + Feli beside eachother. Not much would get past there.
Pienaar is more than welcome. I would play him on the left with license to roam. Barklay/Osman/Naismith rotating behind Jelavic.
My dream sighning would be Johnson who I would play on the left and move Pienaar inside. One is still allowed to dream isn´t one?
Should we sell anyone it would have to be a CH. Here the axe would unfortunatly fall on Jags. Sorry but he would raise more. Football is a business. Look how we got screwed by árry over Pienaar. He bought Pienaar not to strenghten them but to weaken us who where better at the time and it worked. Duffy should get a lot more playing time otherwise he will not develop. JH + SD with Duffy rotating. Rodwell would be forth choice unless we could sell him for £20m.
Tom Dodds
87 Posted 01/08/2012 at 08:51:27
£50k over over a standard 3-year contract = £7.8M.
£50k over Pienaar's 4-year contract = £10.4M!!!

Let's just hope he's quicker than Neville in his last year(s) before retirement.

Steve King
88 Posted 01/08/2012 at 09:01:30
Mike#155

Nice analysis thatnks, kinda covers what I wanted to say.

I only have one issue..............Peter Barry wouldn't be caught dead applauding Everton or calling them shrewd whilst his two favorite people are in charge!!

Barry Rathbone
89 Posted 01/08/2012 at 09:31:38
Peter Barry 142

Well said, people trying to put spin on us losing money here is laughable - should have been brave enough to flog him at decent money before it got to the "spurs" stage.

The only thing I would agree with the spin doctors about is he's a much better performer for his coaching at Spurs.

Peter Barry
90 Posted 01/08/2012 at 10:59:07
Barry Rathbone #162 I agree Barry I am have a real laugh reading all these Moyesophiles scrabbling to protect Daft Davey any way they can. Which just shows you can fool some of the people all of the time but it just depends how naive and gullible they are.

Your point on him being a better player since returning will be seized on by the sheep no doubt as further proof of just how smart Daft Davey, is just wait and see.

Oh wait I see Mike Green # 156 has done exactly that. QED.

Chris Davies
91 Posted 01/08/2012 at 10:25:14
I'm very pleased with this. If the transfer window shut 10 minutes ago, I wouldn't be disappointed. Great starting 11 now:

Howard
Neville Heitinga Distin Baines
Rodwell Gibson Pienaar
Naismith
Fela
Jelavić

Subs: Mucha, Jagielka, Hibbert, Barkley, Coleman, Junior, Anichebe.

Andrew Ellams
92 Posted 01/08/2012 at 11:18:50
Peter, I am definitely no 'Moyesophile' or a fan of our beloved chairman. But, I am however made up that we are going to have a quality player in our team next season that we already know improves us. Go on, give it a go...
Scott Hamilton
93 Posted 01/08/2012 at 11:15:34
Has somebody offered you a pound for every time you can use "Daft Davey" in a post Peter?

Your posts do tend toward early 80's Derek Hatton in their style too.

The irony is that you appear more rigid in your own version of all things blue than the so-called "sheep" that you like to refer to...

Sean Roe
95 Posted 01/08/2012 at 11:49:38
I'm glad he's back, I think he played with 100% effort right up to and including his last game before he joined Spurs. I don't recall that he particularly rocked the boat before moving either (Icould be wrong on that).

I don't think it's a bad price, even taking his age into account, for a player who has been and will continue to be (hopefully) the heartbeat of the team.

Massive confidence boost to the rest of the squad no doubt as well; fingers crossed for a good start!!

Steve King
96 Posted 01/08/2012 at 12:55:06
God forbid we should meet this news with optimism eh?!!

Sorry Peter you are right.....I hate the world and everything is shit......and its all Daft Davey and BK's fault

John Ford
98 Posted 01/08/2012 at 13:06:17
Ignore the facts leading to Pienaar's sale and it's then easily criticise the club. It's all black and white of course!

'The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt'. — Bertrand Russell.

Bob Willis
99 Posted 01/08/2012 at 13:35:36
As an ass -side and to lighten proceedings just a little I noticed that the Volley Ball Girls are doing signs behind their backs - what do they mean?

I don't know and I don't really care BUT I could look at the pics all day long and try and work out their meaning.

If there are any dirty old men out there perhaps you would care to ' ave a gander!!

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/photos/beach-volley-what-do-those-hand-signals-mean-slideshow/#crsl=%252Fphotos%252Fbeach-volley-what-do-those-hand-signals-mean-slideshow%252Fbeach-volleyball-what-do-those-hand-signals-mean-photo-1343817170.html

Ray Roche
100 Posted 01/08/2012 at 14:26:10
Peter Barry@179
"I am have a real laugh"
No you're not, Peter, you don't know how to laugh.

But, hey, let's not let the facts get in the way of a good story.

Mike Green
101 Posted 01/08/2012 at 18:11:22
Peter Barry #179 to Barry Rathbone

"Your point on him being a better player since returning will be seized on by the sheep no doubt as further proof of just how smart Daft Davey, is just wait and see.

Oh wait I see Mike Green # 156 has done exactly that. QED."

Interesting stuff, if a bit crazy. I think you'll find it was my point that Barry was agreeing with, not the other way around. He gives this away with the word " agree" in "The only thing I would agree with the spin doctors about is he's a much better performer for his coaching at Spurs."

There's also little clue in that my post was #155 @ 7.39am and Barry's was #162 @ 9.31am. 155 comes before 162 but we should probably leave maths at the door, eh.

Now, I'm relatively clever, but not clever enough to "seize" on something thats not going to said for another two hours.... even when it's based a point I made in the first place.

My point now I guess is - have you got something constructive to say, or is this just one big wind up......?

But then you knew I was going to say that, didn't you?

Andy Crooks
102 Posted 01/08/2012 at 21:30:46
Barry Rathbone, you may as well stop wasting your time. The return of Pienaar cannot be questioned. There are certain things that are beyond criticism and this appears to be becoming another one.
Noel Lynam
103 Posted 01/08/2012 at 21:56:25
Andy,

Is Shane Duffy's inevitable rise to stardom another one of those things that are beyond criticism and cannot be questioned?

Gavin Ramejkis
104 Posted 01/08/2012 at 22:01:16
Mike #266 I'd be more inclined to say Pienaar;s performances during his loan at the tail end of last season from the guy's own mouth owed a lot to Moyes instructing him to get forward more and have a crack at goal something he didn't do as much when he was last of this parish.
Bjørn-Ivar Pedersen
105 Posted 02/08/2012 at 02:32:31
4 Years contract??? someone has lost his mind, let's hope he can manage two seasons before the juice run empty.

Well, I hope now we do not want to sign Donovan, one old guy is enough.

What we are in desperate need for, are younger talented English players if we are aiming for Euro football next year.
Peter Barry
106 Posted 02/08/2012 at 03:59:17
@ Mike Green # 266 Well Mike illogical or what . Please explain to me how you making the claim that Barry Rathbone says you did somehow invalidates my statement.

Andrew Ellams # 184 Please look at all my posts on the subject and point out where I have said Pienaar would not be an asset to Everton. You won't be able to find one of course. My point is and has always been the insanity, incompetence and inefficiency of Daft Davey and BK in this matter and the laughing stock that they and Spurs have made of Everton in the process.

Peter Barry
107 Posted 02/08/2012 at 06:02:51
@ Scott Hamilton # 185 Scott Daft Davey only gets 'D's' when Davey does something deserving 'D's".

Such as his 'big game bottling' his 'Derby Day Disasters' his negative safety first football and last and by no means least his hand in the Pienaar debacle and humiliating by Spurs which has made Everton a laughing stock.

No matter which way the Moyesophiles try to spin it.

Mike Green
108 Posted 02/08/2012 at 06:22:16
Gavin 307 - fair point mate.
Dave Wilson
109 Posted 02/08/2012 at 06:11:40
Struggling to decide where Spurs humiliated us most:

The bit where they took advantage of Everton's refusal to give in to a greedy agent by agreeing to said greedy agent's demands... only to find that their gormless manager was unable to get any sort of performance out of the player?

The bit where they were forced to cut their ever growing losses by selling him back?

Or the bit where they took Saha from our wage bill and put him on theirs.

I predict our humiliation will be complete when the team Moyes cobbled together on the cheap (without bowing to greedy agents) finishes above them this season.

Perhaps we should have capitulated and met the demands of £70k a week in the first place; it may have cost us £4m more... but think of all that humiliation we could have saved ourselves.

Andrew Bulmer
110 Posted 02/08/2012 at 08:00:50
Peter Barry and Barry Rathbone in conversation..holy moly
James Flynn
112 Posted 02/08/2012 at 14:10:37
Dave (359) - "I predict our humiliation will be complete when the team Moyes cobbled together on the cheap (without bowing to greedy agents) finishes above them this season".

True. Don't know how I'll be able to show my face.

James Flynn
113 Posted 02/08/2012 at 14:11:46
Peter Barry - "the insanity, incompetence and inefficiency of Daft Davey and BK in this matter and the laughing stock that they and Spurs have made of Everton in the process"

"last and by no means least his hand in the Pienaar debacle and humiliating by Spurs which has made Everton a laughing stock".

Still blaming a manager for a club's financial dealings, I see. Daft. And how has Spurs humiliated us? You speak for exactly one Evertonian. Poorly. You're humiliated? Too bad for you. I'm not.

Spurs did well in depriving us of a key player the 1st half last season. This can't be denied. Since then, they've screwed up badly in the Pienaar "debacle" and we get him back.

No matter which way you and the other Levyites try to spin it.

Martin Mason
114 Posted 02/08/2012 at 14:40:41
Dave@ 359

Ouch! Fantastic put down :-)

Scott Hamilton
115 Posted 02/08/2012 at 14:41:55
Peter (355) - On those wonderful occasions where we've beaten the shite in the derby, the immediate reposte from many of their rag-bag of supporters is "there you go, you've won your cup final this year!"

They can say that because of people like you who seem to see those as the only two games of any real significance in a season.

You must be in absolute heaven being able to now bleat about a recent loss to the shite that actually took place at Wembley too! Probably gives you a semi of your own...

Mike Green
116 Posted 02/08/2012 at 15:07:00
Thats the spirit James #431! Give them a dose of their own medicine - "Levyites" :D
Barry Rathbone
117 Posted 02/08/2012 at 15:49:45
Dave 359

Don't thing we were humiliated just made to look what we are - clueless.

Rumour has it the London School of Economics are having tee shirts with "sell low and buy high" printed - why they aren't advertising here is beyond me.

So we'll finish above Spurs eh Dave?

Of course having Pienaar with his spurs "added value" coaching and no european games could be the difference .......... couldn't it?

Levyites??? How very odd, almost Old Testament.

With Moyes and his miracles it's getting more Biblical by the minute here.

"Thou shalt not worship false idols" comes to mind.

Dave Wilson
118 Posted 02/08/2012 at 18:38:33
Barry

It's ironic you want to talk about the London School of economics yet base your entire argument on a rather naive and oversimplified primary school sum.

You may believe that by taking one figure and simply subtracting another, you have come up with the answer, but ask any economist and they will list out a whole load of factors you seem to be either unable or unwilling to factor into your equation.

Moyes has not just pulled Pienaar's carreer out of the Karzi once, he's done it twice. The South African stagnated under the gormless coaching he recieved at Spurs ( where they repeatedly failed get any sort of performance out of him). Yet the minute he was back under Moyes's guidence he was delighting the Goodison faithful in pretty much in the same way he did when he was voted our player of the season last time he was here.

Your claim that Pienaar was better coached and therefore became a better player during his few weeks of hell at Spurs will come as a very great surprise to the thousands of Evertonians who proclaimed him player of the season before he'd been anywhere near WHL.

You carry on looking for negatives, but if you think this is becoming biblical now, wait till you get a load of the fatted calf being prepared by the GP faithful.


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads